Pitt Jolie FINALLY reach divorce settlement

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think he made a tactical error in not making a very generous financial settlement, very quickly. Things surely would have gone more smoothly if he had, and the chateau sale could have been part of it. It smacks of egotism and control. She's the mother of his six children and he should have been very generous. Just on principle, let alone his gross behavior on the plane.

What does wanting a big lump sum payout say about someone? Did she want money or justice?

I'm not saying she's an angel, far from it. But she was entitled to a huge sum for division of property and child support for six kids over 8 years, and it does seem like he withheld it to punish her for leaving and publicly embarrassing him. And she retaliated by withholding the kids, even when it seemed reasonable he was healthy and ready to co-parent. They both suck.

What kind of mother does this?

I'm sure she rationalized it to herself--he's an awful father and person, the kids were better off with her etc. Like most narcissists do.

I was a little shocked when she had a member of her team basically admit she's been brainwashing the kids to think they had no voice because their father has privilege and power. What? The kids worked with court-appointed therapists, who represented their perspectives in custody proceedings. Only a sadistic mother would want to put her kids through testifying in court. Four are now adults and are free to speak out at any time. At least three seem to have dropped his name, out of loyalty to their mother not because he's been a terrible father as far as we can see. There is no evidence to suggest he deserved to have his parental rights severed. She's a vindictive nutcase who absolutely cannot see the harm she's done to her family (after his initial harm, which while terrible seems to have been short-lived). It's always been about her and what she wants, not what's in the best interest of raising well-adjusted kids who have healthy relationships with both parents.

-1
He tried to hit the children.

If someone jumped on your back and kids got too close or tried to intervene on a bumpy ride, I’m sure your arms would be all over the place and someone would accidentally get hit. I suspect this is why the FBI and DCF didn’t press charges. She attacked him first.

I wouldn’t be surprised if she was prepping some of the kids ahead of time. “Your dad is mean to me, I fear him”, etc.

No she didn't. He had physical touched her and pushed her down before he went for one of the kids.

He may have just walked up to the kid and screamed at them. So she has no idea what he was going to do. And sometimes a kid deserves a spanking or a slap in the face (I.e., open hand).

I believe in spanking, but apparently, he was choking Maddox. That's abuse not discipline.

Only choking I found in FBI report was Jolie choking Pitt.

So you're cherry picking what parts to believe. Sure.

LA Times
“Jolie filed for divorce from Pitt on Sept. 20, 2016. Three days later, The Times reported that Los Angeles County’s DCFS was investigating an alleged in-flight physical altercation between Pitt and son Maddox Jolie-Pitt, then 15. No punching or hitting was reported.”

From his sources which we know was untrue due to the fbi report dummy

Show us where in the report he hit, punched or choked Maddox. Otherwise you are just listening to Joile’s sources.

The agent saw Angelina's bruise and the scratches on his neck. Saying no punching or hitting was reported was untrue.

Grabbing someone is not same as hitting.

Do you grab your partner or kids in ways that “leave marks”?

I don’t really know what happened on that plane, other than something bad but I can think of lots of ways that she might have been bruised other than him just punching her. The teen son might have taken a swing at him, he raised an arm to block as she was diving in to separate them, etc. An angry and disregulared teen son and a drunk dad are just a bad, bad combo. Especially if teen son thinks he is defending his upset mother. It’s one reason it’s important to keep your kids out of any drama between you and your spouse … teens are not known for their modulated response to things. It’s been a while since I read the report but my memory is that B and A were having an argument and the son stepped in to take his mother’s side, at which point things escalated.

I wonder how close all the kids are to each other. I hope the twins find a good college situation — I think it would be helpful for all of them to lead a little bit of a normal kids life.

He did not punch her, that’s never been in any report.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think he made a tactical error in not making a very generous financial settlement, very quickly. Things surely would have gone more smoothly if he had, and the chateau sale could have been part of it. It smacks of egotism and control. She's the mother of his six children and he should have been very generous. Just on principle, let alone his gross behavior on the plane.

What does wanting a big lump sum payout say about someone? Did she want money or justice?

I'm not saying she's an angel, far from it. But she was entitled to a huge sum for division of property and child support for six kids over 8 years, and it does seem like he withheld it to punish her for leaving and publicly embarrassing him. And she retaliated by withholding the kids, even when it seemed reasonable he was healthy and ready to co-parent. They both suck.

What kind of mother does this?

I'm sure she rationalized it to herself--he's an awful father and person, the kids were better off with her etc. Like most narcissists do.

I was a little shocked when she had a member of her team basically admit she's been brainwashing the kids to think they had no voice because their father has privilege and power. What? The kids worked with court-appointed therapists, who represented their perspectives in custody proceedings. Only a sadistic mother would want to put her kids through testifying in court. Four are now adults and are free to speak out at any time. At least three seem to have dropped his name, out of loyalty to their mother not because he's been a terrible father as far as we can see. There is no evidence to suggest he deserved to have his parental rights severed. She's a vindictive nutcase who absolutely cannot see the harm she's done to her family (after his initial harm, which while terrible seems to have been short-lived). It's always been about her and what she wants, not what's in the best interest of raising well-adjusted kids who have healthy relationships with both parents.

-1
He tried to hit the children.

If someone jumped on your back and kids got too close or tried to intervene on a bumpy ride, I’m sure your arms would be all over the place and someone would accidentally get hit. I suspect this is why the FBI and DCF didn’t press charges. She attacked him first.

I wouldn’t be surprised if she was prepping some of the kids ahead of time. “Your dad is mean to me, I fear him”, etc.

No she didn't. He had physical touched her and pushed her down before he went for one of the kids.

He may have just walked up to the kid and screamed at them. So she has no idea what he was going to do. And sometimes a kid deserves a spanking or a slap in the face (I.e., open hand).

I believe in spanking, but apparently, he was choking Maddox. That's abuse not discipline.

Only choking I found in FBI report was Jolie choking Pitt.

So you're cherry picking what parts to believe. Sure.

LA Times
“Jolie filed for divorce from Pitt on Sept. 20, 2016. Three days later, The Times reported that Los Angeles County’s DCFS was investigating an alleged in-flight physical altercation between Pitt and son Maddox Jolie-Pitt, then 15. No punching or hitting was reported.”

You think that physical altercation was a kiss?

SHE jumped on his back AND CHOKED HIM.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:lol 😂 finally. Someone posted a link about Giselle and I saw that they signed Christmas day

Angelina did on Christmas, and Brad on the 30th lol. Lots of people saw this coming after she won his correspondences. They'll settle the winery sooner then later so he messages don't leak

Or perhaps she finally settled hoping for an Oscar nom.

Then why wouldn't she settle months ago? That's laughable. He doesn't want his communications out.

I like how his side said he settled because of his gf lol

That’s funny but he’s still an a ss

I find it sad their narrative isnt that he settled for kids but the girfriend instead.

Says a lot about how much he really did not care about his children. It was always a power thing for him. He had the time and money to prolong the matter, requiring Jolie to expend an enormous amount in legal fees. The attorneys always win.

He's starting to let the mask slip with his PR. Today there was an article from his side that side he's upset she didn't sell to him and instead "took the money for herself." How does that make any sense? She would have had the money if she sold to him as well. He's mad he can't control her anymore

What he meant, cult follower, is that they both agreed the vineyard was to be an inheritance for their children. If kept in the family 100%, their children would inherit 100% of the profits/value. When she sold to an outsider and pocketed the money for herself, that ended. Come out if the bubble got a moment. She was the controlling one, btw.

What he meant? LOL He said exactly what he meant. Just like when his side said he always wanted a daughter leaving out Zahara.

. His statements have said the very thing. What you said is your false narrative. Way to try to deflect though by mentioning Zahara. To be clear, one wants Ang or is obsessed with Ang or wants to control Ang or is jealous of Ang’s beauty but her crazy azz followers. 🤪

Nope! He was clear with that obsessed statement. His comment leaving out Zahara was another example of people trying to "correct" what he meant. We know what he meant. He's obsessed. We see it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think he made a tactical error in not making a very generous financial settlement, very quickly. Things surely would have gone more smoothly if he had, and the chateau sale could have been part of it. It smacks of egotism and control. She's the mother of his six children and he should have been very generous. Just on principle, let alone his gross behavior on the plane.

What does wanting a big lump sum payout say about someone? Did she want money or justice?

I'm not saying she's an angel, far from it. But she was entitled to a huge sum for division of property and child support for six kids over 8 years, and it does seem like he withheld it to punish her for leaving and publicly embarrassing him. And she retaliated by withholding the kids, even when it seemed reasonable he was healthy and ready to co-parent. They both suck.

What kind of mother does this?

I'm sure she rationalized it to herself--he's an awful father and person, the kids were better off with her etc. Like most narcissists do.

I was a little shocked when she had a member of her team basically admit she's been brainwashing the kids to think they had no voice because their father has privilege and power. What? The kids worked with court-appointed therapists, who represented their perspectives in custody proceedings. Only a sadistic mother would want to put her kids through testifying in court. Four are now adults and are free to speak out at any time. At least three seem to have dropped his name, out of loyalty to their mother not because he's been a terrible father as far as we can see. There is no evidence to suggest he deserved to have his parental rights severed. She's a vindictive nutcase who absolutely cannot see the harm she's done to her family (after his initial harm, which while terrible seems to have been short-lived). It's always been about her and what she wants, not what's in the best interest of raising well-adjusted kids who have healthy relationships with both parents.

-1
He tried to hit the children.

If someone jumped on your back and kids got too close or tried to intervene on a bumpy ride, I’m sure your arms would be all over the place and someone would accidentally get hit. I suspect this is why the FBI and DCF didn’t press charges. She attacked him first.

I wouldn’t be surprised if she was prepping some of the kids ahead of time. “Your dad is mean to me, I fear him”, etc.

No she didn't. He had physical touched her and pushed her down before he went for one of the kids.

He may have just walked up to the kid and screamed at them. So she has no idea what he was going to do. And sometimes a kid deserves a spanking or a slap in the face (I.e., open hand).

I believe in spanking, but apparently, he was choking Maddox. That's abuse not discipline.

Only choking I found in FBI report was Jolie choking Pitt.

So you're cherry picking what parts to believe. Sure.

LA Times
“Jolie filed for divorce from Pitt on Sept. 20, 2016. Three days later, The Times reported that Los Angeles County’s DCFS was investigating an alleged in-flight physical altercation between Pitt and son Maddox Jolie-Pitt, then 15. No punching or hitting was reported.”

You think that physical altercation was a kiss?

SHE jumped on his back AND CHOKED HIM.

GOOD! He should've poked his eye out for pushing her and going after her son

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think he made a tactical error in not making a very generous financial settlement, very quickly. Things surely would have gone more smoothly if he had, and the chateau sale could have been part of it. It smacks of egotism and control. She's the mother of his six children and he should have been very generous. Just on principle, let alone his gross behavior on the plane.

What does wanting a big lump sum payout say about someone? Did she want money or justice?

I'm not saying she's an angel, far from it. But she was entitled to a huge sum for division of property and child support for six kids over 8 years, and it does seem like he withheld it to punish her for leaving and publicly embarrassing him. And she retaliated by withholding the kids, even when it seemed reasonable he was healthy and ready to co-parent. They both suck.

What kind of mother does this?

I'm sure she rationalized it to herself--he's an awful father and person, the kids were better off with her etc. Like most narcissists do.

I was a little shocked when she had a member of her team basically admit she's been brainwashing the kids to think they had no voice because their father has privilege and power. What? The kids worked with court-appointed therapists, who represented their perspectives in custody proceedings. Only a sadistic mother would want to put her kids through testifying in court. Four are now adults and are free to speak out at any time. At least three seem to have dropped his name, out of loyalty to their mother not because he's been a terrible father as far as we can see. There is no evidence to suggest he deserved to have his parental rights severed. She's a vindictive nutcase who absolutely cannot see the harm she's done to her family (after his initial harm, which while terrible seems to have been short-lived). It's always been about her and what she wants, not what's in the best interest of raising well-adjusted kids who have healthy relationships with both parents.

-1
He tried to hit the children.

If someone jumped on your back and kids got too close or tried to intervene on a bumpy ride, I’m sure your arms would be all over the place and someone would accidentally get hit. I suspect this is why the FBI and DCF didn’t press charges. She attacked him first.

I wouldn’t be surprised if she was prepping some of the kids ahead of time. “Your dad is mean to me, I fear him”, etc.

No she didn't. He had physical touched her and pushed her down before he went for one of the kids.

He may have just walked up to the kid and screamed at them. So she has no idea what he was going to do. And sometimes a kid deserves a spanking or a slap in the face (I.e., open hand).

I believe in spanking, but apparently, he was choking Maddox. That's abuse not discipline.

Only choking I found in FBI report was Jolie choking Pitt.

So you're cherry picking what parts to believe. Sure.

LA Times
“Jolie filed for divorce from Pitt on Sept. 20, 2016. Three days later, The Times reported that Los Angeles County’s DCFS was investigating an alleged in-flight physical altercation between Pitt and son Maddox Jolie-Pitt, then 15. No punching or hitting was reported.”

From his sources which we know was untrue due to the fbi report dummy

Show us where in the report he hit, punched or choked Maddox. Otherwise you are just listening to Joile’s sources.

The agent saw Angelina's bruise and the scratches on his neck. Saying no punching or hitting was reported was untrue.

Grabbing someone is not same as hitting.

Are you stupid? Genuinely asking

No but clearly you are and don’t know the difference. NO CHARGES FILED AGAINST PITT FROM FBI OR CHILD SERVICES. WHAT DOES THAT TELL YOU?

Changing the subject so I am going to take that as yes you are.

No, I think you are the one who isn’t all there!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think he made a tactical error in not making a very generous financial settlement, very quickly. Things surely would have gone more smoothly if he had, and the chateau sale could have been part of it. It smacks of egotism and control. She's the mother of his six children and he should have been very generous. Just on principle, let alone his gross behavior on the plane.

What does wanting a big lump sum payout say about someone? Did she want money or justice?

I'm not saying she's an angel, far from it. But she was entitled to a huge sum for division of property and child support for six kids over 8 years, and it does seem like he withheld it to punish her for leaving and publicly embarrassing him. And she retaliated by withholding the kids, even when it seemed reasonable he was healthy and ready to co-parent. They both suck.

What kind of mother does this?

I'm sure she rationalized it to herself--he's an awful father and person, the kids were better off with her etc. Like most narcissists do.

I was a little shocked when she had a member of her team basically admit she's been brainwashing the kids to think they had no voice because their father has privilege and power. What? The kids worked with court-appointed therapists, who represented their perspectives in custody proceedings. Only a sadistic mother would want to put her kids through testifying in court. Four are now adults and are free to speak out at any time. At least three seem to have dropped his name, out of loyalty to their mother not because he's been a terrible father as far as we can see. There is no evidence to suggest he deserved to have his parental rights severed. She's a vindictive nutcase who absolutely cannot see the harm she's done to her family (after his initial harm, which while terrible seems to have been short-lived). It's always been about her and what she wants, not what's in the best interest of raising well-adjusted kids who have healthy relationships with both parents.

-1
He tried to hit the children.

If someone jumped on your back and kids got too close or tried to intervene on a bumpy ride, I’m sure your arms would be all over the place and someone would accidentally get hit. I suspect this is why the FBI and DCF didn’t press charges. She attacked him first.

I wouldn’t be surprised if she was prepping some of the kids ahead of time. “Your dad is mean to me, I fear him”, etc.

No she didn't. He had physical touched her and pushed her down before he went for one of the kids.

He may have just walked up to the kid and screamed at them. So she has no idea what he was going to do. And sometimes a kid deserves a spanking or a slap in the face (I.e., open hand).

I believe in spanking, but apparently, he was choking Maddox. That's abuse not discipline.

Only choking I found in FBI report was Jolie choking Pitt.

So you're cherry picking what parts to believe. Sure.

LA Times
“Jolie filed for divorce from Pitt on Sept. 20, 2016. Three days later, The Times reported that Los Angeles County’s DCFS was investigating an alleged in-flight physical altercation between Pitt and son Maddox Jolie-Pitt, then 15. No punching or hitting was reported.”

From his sources which we know was untrue due to the fbi report dummy

Show us where in the report he hit, punched or choked Maddox. Otherwise you are just listening to Joile’s sources.

The agent saw Angelina's bruise and the scratches on his neck. Saying no punching or hitting was reported was untrue.

Grabbing someone is not same as hitting.

Are you stupid? Genuinely asking

Making disparaging remarks to poster will get this thread locked.

[Anonymous]

Here are the physical assault allegations (all quotes from articles):

Pitt allegedly began yelling at her and “grabbed her by the head, shaking her, followed by grabbing her at the shoulders and shaking her.”

He allegedly “pushed her into the bathroom wall and was saying things like, ‘You’re f— up this family,’” and “punched the ceiling of the plane approximately four times,”

when one of the kids defended Jolie, the actor "lunged at his own child and Jolie grabbed him from behind to stop him." Pitt then "threw himself backwards into the airplane's seats injuring Jolie's back and elbow," the suit added.

She said he later poured beer on Jolie and on the blanket that was covering her and the kids.

Jolie told agents that as they were about to land, she told the kids to get their things, then told Pitt that they were going to a hotel to get some sleep. Pitt allegedly yelled that she wasn’t taking his kids and jumped out of the bed he was in and pushed her.

“They began fighting and the altercation continued to the back door of the plane,” the report says. Pitt allegedly pushed Jolie down and told the kids they weren’t getting off the plane. Jolie estimated that they were there another 20 minutes.

After they got off the plane but were not yet in the car, Pitt grabbed Jolie’s arm “and turned her toward him. Then he grabbed her by the head and the shoulders and shook her,” the report says. A child interjected, “Don’t hurt her.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Here are the physical assault allegations (all quotes from articles):

Pitt allegedly began yelling at her and “grabbed her by the head, shaking her, followed by grabbing her at the shoulders and shaking her.”

He allegedly “pushed her into the bathroom wall and was saying things like, ‘You’re f— up this family,’” and “punched the ceiling of the plane approximately four times,”

when one of the kids defended Jolie, the actor "lunged at his own child and Jolie grabbed him from behind to stop him." Pitt then "threw himself backwards into the airplane's seats injuring Jolie's back and elbow," the suit added.

She said he later poured beer on Jolie and on the blanket that was covering her and the kids.

Jolie told agents that as they were about to land, she told the kids to get their things, then told Pitt that they were going to a hotel to get some sleep. Pitt allegedly yelled that she wasn’t taking his kids and jumped out of the bed he was in and pushed her.

“They began fighting and the altercation continued to the back door of the plane,” the report says. Pitt allegedly pushed Jolie down and told the kids they weren’t getting off the plane. Jolie estimated that they were there another 20 minutes.

After they got off the plane but were not yet in the car, Pitt grabbed Jolie’s arm “and turned her toward him. Then he grabbed her by the head and the shoulders and shook her,” the report says. A child interjected, “Don’t hurt her.”

Here before they defend that lie of an article that "pushing is not hitting or punching"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:lol 😂 finally. Someone posted a link about Giselle and I saw that they signed Christmas day

Angelina did on Christmas, and Brad on the 30th lol. Lots of people saw this coming after she won his correspondences. They'll settle the winery sooner then later so he messages don't leak

Or perhaps she finally settled hoping for an Oscar nom.

Then why wouldn't she settle months ago? That's laughable. He doesn't want his communications out.

I like how his side said he settled because of his gf lol

That’s funny but he’s still an a ss

I find it sad their narrative isnt that he settled for kids but the girfriend instead.

Says a lot about how much he really did not care about his children. It was always a power thing for him. He had the time and money to prolong the matter, requiring Jolie to expend an enormous amount in legal fees. The attorneys always win.

He's starting to let the mask slip with his PR. Today there was an article from his side that side he's upset she didn't sell to him and instead "took the money for herself." How does that make any sense? She would have had the money if she sold to him as well. He's mad he can't control her anymore

What he meant, cult follower, is that they both agreed the vineyard was to be an inheritance for their children. If kept in the family 100%, their children would inherit 100% of the profits/value. When she sold to an outsider and pocketed the money for herself, that ended. Come out if the bubble got a moment. She was the controlling one, btw.

What he meant? LOL He said exactly what he meant. Just like when his side said he always wanted a daughter leaving out Zahara.

. His statements have said the very thing. What you said is your false narrative. Way to try to deflect though by mentioning Zahara. To be clear, one wants Ang or is obsessed with Ang or wants to control Ang or is jealous of Ang’s beauty but her crazy azz followers. 🤪

Nope! He was clear with that obsessed statement. His comment leaving out Zahara was another example of people trying to "correct" what he meant. We know what he meant. He's obsessed. We see it.

Sweetie, he has now divorced her twice, he is not obsessed with her, but it’s clear you are. You’ve got some fantasy in your head that she’s this walk on water goddess that all men, including Pitt want. He wanted the business in the family for their children. You know that you just can’t admit it. He’s moved on and hopefully so has she. You should want that for her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here are the physical assault allegations (all quotes from articles):

Pitt allegedly began yelling at her and “grabbed her by the head, shaking her, followed by grabbing her at the shoulders and shaking her.”

He allegedly “pushed her into the bathroom wall and was saying things like, ‘You’re f— up this family,’” and “punched the ceiling of the plane approximately four times,”

when one of the kids defended Jolie, the actor "lunged at his own child and Jolie grabbed him from behind to stop him." Pitt then "threw himself backwards into the airplane's seats injuring Jolie's back and elbow," the suit added.

She said he later poured beer on Jolie and on the blanket that was covering her and the kids.

Jolie told agents that as they were about to land, she told the kids to get their things, then told Pitt that they were going to a hotel to get some sleep. Pitt allegedly yelled that she wasn’t taking his kids and jumped out of the bed he was in and pushed her.

“They began fighting and the altercation continued to the back door of the plane,” the report says. Pitt allegedly pushed Jolie down and told the kids they weren’t getting off the plane. Jolie estimated that they were there another 20 minutes.

After they got off the plane but were not yet in the car, Pitt grabbed Jolie’s arm “and turned her toward him. Then he grabbed her by the head and the shoulders and shook her,” the report says. A child interjected, “Don’t hurt her.”

Here before they defend that lie of an article that "pushing is not hitting or punching"

Apparently some do not know the difference between grabbing and hitting. I guess when you grab your kid to stop him from running in the street it’s a hit. Call child services immediately!

And articles don’t matter, only the FBI report, it’s official and not a “source”.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:lol 😂 finally. Someone posted a link about Giselle and I saw that they signed Christmas day

Angelina did on Christmas, and Brad on the 30th lol. Lots of people saw this coming after she won his correspondences. They'll settle the winery sooner then later so he messages don't leak

Or perhaps she finally settled hoping for an Oscar nom.

Then why wouldn't she settle months ago? That's laughable. He doesn't want his communications out.

I like how his side said he settled because of his gf lol

That’s funny but he’s still an a ss

I find it sad their narrative isnt that he settled for kids but the girfriend instead.

Says a lot about how much he really did not care about his children. It was always a power thing for him. He had the time and money to prolong the matter, requiring Jolie to expend an enormous amount in legal fees. The attorneys always win.

He's starting to let the mask slip with his PR. Today there was an article from his side that side he's upset she didn't sell to him and instead "took the money for herself." How does that make any sense? She would have had the money if she sold to him as well. He's mad he can't control her anymore

What he meant, cult follower, is that they both agreed the vineyard was to be an inheritance for their children. If kept in the family 100%, their children would inherit 100% of the profits/value. When she sold to an outsider and pocketed the money for herself, that ended. Come out if the bubble got a moment. She was the controlling one, btw.

What he meant? LOL He said exactly what he meant. Just like when his side said he always wanted a daughter leaving out Zahara.

. His statements have said the very thing. What you said is your false narrative. Way to try to deflect though by mentioning Zahara. To be clear, one wants Ang or is obsessed with Ang or wants to control Ang or is jealous of Ang’s beauty but her crazy azz followers. 🤪

Nope! He was clear with that obsessed statement. His comment leaving out Zahara was another example of people trying to "correct" what he meant. We know what he meant. He's obsessed. We see it.

Sweetie, he has now divorced her twice, he is not obsessed with her, but it’s clear you are. You’ve got some fantasy in your head that she’s this walk on water goddess that all men, including Pitt want. He wanted the business in the family for their children. You know that you just can’t admit it. He’s moved on and hopefully so has she. You should want that for her.

He's moved on yet wouldnt settle with her until now? Hmmm. He wanted them business in the family yet didn't negotiate fairly? Hmmm.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here are the physical assault allegations (all quotes from articles):

Pitt allegedly began yelling at her and “grabbed her by the head, shaking her, followed by grabbing her at the shoulders and shaking her.”

He allegedly “pushed her into the bathroom wall and was saying things like, ‘You’re f— up this family,’” and “punched the ceiling of the plane approximately four times,”

when one of the kids defended Jolie, the actor "lunged at his own child and Jolie grabbed him from behind to stop him." Pitt then "threw himself backwards into the airplane's seats injuring Jolie's back and elbow," the suit added.

She said he later poured beer on Jolie and on the blanket that was covering her and the kids.

Jolie told agents that as they were about to land, she told the kids to get their things, then told Pitt that they were going to a hotel to get some sleep. Pitt allegedly yelled that she wasn’t taking his kids and jumped out of the bed he was in and pushed her.

“They began fighting and the altercation continued to the back door of the plane,” the report says. Pitt allegedly pushed Jolie down and told the kids they weren’t getting off the plane. Jolie estimated that they were there another 20 minutes.

After they got off the plane but were not yet in the car, Pitt grabbed Jolie’s arm “and turned her toward him. Then he grabbed her by the head and the shoulders and shook her,” the report says. A child interjected, “Don’t hurt her.”

Here before they defend that lie of an article that "pushing is not hitting or punching"

Apparently some do not know the difference between grabbing and hitting. I guess when you grab your kid to stop him from running in the street it’s a hit. Call child services immediately!

And articles don’t matter, only the FBI report, it’s official and not a “source”.

The FBI report that we’ve seen only gives Jolie’s account of what happened so we don’t even know if any or all of it it true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:lol 😂 finally. Someone posted a link about Giselle and I saw that they signed Christmas day

Angelina did on Christmas, and Brad on the 30th lol. Lots of people saw this coming after she won his correspondences. They'll settle the winery sooner then later so he messages don't leak

Or perhaps she finally settled hoping for an Oscar nom.

Then why wouldn't she settle months ago? That's laughable. He doesn't want his communications out.

I like how his side said he settled because of his gf lol

That’s funny but he’s still an a ss

I find it sad their narrative isnt that he settled for kids but the girfriend instead.

Says a lot about how much he really did not care about his children. It was always a power thing for him. He had the time and money to prolong the matter, requiring Jolie to expend an enormous amount in legal fees. The attorneys always win.

He's starting to let the mask slip with his PR. Today there was an article from his side that side he's upset she didn't sell to him and instead "took the money for herself." How does that make any sense? She would have had the money if she sold to him as well. He's mad he can't control her anymore

What he meant, cult follower, is that they both agreed the vineyard was to be an inheritance for their children. If kept in the family 100%, their children would inherit 100% of the profits/value. When she sold to an outsider and pocketed the money for herself, that ended. Come out if the bubble got a moment. She was the controlling one, btw.

What he meant? LOL He said exactly what he meant. Just like when his side said he always wanted a daughter leaving out Zahara.

. His statements have said the very thing. What you said is your false narrative. Way to try to deflect though by mentioning Zahara. To be clear, one wants Ang or is obsessed with Ang or wants to control Ang or is jealous of Ang’s beauty but her crazy azz followers. 🤪

Nope! He was clear with that obsessed statement. His comment leaving out Zahara was another example of people trying to "correct" what he meant. We know what he meant. He's obsessed. We see it.

Sweetie, he has now divorced her twice, he is not obsessed with her, but it’s clear you are. You’ve got some fantasy in your head that she’s this walk on water goddess that all men, including Pitt want. He wanted the business in the family for their children. You know that you just can’t admit it. He’s moved on and hopefully so has she. You should want that for her.

He's moved on yet wouldnt settle with her until now? Hmmm. He wanted them business in the family yet didn't negotiate fairly? Hmmm.

I agree but it's not that he's obsessed with her. He's obsessed with the loss of control. A big difference.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:lol 😂 finally. Someone posted a link about Giselle and I saw that they signed Christmas day

Angelina did on Christmas, and Brad on the 30th lol. Lots of people saw this coming after she won his correspondences. They'll settle the winery sooner then later so he messages don't leak

Or perhaps she finally settled hoping for an Oscar nom.

Then why wouldn't she settle months ago? That's laughable. He doesn't want his communications out.

I like how his side said he settled because of his gf lol

That’s funny but he’s still an a ss

I find it sad their narrative isnt that he settled for kids but the girfriend instead.

Says a lot about how much he really did not care about his children. It was always a power thing for him. He had the time and money to prolong the matter, requiring Jolie to expend an enormous amount in legal fees. The attorneys always win.

He's starting to let the mask slip with his PR. Today there was an article from his side that side he's upset she didn't sell to him and instead "took the money for herself." How does that make any sense? She would have had the money if she sold to him as well. He's mad he can't control her anymore

What he meant, cult follower, is that they both agreed the vineyard was to be an inheritance for their children. If kept in the family 100%, their children would inherit 100% of the profits/value. When she sold to an outsider and pocketed the money for herself, that ended. Come out if the bubble got a moment. She was the controlling one, btw.

What he meant? LOL He said exactly what he meant. Just like when his side said he always wanted a daughter leaving out Zahara.

. His statements have said the very thing. What you said is your false narrative. Way to try to deflect though by mentioning Zahara. To be clear, one wants Ang or is obsessed with Ang or wants to control Ang or is jealous of Ang’s beauty but her crazy azz followers. 🤪

Nope! He was clear with that obsessed statement. His comment leaving out Zahara was another example of people trying to "correct" what he meant. We know what he meant. He's obsessed. We see it.

Sweetie, he has now divorced her twice, he is not obsessed with her, but it’s clear you are. You’ve got some fantasy in your head that she’s this walk on water goddess that all men, including Pitt want. He wanted the business in the family for their children. You know that you just can’t admit it. He’s moved on and hopefully so has she. You should want that for her.

He's moved on yet wouldnt settle with her until now? Hmmm. He wanted them business in the family yet didn't negotiate fairly? Hmmm.

I agree but it's not that he's obsessed with her. He's obsessed with the loss of control. A big difference.

Pretty sure HW does not see him as the controlling type, her on the other hand…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:lol 😂 finally. Someone posted a link about Giselle and I saw that they signed Christmas day

Angelina did on Christmas, and Brad on the 30th lol. Lots of people saw this coming after she won his correspondences. They'll settle the winery sooner then later so he messages don't leak

Or perhaps she finally settled hoping for an Oscar nom.

Then why wouldn't she settle months ago? That's laughable. He doesn't want his communications out.

I like how his side said he settled because of his gf lol

That’s funny but he’s still an a ss

I find it sad their narrative isnt that he settled for kids but the girfriend instead.

Says a lot about how much he really did not care about his children. It was always a power thing for him. He had the time and money to prolong the matter, requiring Jolie to expend an enormous amount in legal fees. The attorneys always win.

He's starting to let the mask slip with his PR. Today there was an article from his side that side he's upset she didn't sell to him and instead "took the money for herself." How does that make any sense? She would have had the money if she sold to him as well. He's mad he can't control her anymore

What he meant, cult follower, is that they both agreed the vineyard was to be an inheritance for their children. If kept in the family 100%, their children would inherit 100% of the profits/value. When she sold to an outsider and pocketed the money for herself, that ended. Come out if the bubble got a moment. She was the controlling one, btw.

What he meant? LOL He said exactly what he meant. Just like when his side said he always wanted a daughter leaving out Zahara.

. His statements have said the very thing. What you said is your false narrative. Way to try to deflect though by mentioning Zahara. To be clear, one wants Ang or is obsessed with Ang or wants to control Ang or is jealous of Ang’s beauty but her crazy azz followers. 🤪

Nope! He was clear with that obsessed statement. His comment leaving out Zahara was another example of people trying to "correct" what he meant. We know what he meant. He's obsessed. We see it.

Sweetie, he has now divorced her twice, he is not obsessed with her, but it’s clear you are. You’ve got some fantasy in your head that she’s this walk on water goddess that all men, including Pitt want. He wanted the business in the family for their children. You know that you just can’t admit it. He’s moved on and hopefully so has she. You should want that for her.

He's moved on yet wouldnt settle with her until now? Hmmm. He wanted them business in the family yet didn't negotiate fairly? Hmmm.

I agree but it's not that he's obsessed with her. He's obsessed with the loss of control. A big difference.

Pretty sure HW does not see him as the controlling type, her on the other hand…

What does toxic HW have to do with this? That's all power dynamics. Look at the way the threw Justin Baldoni to the wolves over Blake who has a horrible reputation with her peers.