[Washington Post] Ex-Montgomery superintendent McKnight to get $1.3M in separation deal

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Have you guys seen this? Honestly I had to do a double take because it really wouldn’t surprise me!


https://takomatorch.com/index.php/2024/03/17/maryland-replaces-sales-tax-holiday-with-double-tax-week-to-pay-for-mcps-superintendents-1-3m-separation-agreement/

It's a satire journal. Unfortunately, our school district has devolved into satire,

A superintendent who was so bad that she was rewarded with 1.3 million dollars.

An absurd story worthy of Franz Kafka.

I do not like her either, but this is hardly fair or accurate.

What is inaccurate?

McKnight was terrible. She gets $1.3 million dollars.

Both of those things are true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Have you guys seen this? Honestly I had to do a double take because it really wouldn’t surprise me!


https://takomatorch.com/index.php/2024/03/17/maryland-replaces-sales-tax-holiday-with-double-tax-week-to-pay-for-mcps-superintendents-1-3m-separation-agreement/

It's a satire journal. Unfortunately, our school district has devolved into satire,

A superintendent who was so bad that she was rewarded with 1.3 million dollars.

An absurd story worthy of Franz Kafka.

I do not like her either, but this is hardly fair or accurate.

What is inaccurate?

McKnight was terrible. She gets $1.3 million dollars.

Both of those things are true.

Sure, but there was no evidence of any coverup just speculation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Have you guys seen this? Honestly I had to do a double take because it really wouldn’t surprise me!


https://takomatorch.com/index.php/2024/03/17/maryland-replaces-sales-tax-holiday-with-double-tax-week-to-pay-for-mcps-superintendents-1-3m-separation-agreement/

It's a satire journal. Unfortunately, our school district has devolved into satire,

A superintendent who was so bad that she was rewarded with 1.3 million dollars.

An absurd story worthy of Franz Kafka.

I do not like her either, but this is hardly fair or accurate.

What is inaccurate?

McKnight was terrible. She gets $1.3 million dollars.

Both of those things are true.

Sure, but there was no evidence of any coverup just speculation.

Troll.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see that DCUM is still crying over the fact that Dr. McKnight is smiling all the way to the bank.
Keep crying 😢

Ripping iff children makes you so happy.

I'd direct my anger toward the board since they used her as a scapegoat and it cost them.

She helped cover up for a serial sexual harasser and did everything she could to make sure he was successful and tried to bury the information like it's the 1960s and the internet and emails don't exist. The Board is a bunch of buffoons and instead of having a backbone and showing they're going to stand up to this type of corruption, they cowered and gave her the bag because they don't want to be perceived as racist. If she threatened her a lawsuit, let's go to court and put her on blast for her behavior. Even if she won, the settlement wouldn't have been much more than what she got. Should have stood up for what's right and fired her for cause and showed that type of behavior won't be tolerated anymore. But they didn't...vote them all out over the next few elections. Actions need to have consequences.

That wasn't clear from the report. Sure, there were a few anonymous complaints, but it's hard to give that much weight.

Which they were investigating.

It's really not clear McKnight did anything improper here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see that DCUM is still crying over the fact that Dr. McKnight is smiling all the way to the bank.
Keep crying 😢

Ripping iff children makes you so happy.

I'd direct my anger toward the board since they used her as a scapegoat and it cost them.

She helped cover up for a serial sexual harasser and did everything she could to make sure he was successful and tried to bury the information like it's the 1960s and the internet and emails don't exist. The Board is a bunch of buffoons and instead of having a backbone and showing they're going to stand up to this type of corruption, they cowered and gave her the bag because they don't want to be perceived as racist. If she threatened her a lawsuit, let's go to court and put her on blast for her behavior. Even if she won, the settlement wouldn't have been much more than what she got. Should have stood up for what's right and fired her for cause and showed that type of behavior won't be tolerated anymore. But they didn't...vote them all out over the next few elections. Actions need to have consequences.

That wasn't clear from the report. Sure, there were a few anonymous complaints, but it's hard to give that much weight.

Which they were investigating.

It's really not clear McKnight did anything improper here.

It's quite clear.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see that DCUM is still crying over the fact that Dr. McKnight is smiling all the way to the bank.
Keep crying 😢

Ripping iff children makes you so happy.

I'd direct my anger toward the board since they used her as a scapegoat and it cost them.

She helped cover up for a serial sexual harasser and did everything she could to make sure he was successful and tried to bury the information like it's the 1960s and the internet and emails don't exist. The Board is a bunch of buffoons and instead of having a backbone and showing they're going to stand up to this type of corruption, they cowered and gave her the bag because they don't want to be perceived as racist. If she threatened her a lawsuit, let's go to court and put her on blast for her behavior. Even if she won, the settlement wouldn't have been much more than what she got. Should have stood up for what's right and fired her for cause and showed that type of behavior won't be tolerated anymore. But they didn't...vote them all out over the next few elections. Actions need to have consequences.

That wasn't clear from the report. Sure, there were a few anonymous complaints, but it's hard to give that much weight.

Which they were investigating.

It's really not clear McKnight did anything improper here.

It's quite clear.

The only thing that's clear is that a lot of people have been out to get her from the start of her acting as superintendent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see that DCUM is still crying over the fact that Dr. McKnight is smiling all the way to the bank.
Keep crying 😢

Ripping iff children makes you so happy.

I'd direct my anger toward the board since they used her as a scapegoat and it cost them.

She helped cover up for a serial sexual harasser and did everything she could to make sure he was successful and tried to bury the information like it's the 1960s and the internet and emails don't exist. The Board is a bunch of buffoons and instead of having a backbone and showing they're going to stand up to this type of corruption, they cowered and gave her the bag because they don't want to be perceived as racist. If she threatened her a lawsuit, let's go to court and put her on blast for her behavior. Even if she won, the settlement wouldn't have been much more than what she got. Should have stood up for what's right and fired her for cause and showed that type of behavior won't be tolerated anymore. But they didn't...vote them all out over the next few elections. Actions need to have consequences.

That wasn't clear from the report. Sure, there were a few anonymous complaints, but it's hard to give that much weight.

Which they were investigating.

It's really not clear McKnight did anything improper here.

It's quite clear.

The only thing that's clear is that a lot of people have been out to get her from the start of her acting as superintendent.

Ah, Monifa the victim AGAIN. LOL. Take the money and run.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see that DCUM is still crying over the fact that Dr. McKnight is smiling all the way to the bank.
Keep crying 😢

Ripping iff children makes you so happy.

I'd direct my anger toward the board since they used her as a scapegoat and it cost them.

She helped cover up for a serial sexual harasser and did everything she could to make sure he was successful and tried to bury the information like it's the 1960s and the internet and emails don't exist. The Board is a bunch of buffoons and instead of having a backbone and showing they're going to stand up to this type of corruption, they cowered and gave her the bag because they don't want to be perceived as racist. If she threatened her a lawsuit, let's go to court and put her on blast for her behavior. Even if she won, the settlement wouldn't have been much more than what she got. Should have stood up for what's right and fired her for cause and showed that type of behavior won't be tolerated anymore. But they didn't...vote them all out over the next few elections. Actions need to have consequences.

That wasn't clear from the report. Sure, there were a few anonymous complaints, but it's hard to give that much weight.

Which they were investigating.

It's really not clear McKnight did anything improper here.

It's quite clear.

The only thing that's clear is that a lot of people have been out to get her from the start of her acting as superintendent.

Ah, Monifa the victim AGAIN. LOL. Take the money and run.

She is swimming in the pool of money while you're huffing and puffing on DCUM.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see that DCUM is still crying over the fact that Dr. McKnight is smiling all the way to the bank.
Keep crying 😢

Ripping iff children makes you so happy.

I'd direct my anger toward the board since they used her as a scapegoat and it cost them.

She helped cover up for a serial sexual harasser and did everything she could to make sure he was successful and tried to bury the information like it's the 1960s and the internet and emails don't exist. The Board is a bunch of buffoons and instead of having a backbone and showing they're going to stand up to this type of corruption, they cowered and gave her the bag because they don't want to be perceived as racist. If she threatened her a lawsuit, let's go to court and put her on blast for her behavior. Even if she won, the settlement wouldn't have been much more than what she got. Should have stood up for what's right and fired her for cause and showed that type of behavior won't be tolerated anymore. But they didn't...vote them all out over the next few elections. Actions need to have consequences.

That wasn't clear from the report. Sure, there were a few anonymous complaints, but it's hard to give that much weight.

Which they were investigating.

It's really not clear McKnight did anything improper here.

You are correct, but the McKnight haters will label you a troll for relying on facts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see that DCUM is still crying over the fact that Dr. McKnight is smiling all the way to the bank.
Keep crying 😢

Ripping iff children makes you so happy.

I'd direct my anger toward the board since they used her as a scapegoat and it cost them.

She helped cover up for a serial sexual harasser and did everything she could to make sure he was successful and tried to bury the information like it's the 1960s and the internet and emails don't exist. The Board is a bunch of buffoons and instead of having a backbone and showing they're going to stand up to this type of corruption, they cowered and gave her the bag because they don't want to be perceived as racist. If she threatened her a lawsuit, let's go to court and put her on blast for her behavior. Even if she won, the settlement wouldn't have been much more than what she got. Should have stood up for what's right and fired her for cause and showed that type of behavior won't be tolerated anymore. But they didn't...vote them all out over the next few elections. Actions need to have consequences.

That wasn't clear from the report. Sure, there were a few anonymous complaints, but it's hard to give that much weight.

Which they were investigating.

It's really not clear McKnight did anything improper here.

It's quite clear.

The only thing that's clear is that a lot of people have been out to get her from the start of her acting as superintendent.

The only thing that's clear is that she knowingly promoted a serial sexual harasser.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see that DCUM is still crying over the fact that Dr. McKnight is smiling all the way to the bank.
Keep crying 😢

Ripping iff children makes you so happy.

I'd direct my anger toward the board since they used her as a scapegoat and it cost them.

She helped cover up for a serial sexual harasser and did everything she could to make sure he was successful and tried to bury the information like it's the 1960s and the internet and emails don't exist. The Board is a bunch of buffoons and instead of having a backbone and showing they're going to stand up to this type of corruption, they cowered and gave her the bag because they don't want to be perceived as racist. If she threatened her a lawsuit, let's go to court and put her on blast for her behavior. Even if she won, the settlement wouldn't have been much more than what she got. Should have stood up for what's right and fired her for cause and showed that type of behavior won't be tolerated anymore. But they didn't...vote them all out over the next few elections. Actions need to have consequences.

That wasn't clear from the report. Sure, there were a few anonymous complaints, but it's hard to give that much weight.

Which they were investigating.

It's really not clear McKnight did anything improper here.

You are correct, but the McKnight haters will label you a troll for relying on facts.

Find a taxpayer happy she got $1.3M for nothing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see that DCUM is still crying over the fact that Dr. McKnight is smiling all the way to the bank.
Keep crying 😢

Ripping iff children makes you so happy.

I'd direct my anger toward the board since they used her as a scapegoat and it cost them.

She helped cover up for a serial sexual harasser and did everything she could to make sure he was successful and tried to bury the information like it's the 1960s and the internet and emails don't exist. The Board is a bunch of buffoons and instead of having a backbone and showing they're going to stand up to this type of corruption, they cowered and gave her the bag because they don't want to be perceived as racist. If she threatened her a lawsuit, let's go to court and put her on blast for her behavior. Even if she won, the settlement wouldn't have been much more than what she got. Should have stood up for what's right and fired her for cause and showed that type of behavior won't be tolerated anymore. But they didn't...vote them all out over the next few elections. Actions need to have consequences.

That wasn't clear from the report. Sure, there were a few anonymous complaints, but it's hard to give that much weight.

Which they were investigating.

It's really not clear McKnight did anything improper here.

You are correct, but the McKnight haters will label you a troll for relying on facts.

Find a taxpayer happy she got $1.3M for nothing.

I never liked her much or her policies, but I'm fine with it since I think it's only fair. IMO the board shoulders more blame and just scapegoated her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see that DCUM is still crying over the fact that Dr. McKnight is smiling all the way to the bank.
Keep crying 😢

Ripping iff children makes you so happy.

I'd direct my anger toward the board since they used her as a scapegoat and it cost them.

She helped cover up for a serial sexual harasser and did everything she could to make sure he was successful and tried to bury the information like it's the 1960s and the internet and emails don't exist. The Board is a bunch of buffoons and instead of having a backbone and showing they're going to stand up to this type of corruption, they cowered and gave her the bag because they don't want to be perceived as racist. If she threatened her a lawsuit, let's go to court and put her on blast for her behavior. Even if she won, the settlement wouldn't have been much more than what she got. Should have stood up for what's right and fired her for cause and showed that type of behavior won't be tolerated anymore. But they didn't...vote them all out over the next few elections. Actions need to have consequences.

That wasn't clear from the report. Sure, there were a few anonymous complaints, but it's hard to give that much weight.

Which they were investigating.

It's really not clear McKnight did anything improper here.

It's quite clear.

The only thing that's clear is that a lot of people have been out to get her from the start of her acting as superintendent.

The only thing that's clear is that she knowingly promoted a serial sexual harasser.

Don't you mean the school board?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see that DCUM is still crying over the fact that Dr. McKnight is smiling all the way to the bank.
Keep crying 😢

Ripping iff children makes you so happy.

I'd direct my anger toward the board since they used her as a scapegoat and it cost them.

She helped cover up for a serial sexual harasser and did everything she could to make sure he was successful and tried to bury the information like it's the 1960s and the internet and emails don't exist. The Board is a bunch of buffoons and instead of having a backbone and showing they're going to stand up to this type of corruption, they cowered and gave her the bag because they don't want to be perceived as racist. If she threatened her a lawsuit, let's go to court and put her on blast for her behavior. Even if she won, the settlement wouldn't have been much more than what she got. Should have stood up for what's right and fired her for cause and showed that type of behavior won't be tolerated anymore. But they didn't...vote them all out over the next few elections. Actions need to have consequences.

That wasn't clear from the report. Sure, there were a few anonymous complaints, but it's hard to give that much weight.

Which they were investigating.

It's really not clear McKnight did anything improper here.

You are correct, but the McKnight haters will label you a troll for relying on facts.

Find a taxpayer happy she got $1.3M for nothing.

I never liked her much or her policies, but I'm fine with it since I think it's only fair. IMO the board shoulders more blame and just scapegoated her.

McKnight knew all the facts and still recommended the BOE to promote the serial sexual harasser.

The BOE did not know all the facts and blindly followed McKnight's recommendation.

Both McKnight and the BOE should be fired.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see that DCUM is still crying over the fact that Dr. McKnight is smiling all the way to the bank.
Keep crying 😢

Ripping iff children makes you so happy.

I'd direct my anger toward the board since they used her as a scapegoat and it cost them.

She helped cover up for a serial sexual harasser and did everything she could to make sure he was successful and tried to bury the information like it's the 1960s and the internet and emails don't exist. The Board is a bunch of buffoons and instead of having a backbone and showing they're going to stand up to this type of corruption, they cowered and gave her the bag because they don't want to be perceived as racist. If she threatened her a lawsuit, let's go to court and put her on blast for her behavior. Even if she won, the settlement wouldn't have been much more than what she got. Should have stood up for what's right and fired her for cause and showed that type of behavior won't be tolerated anymore. But they didn't...vote them all out over the next few elections. Actions need to have consequences.

That wasn't clear from the report. Sure, there were a few anonymous complaints, but it's hard to give that much weight.

Which they were investigating.

It's really not clear McKnight did anything improper here.

You are correct, but the McKnight haters will label you a troll for relying on facts.

Find a taxpayer happy she got $1.3M for nothing.

I never liked her much or her policies, but I'm fine with it since I think it's only fair. IMO the board shoulders more blame and just scapegoated her.