Kate Middleton in Hospital - Recovering from Surgery

[Anonymous]

Colon cancer is spiking in younger people. I truly hope this is nothing serious.

I'm not sure I 'trust' whatever they report. They aren't going to give serious personal info like that if this was some emergency thing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope she doesn’t have cancer

The announcement stated it is not cancer.

They also said she won't be resuming duties for like 2 months----that is way more time than a hystorectomy.

As a teen she had a lump on her head removed.

Apparently, during Kate's time at Marlborough, she discovered a lump on the left side of her head. The school called Kate's mom, who promptly took her to the doctor. That doctor ordered an emergency operation to remove the lump.

The evidence of Kate's emergency operation is still around today, in the form of a scar on her hairline that you can still spot in pictures of the Duchess.

What does that lump have to do with abdominal surgery?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://people.com/kate-middleton-hospitalized-following-abdominal-surgery-details-official-statement-8430668

She will be in the hospital for 10-16 days. It must’ve been a big surgery!

Or she’s the princess of wales and gets the literal royal treatment. The rest of us would have to be back at work.

While true, she could recover at home in a literal palace with a full medical team. Not in some hospital risking mrsa or some other infection.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You don’t need 16 days for a hysterectomy

You can if it’s complicated.

My friend had terrible fibroids that had tangled with her other organs. It was 13 days in the hospital and she needed two different surgeries. Was at home for five weeks afterwards.

Someone earlier said the hospital she's in doesn't do gyno stuff. I think it's digestive.

Yes they do.

No, they don't.
https://www.thelondonclinic.co.uk/our-service-departments

They do.

https://www.thelondonclinic.co.uk/services/treatments/hysteroscopy

No, they don't. They have a robotic surgery department that does various types of scopes. This is like an endoscopy or colonoscopy of your uterus. It is 100% not a major surgery. Hysteroscopy is an outpatient surgery where you go home the same day. They do NOT have a gyn department and no royal would undergo major gyn surgery there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://people.com/kate-middleton-hospitalized-following-abdominal-surgery-details-official-statement-8430668

She will be in the hospital for 10-16 days. It must’ve been a big surgery!

Or she’s the princess of wales and gets the literal royal treatment. The rest of us would have to be back at work.

Yes but this is the same women who left the hospital hours after giving birth I think all three times. So she's not one to lay around if she doesn't have to.

You would have too if you went home to Nannie’s, full house staff and personal doctors who made house calls. Please.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What in the world could she have had done that was PLANNED, yet will keep her in the hospital for two weeks, and home bound until Easter?

This is 2024! Two weeks? I can’t even imagine what it could have been since it was planned.

Most cancer surgeries are planned.

Nope. My dad went straight from the colonscopy to surgery later that day--colon and kidney.

And that is less common than someone knowing long enough to meet with the surgeon first, and fast before the procedure. If they do those two things, even if they are admitted from the ER, have a bedside consult and fast that night, it's still a "planned" surgery. Cancer surgeries are more likely to be planned than not.

Not saying this was cancer, but during a pandemic we heard all the time that if a surgery is elective or planned it's not for something that bad and can be pushed back. That's not always true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So the statement from the palace said that she had surgery at The London Clinic. The London clinic does not have a Gyn dept. They have cancer care (reporters have been told it’s not cancer) and “digestive health” which includes Crohns as well as tumors and other procedures.

If it had been Gyn, she’d have gone to St Mary’s or the Portman.

This is very concerning

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's not a hysterectomy. London Clinic doesn't do those. Eating Disorder damage speculation is silly. This sort of damage is normally due to bulimia, which doesn't actually typically lead to weight loss, and if she had an eating disorder serious enough to cause intestinal damage, there is basically zero chance she would have been able to get pregnant with 3 kids so easily. On top of that, lots of other conditions can cause the same damage, so they wouldn't have to disclose either way.

It's obviously either Crohn's or UC and I'm sure it's a condition that she's known about for ages that suddenly flared. It could also be a bowel perf, but those usually are emergency surgeries. A serious adhesion could also do it, but I don't think she's had abdominal surgery before, so that would make it less likely. (Also, they wouldn't have known it wasn't cancer for sure pre-surgery, but because they didn't put out the release until afterwards, it's possible.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What in the world could she have had done that was PLANNED, yet will keep her in the hospital for two weeks, and home bound until Easter?

This is 2024! Two weeks? I can’t even imagine what it could have been since it was planned.

Most cancer surgeries are planned.

Nope. My dad went straight from the colonscopy to surgery later that day--colon and kidney.

Your dad’s experience was unusual. Most cancers are discovered by imaging or biopsy and any surgery is planned from there.

[Anonymous]

Could be intestinal blockage caused by semiglutides or weight loss surgery. No evidence of anything though including Crohn’s or UC. Crohn’s also isn’t super common amongst non-Jews.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope she doesn’t have cancer

The announcement stated it is not cancer.

They also said she won't be resuming duties for like 2 months----that is way more time than a hystorectomy.

As a teen she had a lump on her head removed.

Apparently, during Kate's time at Marlborough, she discovered a lump on the left side of her head. The school called Kate's mom, who promptly took her to the doctor. That doctor ordered an emergency operation to remove the lump.

The evidence of Kate's emergency operation is still around today, in the form of a scar on her hairline that you can still spot in pictures of the Duchess.

What does that lump have to do with abdominal surgery?

if it were cancer back then...recurrence--which can come back to different organs. But that is a big stretch. They were always very secretive about the 'lump/bump' thing is what the former school said.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Could be intestinal blockage caused by semiglutides or weight loss surgery. No evidence of anything though including Crohn’s or UC. Crohn’s also isn’t super common amongst non-Jews.

The woman already weighed 90 pounds---wth would she have had weight loss surgery?

[Anonymous]

Under 'prolapse' treatments it says The London Clinic offers keyhole hysterectomy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Could be intestinal blockage caused by semiglutides or weight loss surgery. No evidence of anything though including Crohn’s or UC. Crohn’s also isn’t super common amongst non-Jews.

What?! Of course non-Jews get Crohns. I know two non-Jewish women who have it.

[Anonymous]

Maybe she is donating one of her kidneys to the king.