Are yoga pants ok?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Look like this in yoga pants and you can wear there anywhere. No man will complain - none ;)

A classy man would complain. Those outfits are wholly inappropriate for the bookstore. Also, the lady in the blue’s behind is much too big to keep uncovered like that.

No one's bum is uncovered, all these women are wearing pants.

Are you gay? Nothing wrong with it. Maybe you just dont like looking at women in tight clothing?

I’m not a man. She needs to wear real pants and/or a dress or a loose fitting shirt to disguise how incredibly huge her behind is. I would if that were my behind.

Huh? She clearly worked out hard for that ass. She's not ashamed and wanting to hide her body away, lest someone (probably on dcum) call her a fat ugly slob.

Why do you feel the need to denigrate other women?

I’m not denigrating her as a person. I think it’s fine to wear that to the gym, but I think her butt is too big. If my butt looked like that, I would tone down the lunges and would try to cover it up better.

In case you’re wondering, my butt looks like the second one from the left. I would never think to wear leggings as pants anywhere but the gym. It’s inappropriate and in bad taste.

I can’t tell from this picture if this lady has bad taste or not, but going to the bookstore like that, would be very much in bad taste for me.

Are you dim? You can’t see the ass on the second woman from the left. She’s almost fully facing the camera.

Maybe thats her point - her ass is practically invisible! Makes sense why she hates women with a nice full thick booty.

I don't think jeans or a dress would cover up Nikki's badonkadonk if they tried :lol: :lol: :lol:

No, I meant the second from the right. The one next to the one in the blue. I have a perfect behind. Sorry to disappoint. I’ve had random strangers pinch it out in the street, both men and women. Maybe that’s why I don’t walk around flashing it in everyone’s faces. I’m also the daughter of European immigrants, so that too could be why I wear proper clothing outside of my house and yoga pants to work out only.

It’s funny to see all the ridiculous excuses people come up with to justify their slovenliness. Just wear real pants, people! It’s not that hard!

You do know that wearing pants =/= flashing right

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Look like this in yoga pants and you can wear there anywhere. No man will complain - none ;)

A classy man would complain. Those outfits are wholly inappropriate for the bookstore. Also, the lady in the blue’s behind is much too big to keep uncovered like that.

No one's bum is uncovered, all these women are wearing pants.

Are you gay? Nothing wrong with it. Maybe you just dont like looking at women in tight clothing?

I’m not a man. She needs to wear real pants and/or a dress or a loose fitting shirt to disguise how incredibly huge her behind is. I would if that were my behind.

Huh? She clearly worked out hard for that ass. She's not ashamed and wanting to hide her body away, lest someone (probably on dcum) call her a fat ugly slob.

Why do you feel the need to denigrate other women?

I’m not denigrating her as a person. I think it’s fine to wear that to the gym, but I think her butt is too big. If my butt looked like that, I would tone down the lunges and would try to cover it up better.

In case you’re wondering, my butt looks like the second one from the left. I would never think to wear leggings as pants anywhere but the gym. It’s inappropriate and in bad taste.

I can’t tell from this picture if this lady has bad taste or not, but going to the bookstore like that, would be very much in bad taste for me.

Are you dim? You can’t see the ass on the second woman from the left. She’s almost fully facing the camera.

Maybe thats her point - her ass is practically invisible! Makes sense why she hates women with a nice full thick booty.

I don't think jeans or a dress would cover up Nikki's badonkadonk if they tried :lol: :lol: :lol:

No, I meant the second from the right. The one next to the one in the blue. I have a perfect behind. Sorry to disappoint. I’ve had random strangers pinch it out in the street, both men and women. Maybe that’s why I don’t walk around flashing it in everyone’s faces. I’m also the daughter of European immigrants, so that too could be why I wear proper clothing outside of my house and yoga pants to work out only.

It’s funny to see all the ridiculous excuses people come up with to justify their slovenliness. Just wear real pants, people! It’s not that hard!

You do know that wearing pants =/= flashing right

Wearing yoga pants is flashing it. Not only can I see your dang butt crack and underwear line. I can see your camel toe, too. It’s disgusting and very inappropriate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would you be upset if he wore sweatpants or joggers for your date?

Bc it's the same thing.

If not, then you guys just aren't compatible.

But if that would bother you, then you should hold yourself to the same standard

+1
If your bf showed up in sweats, would you be flattered that he was so comfortable around you? If yes, it's okay for you to wear the same. If not, and you think he should make more of an effort, then he has a point.

The male equivalent is more like khakis or cargo pants. But I wouldn’t mind any sort of athleisure as long as it fit and was clean and not too worn. I am very active on the weekends and wouldn’t wear my “dressy pants” to the bookstore, lol, because I would have walked or biked there, and may in fact be headed to yoga or the gym after.

No. That is the equivalent of jeans. The sweatpants poster was right on.

Yep

I am an American guy who lived in Europe and Asia and dated foreign women

Their complains about athleisure made sense because they themselves would never wear it outside of:

1. Gym (if they went, but that’s a different topic)
2. Traveling to and from the gym
3. Airport (sometimes)

Even the few that wouldn’t care/complain also after a while got me out of athleisure because it got a bit ridiculous if we were going out for a meal or at a cafe and she’s dressed put together and I’m in sweats

Well we’re not in Bulgaria or Vietnam. We’re in DC where it is totally acceptable for a young woman to wear yoga pants to the book store.

[b]

As such, it's perfectly acceptable for people to have an opinion opposite yours. Not everyone thinks it's "acceptable" to wear yoga pants to stores. Welcome to America too. You can have an opinion. Others can have one also.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would you be upset if he wore sweatpants or joggers for your date?

Bc it's the same thing.

If not, then you guys just aren't compatible.

But if that would bother you, then you should hold yourself to the same standard

+1
If your bf showed up in sweats, would you be flattered that he was so comfortable around you? If yes, it's okay for you to wear the same. If not, and you think he should make more of an effort, then he has a point.

The male equivalent is more like khakis or cargo pants. But I wouldn’t mind any sort of athleisure as long as it fit and was clean and not too worn. I am very active on the weekends and wouldn’t wear my “dressy pants” to the bookstore, lol, because I would have walked or biked there, and may in fact be headed to yoga or the gym after.

No. That is the equivalent of jeans. The sweatpants poster was right on.

Yep

I am an American guy who lived in Europe and Asia and dated foreign women

Their complains about athleisure made sense because they themselves would never wear it outside of:

1. Gym (if they went, but that’s a different topic)
2. Traveling to and from the gym
3. Airport (sometimes)

Even the few that wouldn’t care/complain also after a while got me out of athleisure because it got a bit ridiculous if we were going out for a meal or at a cafe and she’s dressed put together and I’m in sweats

Well we’re not in Bulgaria or Vietnam. We’re in DC where it is totally acceptable for a young woman to wear yoga pants to the book store.

[b]

As such, it's perfectly acceptable for people to have an opinion opposite yours. Not everyone thinks it's "acceptable" to wear yoga pants to stores. Welcome to America too. You can have an opinion. Others can have one also.

And if you’re a man and weighing in on your date’s choice to wear yoga pants in a context where it is appropriate in DC, you’re a controlling *ss.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Look like this in yoga pants and you can wear there anywhere. No man will complain - none ;)

A classy man would complain. Those outfits are wholly inappropriate for the bookstore. Also, the lady in the blue’s behind is much too big to keep uncovered like that.

No one's bum is uncovered, all these women are wearing pants.

Are you gay? Nothing wrong with it. Maybe you just dont like looking at women in tight clothing?

I’m not a man. She needs to wear real pants and/or a dress or a loose fitting shirt to disguise how incredibly huge her behind is. I would if that were my behind.

Huh? She clearly worked out hard for that ass. She's not ashamed and wanting to hide her body away, lest someone (probably on dcum) call her a fat ugly slob.

Why do you feel the need to denigrate other women?

I’m not denigrating her as a person. I think it’s fine to wear that to the gym, but I think her butt is too big. If my butt looked like that, I would tone down the lunges and would try to cover it up better.

In case you’re wondering, my butt looks like the second one from the left. I would never think to wear leggings as pants anywhere but the gym. It’s inappropriate and in bad taste.

I can’t tell from this picture if this lady has bad taste or not, but going to the bookstore like that, would be very much in bad taste for me.

Are you dim? You can’t see the ass on the second woman from the left. She’s almost fully facing the camera.

Maybe thats her point - her ass is practically invisible! Makes sense why she hates women with a nice full thick booty.

I don't think jeans or a dress would cover up Nikki's badonkadonk if they tried :lol: :lol: :lol:

No, I meant the second from the right. The one next to the one in the blue. I have a perfect behind. Sorry to disappoint. I’ve had random strangers pinch it out in the street, both men and women. Maybe that’s why I don’t walk around flashing it in everyone’s faces. I’m also the daughter of European immigrants, so that too could be why I wear proper clothing outside of my house and yoga pants to work out only.

It’s funny to see all the ridiculous excuses people come up with to justify their slovenliness. Just wear real pants, people! It’s not that hard!

You do know that wearing pants =/= flashing right

Wearing yoga pants is flashing it. Not only can I see your dang butt crack and underwear line. I can see your camel toe, too. It’s disgusting and very inappropriate.

Are you thinking of thin, legging types? My pants you can definitely not see a butt crack or underwear line. Definitely not camel toe!

Sounds like some interesting pants you see, but thats not most yoga pants.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would you be upset if he wore sweatpants or joggers for your date?

Bc it's the same thing.

If not, then you guys just aren't compatible.

But if that would bother you, then you should hold yourself to the same standard

+1
If your bf showed up in sweats, would you be flattered that he was so comfortable around you? If yes, it's okay for you to wear the same. If not, and you think he should make more of an effort, then he has a point.

The male equivalent is more like khakis or cargo pants. But I wouldn’t mind any sort of athleisure as long as it fit and was clean and not too worn. I am very active on the weekends and wouldn’t wear my “dressy pants” to the bookstore, lol, because I would have walked or biked there, and may in fact be headed to yoga or the gym after.

No. That is the equivalent of jeans. The sweatpants poster was right on.

Yep

I am an American guy who lived in Europe and Asia and dated foreign women

Their complains about athleisure made sense because they themselves would never wear it outside of:

1. Gym (if they went, but that’s a different topic)
2. Traveling to and from the gym
3. Airport (sometimes)

Even the few that wouldn’t care/complain also after a while got me out of athleisure because it got a bit ridiculous if we were going out for a meal or at a cafe and she’s dressed put together and I’m in sweats

Well we’re not in Bulgaria or Vietnam. We’re in DC where it is totally acceptable for a young woman to wear yoga pants to the book store.

[b]

As such, it's perfectly acceptable for people to have an opinion opposite yours. Not everyone thinks it's "acceptable" to wear yoga pants to stores. Welcome to America too. You can have an opinion. Others can have one also.

Do you really think starbucks or barnes should have a dress code? Thats basically what youre saying, that you cannot wear athleisure to dunkin donuts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would you be upset if he wore sweatpants or joggers for your date?

Bc it's the same thing.

If not, then you guys just aren't compatible.

But if that would bother you, then you should hold yourself to the same standard

+1
If your bf showed up in sweats, would you be flattered that he was so comfortable around you? If yes, it's okay for you to wear the same. If not, and you think he should make more of an effort, then he has a point.

The male equivalent is more like khakis or cargo pants. But I wouldn’t mind any sort of athleisure as long as it fit and was clean and not too worn. I am very active on the weekends and wouldn’t wear my “dressy pants” to the bookstore, lol, because I would have walked or biked there, and may in fact be headed to yoga or the gym after.

No. That is the equivalent of jeans. The sweatpants poster was right on.

But tight sweatpants which feature buns and bulge.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would you be upset if he wore sweatpants or joggers for your date?

Bc it's the same thing.

If not, then you guys just aren't compatible.

But if that would bother you, then you should hold yourself to the same standard

+1
If your bf showed up in sweats, would you be flattered that he was so comfortable around you? If yes, it's okay for you to wear the same. If not, and you think he should make more of an effort, then he has a point.

The male equivalent is more like khakis or cargo pants. But I wouldn’t mind any sort of athleisure as long as it fit and was clean and not too worn. I am very active on the weekends and wouldn’t wear my “dressy pants” to the bookstore, lol, because I would have walked or biked there, and may in fact be headed to yoga or the gym after.

No. That is the equivalent of jeans. The sweatpants poster was right on.

Yep

I am an American guy who lived in Europe and Asia and dated foreign women

Their complains about athleisure made sense because they themselves would never wear it outside of:

1. Gym (if they went, but that’s a different topic)
2. Traveling to and from the gym
3. Airport (sometimes)

Even the few that wouldn’t care/complain also after a while got me out of athleisure because it got a bit ridiculous if we were going out for a meal or at a cafe and she’s dressed put together and I’m in sweats

Well we’re not in Bulgaria or Vietnam. We’re in DC where it is totally acceptable for a young woman to wear yoga pants to the book store.

[b]

As such, it's perfectly acceptable for people to have an opinion opposite yours. Not everyone thinks it's "acceptable" to wear yoga pants to stores. Welcome to America too. You can have an opinion. Others can have one also.

And if you’re a man and weighing in on your date’s choice to wear yoga pants in a context where it is appropriate in DC, you’re a controlling *ss.

Like no woman has ever in the history of time told her husband/boyfriend what to wear! I dress my husband all of the time, so I guess I must be an evil, controlling abuser, too. Y’all are nuts!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Look like this in yoga pants and you can wear there anywhere. No man will complain - none

A classy man would complain. Those outfits are wholly inappropriate for the bookstore. Also, the lady in the blue’s behind is much too big to keep uncovered like that.

No one's bum is uncovered, all these women are wearing pants.

Are you gay? Nothing wrong with it. Maybe you just dont like looking at women in tight clothing?

I’m not a man. She needs to wear real pants and/or a dress or a loose fitting shirt to disguise how incredibly huge her behind is. I would if that were my behind.

Huh? She clearly worked out hard for that ass. She's not ashamed and wanting to hide her body away, lest someone (probably on dcum) call her a fat ugly slob.

Why do you feel the need to denigrate other women?

I’m not denigrating her as a person. I think it’s fine to wear that to the gym, but I think her butt is too big. If my butt looked like that, I would tone down the lunges and would try to cover it up better.

In case you’re wondering, my butt looks like the second one from the left. I would never think to wear leggings as pants anywhere but the gym. It’s inappropriate and in bad taste.

I can’t tell from this picture if this lady has bad taste or not, but going to the bookstore like that, would be very much in bad taste for me.

Are you dim? You can’t see the ass on the second woman from the left. She’s almost fully facing the camera.

Maybe thats her point - her ass is practically invisible! Makes sense why she hates women with a nice full thick booty.

I don't think jeans or a dress would cover up Nikki's badonkadonk if they tried

Her butt looks Kardashianish aka bbl.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Look like this in yoga pants and you can wear there anywhere. No man will complain - none

A classy man would complain. Those outfits are wholly inappropriate for the bookstore. Also, the lady in the blue’s behind is much too big to keep uncovered like that.

No one's bum is uncovered, all these women are wearing pants.

Are you gay? Nothing wrong with it. Maybe you just dont like looking at women in tight clothing?

I’m not a man. She needs to wear real pants and/or a dress or a loose fitting shirt to disguise how incredibly huge her behind is. I would if that were my behind.

Huh? She clearly worked out hard for that ass. She's not ashamed and wanting to hide her body away, lest someone (probably on dcum) call her a fat ugly slob.

Why do you feel the need to denigrate other women?

I’m not denigrating her as a person. I think it’s fine to wear that to the gym, but I think her butt is too big. If my butt looked like that, I would tone down the lunges and would try to cover it up better.

In case you’re wondering, my butt looks like the second one from the left. I would never think to wear leggings as pants anywhere but the gym. It’s inappropriate and in bad taste.

I can’t tell from this picture if this lady has bad taste or not, but going to the bookstore like that, would be very much in bad taste for me.

Are you dim? You can’t see the ass on the second woman from the left. She’s almost fully facing the camera.

Maybe thats her point - her ass is practically invisible! Makes sense why she hates women with a nice full thick booty.

I don't think jeans or a dress would cover up Nikki's badonkadonk if they tried

Her butt looks Kardashianish aka bbl.

No way, look at her thighs. Kardasians are like lollipops, stick legs with a giant bulge on top. This girl has muscular thighs and butt.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Look like this in yoga pants and you can wear there anywhere. No man will complain - none ;)

A classy man would complain. Those outfits are wholly inappropriate for the bookstore. Also, the lady in the blue’s behind is much too big to keep uncovered like that.

No one's bum is uncovered, all these women are wearing pants.

Are you gay? Nothing wrong with it. Maybe you just dont like looking at women in tight clothing?

I’m not a man. She needs to wear real pants and/or a dress or a loose fitting shirt to disguise how incredibly huge her behind is. I would if that were my behind.

Huh? She clearly worked out hard for that ass. She's not ashamed and wanting to hide her body away, lest someone (probably on dcum) call her a fat ugly slob.

Why do you feel the need to denigrate other women?

I’m not denigrating her as a person. I think it’s fine to wear that to the gym, but I think her butt is too big. If my butt looked like that, I would tone down the lunges and would try to cover it up better.

In case you’re wondering, my butt looks like the second one from the left. I would never think to wear leggings as pants anywhere but the gym. It’s inappropriate and in bad taste.

I can’t tell from this picture if this lady has bad taste or not, but going to the bookstore like that, would be very much in bad taste for me.

Are you dim? You can’t see the ass on the second woman from the left. She’s almost fully facing the camera.

Maybe thats her point - her ass is practically invisible! Makes sense why she hates women with a nice full thick booty.

I don't think jeans or a dress would cover up Nikki's badonkadonk if they tried :lol: :lol: :lol:

No, I meant the second from the right. The one next to the one in the blue. I have a perfect behind. Sorry to disappoint. I’ve had random strangers pinch it out in the street, both men and women. Maybe that’s why I don’t walk around flashing it in everyone’s faces. I’m also the daughter of European immigrants, so that too could be why I wear proper clothing outside of my house and yoga pants to work out only.

It’s funny to see all the ridiculous excuses people come up with to justify their slovenliness. Just wear real pants, people! It’s not that hard!

You do not have random strangers pinch your butt in public- I call BS. That is assault and no one would put up with it much less brag about it. I’m sure your butt is very nice, but let’s not tell lies.

[Anonymous]

If you have a nice body, most men love yoga pants. Which may be the problem here. I suspect he doesn't want other men checking out your butt in those yoga pants. Or he is just old school conservative and thinks you should dress more conservatively.

Frankly, I'd probably throw out the whole man.

[Anonymous]

What kind of man doesn't love his partner in yoga pants?!
I'd agree that it's low effort if you were going out for a nice dinner but you met at a bookstore for coffee? Yoga pants are fine.

[Anonymous]

No. Ew.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Look like this in yoga pants and you can wear there anywhere. No man will complain - none ;)

A classy man would complain. Those outfits are wholly inappropriate for the bookstore. Also, the lady in the blue’s behind is much too big to keep uncovered like that.

No one's bum is uncovered, all these women are wearing pants.

Are you gay? Nothing wrong with it. Maybe you just dont like looking at women in tight clothing?

I’m not a man. She needs to wear real pants and/or a dress or a loose fitting shirt to disguise how incredibly huge her behind is. I would if that were my behind.

Huh? She clearly worked out hard for that ass. She's not ashamed and wanting to hide her body away, lest someone (probably on dcum) call her a fat ugly slob.

Why do you feel the need to denigrate other women?

I’m not denigrating her as a person. I think it’s fine to wear that to the gym, but I think her butt is too big. If my butt looked like that, I would tone down the lunges and would try to cover it up better.

In case you’re wondering, my butt looks like the second one from the left. I would never think to wear leggings as pants anywhere but the gym. It’s inappropriate and in bad taste.

I can’t tell from this picture if this lady has bad taste or not, but going to the bookstore like that, would be very much in bad taste for me.

Are you dim? You can’t see the ass on the second woman from the left. She’s almost fully facing the camera.

Maybe thats her point - her ass is practically invisible! Makes sense why she hates women with a nice full thick booty.

I don't think jeans or a dress would cover up Nikki's badonkadonk if they tried :lol: :lol: :lol:

No, I meant the second from the right. The one next to the one in the blue. I have a perfect behind. Sorry to disappoint. I’ve had random strangers pinch it out in the street, both men and women. Maybe that’s why I don’t walk around flashing it in everyone’s faces. I’m also the daughter of European immigrants, so that too could be why I wear proper clothing outside of my house and yoga pants to work out only.

It’s funny to see all the ridiculous excuses people come up with to justify their slovenliness. Just wear real pants, people! It’s not that hard!

You do not have random strangers pinch your butt in public- I call BS. That is assault and no one would put up with it much less brag about it. I’m sure your butt is very nice, but let’s not tell lies.

I did. Sadly, this happened to me a lot. The first time when I was only 15. I did go to the police then, but nothing happened. It happens to women a lot, especially on the subway. Just because something never happened to you, doesn’t mean it’s bs, but it does probably mean you’re ugly.