Anonymous wrote:
I've been advocating for years to reopen, or build, schools for aggressive and violent students.
Violence has no place in schools. There are only a very small subset of students who are repeatedly violent, mostly due to untreated and unmedicated brain differences, sometimes gang-related issues, and also due to violent family situations. NONE of these belong in mainstream schools. They need their own schools, where they can be closely supervised and services and accommodations followed more closely, since specialized teachers will have fewer kids in these classrooms, all co-taught, with specially trained security in the building at all times, or sometimes inside classrooms, to protect teachers and students.
Do not lump violent students with the general special needs population, or the gifted population. I have one child with special needs and one child who is gifted. Neither have ever been violent, and more importantly, none of their similar-minded friends have ever been violent.
The only violent child I have known personally, in my 15 years in MCPS (K to 12th grade, two kids, two school clusters) had a very disturbing and unusual profile, and to my untrained eye, seemed like a budding sociopath. He enjoyed inflicting pain. HE DID NOT BELONG IN A NORMAL SCHOOL. Aggression is something apart from the usual ADHD/ASD/anxiety/depression profiles that schools are equipped to cater to. It's something beyond unruly behavior, talking back to teachers, and various lunchtime and corridor physicalities. It needs to be contained and controlled in special schools otherwise serious injuries or deaths can occur.
For kids whose brain differences lead them to be on the cusp, the mere suggestion that a school can decide to transfer them, after documented incidents of violence, would probably be enough in many case, to have parents wake up and seek discipline and treatment for their kids. Because today, without intimidation, some parents just can't get a handle on their children's behaviors at school - there are repercussions, so there is less motivation. The existence of such schools will act both as a solution and as a deterrent. We will be able to assess which families are able to self-manage, and which won't be able to (for many different reasons).
Taxpayers should bear the burden, and be happy to do so, in order to provide a better learning experience for students as well as a better retention rate for high-caliber personnel.
When you convince tax payers to pay for these buildings, personnel, and services is when it will happen. As it stands now, taxpayers won’t pay for nor fight for, the current needed school buildings, repairs, maintenance, and ADA compliance.
|