I'm sure they do, given the socio-economic status of a good proportion of college lacrosse players (although not all are prep school products, of course -- Long Island and the Syracuse area have long been a hotbed of public school/less affluent lacrosse types). It still strikes me, as an observer of lacrosse in this area, that there is a party culture that, unfortunately, can feed into substance abuse problems at the college level for some of these players. Have seen it from our "local" school -- some sad stories of college careers gone awry where the lacrosse appeared to be part of the issue, not a path away from alcohol and drugs. |
Well put! |
It's really about the parents. These affluent lax kids are drinking, most likely, from 13-14 on. WHere are the parents? Parties need to be monitored, alcohol in the house needs to be watched, etc. Somebody's introducing these kids to binge drinking. And it's done under the nose of affluent, educated parents. The issue is more about affluent preppy society and unaccountable kids than about the specific sport. I'd be surprised if public school laxers were dramatically more likely to binge drink than other athletes, though of course I could be wrong. |
You are wrong. You probably just have a younger child. Not sure about 13 or 14, but must high school kids (14, 15) start drinking freshman year. Parents can do all the snooping, party crashing they want but high school kids are going to drink. That's true at every single school discussed on this forum. And there is nothing you can do it about as a parent but be hyper vigilant and keep an open dialogue. |
High school kids are going to drink only because they are not monitored well enough. I have no doubt huguely started drinking in junior high or 9th grade. Kids who drink this early have much higher likelihood of becoming addicted. |
Reality takes the bite out of what was meant to be dripping sarcasm. |
That was the general sentiment in high school. The $ and connections for jobs holds true for what to do when actually in college. |
Funny. |
It wasn't meant to be sarcasm at all. It was meant to be true. |
Hate to bust your bubble but laxers who don't have the size and strength to make the football team are typically one sport athletes |
I like lacrosse -- it's a great game and it's wonderful that it is growing as a sport (for both boys and girls) nationwide. But let's just say that the only sports in which the best athletes are 5'10" white guys are sports in which the only athletes are the 5'10" white guys. |
5'10 white guys with speed and strength and coordination. Unlike your 7 foot center in basketball who does nothing but be tall and dunk a ball, or the 300 lb lineman in football who blocks people with his massive size. Lax requires athleticism at all positions. PS it's not the only sport where you don't have to be tall or black to be a star. Tennis, golf, soccer, baseball... |
Imagine if the 6' 5" plus basketball player was given the opportunity to play lacrosse or if some lax coaches encouraged the football players... But then the usual laxer crowd might not get gametime or help with college admissions - the others might not be the right sort. I've seen the rosters in high school. |
because you are in high school... |
I agree the 5'10" white guys who play at UVA and UNC and Syracuse are wonderful athletes. However, market analysis says that if they could truly excel at a sport with a major economic payoff, they would be doing that. I would venture to say almost any 3d string running back in the major football conferences would be a lacrosse superstar within about a year of picking up the game. |