Mary Cheh wants to make it legal for bicyclists for blow stop signs and stop lights

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"You’re honestly a weird person to believe that pointing out that bicyclists should obey the law and not put pedestrians at risk is “bad faith”."

Question: if you believe that cyclists should follow the law, why not change the law to make it easier for them to follow it?

Yeah the way to get rid of crime is to decriminalize everything criminals like to do.

So once a law is enacted, it is infallible and removing that law simply encourages criminal behavior no matter if new information or ideas show the law was bad in the first place?

Do you also resent the black "criminals" sitting at the front of the bus and drinking from your water fountain?

You are doing great work dispelling the notion that cyclists are entitled, white, a-holes in spandex.

Keep up the good work!

Once again, you have no substantive responses, only more irrational half-baked retorts to some imaginary poster in your head that have nothing to do with what people are actually posting. Pitiful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"You’re honestly a weird person to believe that pointing out that bicyclists should obey the law and not put pedestrians at risk is “bad faith”."

Question: if you believe that cyclists should follow the law, why not change the law to make it easier for them to follow it?

Yeah the way to get rid of crime is to decriminalize everything criminals like to do.

So once a law is enacted, it is infallible and removing that law simply encourages criminal behavior no matter if new information or ideas show the law was bad in the first place?

Do you also resent the black "criminals" sitting at the front of the bus and drinking from your water fountain?

You are doing great work dispelling the notion that cyclists are entitled, white, a-holes in spandex.

Keep up the good work!

So we should oppress them with unreasonable laws to punish them for their attitude? Got it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Stop driving if you can't do it safely.

I promise not to drive on bike paths or sidewalks in an unsafe manner. If I do try to drive on the sidewalk or bike path I will not complain about bikes and pedestrians getting in my way.

[Anonymous]

Well given you are not allowed to drive on a sidewalk or bike path, your promise seems a little strawmanny.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Stop driving if you can't do it safely.

I promise not to drive on bike paths or sidewalks in an unsafe manner. If I do try to drive on the sidewalk or bike path I will not complain about bikes and pedestrians getting in my way.

Conspicuously absent from your list of places where you pledge to drive safely is roads.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"You’re honestly a weird person to believe that pointing out that bicyclists should obey the law and not put pedestrians at risk is “bad faith”."

Question: if you believe that cyclists should follow the law, why not change the law to make it easier for them to follow it?

Yeah the way to get rid of crime is to decriminalize everything criminals like to do.

So once a law is enacted, it is infallible and removing that law simply encourages criminal behavior no matter if new information or ideas show the law was bad in the first place?

Do you also resent the black "criminals" sitting at the front of the bus and drinking from your water fountain?

You are doing great work dispelling the notion that cyclists are entitled, white, a-holes in spandex.

Keep up the good work!

So we should oppress them with unreasonable laws to punish them for their attitude? Got it.

How is stopping at a stop sign oppress?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Stop driving if you can't do it safely.

I promise not to drive on bike paths or sidewalks in an unsafe manner. If I do try to drive on the sidewalk or bike path I will not complain about bikes and pedestrians getting in my way.

Conspicuously absent from your list of places where you pledge to drive safely is roads.

No that would make me a biker. Oh, my bad, Cyclist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"You’re honestly a weird person to believe that pointing out that bicyclists should obey the law and not put pedestrians at risk is “bad faith”."

Question: if you believe that cyclists should follow the law, why not change the law to make it easier for them to follow it?

Yeah the way to get rid of crime is to decriminalize everything criminals like to do.

So once a law is enacted, it is infallible and removing that law simply encourages criminal behavior no matter if new information or ideas show the law was bad in the first place?

Do you also resent the black "criminals" sitting at the front of the bus and drinking from your water fountain?

You are doing great work dispelling the notion that cyclists are entitled, white, a-holes in spandex.

Keep up the good work!

So we should oppress them with unreasonable laws to punish them for their attitude? Got it.

Ironic that the person pushing back on cyclists is himself an entitled, white a-hole clutching the steering wheel of a small-dick car.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"You’re honestly a weird person to believe that pointing out that bicyclists should obey the law and not put pedestrians at risk is “bad faith”."

Question: if you believe that cyclists should follow the law, why not change the law to make it easier for them to follow it?

Yeah the way to get rid of crime is to decriminalize everything criminals like to do.

So once a law is enacted, it is infallible and removing that law simply encourages criminal behavior no matter if new information or ideas show the law was bad in the first place?

Do you also resent the black "criminals" sitting at the front of the bus and drinking from your water fountain?

You are doing great work dispelling the notion that cyclists are entitled, white, a-holes in spandex.

Keep up the good work!

Once again, you have no substantive responses, only more irrational half-baked retorts to some imaginary poster in your head that have nothing to do with what people are actually posting. Pitiful.

^^^ This guy thinks requiring cyclists to obey traffic laws is equivalent to Jim Crow. Incredible. Just cannot make this up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"You’re honestly a weird person to believe that pointing out that bicyclists should obey the law and not put pedestrians at risk is “bad faith”."

Question: if you believe that cyclists should follow the law, why not change the law to make it easier for them to follow it?

Yeah the way to get rid of crime is to decriminalize everything criminals like to do.

So once a law is enacted, it is infallible and removing that law simply encourages criminal behavior no matter if new information or ideas show the law was bad in the first place?

Do you also resent the black "criminals" sitting at the front of the bus and drinking from your water fountain?

You are doing great work dispelling the notion that cyclists are entitled, white, a-holes in spandex.

Keep up the good work!

Once again, you have no substantive responses, only more irrational half-baked retorts to some imaginary poster in your head that have nothing to do with what people are actually posting. Pitiful.

^^^ This guy thinks requiring cyclists to obey traffic laws is equivalent to Jim Crow. Incredible. Just cannot make this up.

There you go again, responding to a fictional post! What else are the voices in your head saying?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"You’re honestly a weird person to believe that pointing out that bicyclists should obey the law and not put pedestrians at risk is “bad faith”."

Question: if you believe that cyclists should follow the law, why not change the law to make it easier for them to follow it?

Yeah the way to get rid of crime is to decriminalize everything criminals like to do.

So once a law is enacted, it is infallible and removing that law simply encourages criminal behavior no matter if new information or ideas show the law was bad in the first place?

Do you also resent the black "criminals" sitting at the front of the bus and drinking from your water fountain?

You are doing great work dispelling the notion that cyclists are entitled, white, a-holes in spandex.

Keep up the good work!

Once again, you have no substantive responses, only more irrational half-baked retorts to some imaginary poster in your head that have nothing to do with what people are actually posting. Pitiful.

^^^ This guy thinks requiring cyclists to obey traffic laws is equivalent to Jim Crow. Incredible. Just cannot make this up.

There you go again, responding to a fictional post! What else are the voices in your head saying?

They're saying, "go ahead and skip your meds today, you can double up tomorrow."

[Anonymous]

Well, this thread has officially gotten stupid. It'll be interesting to see how these changes actual play out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Well, this thread has officially gotten stupid. It'll be interesting to see how these changes actual play out.

This thread officially got stupid when the first poster said the new law allows cyclists to "blow stop signs and stop lights" when the law says nothing of the kind.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well, this thread has officially gotten stupid. It'll be interesting to see how these changes actual play out.

This thread officially got stupid when the first poster said the new law allows cyclists to "blow stop signs and stop lights" when the law says nothing of the kind.

Yeah, I mean what's the point when they've always done that anyway?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"You’re honestly a weird person to believe that pointing out that bicyclists should obey the law and not put pedestrians at risk is “bad faith”."

Question: if you believe that cyclists should follow the law, why not change the law to make it easier for them to follow it?

Yeah the way to get rid of crime is to decriminalize everything criminals like to do.

So once a law is enacted, it is infallible and removing that law simply encourages criminal behavior no matter if new information or ideas show the law was bad in the first place?

Do you also resent the black "criminals" sitting at the front of the bus and drinking from your water fountain?

You are doing great work dispelling the notion that cyclists are entitled, white, a-holes in spandex.

Keep up the good work!

Once again, you have no substantive responses, only more irrational half-baked retorts to some imaginary poster in your head that have nothing to do with what people are actually posting. Pitiful.

^^^ This guy thinks requiring cyclists to obey traffic laws is equivalent to Jim Crow. Incredible. Just cannot make this up.

"We believed one thing (black people are inferior) which led us to make this law. We now know that is wrong, therefore the law is wrong and should be repealed."

"We believed one thing (cyclists doing an Idaho stop is less safe than a full stop) which led us to make this law. We now know that is wrong, therefore the law is wrong and should be repealed."

What exactly here isn't equivalent?