EVERY Six Months Jolie reiterates accusations against Pitt

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Well that's not true. If you read the article, plus all the others previously posted, she had no problem with visitation for Brad. A private arbitrator who did not disclose his connections with Brad and his conflict of interest granted joint custody ruling in favor of Brad. An appellate court reversed, so obviously Brad and his team were not playing fair. Reminds me of the bankruptcy judge down in Texas taking cases and not disclosing his personal connections with the female attorney who always prevailed in his court.

The private judge officiated their wedding. Angelina never had a problem with him until she realized he was going to rule against her and in favor of Brad.

Not true. She asked for him to be removed before the trial ever started. He was notifying her of the cases he had taken with Brad but
suddenly stopped. He was wrong. And the timing of Brad asking for a new modification even made the appellate judges uncomfortable

Sure. Basically she liked the private judge just fine until the private judge gave Brad a normal custody agreement instead of the vindictive agreement she wanted. Which is what PP said.

She asked for the judge to be removed BEFORE the trial ever happened and before the judge gave any verdict so no that's completely wrong.

Because it wasn't going her way...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Well that's not true. If you read the article, plus all the others previously posted, she had no problem with visitation for Brad. A private arbitrator who did not disclose his connections with Brad and his conflict of interest granted joint custody ruling in favor of Brad. An appellate court reversed, so obviously Brad and his team were not playing fair. Reminds me of the bankruptcy judge down in Texas taking cases and not disclosing his personal connections with the female attorney who always prevailed in his court.

The private judge officiated their wedding. Angelina never had a problem with him until she realized he was going to rule against her and in favor of Brad.

Not true. She asked for him to be removed before the trial ever started. He was notifying her of the cases he had taken with Brad but
suddenly stopped. He was wrong. And the timing of Brad asking for a new modification even made the appellate judges uncomfortable

Sure. Basically she liked the private judge just fine until the private judge gave Brad a normal custody agreement instead of the vindictive agreement she wanted. Which is what PP said.

She asked for the judge to be removed BEFORE the trial ever happened and before the judge gave any verdict so no that's completely wrong.

Because it wasn't going her way...

the trial had never started.........and in the grand scheme of things if a majority of therapist thought joint custody would be favorable for all the kids then the judge wouldn't have matter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Well that's not true. If you read the article, plus all the others previously posted, she had no problem with visitation for Brad. A private arbitrator who did not disclose his connections with Brad and his conflict of interest granted joint custody ruling in favor of Brad. An appellate court reversed, so obviously Brad and his team were not playing fair. Reminds me of the bankruptcy judge down in Texas taking cases and not disclosing his personal connections with the female attorney who always prevailed in his court.

The private judge officiated their wedding. Angelina never had a problem with him until she realized he was going to rule against her and in favor of Brad.

Not true. She asked for him to be removed before the trial ever started. He was notifying her of the cases he had taken with Brad but
suddenly stopped. He was wrong. And the timing of Brad asking for a new modification even made the appellate judges uncomfortable

Sure. Basically she liked the private judge just fine until the private judge gave Brad a normal custody agreement instead of the vindictive agreement she wanted. Which is what PP said.

She asked for the judge to be removed BEFORE the trial ever happened and before the judge gave any verdict so no that's completely wrong.

Because it wasn't going her way...

the trial had never started.........and in the grand scheme of things if a majority of therapist thought joint custody would be favorable for all the kids then the judge wouldn't have matter.

In the grand scheme of things, if the custodial parent does not allow the other parent visitation or custody, then it doesn't happen. And she didn't. And it didn't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Well that's not true. If you read the article, plus all the others previously posted, she had no problem with visitation for Brad. A private arbitrator who did not disclose his connections with Brad and his conflict of interest granted joint custody ruling in favor of Brad. An appellate court reversed, so obviously Brad and his team were not playing fair. Reminds me of the bankruptcy judge down in Texas taking cases and not disclosing his personal connections with the female attorney who always prevailed in his court.

Sure. She just conditioned the kids to dislike and fear him, and obstructed their visits and contact at every turn.

She did not have to condition the kids, he did it to himself when he chose not to participate in visitation. He wanted it his way or nothing at all. You don't have to tell a child that their mother or father is a dirtbag or POS. It reveals itself by that parent's actions or lack thereof.

... She didn't allow visitation.

Wrong. When she first filed, yes she filed first, she proposed visitation, but she would retain sole physical custody. He said no.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Well that's not true. If you read the article, plus all the others previously posted, she had no problem with visitation for Brad. A private arbitrator who did not disclose his connections with Brad and his conflict of interest granted joint custody ruling in favor of Brad. An appellate court reversed, so obviously Brad and his team were not playing fair. Reminds me of the bankruptcy judge down in Texas taking cases and not disclosing his personal connections with the female attorney who always prevailed in his court.

The private judge officiated their wedding. Angelina never had a problem with him until she realized he was going to rule against her and in favor of Brad.

The appeals court says different.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Well that's not true. If you read the article, plus all the others previously posted, she had no problem with visitation for Brad. A private arbitrator who did not disclose his connections with Brad and his conflict of interest granted joint custody ruling in favor of Brad. An appellate court reversed, so obviously Brad and his team were not playing fair. Reminds me of the bankruptcy judge down in Texas taking cases and not disclosing his personal connections with the female attorney who always prevailed in his court.

The private judge officiated their wedding. Angelina never had a problem with him until she realized he was going to rule against her and in favor of Brad.

Not true. She asked for him to be removed before the trial ever started. He was notifying her of the cases he had taken with Brad but
suddenly stopped. He was wrong. And the timing of Brad asking for a new modification even made the appellate judges uncomfortable

Sure. Basically she liked the private judge just fine until the private judge gave Brad a normal custody agreement instead of the vindictive agreement she wanted. Which is what PP said.

Wow, you are sad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Well that's not true. If you read the article, plus all the others previously posted, she had no problem with visitation for Brad. A private arbitrator who did not disclose his connections with Brad and his conflict of interest granted joint custody ruling in favor of Brad. An appellate court reversed, so obviously Brad and his team were not playing fair. Reminds me of the bankruptcy judge down in Texas taking cases and not disclosing his personal connections with the female attorney who always prevailed in his court.

The private judge officiated their wedding. Angelina never had a problem with him until she realized he was going to rule against her and in favor of Brad.

Not true. She asked for him to be removed before the trial ever started. He was notifying her of the cases he had taken with Brad but
suddenly stopped. He was wrong. And the timing of Brad asking for a new modification even made the appellate judges uncomfortable

She lashed out at the judge, claiming he denied her a fair trial because he gave a dad partial custody of his kids. That’s what she’s been fighting for - to keep a father from his children. She’s a parental alienator of the highest order, just like her mother.

She also supposedly filed a complaint against a therapist who testified in the trial who believed Brad should have 50/50 custody. She is vengeful and demands her way 100% of the time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She thought from the beginning he would roll over and give her anything she wanted rather than be publicly embarrassed. When that didn’t happen, sure enough she punished him whenever she lost a legal motion. Drip, drip, drip of embarrassing info plus the chateau shares sale. He’s got nothing left to lose at this point, should go scorched earth. And highly likely he can prove her sale was about the custody ruling not the NDA.

If she has receipts on him physically abusing her and the kids, he absolutely has more to lose. That said, he must have some nutso info on her too, because she is insane.

It's been 8 years and already investigated. She has no receipts. Obviously.

She had something because he started off with supervised visitation.

Yeah, some of the outlets said the kids had journals collected too by the fbi. All of that is going to come out. It was always going to end this way.

The legal case is about the winery. It’s not about her abuse allegations. She is trying to distract and misdirect from her wrongful sale of the chateau.

She’s already released so much information about her allegations and she hasn’t managed to destroy his reputation or career. She can keep trying, but I don’t think most of the public cares about the details of their messy divorce. She’s like a broken record. At some point, you tune out.

Most of the public has decided she's a nut bag and he's the normal one. She's not changing any hearts or minds on this. It's been 8 years and no smoking gun or bombshells. Yawn.

You remember how she made some statement about how people (Brad) have taken advantage of her silence? No one cares about her endless claims of abuse. This happened almost a decade ago but she can’t move on with her life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Well that's not true. If you read the article, plus all the others previously posted, she had no problem with visitation for Brad. A private arbitrator who did not disclose his connections with Brad and his conflict of interest granted joint custody ruling in favor of Brad. An appellate court reversed, so obviously Brad and his team were not playing fair. Reminds me of the bankruptcy judge down in Texas taking cases and not disclosing his personal connections with the female attorney who always prevailed in his court.

Sure. She just conditioned the kids to dislike and fear him, and obstructed their visits and contact at every turn.

She did not have to condition the kids, he did it to himself when he chose not to participate in visitation. He wanted it his way or nothing at all. You don't have to tell a child that their mother or father is a dirtbag or POS. It reveals itself by that parent's actions or lack thereof.

... She didn't allow visitation.

Wrong. When she first filed, yes she filed first, she proposed visitation, but she would retain sole physical custody. He said no.

Yes, because how dare a father want to be in his children’s lives? There are many kids whose fathers abandon them, but these children had a father who wanted to be involved in their lives and a so-called mother prevented it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She thought from the beginning he would roll over and give her anything she wanted rather than be publicly embarrassed. When that didn’t happen, sure enough she punished him whenever she lost a legal motion. Drip, drip, drip of embarrassing info plus the chateau shares sale. He’s got nothing left to lose at this point, should go scorched earth. And highly likely he can prove her sale was about the custody ruling not the NDA.

If she has receipts on him physically abusing her and the kids, he absolutely has more to lose. That said, he must have some nutso info on her too, because she is insane.

It's been 8 years and already investigated. She has no receipts. Obviously.

She had something because he started off with supervised visitation.

Yeah, some of the outlets said the kids had journals collected too by the fbi. All of that is going to come out. It was always going to end this way.

The legal case is about the winery. It’s not about her abuse allegations. She is trying to distract and misdirect from her wrongful sale of the chateau.

She’s already released so much information about her allegations and she hasn’t managed to destroy his reputation or career. She can keep trying, but I don’t think most of the public cares about the details of their messy divorce. She’s like a broken record. At some point, you tune out.

Most of the public has decided she's a nut bag and he's the normal one. She's not changing any hearts or minds on this. It's been 8 years and no smoking gun or bombshells. Yawn.

You remember how she made some statement about how people (Brad) have taken advantage of her silence? No one cares about her endless claims of abuse. This happened almost a decade ago but she can’t move on with her life.

Her silence. Oh how she has suffered.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Well that's not true. If you read the article, plus all the others previously posted, she had no problem with visitation for Brad. A private arbitrator who did not disclose his connections with Brad and his conflict of interest granted joint custody ruling in favor of Brad. An appellate court reversed, so obviously Brad and his team were not playing fair. Reminds me of the bankruptcy judge down in Texas taking cases and not disclosing his personal connections with the female attorney who always prevailed in his court.

The private judge officiated their wedding. Angelina never had a problem with him until she realized he was going to rule against her and in favor of Brad.

Not true. She asked for him to be removed before the trial ever started. He was notifying her of the cases he had taken with Brad but
suddenly stopped. He was wrong. And the timing of Brad asking for a new modification even made the appellate judges uncomfortable

She lashed out at the judge, claiming he denied her a fair trial because he gave a dad partial custody of his kids. That’s what she’s been fighting for - to keep a father from his children. She’s a parental alienator of the highest order, just like her mother.

She also supposedly filed a complaint against a therapist who testified in the trial who believed Brad should have 50/50 custody. She is vengeful and demands her way 100% of the time.

he did deny her a fair trial. The appellate judges agreed he should have rescued himself. Idk why you keep acting like she only said something after he made his verdict.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Well that's not true. If you read the article, plus all the others previously posted, she had no problem with visitation for Brad. A private arbitrator who did not disclose his connections with Brad and his conflict of interest granted joint custody ruling in favor of Brad. An appellate court reversed, so obviously Brad and his team were not playing fair. Reminds me of the bankruptcy judge down in Texas taking cases and not disclosing his personal connections with the female attorney who always prevailed in his court.

The private judge officiated their wedding. Angelina never had a problem with him until she realized he was going to rule against her and in favor of Brad.

The appeals court says different.

this. The judge was wrong and there was nothing stopping him from filing for a new modification but he didn't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Well that's not true. If you read the article, plus all the others previously posted, she had no problem with visitation for Brad. A private arbitrator who did not disclose his connections with Brad and his conflict of interest granted joint custody ruling in favor of Brad. An appellate court reversed, so obviously Brad and his team were not playing fair. Reminds me of the bankruptcy judge down in Texas taking cases and not disclosing his personal connections with the female attorney who always prevailed in his court.

The private judge officiated their wedding. Angelina never had a problem with him until she realized he was going to rule against her and in favor of Brad.

Not true. She asked for him to be removed before the trial ever started. He was notifying her of the cases he had taken with Brad but
suddenly stopped. He was wrong. And the timing of Brad asking for a new modification even made the appellate judges uncomfortable

Sure. Basically she liked the private judge just fine until the private judge gave Brad a normal custody agreement instead of the vindictive agreement she wanted. Which is what PP said.

She asked for the judge to be removed BEFORE the trial ever happened and before the judge gave any verdict so no that's completely wrong.

Because it wasn't going her way...

the trial had never started.........and in the grand scheme of things if a majority of therapist thought joint custody would be favorable for all the kids then the judge wouldn't have matter.

In the grand scheme of things, if the custodial parent does not allow the other parent visitation or custody, then it doesn't happen. And she didn't. And it didn't.

This. She controlled those children day in and day out, and made damn sure they didn't heal from one bad experience because it served her selfish purposes to keep them isolated and afraid of their father. She is VILE.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jolie doesn’t seem to have many friends in Hollywood but it’s interesting that Salma Hayek is firmly in her corner. https://www.etonline.com/angelina-jolie-and-daughter-vivienne-jolie-pitt-praised-by-salma-hayek-following-their-tony-wins

Not interesting at all since they did a movie together

LOL! Now she’s friends with Queen Latifah?


She doesn’t seem close to other actors from the many movies she’s made.

They're coworkers at the end of the day, but it seems she has gained a few friendships from her movies in the past. That seems like where all her Hollywood friends come from. People she's met on set

What other friends? Just curious. She’s only ever photographed with her kids, and the occasional guy.

Simon Crane, Eunice Huthart, Queen Latifah, Jillian Armenante....mufasa the poet.....Just because she's not pictured with them doesn't mean she doesn't have friends lmao.

You’re pretty good at imagining “friendships” lmao. Or have trouble distinguishing between acquaintances and friends.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Well that's not true. If you read the article, plus all the others previously posted, she had no problem with visitation for Brad. A private arbitrator who did not disclose his connections with Brad and his conflict of interest granted joint custody ruling in favor of Brad. An appellate court reversed, so obviously Brad and his team were not playing fair. Reminds me of the bankruptcy judge down in Texas taking cases and not disclosing his personal connections with the female attorney who always prevailed in his court.

The private judge officiated their wedding. Angelina never had a problem with him until she realized he was going to rule against her and in favor of Brad.

Not true. She asked for him to be removed before the trial ever started. He was notifying her of the cases he had taken with Brad but
suddenly stopped. He was wrong. And the timing of Brad asking for a new modification even made the appellate judges uncomfortable

Sure. Basically she liked the private judge just fine until the private judge gave Brad a normal custody agreement instead of the vindictive agreement she wanted. Which is what PP said.

She asked for the judge to be removed BEFORE the trial ever happened and before the judge gave any verdict so no that's completely wrong.

Because it wasn't going her way...

the trial had never started.........and in the grand scheme of things if a majority of therapist thought joint custody would be favorable for all the kids then the judge wouldn't have matter.

In the grand scheme of things, if the custodial parent does not allow the other parent visitation or custody, then it doesn't happen. And she didn't. And it didn't.

This. She controlled those children day in and day out, and made damn sure they didn't heal from one bad experience because it served her selfish purposes to keep them isolated and afraid of their father. She is VILE.

Agreed. I can't believe anyone thinks the guy described as a wonderful father for many years by the woman herself deserved this.