Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 5

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We should be thankful that must of us aren't alcoholics and didn't do permanent damage to our vital organs.

How do you all know that he’s an alcoholic? Do you know him? Your basing it on his complexion and the fact that he got drunk in high school and college 35 years ago? That is about as much supporting evidence as Swetnick had for her claim. Unless you know the man personally, you really don’t know anything. Just more wishful thinking.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We should be thankful that must of us aren't alcoholics and didn't do permanent damage to our vital organs.

How do you all know that he’s an alcoholic? Do you know him? Your basing it on his complexion and the fact that he got drunk in high school and college 35 years ago? That is about as much supporting evidence as Swetnick had for her claim. Unless you know the man personally, you really don’t know anything. Just more wishful thinking.

DP here. This is the age of Trump. Just consider it truthful hyperbole and it will all make sense to you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We should be thankful that must of us aren't alcoholics and didn't do permanent damage to our vital organs.

How do you all know that he’s an alcoholic? Do you know him? Your basing it on his complexion and the fact that he got drunk in high school and college 35 years ago? That is about as much supporting evidence as Swetnick had for her claim. Unless you know the man personally, you really don’t know anything. Just more wishful thinking.

DP here. This is the age of Trump. Just consider it truthful hyperbole and it will all make sense to you.

Another liberal making conclusions based on no evidence. Nice deflection.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I was hoping avenatti had the goods but he didn't...

He didn't help

Only because the GOP didn't and doesn't care to get to the bottom of what Avenatti's client had to say.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was hoping avenatti had the goods but he didn't...

He didn't help

Only because the GOP didn't and doesn't care to get to the bottom of what Avenatti's client had to say.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Light prevailed over darkness. Not much more to it than that.

That is the exact opposite of what occurred.

You must be referring to yesterday's Red Sox / Yankees game. I was talking about Kavanaugh.

Kavanaugh is a black hole.
Kavanaugh is midnight in Manitoba in December.
Kavanaugh is the dark of the crypt.
Kavanaugh is the depths of the oceans.
Kavanaugh is the dimness of the past come back from the dead.

Kavanaugh is a blot on democracy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was hoping avenatti had the goods but he didn't...

He didn't help

Only because the GOP didn't and doesn't care to get to the bottom of what Avenatti's client had to say.

+1

This is true, but her four witnesses she provided turned up nothing and she backtracked her claim on TV

I say this as someone who was rooting for avenatti to take kavanaugh down. He promised to humiliate Republicans on the SJC but wasn't able to deliver the evidence

[Anonymous]

But I understand that people would have privately backed her claims to the FBI that might not have done so publicly

Still, I think he should have had a better backup plan for the scenario where the FBI didn't investigate

[Anonymous]

Mr. Flake? Mr. Flake, aye.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We should be thankful that must of us aren't alcoholics and didn't do permanent damage to our vital organs.

How do you all know that he’s an alcoholic? Do you know him? Your basing it on his complexion and the fact that he got drunk in high school and college 35 years ago? That is about as much supporting evidence as Swetnick had for her claim. Unless you know the man personally, you really don’t know anything. Just more wishful thinking.

DP here. This is the age of Trump. Just consider it truthful hyperbole and it will all make sense to you.

Another liberal making conclusions based on no evidence. Nice deflection.

Wooooosh

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was hoping avenatti had the goods but he didn't...

He didn't help

Only because the GOP didn't and doesn't care to get to the bottom of what Avenatti's client had to say.

Are you for real?! Get a f@cking grip on reality! Your side is trotting out mentally ill women to slander a guy who has different political opinions than them. And they, your side, is demanding we end this guy’s career and social life because a mentally ill person—I don’t know what else to call it— accused him of serially gang raping women over 35 years ago. An incredibly salacious bit of gossip that it’s impossible the fbi would have missed in Justce Kavanaughs six prior investigations.
Take your lithium already...

DP here. Save your indignation, our society is way past that. Look what Trump did to Ben Carson. Knocked him out of the race by accusing him of lying about a 9th grade school fight. Or Ted Cruz. Who had to deny that his father killed JFK.

But Brett Kavanaugh did it before Trump. He accused Hillary Clinton of murdering her secret lover and spent years trying to prove it.

"What goes around, comes around."
-Brett Kavanaugh

God help us.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was hoping avenatti had the goods but he didn't...

He didn't help

Only because the GOP didn't and doesn't care to get to the bottom of what Avenatti's client had to say.

Are you for real?! Get a f@cking grip on reality! Your side is trotting out mentally ill women to slander a guy who has different political opinions than them. And they, your side, is demanding we end this guy’s career and social life because a mentally ill person—I don’t know what else to call it— accused him of serially gang raping women over 35 years ago. An incredibly salacious bit of gossip that it’s impossible the fbi would have missed in Justce Kavanaughs six prior investigations.
Take your lithium already...

DP here. Save your indignation, our society is way past that. Look what Trump did to Ben Carson. Knocked him out of the race by accusing him of lying about a 9th grade school fight. Or Ted Cruz. Who had to deny that his father killed JFK.

But Brett Kavanaugh did it before Trump. He accused Hillary Clinton of murdering her secret lover and spent years trying to prove it.

"What goes around, comes around."
-Brett Kavanaugh

God help us.

Didn’t you see the Judicial Watch guy over Kavanaugh’s shoulder during the hearing?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

she explained that the parties she went to had a mix of college and high school students. Still weird, but it helps explain things some. Like maybe the host had a sibling in college and some of his friends were invited and it spread to a mix.

Sure a one time event could be explained by the host having an older sibling who invited their friends over that night. But according to Swetnick this was an ongoing thing where Kavanaugh and judge were spiking the punch bowl. She was at 10 different parties where this was happening. According to her everyone in Montgomery County remembers this.

By the way how many high school parties has anybody here attended where there was a communal punch bowl? I can't think of 1 off the top of my head and I was at plenty of Prep, St. Johns, Gonzaga, Stone Ridge, Holy Cross, Holy Child, Visi etc parties back in the mid-late 90's. People would show up with beer. No communal punch bowl. No girls from Gaithersburg High that were 3 years old older than us. Certainly not on 10 different occasions.

Swetnick and Avanatti did nothing to help the Democrats cause on this one.

Attended many Gonzaga and Vistation parties in early 80s, never punch bowls, always kegs. Now days, you do not often see kegs but back in the early 80s in Montgomery County parties it was the norm. No way a Gaithersburg High 3 year older MC woman hangs out at multiple Prep HS parties. No way. She did a huge disservice to actual victims by concocting this story.....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Just got off a phone call with my mother who lives in a small midwestern town and she told me the other day she was watching a local race wearing an anti-Trump t-shirt and she was amazed at how many runners gave her the thumbs up as they passed her, including men. Dozens of them.

This is a town that voted for Trump, guys. Ha ha.

So everyone in that town voted for Trump and some have turned to the other side? Or, your mother got the thumbs up from Hillary voters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My prediction is that Trump will get a second term, and with it the opportunity to appoint at least two more, possibly three S.C. justices. Definitely Ginsburg, who is clearly struggling in recent interviews. Probably Breyer too who is getting up there in age. And certainly Thomas, who will want to step down under a Republican President. That will usher in a 7-2 majority for at least 30 years.

I sure as hell hope not.