EVERY Six Months Jolie reiterates accusations against Pitt

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If he’s smart he’ll never marry again

+1

Yeah, he’s now seen what a divorce is like with kids involved plus unequal wealth. With Jen A it was easy peasy, no kids and equal wealth so everything split neatly down the middle. He’ll never have that again, should just enjoy coupling up until it gets stale.

It will be interesting to see if he ever marries again. Probably only after being with a partner a good long time is my guess. He's a pretty romantic guy though. He gave Jolie incredible gifts when they were together, the Winston Churchill painting, custom-made desk, Chateau shares (ill-advised of course) and was very gushy with his previous partners. I could see him marrying again, down the road. Not any time soon though, given the trauma of the years-long raking over the coals by Jolie.

In most respects he seems to have treated Jolie like a queen. I find it puzzling that she could never muster any forgiveness toward him, especially once he got sober.

Maybe because he was happy to divorce her at that point? Narcissists can't abide rejection. I always thought her rage was much more about selfish reasons than the kids per se.

He didn’t want her at that point. Their relationship had been toxic for a while. He told her she was crazy and was ruining their family on the plane. They both ended up hating each other.

But there were so many good times before the bad times. I guess I've never experienced it but I just don't get why they can't forgive each other and move on now that so much time has passed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If he’s smart he’ll never marry again

+1

Yeah, he’s now seen what a divorce is like with kids involved plus unequal wealth. With Jen A it was easy peasy, no kids and equal wealth so everything split neatly down the middle. He’ll never have that again, should just enjoy coupling up until it gets stale.

It will be interesting to see if he ever marries again. Probably only after being with a partner a good long time is my guess. He's a pretty romantic guy though. He gave Jolie incredible gifts when they were together, the Winston Churchill painting, custom-made desk, Chateau shares (ill-advised of course) and was very gushy with his previous partners. I could see him marrying again, down the road. Not any time soon though, given the trauma of the years-long raking over the coals by Jolie.

In most respects he seems to have treated Jolie like a queen. I find it puzzling that she could never muster any forgiveness toward him, especially once he got sober.

Maybe because he was happy to divorce her at that point? Narcissists can't abide rejection. I always thought her rage was much more about selfish reasons than the kids per se.

he wanted to try couples counseling. He was not sober. He didn't mean anything he said on the plane

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If he’s smart he’ll never marry again

+1

Yeah, he’s now seen what a divorce is like with kids involved plus unequal wealth. With Jen A it was easy peasy, no kids and equal wealth so everything split neatly down the middle. He’ll never have that again, should just enjoy coupling up until it gets stale.

It will be interesting to see if he ever marries again. Probably only after being with a partner a good long time is my guess. He's a pretty romantic guy though. He gave Jolie incredible gifts when they were together, the Winston Churchill painting, custom-made desk, Chateau shares (ill-advised of course) and was very gushy with his previous partners. I could see him marrying again, down the road. Not any time soon though, given the trauma of the years-long raking over the coals by Jolie.

In most respects he seems to have treated Jolie like a queen. I find it puzzling that she could never muster any forgiveness toward him, especially once he got sober.

he doesn't want to be 100% sober. It's his prerogative. He's obviously not getting married to a girl he's just using for PR. there's no warmth in their interactions. there's a video of him pushing her hand away curtly. Nothing like his other relationship

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If he’s smart he’ll never marry again

+1

Yeah, he’s now seen what a divorce is like with kids involved plus unequal wealth. With Jen A it was easy peasy, no kids and equal wealth so everything split neatly down the middle. He’ll never have that again, should just enjoy coupling up until it gets stale.

It will be interesting to see if he ever marries again. Probably only after being with a partner a good long time is my guess. He's a pretty romantic guy though. He gave Jolie incredible gifts when they were together, the Winston Churchill painting, custom-made desk, Chateau shares (ill-advised of course) and was very gushy with his previous partners. I could see him marrying again, down the road. Not any time soon though, given the trauma of the years-long raking over the coals by Jolie.

In most respects he seems to have treated Jolie like a queen. I find it puzzling that she could never muster any forgiveness toward him, especially once he got sober.

he doesn't want to be 100% sober. It's his prerogative. He's obviously not getting married to a girl he's just using for PR. there's no warmth in their interactions. there's a video of him pushing her hand away curtly. Nothing like his other relationship

You know this how? He himself said he can't do it in moderation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If he’s smart he’ll never marry again

+1

Yeah, he’s now seen what a divorce is like with kids involved plus unequal wealth. With Jen A it was easy peasy, no kids and equal wealth so everything split neatly down the middle. He’ll never have that again, should just enjoy coupling up until it gets stale.

It will be interesting to see if he ever marries again. Probably only after being with a partner a good long time is my guess. He's a pretty romantic guy though. He gave Jolie incredible gifts when they were together, the Winston Churchill painting, custom-made desk, Chateau shares (ill-advised of course) and was very gushy with his previous partners. I could see him marrying again, down the road. Not any time soon though, given the trauma of the years-long raking over the coals by Jolie.

In most respects he seems to have treated Jolie like a queen. I find it puzzling that she could never muster any forgiveness toward him, especially once he got sober.

he doesn't want to be 100% sober. It's his prerogative. He's obviously not getting married to a girl he's just using for PR. there's no warmth in their interactions. there's a video of him pushing her hand away curtly. Nothing like his other relationship

You know this how? He himself said he can't do it in moderation.

Well hes drinking now so he could be trying something new. Flea and Anthony drink/smoke in moderation

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/brad-pitt-ready-propose-girlfriend-113833386.html

I know this is from a trashy tabloid, but I hope this news is true. Marriage and a baby would be so good for Brad. He deserves happiness after the hell his crazy ex-wife has put him through for the past eight years.

Sounds fake

[Anonymous]

Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Repeated nonsense. That's not even an interesting tidbit since it's exactly what her lawyer said.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Repeated nonsense. That's not even an interesting tidbit since it's exactly what her lawyer said.

But if Pitt wants it, doesn't that suggest there will be plenty of info about her alienation efforts?

In April, Pitt filed a motion requesting Jolie produce years worth of non-disclosure agreements (NDAs), according to a legal filing obtained by CNN. The court granted Pitt’s motion in May and set a deadline for Jolie to submit the NDAs by mid-July, according to the order, obtained by CNN.

These NDAs have become the center of the Miraval case, which in itself has felt like “an extension of their divorce,” according to Jacobi-Parisi, who clarified that the Miraval case and the divorce are technically separate court actions.

Jacobi-Parisi added: “Under the Miraval court action, [the NDAs] can then bring up and dredge up all of the information that was probably sealed in their divorce.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Repeated nonsense. That's not even an interesting tidbit since it's exactly what her lawyer said.

But if Pitt wants it, doesn't that suggest there will be plenty of info about her alienation efforts?

In April, Pitt filed a motion requesting Jolie produce years worth of non-disclosure agreements (NDAs), according to a legal filing obtained by CNN. The court granted Pitt’s motion in May and set a deadline for Jolie to submit the NDAs by mid-July, according to the order, obtained by CNN.

These NDAs have become the center of the Miraval case, which in itself has felt like “an extension of their divorce,” according to Jacobi-Parisi, who clarified that the Miraval case and the divorce are technically separate court actions.

Jacobi-Parisi added: “Under the Miraval court action, [the NDAs] can then bring up and dredge up all of the information that was probably sealed in their divorce.”

Her lawyer said it would open doors for them to call NDA's about the plane and abuse. He was right as many people have said it was going to backfire.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

She’s an aggressor, but she acts like a perpetual victim. She’s martyred herself; in her mind, she can do no wrong. Their legal battles have been over her actions. Her need for sole custody. Apparently, she thinks it’s wrong for a father to fight to see his kids. And her sale of Miraval behind his back to a hostile third party. Apparently, Brad should just let her violate their contact and saddle him with a terrible business partner.

She’s the one who won’t let the family have peace or healing. She’s the one dragging her endless abuse allegations into a contract dispute. Apparently, she can’t defend her actions on the merits, so she sees her best chance as dragging this case into the mud with her ever-evolving allegations. She’s a nasty piece of work.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Repeated nonsense. That's not even an interesting tidbit since it's exactly what her lawyer said.

But if Pitt wants it, doesn't that suggest there will be plenty of info about her alienation efforts?

In April, Pitt filed a motion requesting Jolie produce years worth of non-disclosure agreements (NDAs), according to a legal filing obtained by CNN. The court granted Pitt’s motion in May and set a deadline for Jolie to submit the NDAs by mid-July, according to the order, obtained by CNN.

These NDAs have become the center of the Miraval case, which in itself has felt like “an extension of their divorce,” according to Jacobi-Parisi, who clarified that the Miraval case and the divorce are technically separate court actions.

Jacobi-Parisi added: “Under the Miraval court action, [the NDAs] can then bring up and dredge up all of the information that was probably sealed in their divorce.”

Her lawyer said it would open doors for them to call NDA's about the plane and abuse. He was right as many people have said it was going to backfire.

There is a hearing scheduled for August on her request for material from Pitt in regards to her abuse allegations. There is no way to determine how the judge will rule on her motion. Brad will argue that the information isn’t relevant to the case.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Repeated nonsense. That's not even an interesting tidbit since it's exactly what her lawyer said.

But if Pitt wants it, doesn't that suggest there will be plenty of info about her alienation efforts?

In April, Pitt filed a motion requesting Jolie produce years worth of non-disclosure agreements (NDAs), according to a legal filing obtained by CNN. The court granted Pitt’s motion in May and set a deadline for Jolie to submit the NDAs by mid-July, according to the order, obtained by CNN.

These NDAs have become the center of the Miraval case, which in itself has felt like “an extension of their divorce,” according to Jacobi-Parisi, who clarified that the Miraval case and the divorce are technically separate court actions.

Jacobi-Parisi added: “Under the Miraval court action, [the NDAs] can then bring up and dredge up all of the information that was probably sealed in their divorce.”

Her lawyer said it would open doors for them to call NDA's about the plane and abuse. He was right as many people have said it was going to backfire.

There is a hearing scheduled for August on her request for material from Pitt in regards to her abuse allegations. There is no way to determine how the judge will rule on her motion. Brad will argue that the information isn’t relevant to the case.

She most definitely signed the NDA's about the plane too. As said, it will and has backfired

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Repeated nonsense. That's not even an interesting tidbit since it's exactly what her lawyer said.

But if Pitt wants it, doesn't that suggest there will be plenty of info about her alienation efforts?

In April, Pitt filed a motion requesting Jolie produce years worth of non-disclosure agreements (NDAs), according to a legal filing obtained by CNN. The court granted Pitt’s motion in May and set a deadline for Jolie to submit the NDAs by mid-July, according to the order, obtained by CNN.

These NDAs have become the center of the Miraval case, which in itself has felt like “an extension of their divorce,” according to Jacobi-Parisi, who clarified that the Miraval case and the divorce are technically separate court actions.

Jacobi-Parisi added: “Under the Miraval court action, [the NDAs] can then bring up and dredge up all of the information that was probably sealed in their divorce.”

Her lawyer said it would open doors for them to call NDA's about the plane and abuse. He was right as many people have said it was going to backfire.

She’s not requesting NDAs. She’s requesting his communications with law enforcement agencies regarding her allegations and his communications with his friends/lawyers/business partners regarding her allegations. If you read her motion, she is asking for a lot of intrusive information. It’s basically a fishing expedition for her obsession with the plane incident that she can’t move on from, like how she filed her FOIA lawsuit requesting information.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

She’s an aggressor, but she acts like a perpetual victim. She’s martyred herself; in her mind, she can do no wrong. Their legal battles have been over her actions. Her need for sole custody. Apparently, she thinks it’s wrong for a father to fight to see his kids. And her sale of Miraval behind his back to a hostile third party. Apparently, Brad should just let her violate their contact and saddle him with a terrible business partner.

She’s the one who won’t let the family have peace or healing. She’s the one dragging her endless abuse allegations into a contract dispute. Apparently, she can’t defend her actions on the merits, so she sees her best chance as dragging this case into the mud with her ever-evolving allegations. She’s a nasty piece of work.

When you repeat the same things stuff it's easy to tell you're replying to yourself.