Trump found Guilty on all charges!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Breaking news !!!

Trump Sentenced To Four Years Of Confinement In Small Oval Room In Washington D.C.

Fantasy. He’s going to lose. Most normal people do not want a convicted felon for president.

And this is precisely what the Leftists were banking in when they decided to charge him and put him on trial.
It’s like getting Capone on tax evasion when they couldn’t make other things stick….only this time there is no “there” there —and everyone knows it. It’s dirty pool by a bunch of people who are seeing the pendulum swing back and are afraid of losing power through a legitimate election. So they have to find another way to try to “secure” the win through a form of disqualification. Or at least that’s what they are hoping for.
It’s why the DNC and Biden election headquarters squealed with glee when the verdict was announced.
Disgusting.
Whether you are politically aligned or not, news that a former president of our country has been convicted on 34 felony counts (based on this ridiculous sham of a trial) should not cause anyone to celebrate. If anything, we should be collectively hanging our heads in embarrassment that our justice system has become a banana republic tool of political retribution.

The majority of Americans think the charges and outcome are justified.

The MAGAs are so seeped in the right wing propaganda that they don't realize that the American people broadly think the verdict was the right outcome. They just hear Sean Hannity and Jesse Waters yelling about it every night and assume everyone else agrees.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Breaking news !!!

Trump Sentenced To Four Years Of Confinement In Small Oval Room In Washington D.C.

Fantasy. He’s going to lose. Most normal people do not want a convicted felon for president.

And this is precisely what the Leftists were banking in when they decided to charge him and put him on trial.
It’s like getting Capone on tax evasion when they couldn’t make other things stick….only this time there is no “there” there —and everyone knows it. It’s dirty pool by a bunch of people who are seeing the pendulum swing back and are afraid of losing power through a legitimate election. So they have to find another way to try to “secure” the win through a form of disqualification. Or at least that’s what they are hoping for.
It’s why the DNC and Biden election headquarters squealed with glee when the verdict was announced.
Disgusting.
Whether you are politically aligned or not, news that a former president of our country has been convicted on 34 felony counts (based on this ridiculous sham of a trial) should not cause anyone to celebrate. If anything, we should be collectively hanging our heads in embarrassment that our justice system has become a banana republic tool of political retribution.

It's funny you mention Capone. Yes, the tactic is exactly how the feds got Capone. Both of them conspired to lie on business documents to hide an underlying crime. That's what got Capone, and that's what got Trump, who is also like a mobster.

Rs should be the one hanging their heads in shame for choosing a rapist, and now convicted felon as their leader. The world sees that your party is the one that is like a banana republic by choosing such a leader. It is you who is shaming our country. Most of the world despises Trump. The only countries that love Trump are those run by dictators.

MAGA - where the rich and powerful are not above our laws.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

And it’s true, too, as we can see from several of the threatening responses from Trump supporters on this thread. These 12 people stood up for freedom in a way that no elected Republican has been able to so far, and have formed a clear and concise “no one is above the law” statement in convicting Donald of all 34 of his charges.

I agree the jurors were heroic and took their job seriously.

But I have to give kudos to some elected republicans in 2020 who were brave and true patriots, like Mike pence refusing to do Trump’s bidding on j6 and raffensburger refusing to “find the votes” for whiny Trump in Georgia. And there were others in I think Arizona. Some of the names are gone from my memory but they were honorable and I respect them.

Heroic????? OMFG.

Yes. Where else do you serve jury duty and get doxxed and death threats? One of the jury candidates said during Voir Dire that she could be impartial, then she went home and family and friends figured out from the information published in the NYT and CNN that she was the jury candidate. Then she got threats. And she came back the next day and said that based on being doxxed and threats, that she no longer thought she could be impartial as she felt that just sitting on the jury she was getting threats form the defendants supporters. And the jurors that did end up sitting started getting death threats once the verdict came out.

So, yes, those who sat on this jury were heroic. Knowing what this convicted felon and his loyal followers do to people who cross him, they were heroic to accept sitting on this jury. If there weren't so many sociopatchic Trump followers, then it wouldn't apply, but he has attracted the most dysfunctional, socially antagonistic followers, so they are definitely heroic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, someone here who agrees with this verdict.......

Tell us what the jury found him guilty of.

They found him guilty of 34 counts of falsifying business records.

That is a misdemeanor. How is it a felony?

I don't know. Take it up with the New York State legislature. Or do you think the law they passed years ago which deemed falsifying business records to be a felony is also "rigged" against Trump?

Here is the law:

https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/PEN/175.10#:~:text=§%20175.10%20Falsifying%20business%20records%20in%20the%20first%20degree.&text=another%20crime%20or%20to%20aid,is%20a%20class%20E%20felony.

As you can see from the link, in order for this "crime" to be a felony, there must be another crime.

What was that crime in this case?

"Jurors in New York state court on Thursday found Donald Trump guilty on all 34 felony counts of falsifying business records to cover up hush money payments to a porn star ultimately to influence the outcome of the 2016 presidential election."

Here is the pertinent New York law:

Section 17-152 of the New York Election Law provides that any two or more persons who conspire to promote or prevent the election of any person to a public office by unlawful means and which conspiracy is acted upon by one or more of the parties thereto, shall be guilty of conspiracy to promote or prevent an election.

Hillary Clinton was fined by the FEC for her campaign’s role in the Russia collusion including the Steele dossier payments. She’s broken section 17-152. Looking forward to the prosecution.

What was the unlawful act?

It doesn’t matter. With a crafty DA, complicit judge and partisans jury, she can be convicted.

So, there was no unlawful act, and you just want to lock her up?

Countless legal scholars said the case against Trump was bunk. But here we are. So yeah, let’s take Hillary for a ride. Or Gretchen Whitmer. Or Gavin newsome. I’m sure we can find something. No problem.
As I said, game on. You made the rules and now you get to play by them. As another poster said, check in with Harry Reid about the law of unintended consequences. Or maybe it’s better described as what’s good for the goose is good for the gander.

if there is evidence what Whitmer committed any crimes, bring it on. Newsome, I wouldn't trust with my dog.

I don’t’ know of any crimes off the top of my head, but what she did during Covid was beyond the pale, especially when she and her husband didn’t live by the same rules she imposed

The typical Republican playbook. We don't know of any crimes off the top of our heads, but we need to give them a good McCarthy red scare by calling them up before Congressional committees and charging them with anything just to go on fishing expeditions. You don't like her policies, so you're just going to charge her with crimes and fish for anything to charge her with.

[Anonymous]

Criminals ought to be convicted. This time we got it right.

[Anonymous]

They said he would never be convicted. Wrong.

They say he will never go to jail. Let's see if the universe and our justice system gets it right.

You do the crime you do the time. Lolol

[Anonymous]

34 down, 57 more to go.

[Anonymous]

Countless legal scholars said the case against Trump was bunk. But here we are. So yeah, let’s take Hillary for a ride. Or Gretchen Whitmer. Or Gavin newsome. I’m sure we can find something. No problem. As I said, game on. You made the rules and now you get to play by them. As another poster said, check in with Harry Reid about the law of unintended consequences. Or maybe it’s better described as what’s good for the goose is good for the gander.

You’ll be too busy buying extra flags to hang upside down when the remaining (91-34=57) indictments result in rule of law consequences. P.S. cite the countless legal sources. Trust they’re the minority. We really shouldn’t acknowledge any of you. Moratorium on Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Countless legal scholars said the case against Trump was bunk. But here we are. So yeah, let’s take Hillary for a ride. Or Gretchen Whitmer. Or Gavin newsome. I’m sure we can find something. No problem. As I said, game on. You made the rules and now you get to play by them. As another poster said, check in with Harry Reid about the law of unintended consequences. Or maybe it’s better described as what’s good for the goose is good for the gander.

You’ll be too busy buying extra flags to hang upside down when the remaining (91-34=57) indictments result in rule of law consequences. P.S. cite the countless legal sources. Trust they’re the minority. We really shouldn’t acknowledge any of you. Moratorium on Trump.

"So yeah, let’s take Hillary for a ride. Or Gretchen Whitmer. Or Gavin newsome."

If any of them are guilty of felonies, they deserve to be prosecuted, just like sleepy Don.

We welcome you to go for it. And to also cite all those countless legal sources.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Countless legal scholars said the case against Trump was bunk. But here we are. So yeah, let’s take Hillary for a ride. Or Gretchen Whitmer. Or Gavin newsome. I’m sure we can find something. No problem. As I said, game on. You made the rules and now you get to play by them. As another poster said, check in with Harry Reid about the law of unintended consequences. Or maybe it’s better described as what’s good for the goose is good for the gander.

You’ll be too busy buying extra flags to hang upside down when the remaining (91-34=57) indictments result in rule of law consequences. P.S. cite the countless legal sources. Trust they’re the minority. We really shouldn’t acknowledge any of you. Moratorium on Trump.

"So yeah, let’s take Hillary for a ride. Or Gretchen Whitmer. Or Gavin newsome."

If any of them are guilty of felonies, they deserve to be prosecuted, just like sleepy Don.

We welcome you to go for it. And to also cite all those countless legal sources.

Goodness, the amount of scrutiny HRC has had, if there was anything to charge her for, they'd have done it by now.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Countless legal scholars said the case against Trump was bunk. But here we are. So yeah, let’s take Hillary for a ride. Or Gretchen Whitmer. Or Gavin newsome. I’m sure we can find something. No problem. As I said, game on. You made the rules and now you get to play by them. As another poster said, check in with Harry Reid about the law of unintended consequences. Or maybe it’s better described as what’s good for the goose is good for the gander.

You’ll be too busy buying extra flags to hang upside down when the remaining (91-34=57) indictments result in rule of law consequences. P.S. cite the countless legal sources. Trust they’re the minority. We really shouldn’t acknowledge any of you. Moratorium on Trump.

Probably Turley and the wine judge on Fox.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

party of law and order /s

I think 3rd world countries with dictators also allow convicted felons to be president.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Countless legal scholars said the case against Trump was bunk. But here we are. So yeah, let’s take Hillary for a ride. Or Gretchen Whitmer. Or Gavin newsome. I’m sure we can find something. No problem. As I said, game on. You made the rules and now you get to play by them. As another poster said, check in with Harry Reid about the law of unintended consequences. Or maybe it’s better described as what’s good for the goose is good for the gander.

You’ll be too busy buying extra flags to hang upside down when the remaining (91-34=57) indictments result in rule of law consequences. P.S. cite the countless legal sources. Trust they’re the minority. We really shouldn’t acknowledge any of you. Moratorium on Trump.

"So yeah, let’s take Hillary for a ride. Or Gretchen Whitmer. Or Gavin newsome."

If any of them are guilty of felonies, they deserve to be prosecuted, just like sleepy Don.

We welcome you to go for it. And to also cite all those countless legal sources.

If Hillary had committed crimes, barr and trump would have prosecuted them.

Same with Whitmer.
Same with Newsome.

You don't see Dems defending Hunter Biden or Senator Menendez. If they are found guilty, so be it. Why can't the right defend the rule of law?