I thought it was 10 of the same class. So if you miss a day it wouldn’t count as 7 classes but just 1 for each class. But it could be skipping a particular class 10 times. |
| I notice that MCPS counts missed classes as the total number of absences not days. When DD went to Outdoor Ed (an excused school event) she was marked absent 12 times (4 classes * 3 days). When she had the flu (also excused), she was marked absent 16x (4 classes * 4 days). |
You need help. |
It's a pretty fair system if kids who miss school are held accountable to prove themselves with their grades. It actually teaches responsibility and is better preparation for college than denying graduation due to absences. Good for MCPS. |
Wow you are dumber than a rock. These kids are not earning the grades or proving themselves! Teachers are pushed to inflate grades ON TOP of MCPS policies that will give them 50% for just putting their name into something. In addition, teachers are told to strike out 0 grades for things where the kid couldn't even be bothered to try. The teacher is pushed to "reteach" and pass a kid who has barely been in class and is nowhere close to proficient or passing on their own. This is solely about making MCPS better than it is by pumping up the graduation rate. |
|
Let’s allow more course credit by exam and also shorter courses. My brother did 4 courses at a time back in 1970 something.
Allow co-op starting in 9th grade and permit non-SPED/ESOL students at attend classes through age 21. Students could attend classes 3 hours a day and still work. Bring back HS Plus, an actual evening school running 7-11 pm at least 4 days a week), and real Saturday school (I love George B. Thomas, but the kids enrolled are not the ones with high absenteeism.) I taught a number of pregnant and parenting students in HS Plus. All were eager to make up a semester lost to absences for pregnancy complications, childbirth, and/or infant care. |
No putting your name on a blank piece of paper does not get you 50%. |
|
The Post article mentioned the MD Report Card site, but didn't include very much data, so I looked it up.
Here are each of the MCPS high schools' percentages of "Students not chronically absent" which is defined as "the percent of students not absent 10 percent or more school days during the year": Wootton 83.5 Churchill 81 Poolesville 80.6 Whitman 79.7 Walter Johnson 79.5 B-CC 79.4 Sherwood 78.3 Blair 76.9 Blake 76 Clarksburg 75.5 Rockville 75.2 Damascus 75 Springbrook 74 Wheaton 73.4 Northwest 72.7 Seneca Valley 71.4 Richard Montgomery 70.3 Einstein 66.5 Northwood 62.5 Gaithersburg 62.1 Quince Orchard 60.2 Kennedy 59 Watkins Mill 58 Magruder 57 |
| Interesting to see Magruder at 57%. Any Magruder teachers or parents? |
Maybe their administration should take a drive over to Paint Branch to learn something from them. |
I’m not a PBHS parent or teacher, but I’ve had a child compete against them and when I taught HS, my students competed against them. That school intensely engages their black and brown students. They have a huge MSP! Maybe students feel heard and cared about? |
Some of the problem with all of the schools is likely data entry and attendance code problems. We just figured out that the wrong code was being used for students in testing and it was counting against chronic absences. The whole system is double checking what schools are using for field trips, early release for athletics, etc. to make sure things that are still school supervised aren't counted as chronic absences. |
The principal is old school who protects her staff. I'm not saying everyone adores her, but she has a devoted crew. And when teachers feel respected, kids learn. 'Nuff said |
Not sure what the definition of chronically absent is. But Magruder has a self contained ED program. Maybe absences from hospitalizations and school refusal play into the low numbers. |
For the lowest schools that score under 70% I say that principals are only paid the % of their salary that matches their attendance numbers. What is also interesting is that the MD report card number doesn't seem to match the data that was leaked to WaPo. So either the problem is getting worse and the MD report is one year behind or there is a little cooking the books going on at a few of the schools mentioned in the article when they submit their numbers to the state. Might be time for the state or even feds to do some investigating at a few of our local schools. I believe that some funding grants are tied to attendance numbers. |