The Mueller Report

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Listen we ALL have access to the report. Every person with internet access, the whole world over, can read it.

It doesn’t need summarizing on here for people that won’t read it. Yes he did ask McGahn(twice I think), McFarland, and Christie, and porter to call people, to write letters firing people, to garner loyalty, to end the invest.

Do NOT take my word for it. Read it.

If you want to take a week, go ahead. Longer, fine by me. But by three weeks’ time, there is literally no excuse to say you haven’t read it (if you’re on here, interested in politics, and debating about what it says)

So Trump tried but actually didn't, obstruct the investigation- that was based on the made up Russian collusion outlined in the fake Steel Dossier? He should have fired Mueller right off the bat and ended it right there.

If you can't see that this whole thing started with a bullshit dossier created specifically to lead to FISA warrant abuse, attempts to rig an election, and then unseat an elected US President- all of which amounts to TREASON, then I don't know what to tell you.

Someone doesn't know his law.

Trying to obstruct is an offense even if it doesn't succeed, bud.

You can lie all you want but the truth is out there and we don't believe your gaslighting.

You obviously don't understand the fruit of a poisonous tree argument and why this will all come back and bite the Obama administration on the ass.

#spygate

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Listen we ALL have access to the report. Every person with internet access, the whole world over, can read it.

It doesn’t need summarizing on here for people that won’t read it. Yes he did ask McGahn(twice I think), McFarland, and Christie, and porter to call people, to write letters firing people, to garner loyalty, to end the invest.

Do NOT take my word for it. Read it.

If you want to take a week, go ahead. Longer, fine by me. But by three weeks’ time, there is literally no excuse to say you haven’t read it (if you’re on here, interested in politics, and debating about what it says)

So Trump tried but actually didn't, obstruct the investigation- that was based on the made up Russian collusion outlined in the fake Steel Dossier? He should have fired Mueller right off the bat and ended it right there.

If you can't see that this whole thing started with a bullshit dossier created specifically to lead to FISA warrant abuse, attempts to rig an election, and then unseat an elected US President- all of which amounts to TREASON, then I don't know what to tell you.

Someone doesn't know his law.

Trying to obstruct is an offense even if it doesn't succeed, bud.

You can lie all you want but the truth is out there and we don't believe your gaslighting.

You obviously don't understand the fruit of a poisonous tree argument and why this will all come back and bite the Obama administration on the ass.

#spygate

Wow, you are predicting that Obama is going to become president again? Weird.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

We get it. You don't care that the president is a proven liar and the biggest promoter of "Fake News," denying one story after the next, when in fact they were true. You don't care that the president repeatedly pressured his officials to break the law. You don't care that the Russians interfered big-time in the 2016 election and that if the Trump campaign didn't coordinate with them, it wasn't from lack of desire to do so.

There is no "fake dossier" and you are a prime example of the conservative lack of ethics and embrace of lies.

The sourcing on each of the points given in the dossier was and is crap. They don't pass muster.The whole document is hearsay and innuendo.

You don't FISA people over it. Obama wanted dirt on Trump because he is a democrat and saw no other avenue other than having Hillary as the next president. All further actions flow from those basic facts. This was turning the instrumentalities of the state on an opposing candidate.


I have full faith the current AG will now seek retribution, and rightfully so. You better hang on.

Again, the dossier was not the justification for the FISA warrant and further, the FISA warrant was extended 3 times by GOP appointed judges, so it was yielding fruit.

And I am glad to see the GOP feels it is appropriate for the AG to be seeking retribution. That's the way justice is imparted.

[Anonymous]

Obama is not the type of person to want or try to get dirt on anybody. Deep down you all know this. He is a man of character unlike orange ignorant Embarrassment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Let’s not forget that what no one disputes is that Trump and his campaign freely accepted and even solicited help from a foreign government. And not just any foreign government. — Russia. Trump doesn’t deny.

I am seriously asking Trump supports and Rs — are you okay with this?

Are you okay with the fact that Democrats went to Mexico to meet with Mexicans on the topic of how they could be helpful to the Clinton campaign?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Listen we ALL have access to the report. Every person with internet access, the whole world over, can read it.

It doesn’t need summarizing on here for people that won’t read it. Yes he did ask McGahn(twice I think), McFarland, and Christie, and porter to call people, to write letters firing people, to garner loyalty, to end the invest.

Do NOT take my word for it. Read it.

If you want to take a week, go ahead. Longer, fine by me. But by three weeks’ time, there is literally no excuse to say you haven’t read it (if you’re on here, interested in politics, and debating about what it says)

So Trump tried but actually didn't, obstruct the investigation- that was based on the made up Russian collusion outlined in the fake Steel Dossier? He should have fired Mueller right off the bat and ended it right there.

If you can't see that this whole thing started with a bullshit dossier created specifically to lead to FISA warrant abuse, attempts to rig an election, and then unseat an elected US President- all of which amounts to TREASON, then I don't know what to tell you.

This isn't how the law works. You either are ignorant of the law, or you are purposefully trolling. Neither is a good look.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats 2017 - Republicans must accept Mueller's findings.

Republicans 2019 - We do not accept Mueller's findings.

Fixed it for ya!

Here's a hint - read the report yourself, bud! I totally accept what's in it. And what's in it is damning and exposes the seedy underbelly of the Trump administration. (Ah, who am I kidding, that's been exposed for a long time.)

+1. This. It’s a low point for the American Presidency. Historians are going to look back at this period and wonder why Trump supporters continued to support him despite all the evidence of his grifting and engaging with foreign powers for dubious causes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let’s not forget that what no one disputes is that Trump and his campaign freely accepted and even solicited help from a foreign government. And not just any foreign government. — Russia. Trump doesn’t deny.

I am seriously asking Trump supports and Rs — are you okay with this?

Are you okay with the fact that Democrats went to Mexico to meet with Mexicans on the topic of how they could be helpful to the Clinton campaign?

I think Trump was doing his part to make sure Mexico would support the Clinton campaign, if it were legal to do so.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Seedy underbelly? You mean like Bill Clinton walking onto the DOJ airplane of the Attorney General Loretta Lynch during an ongoing federal investigation into 18USC793 crimes and having ex-parte communication over his wife being investigated, which suddenly were dropped?

Tell me more about seedy.

Just read the Mueller report and you'll know all about seedy!

Also, for a real nice dose of seedy, imagine Trump humping a porn start while his wife was recuperating from giving birth to his child.

Oh and hey, did you know that Barr conferred with Trump, as well as Trump's personal lawyer, about the Mueller report before releasing it, to see whether the redactions met with the approval of the person the report investigated? I thought you'd like to know that since you are so distraught about Clinton meeting Lynch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats 2017 - Republicans must accept Mueller's findings.

Democrats 2019 - We do not accept Mueller's findings.

Mueller’s finding was that he turned the obstruction charge over to Congress because he couldn’t exonerate the President. I’d be pretty ashamed to be supporting a treasonous liar like Trump these days.

So are you going to stop beating your wife? I have a made up dossier here that says you beat her all the time. In fact I'm going to use that dossier to first wiretap you- then to investigate you for two years. Oh wait, you just did something that might be construed as "obstruction" against my witch hunt to find anything on you- even though you are innocent.

Go for that obstruction charge on your investigation- by all means, please pursue this in it's entirety. Show the American people just how completely corrupt this system is that your party can't even lose with dignity in an election that you attempted to rig for yourselves. Please continue, by all means, just show us that our election system no longer matters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats 2017 - Republicans must accept Mueller's findings.

Democrats 2019 - We do not accept Mueller's findings.

Mueller’s finding was that he turned the obstruction charge over to Congress because he couldn’t exonerate the President. I’d be pretty ashamed to be supporting a treasonous liar like Trump these days.

So are you going to stop beating your wife? I have a made up dossier here that says you beat her all the time. In fact I'm going to use that dossier to first wiretap you- then to investigate you for two years. Oh wait, you just did something that might be construed as "obstruction" against my witch hunt to find anything on you- even though you are innocent.

Go for that obstruction charge on your investigation- by all means, please pursue this in it's entirety. Show the American people just how completely corrupt this system is that your party can't even lose with dignity in an election that you attempted to rig for yourselves. Please continue, by all means, just show us that our election system no longer matters.

Another graduate of Trump University with a degree in lying. Were you magna cum laude?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats 2017 - Republicans must accept Mueller's findings.

Democrats 2019 - We do not accept Mueller's findings.

Mueller’s finding was that he turned the obstruction charge over to Congress because he couldn’t exonerate the President. I’d be pretty ashamed to be supporting a treasonous liar like Trump these days.

So are you going to stop beating your wife? I have a made up dossier here that says you beat her all the time. In fact I'm going to use that dossier to first wiretap you- then to investigate you for two years. Oh wait, you just did something that might be construed as "obstruction" against my witch hunt to find anything on you- even though you are innocent.

Go for that obstruction charge on your investigation- by all means, please pursue this in it's entirety. Show the American people just how completely corrupt this system is that your party can't even lose with dignity in an election that you attempted to rig for yourselves. Please continue, by all means, just show us that our election system no longer matters.

Keep crying, little baby! "Wah, wahh! My president is a crook, it's not fair!"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats 2017 - Republicans must accept Mueller's findings.

Democrats 2019 - We do not accept Mueller's findings.

Mueller’s finding was that he turned the obstruction charge over to Congress because he couldn’t exonerate the President. I’d be pretty ashamed to be supporting a treasonous liar like Trump these days.

So are you going to stop beating your wife? I have a made up dossier here that says you beat her all the time. In fact I'm going to use that dossier to first wiretap you- then to investigate you for two years. Oh wait, you just did something that might be construed as "obstruction" against my witch hunt to find anything on you- even though you are innocent.

Go for that obstruction charge on your investigation- by all means, please pursue this in it's entirety. Show the American people just how completely corrupt this system is that your party can't even lose with dignity in an election that you attempted to rig for yourselves. Please continue, by all means, just show us that our election system no longer matters.

Keep crying, little baby! "Wah, wahh! My president is a crook, it's not fair!"

My President was at least born in the US and while he may be a pussy grabbing SOB- he's still my President and yours to.

He's only my president in the sense that he can be impeached.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats 2017 - Republicans must accept Mueller's findings.

Republicans 2019 - We do not accept Mueller's findings.

Fixed it for ya!

Here's a hint - read the report yourself, bud! I totally accept what's in it. And what's in it is damning and exposes the seedy underbelly of the Trump administration. (Ah, who am I kidding, that's been exposed for a long time.)

Similar to the time Hillary Clinton said the election results should be accepted, then changed her mind when she lost.

[Anonymous]

The dossier wasn’t the reason for the Special counsel appointment.

The beginning of this mess is when he fired Comey.