At what age can a man no longer date a woman in her 30s or younger?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm 35 and would not go lower than 35 or older than 48 and not shorter than 6'1" or heavier than 190.

However that is me. I'm not the dating police so I say date who you want. Hugh Hefner is fine by me. He's gonna die happy.

6'1?? Good luck with that, excluding 90% of men off the bat

I’m 6’2’… in the world of online dating, so many women seem to have “height restrictions”. Restrictions kill “ what could have beans”… when you have a feeling, conversation, glance, you follow through.

For dating, the only restriction I have is can’t be married. I’m the one who referenced the 30 yr old hostess, and my next date is older than me.

My $.02. Thanks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dear God… I’m old at 48 and I still wouldn’t date anyone over 55. Six years plus or minus is usually my max. And has been all along. If I’m single again in my 60s then I’ll date someone in their 60s But otherwise, no way man.

Plus that half your age +7 bit has always been disgusting.

Broke that rule right away, separated, 54, hostess 30 came on to me… sex for a few months, was nothing short of mind blowing.

24 yrs… spread, we are both the Horse on the Chinese menu!

I mean I guess you’re living out the fantasy of sleeping with your daughter… Or her friends. Good for you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm 34 and I wouldn't give a 65 year old the time of day, are you kidding?

Exactly. I'm 30 and I wouldn't give a 45 year old the time of day. I find plenty of men in their 30s (and late 20s) to date, why would I want to date someone that much older? I would make an exception for someone who was a great match with me, but women are not so desperate that they have to date men that much older. This goes for all of my 30 year old friends.

You and all of your 30 year old friends are single, at 30. Your risk of having a downie starts increasing now. Good luck.

That is ridiculous and just not true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is not the dark ages...there should not be a difference of more than 4 years in my opinion. Women hit their sexual stride in their late 30s and 40s...so to have a partner who is very much older than her is a big no-no.

"sexual stride" is a madeup term. Women in their 20s are much hotter and more fertile.

Same for men.

Not really. Men's attractiveness depends on many factors, of which looks is only one. Accomplishments, money, maturity, education are very important to most women. We're talking about dating here. Women's attractiveness depends mainly on looks and youth.

So men probably peak lookswise at 25-30, but their other criteria are increasing after that. Meanwhile, women peak lookswise at 25 at the latest, and that's the main criteria. Your professional accomplishments don't mean anything to a man, though he does want someone with a degree (something which is decided by 22).

Yes - a man wants a young woman. And for the same reasons a woman wants a young man. So stick to your age +/- 5 years.

"An old man marrying a young woman is like a man buying a book for a neighbor to read"

...though there are many women and men who will whore out their bodies for money ...so yeah, an old corpse can marry an Anna NickHole Smith

I have no problem attracting men younger than me (in my 40s). At all. I don't think what you say is true at all. I would have thought that before divorcing but man, was I wrote. No issues whatsoever. I can compete with women much younger. It's not an issue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I dont think i said anything about crow's feet. Thats more of a 35 plus thing. You got time.

It seems that women close to my age (which i am ok with dating) often have some bitterness. They double down on the ridiculous standards and long shopping lists. Women a few years younger like yourself are a bit less jaded. Dont forget your own comments about guys in their late 30s. Its a message board and people vent frustrations, nbd.

Woman here. 43. No crows feet yet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:casual dating or serious dating?

when I was 37 I dated a 53 year old. And he was not rich. Lovely guy, really handsome and sexy, but I ended it because the age difference was going to be too great going forward. I'd say late 40s/50. But who knows, my other ex, who is 52, puts on his match profile that he wont date anyone over 38. Or anyone who has been married before. He is a 52 year old guy who has never been married and is not rich, and wants to find a slim, educated, blue eyed, never married woman between 28 and 38.

So he's 52, not rich, and looking for a 28-year-old?
People never cease to amaze me...

I mean… There’s a reason he’s single and has never married…And with standards so out of touch with reality he probably never will.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I always think it's funny when I see single 30 somethings be so picky when it comes to dating. Tick tock, ladies.

Your attitude is why women in their early 30s end up settling in unhappy marriages. In reality, 30-36 is really prime dating time for women. I can't stand your attitude. It does not do anyone any good.

[Anonymous]

Any age gap more than 10 years gets weird. A 30 year old dating a 40 year old is pushing it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is not the dark ages...there should not be a difference of more than 4 years in my opinion. Women hit their sexual stride in their late 30s and 40s...so to have a partner who is very much older than her is a big no-no.

My DH and I have an 8 year age difference. Works great.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dear God… I’m old at 48 and I still wouldn’t date anyone over 55. Six years plus or minus is usually my max. And has been all along. If I’m single again in my 60s then I’ll date someone in their 60s But otherwise, no way man.

Plus that half your age +7 bit has always been disgusting.

Broke that rule right away, separated, 54, hostess 30 came on to me… sex for a few months, was nothing short of mind blowing.

24 yrs… spread, we are both the Horse on the Chinese menu!

I mean I guess you’re living out the fantasy of sleeping with your daughter… Or her friends. Good for you?

So, if you were 54, and a 30 guy came on to you… you’d say, no?

Didn’t think so.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, a truly wealthy man can always, 100% of the time, find someone to date of any legal age. Not talking about the $500k- $1m salary guys, altho they probably do fine. I mean rich. Assets rich.

Regular guys? I'd guess the cut off is 65.

I'm a PP so I'm totally sockpuppeting but I had to add to my previous post. Why do you think a woman in her 30s (or younger) would be romantically interested in a 65 year old, especially a regular 65 yr old? I mean I'm sure there are exceptions but it would be very rare. Hell, my dad's only 56!

Money.

[Anonymous]

OP - do you have kids? I think that can make a difference. Not too many 30 year olds want to be younger/same age as their potential step kids. And, you would probably get some disapproval from your kids if they are the same age.

If you don't have kids, then who cares?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I dont think i said anything about crow's feet. Thats more of a 35 plus thing. You got time.

It seems that women close to my age (which i am ok with dating) often have some bitterness. They double down on the ridiculous standards and long shopping lists. Women a few years younger like yourself are a bit less jaded. Dont forget your own comments about guys in their late 30s. Its a message board and people vent frustrations, nbd.

Woman here. 43. No crows feet yet.

Crows feet are fine… men ( and women) are looking for OP who stay, in shape. People that don’t ride the excuse, “ I’m older, I’m suppose to be heavy”.

Listened to podcast this morning, if somebody reduces 100 calories a day, over a yr they lose 10 pounds. That is one drink a day, throw in real exercise ( which requires strength training as well ladies) and a person is there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dear God… I’m old at 48 and I still wouldn’t date anyone over 55. Six years plus or minus is usually my max. And has been all along. If I’m single again in my 60s then I’ll date someone in their 60s But otherwise, no way man.

Plus that half your age +7 bit has always been disgusting.

Broke that rule right away, separated, 54, hostess 30 came on to me… sex for a few months, was nothing short of mind blowing.

24 yrs… spread, we are both the Horse on the Chinese menu!

I mean I guess you’re living out the fantasy of sleeping with your daughter… Or her friends. Good for you?

So, if you were 54, and a 30 guy came on to you… you’d say, no?

Didn’t think so.

I’m 46 and I had a very nice fling with a 28 year old guy. He may have had a MILF fetish but I definitely enjoyed the experience.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dear God… I’m old at 48 and I still wouldn’t date anyone over 55. Six years plus or minus is usually my max. And has been all along. If I’m single again in my 60s then I’ll date someone in their 60s But otherwise, no way man.

Plus that half your age +7 bit has always been disgusting.

Broke that rule right away, separated, 54, hostess 30 came on to me… sex for a few months, was nothing short of mind blowing.

24 yrs… spread, we are both the Horse on the Chinese menu!

I mean I guess you’re living out the fantasy of sleeping with your daughter… Or her friends. Good for you?

So, if you were 54, and a 30 guy came on to you… you’d say, no?

Didn’t think so.

I’m 46 and I had a very nice fling with a 28 year old guy. He may have had a MILF fetish but I definitely enjoyed the experience.

Nice! See…. How did you meet?