Epstein letter: Trump knew

[Anonymous]

Pretty sure that child sex isn’t covered under his immunity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If V.G. was NOT the victim in Epstein’s email, the dems should announce she was NOT the victim.
The WH wants it to be her since she never implicated Trump.
If the dems indicate that it was not VG they aren’t necessarily outing anyone since there were hundreds of victims.

[phone] phone number of Congressman Ro Khanna and ask him to correct kkkarolying that it was Giuffre whose name was redacted.

Yes. Make the call

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Remember, Leavitt’s husband was 47 when she was 15, so she may not have the clearest vision about how wrong this operation was.

(Not saying they knew each other at that time, but pointing out that she may not share our disgust about older men who get off on sex with MUCH younger women)

Good catch

[Anonymous]

From 2017. Redacted name (presumably victim) doesn't want to go to Epstein's if Trump is there.

Again, from 2017.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:MAGA/Republicans are officially the Pedo Party.

Here's the text of The Onion article:

Despite the president’s sagging approval rating overall, a Gallup Poll released Tuesday confirmed that Donald Trump’s support remained overwhelmingly strong among working-class American pedophiles. “Even though his polling numbers among Americans who are not sexually attracted to children have hit a second-term low, the president’s approval rating is still an impressive 80% among child rapists with household incomes between $30,000 and $80,000,” said polling analyst Lily Willis, explaining that Gallup’s results indicated that Trump’s agenda still spoke to the large number of Americans primarily concerned with kitchen table issues like whether or not they’ll be able to afford 13-year-old prostitutes.

“For sexual predators who molest kids paycheck to paycheck, Trump’s promise to jump-start the economy with tariffs remains extremely popular. Furthermore, the recent trend of lower gas prices has significantly eased the financial burden on pedophiles whose sex crimes often rely on trafficking children across state lines. Interestingly, while the poll demonstrated that Trump’s support has softened among rapists more broadly, his approval rating remains safely above water among the demographic of ephebophiles—those who, like Trump himself, are sexually attracted to teenagers.” At press time, Democratic strategists were reportedly looking for new ways to appeal to the essential pedophile voting bloc to avoid a disastrous midterm election.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember, Leavitt’s husband was 47 when she was 15, so she may not have the clearest vision about how wrong this operation was.

(Not saying they knew each other at that time, but pointing out that she may not share our disgust about older men who get off on sex with MUCH younger women)

My husband is much older than I am, but we both understand very clearly that passing around young-looking women who might be minors, and who are explicitly asked to entertain multiple men, stinks to high heaven and is morally unacceptable.

But press secretaries are a weird breed, PP. The job description is to lie for the White House, or at the very least, fudge the truth. The people who sign up for this are not going to be paragons of morality and virtue, in any administration.

Is your husband old enough to be your grandfather? Hers is

I appreciate your measured response, but to me the idea of older, richer men convincing young, attractive women with much less life experience borders on the predatory (or at least they are exploiting the woman’s perception that he might be her only path to a better life).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How does this change anything? 70+ million people knew all this about Trump and yet voted for him 3 times. What more could possibly come out?

Those “Christians” protect their own.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting timing of this release

how so? Johnson kept the House of Representatives closed for 3 months to protect Trump and now that the House is re-opening, this is back on the front burner.

You talk as if they only had this information that last 3 months.

This has been in the hands of democrats for over 4 years.

The timing is interesting and tells me this is all for show.

I do not believe that any democrat or republican cares.

4 years?

The House Oversight Committee subpoenaed the Epstein estate on Aug 25, 2025, with production due by Sept 8; records were later released pursuant to that subpoena. ​

Please sit down and shut up until you take the time to actually learn some facts and can resist the urge to pull whatever you want out of your a**.

[Anonymous]

20000 or whatever docs have been out for hours. no word on what is in them. They can have chat gpt scan them and then verify what it word predicts -no reason nothing is out yet. Someone post them here and we'll do it!

[Anonymous]

So Epstein was in Trump Tower AFTER the 2016 election.

Why would he be in Trump Tower if Trump had declared him persona non grata years earlier?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:20000 or whatever docs have been out for hours. no word on what is in them. They can have chat gpt scan them and then verify what it word predicts -no reason nothing is out yet. Someone post them here and we'll do it!

The GOP won't release anything incriminating.

Remember how the DOJ already went through the files looking for Trump mentions? Surely they carefully omitted the incriminating mentions.

https://www.axios.com/2025/07/18/epstein-documents-trump-fbi-senator

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So Epstein was in Trump Tower AFTER the 2016 election.

Why would he be in Trump Tower if Trump had declared him persona non grata years earlier?

But this is not surprising. The only surprising thing is why Trump cares.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So Epstein was in Trump Tower AFTER the 2016 election.

Why would he be in Trump Tower if Trump had declared him persona non grata years earlier?

But this is not surprising. The only surprising thing is why Trump cares.

IT takes a dump on the WH narrative that Trump disassociated himself from Epstein in 2007, doesn't it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:MAGA/Republicans are officially the Pedo Party.

I remember when the Onion only posted parodies. It's sad that they've lost their way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So Epstein was in Trump Tower AFTER the 2016 election.

Why would he be in Trump Tower if Trump had declared him persona non grata years earlier?

But this is not surprising. The only surprising thing is why Trump cares.

IT takes a dump on the WH narrative that Trump disassociated himself from Epstein in 2007, doesn't it?

I think Trump is a lying skeezebag, but being in a Trump tower doesn't mean anything