Epstein letter: Trump knew

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If V.G. was NOT the victim in Epstein’s email, the dems should announce she was NOT the victim.
The WH wants it to be her since she never implicated Trump.
If the dems indicate that it was not VG they aren’t necessarily outing anyone since there were hundreds of victims.

Virginia was born in 1983, so she would have been 29 at the time the redacted victim met with Trump in 2012 at Epstein's house. She was living in Australia by then. And anyway, she was way too young for Epstein to be remotely interested in still inviting her to his house, or for Trump to be interested.

Nice try, White House.

There is a pretty good chance that if they even just unredact the first letter in either the first or last name that it would prove the WH wrong.

[Anonymous]

MAGA/Republicans are officially the Pedo Party.

[Anonymous]

Remember, Leavitt’s husband was 47 when she was 15, so she may not have the clearest vision about how wrong this operation was.

(Not saying they knew each other at that time, but pointing out that she may not share our disgust about older men who get off on sex with MUCH younger women)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why wouldn't Biden release this information

Aren't you embarrassed or ashamed still playing this game? Why would you still be defending him?

Because he's paid to defend him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone who doesn't realize at this point that Epstein was part of an intelligence operation by Mossad is either willfully blind to it or downright stupid. That Trump was a clear target of this operation.

The connections are all there and it's obvious that institutions of power tried to sweep it all under the rug *for some reason*. Epstein was literally caught conducting back-channel diplomacy for Israel (https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/jeffrey-epstein-ehud-barak-putin-israel-russia-syria-war-depose-assad) at the behest of a former Israeli Prime Minister.

Yep, this is way bigger than any one person. This goes deep.

It’s a coping mechanism to think it’s just Trump, or whoever.

People should also be asking what other Epstein are out there today.

It's not just Trump, but Trump knows who the others are. Why isn't he saying anything?

Because he raped children, that’s my guess.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Honestly, Trump could be live streamed raping a 15 year old girl and his MAGA followers wouldn’t care. “She wanted it, did you see what she was wearing!”

Really sad and frighteningly true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If V.G. was NOT the victim in Epstein’s email, the dems should announce she was NOT the victim.
The WH wants it to be her since she never implicated Trump.
If the dems indicate that it was not VG they aren’t necessarily outing anyone since there were hundreds of victims.

[phone] phone number of Congressman Ro Khanna and ask him to correct kkkarolying that it was Giuffre whose name was redacted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:MAGA/Republicans are officially the Pedo Party.

Omg lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone who doesn't realize at this point that Epstein was part of an intelligence operation by Mossad is either willfully blind to it or downright stupid. That Trump was a clear target of this operation.

The connections are all there and it's obvious that institutions of power tried to sweep it all under the rug *for some reason*. Epstein was literally caught conducting back-channel diplomacy for Israel (https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/jeffrey-epstein-ehud-barak-putin-israel-russia-syria-war-depose-assad) at the behest of a former Israeli Prime Minister.

Yep, this is way bigger than any one person. This goes deep.

It’s a coping mechanism to think it’s just Trump, or whoever.

People should also be asking what other Epstein are out there today.

It's not just Trump, but Trump knows who the others are. Why isn't he saying anything?

Maybe he's afraid that he will be the first US president to commit "suicide" along with Epstein, the French man, and Giuffre .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why wouldn't Biden release this information

Aren't you embarrassed or ashamed still playing this game? Why would you still be defending him?

Because he's paid to defend him.

I hope so, that is the only explanation that makes sense. Either getting paid or a pedo himself .

[Anonymous]

Interesting timing of this release

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why wouldn't Biden release this information

Doesn't matter. It's now. Not then. Stay focused.

Buffet pp.

It does matter.

It tells me that the Dems don’t care either because they waited until now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why wouldn't Biden release this information

Doesn't matter. It's now. Not then. Stay focused.

Buffet pp.

It does matter.

It tells me that the Dems don’t care either because they waited until now.

We care. Join us!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Interesting timing of this release

how so? Johnson kept the House of Representatives closed for 3 months to protect Trump and now that the House is re-opening, this is back on the front burner.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Remember, Leavitt’s husband was 47 when she was 15, so she may not have the clearest vision about how wrong this operation was.

(Not saying they knew each other at that time, but pointing out that she may not share our disgust about older men who get off on sex with MUCH younger women)

My husband is much older than I am, but we both understand very clearly that passing around young-looking women who might be minors, and who are explicitly asked to entertain multiple men, stinks to high heaven and is morally unacceptable.

But press secretaries are a weird breed, PP. The job description is to lie for the White House, or at the very least, fudge the truth. The people who sign up for this are not going to be paragons of morality and virtue, in any administration.