should private and independent school provide accountability and transparency admission

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All the profits from the endowments are tax free. Huge subsidies to private schools ….. that really don’t needed.

So far everyone agrees with the subsidies to rich schools and no one says that those subsidies should be instead allocated to public schools.

Last time I saw this kind of wealth redistribution was in a Communist authoritarian regime. It didn’t turn out very well for them.

Well, you should read a bit more about tax policy in Scandinavian countries that are very rich and financehigh quality public education. It doesn’t hurt to read more.

Indeed. “Denmark has a tradition of private schools with a substantial government subsidy.”

Source: https://eng.uvm.dk/primary-and-lower-secondary-education/private-schools-in-denmark

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All the profits from the endowments are tax free. Huge subsidies to private schools ….. that really don’t needed.

So far everyone agrees with the subsidies to rich schools and no one says that those subsidies should be instead allocated to public schools.

Last time I saw this kind of wealth redistribution was in a Communist authoritarian regime. It didn’t turn out very well for them.

Well, you should read a bit more about tax policy in Scandinavian countries that are very rich and financehigh quality public education. It doesn’t hurt to read more.

Indeed. “Denmark has a tradition of private schools with a substantial government subsidy.”

Source: https://eng.uvm.dk/primary-and-lower-secondary-education/private-schools-in-denmark

With one of the largest tax rates in the world …..

https://nomadcapitalist.com/finance/countries-with-the-highest-tax-rates/

Maybe reading a bit more would be helpful for you ….

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All the profits from the endowments are tax free. Huge subsidies to private schools ….. that really don’t needed.

So far everyone agrees with the subsidies to rich schools and no one says that those subsidies should be instead allocated to public schools.

Last time I saw this kind of wealth redistribution was in a Communist authoritarian regime. It didn’t turn out very well for them.

Well, you should read a bit more about tax policy in Scandinavian countries that are very rich and financehigh quality public education. It doesn’t hurt to read more.

Indeed. “Denmark has a tradition of private schools with a substantial government subsidy.”

Source: https://eng.uvm.dk/primary-and-lower-secondary-education/private-schools-in-denmark

With one of the largest tax rates in the world …..

https://nomadcapitalist.com/finance/countries-with-the-highest-tax-rates/

Maybe reading a bit more would be helpful for you ….

You seem as confused as ever. I am for raising taxes. Just not for non-profits. Glad you agree with the Scandinavians too!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All the profits from the endowments are tax free. Huge subsidies to private schools ….. that really don’t needed.

So far everyone agrees with the subsidies to rich schools and no one says that those subsidies should be instead allocated to public schools.

Last time I saw this kind of wealth redistribution was in a Communist authoritarian regime. It didn’t turn out very well for them.

Well, you should read a bit more about tax policy in Scandinavian countries that are very rich and financehigh quality public education. It doesn’t hurt to read more.

Indeed. “Denmark has a tradition of private schools with a substantial government subsidy.”

Source: https://eng.uvm.dk/primary-and-lower-secondary-education/private-schools-in-denmark

With one of the largest tax rates in the world …..

https://nomadcapitalist.com/finance/countries-with-the-highest-tax-rates/

Maybe reading a bit more would be helpful for you ….

You seem as confused as ever. I am for raising taxes. Just not for non-profits. Glad you agree with the Scandinavians too!

I agree. I am also for raising taxes…. Except my taxes.

And yes, I agree with Scandinavians too that they don’t have tax loopholes for oligarchs like in the US.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They have comply with anti-discrimination laws. They don’t have to volunteer their admissions decision making. If you are an aggrieved party, you can sue and seek the information you need through the courts.

If it’s opaque very difficult to know is a discrimination takes place.

If I am landlord and reject an application for rental I have to explain what was the criteria for rejection openly. I cannot keep to myself.

Why the law should be different for schools and landlords, even in the absence of federal grants?

Because you have a right to housing, you have not right to private school.

[Anonymous]

Dc Human Rights Act:

Every individual shall have an equal opportunity to participate fully in the economic, cultural and intellectual life of the District and to have an equal opportunity to participate in all aspects of life, including, but not limited to, in employment, in places of public accommodation, resort or amusement, in educational institutions, in public service, and in housing and commercial space accommodations.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They have comply with anti-discrimination laws. They don’t have to volunteer their admissions decision making. If you are an aggrieved party, you can sue and seek the information you need through the courts.

If it’s opaque very difficult to know is a discrimination takes place.

If I am landlord and reject an application for rental I have to explain what was the criteria for rejection openly. I cannot keep to myself.

Why the law should be different for schools and landlords, even in the absence of federal grants?

Because you have a right to housing, you have not right to private school.

DC Human Rights Axt:

Every individual shall have an equal opportunity to participate fully in the economic, cultural and intellectual life of the District and to have an equal opportunity to participate in all aspects of life, including, but not limited to, in employment, in places of public accommodation, resort or amusement, in educational institutions, in public service, and in housing and commercial space accommodations.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All the profits from the endowments are tax free. Huge subsidies to private schools ….. that really don’t needed.

So far everyone agrees with the subsidies to rich schools and no one says that those subsidies should be instead allocated to public schools.

Last time I saw this kind of wealth redistribution was in a Communist authoritarian regime. It didn’t turn out very well for them.

Well, you should read a bit more about tax policy in Scandinavian countries that are very rich and financehigh quality public education. It doesn’t hurt to read more.

Indeed. “Denmark has a tradition of private schools with a substantial government subsidy.”

Source: https://eng.uvm.dk/primary-and-lower-secondary-education/private-schools-in-denmark

Ask the danish government if it is socially responsible to subsidize a school with a tuition of 60k.

I think it’s ok to subsidize private education such as charter schools. It’s Just that nothing will happen if you don’t give a subsidy to a school for oligarch families.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think you understand holistic admissions and its benefits for building a balanced community. I think want a school where people get admitted off of only strict quantitative instead of qualitative measures. That’s fine. You’re free to start a school for find one that suits your preferences. To demand private schools do x,y,z kind of reminds me of the communist style school system my family purposely moved to get away from.

Holistic admissions : my wealthy and connected family get better chances of getting admitted in a private school. Very good for building community!

Point based system: the test scores of my kid are on the low side. Very bad for building community!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All the profits from the endowments are tax free. Huge subsidies to private schools ….. that really don’t needed.

So far everyone agrees with the subsidies to rich schools and no one says that those subsidies should be instead allocated to public schools.

Last time I saw this kind of wealth redistribution was in a Communist authoritarian regime. It didn’t turn out very well for them.

Well, you should read a bit more about tax policy in Scandinavian countries that are very rich and financehigh quality public education. It doesn’t hurt to read more.

Indeed. “Denmark has a tradition of private schools with a substantial government subsidy.”

Source: https://eng.uvm.dk/primary-and-lower-secondary-education/private-schools-in-denmark

With one of the largest tax rates in the world …..

https://nomadcapitalist.com/finance/countries-with-the-highest-tax-rates/

Maybe reading a bit more would be helpful for you ….

You seem as confused as ever. I am for raising taxes. Just not for non-profits. Glad you agree with the Scandinavians too!

I was poor and envious of the rich when I was young. But instead of coveting others’ wealth and fortunes, I worked hard and figured out how to create my own. If more people did this instead creating excuses for why they can’t and coming up with ways to redistribute wealth through taxes.

Yeah, go ahead a raise taxes to 90% and see what happens to innovations and brain drain of the most capable workers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All the profits from the endowments are tax free. Huge subsidies to private schools ….. that really don’t needed.

So far everyone agrees with the subsidies to rich schools and no one says that those subsidies should be instead allocated to public schools.

Last time I saw this kind of wealth redistribution was in a Communist authoritarian regime. It didn’t turn out very well for them.

Well, you should read a bit more about tax policy in Scandinavian countries that are very rich and financehigh quality public education. It doesn’t hurt to read more.

Indeed. “Denmark has a tradition of private schools with a substantial government subsidy.”

Source: https://eng.uvm.dk/primary-and-lower-secondary-education/private-schools-in-denmark

With one of the largest tax rates in the world …..

https://nomadcapitalist.com/finance/countries-with-the-highest-tax-rates/

Maybe reading a bit more would be helpful for you ….

You seem as confused as ever. I am for raising taxes. Just not for non-profits. Glad you agree with the Scandinavians too!

I was poor and envious of the rich when I was young. But instead of coveting others’ wealth and fortunes, I worked hard and figured out how to create my own. If more people did this instead creating excuses for why they can’t and coming up with ways to redistribute wealth through taxes.

Yeah, go ahead a raise taxes to 90% and see what happens to innovations and brain drain of the most capable workers.

Sorry for saying that I do not agree with a subsidy to oligarchs. Maybe we should keep it. We have to be inclusive, even with oligarchs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They have comply with anti-discrimination laws. They don’t have to volunteer their admissions decision making. If you are an aggrieved party, you can sue and seek the information you need through the courts.

If it’s opaque very difficult to know is a discrimination takes place.

If I am landlord and reject an application for rental I have to explain what was the criteria for rejection openly. I cannot keep to myself.

Why the law should be different for schools and landlords, even in the absence of federal grants?

Because you have a right to housing, you have not right to private school.

DC Human Rights Axt:

Every individual shall have an equal opportunity to participate fully in the economic, cultural and intellectual life of the District and to have an equal opportunity to participate in all aspects of life, including, but not limited to, in employment, in places of public accommodation, resort or amusement, in educational institutions, in public service, and in housing and commercial space accommodations.

That would be public school.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They have comply with anti-discrimination laws. They don’t have to volunteer their admissions decision making. If you are an aggrieved party, you can sue and seek the information you need through the courts.

If it’s opaque very difficult to know is a discrimination takes place.

If I am landlord and reject an application for rental I have to explain what was the criteria for rejection openly. I cannot keep to myself.

Why the law should be different for schools and landlords, even in the absence of federal grants?

Because you have a right to housing, you have not right to private school.

DC Human Rights Axt:

Every individual shall have an equal opportunity to participate fully in the economic, cultural and intellectual life of the District and to have an equal opportunity to participate in all aspects of life, including, but not limited to, in employment, in places of public accommodation, resort or amusement, in educational institutions, in public service, and in housing and commercial space accommodations.

That would be public school.

Really ? No wonder elites are not liked that much.

In essence you are saying is if that if you have a race, religion, political preference, gender, that the school doesn’t like, you can be excluded. That’s fine, but then schools should adjust their DEI instruction accordingly.

[Anonymous]

Why are we indulging one moron who is probably typing on one hand while chaining himself to Sidwell's front door and on the cusp of self-immolation because they have nothing else in their life?

It's actually a bit sad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why are we indulging one moron who is probably typing on one hand while chaining himself to Sidwell's front door and on the cusp of self-immolation because they have nothing else in their life?

It's actually a bit sad.

+1000000