Was Walz a mistake?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Walz is gay

I think that mattered. Yes.

I think that's why she picked him! She didn't want to be upstaged by a masculine man who was well-spoken. People might have wondered why she was top of the ticket.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Was he the wrong vp pick?

Biden was the mistake. Electing a first termer that is almost guaranteed to be unfit and unpopular as an incumbent seeking re-election is a recipe for disaster and it played out as such.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s not Walz, it’s not Harris, it’s DEMOCRATS. We don’t want progressive policies.

+1
Though I did think Walz was a poor pick.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No. This was a choice between good and evil. All other considerations were secondary.

I'm deeply ashamed of my country today.

Correct.

The VP pick (as evidenced by Vance), had NO impact on the outcome of this election.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No. He was a good pick.

Correct. His aw shucks, Midwest , coach vibe counteracted her progressive, Northern CA vibe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yes, he wasn’t even from a swing state. He offered no value to the ticket

+1. She should have picked Josh Shapiro or Mark Kelly. She lost Michigan anyway with Walz but at least she could have picked up Pennsylvania maybe. And Walz proved to be a gaffe machine with a penchant for exaggeration similar to Biden.

[Anonymous]

She was the bad pick. There should have been a debate. She did not lose because of Walz.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No. He was a good pick.

Correct. His aw shucks, Midwest , coach vibe counteracted her progressive, Northern CA vibe.

Ugh. His folksy shtick and over-emotional demeanor got old incredibly fast.

[Anonymous]

Theu both suck.

[Anonymous]

It's not that Walz or Kamala was the wrong choice....it's simply that Trump was the right choice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It doesn't seem like there is any VP candidate home state advantage. I don't think a Harris/Shapiro ticket would have won either. Harris was ok, but not awesome and had a late start thanks to Biden.

Agree. Maybe they would have won PA. Still don’t see a path to Wisconsin and Michigan in particular given all of Shapiro’s baggage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s not Walz, it’s not Harris, it’s DEMOCRATS. We don’t want progressive policies.

+1
Though I did think Walz was a poor pick.

+2

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Didn't Walz refer to Elon Musk as "that gay guy"?? How on earth did that not offend people? Not only was he making fun of Elon, he was making fun of gay people because he was using the word gay in a negative way. Walz is a loser!

Totally agree. It’s a double standard.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, he wasn’t even from a swing state. He offered no value to the ticket

+1. She should have picked Josh Shapiro or Mark Kelly. She lost Michigan anyway with Walz but at least she could have picked up Pennsylvania maybe. And Walz proved to be a gaffe machine with a penchant for exaggeration similar to Biden.

Shapiro and Kelly both had Emhoff-grade woman issues. Walz turned out to have CCP issues.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's not that Walz or Kamala was the wrong choice....it's simply that Trump was the right choice.

No, he's not. You'll see.