Was Walz a mistake?
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
|
He was a lightweight. His folksy schtick on 60 Minutes wasn’t even cute. I don’t think he hurt her but he definitely didn’t help.
PA was always a must win state. Why they didn’t pick Josh Shapiro as VP was baffling. |
Anonymous
| Folks are tired of the elites. Enough of Obamas, Clintons, Hollywood and Fake News. It’s over. |
Anonymous
Baffling? They couldn’t choose him. Your party doesn’t like Jews. You know this. |
Anonymous
This. We’re a shithole country filed with idiots. |
Anonymous
| Trump didn’t win because of Vance and Harris didn’t lose because of Walz. |
Anonymous
| 100 percent a mistake. A sign of Kamala’s flawed thinking and bad judgments. |
Anonymous
I absolutely think Vance helped steer independents to Trump. |
Anonymous
Ding ding ding ding ding!! Biden’s ego was the problem |
Anonymous
+100 |
Anonymous
I don’t. I think picking Vance was net neutral. |
Anonymous
|
Nobody gives a flying F about Walz and the VP pick. Dems are trying to scape goat their meltdown on a white male (yet again). Harris was terrible. The Dems lost because their positions on issues are trash. Walz is so far down on the list for why the Dems lost.
Walz has nothing to do with why the GOP routed the Dems in the Senate as well. The fact that the Dems lost the presidency and the Senate races means they have much larger policy issues beyond Walz. |
Anonymous
I’m an Independent. Trump won because of Joe Biden’s public blunders and suspected dementia . That’s what I am seeing in my circles. |
Anonymous
|
Nope, nothing to do with Walz or Harris.
We live in a racist and misogynistic country and clearly more than half the people are totally good with it, including the very people who will be harmed the most by the coming regime. |
Anonymous
This. |
Anonymous
It's not baffling at all, given what we've been hearing from Democrats for months... |