Kate's New Picture

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thoughts? Take a look at the timeline

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy_commons/s/NSYTYviOFS

https://tomsiebert.substack.com/p/the-strange-case-of-kate-middleton

Oooh, this timeline was really helpful in understanding what all the fuss is about! VERY intriguing!

Very much so! What a rabbit hole!

The ambulance at Sandringham was news to me, as is the assertion that the children haven't been seen since Christmas, either. Is that true? Have them been out of school, or does the writer just mean that they haven't made any official public appearances? That part was unclear.

I've read that the children have been at school.

"Culling" is a bit of a disturbing word choice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it’s pretty clear that it’s an old photo. The Royals post non-contemporaneous photos all the time on their social media.

Except, this time, they tried to make a point of say “hey this pic was taken by William this week! 📸 “ which they don’t normally do. It just highlights the fib in their post.

…except no they didn’t. That’s literally not what the Instagram post said. That’s what you read in one linked news source; by the way, US Weekly said the photo was “taken earlier in 2024.” Here is literally the caption on the actual Instagram post:

Thank you for your kind wishes and continued support over the last two months.

Wishing everyone a Happy Mother’s Day. C

📸 The Prince of Wales, 2024

NOTE THAT THIS DOES NOT SAY “HEY WE TOOK THIS PHOTO THIS WEEK,” OR EVEN “WE TOOK THIS PHOTO IN 2024.” The “2024” can simply mean it was posted to celebrate Mother’s Day 2024.

So it was taken in the dead of winter in early 2024? With green grass?

I don’t know what to make of the photo. When compared to the Christmas photos of the children, Louis is now missing a tooth, and Charlotte’s lateral incisors have grown longer, so it couldn’t have been taken last fall.

But it’s also doubtful it was taken very recently due to the foliage.

So when was it taken? Or is it edited?

Dude, it’s an Instagram photo. Do you do this to the photos your family and friends post, too? If someone dares to use a photo of their family looking nice at the beach on their Christmas card, are you like OMG THIS WAS TAKEN MONTHS AGO! Because that’s what this post is: a greeting. A Mother’s Day (UK) greeting. This is not “Today is the day our family is able to sit together in real time and post a photo of this exact moment.” Are you really this dim?

My family aren't public figures or royals who are known to lie to the public......which to be fair most public figured lies but do be surprised people are picking them apart.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why is it hard to take what they are saying at face value? I don't get it.

That would be boring. Wild conspiracy theories stimulate dull minds.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Their PR team is so terrible. Who thought it was a good idea to post this pic? They need to hire a PR firm that’s lead by an America.

they really do. I am not even one of the conspiracy people but why in the world would you release a picture that looks like this? This isn't helping at all.

What am I missing from this crop?

it's Charlotte's sleeve. The bottom part of it is disappearing. It's definitely an altered picture that's been done terribly

You’re honestly insane.

The sleeve is literally disappearing. It's not my fault they terrible at editing pics.

But what were they even editing?

lol that's my question. Someone on twitter theorized they took many pictures and spliced them together. Okay but why? Just take a nice picture with the basic touch up and post it.

"Someone on twitter", lol.

Who was a photographer.....We all have eyes as well. The picture is edited.

Seriously! The delusional people claiming that the clearly edited picture isn’t edited are, in fact, insane.

I feel like theyre trying to gaslight us lol.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it’s pretty clear that it’s an old photo. The Royals post non-contemporaneous photos all the time on their social media.

Except, this time, they tried to make a point of say “hey this pic was taken by William this week! 📸 “ which they don’t normally do. It just highlights the fib in their post.

…except no they didn’t. That’s literally not what the Instagram post said. That’s what you read in one linked news source; by the way, US Weekly said the photo was “taken earlier in 2024.” Here is literally the caption on the actual Instagram post:

Thank you for your kind wishes and continued support over the last two months.

Wishing everyone a Happy Mother’s Day. C

📸 The Prince of Wales, 2024

NOTE THAT THIS DOES NOT SAY “HEY WE TOOK THIS PHOTO THIS WEEK,” OR EVEN “WE TOOK THIS PHOTO IN 2024.” The “2024” can simply mean it was posted to celebrate Mother’s Day 2024.

So it was taken in the dead of winter in early 2024? With green grass?

I don’t know what to make of the photo. When compared to the Christmas photos of the children, Louis is now missing a tooth, and Charlotte’s lateral incisors have grown longer, so it couldn’t have been taken last fall.

But it’s also doubtful it was taken very recently due to the foliage.

So when was it taken? Or is it edited?

Dude, it’s an Instagram photo. Do you do this to the photos your family and friends post, too? If someone dares to use a photo of their family looking nice at the beach on their Christmas card, are you like OMG THIS WAS TAKEN MONTHS AGO! Because that’s what this post is: a greeting. A Mother’s Day (UK) greeting. This is not “Today is the day our family is able to sit together in real time and post a photo of this exact moment.” Are you really this dim?

My family aren't public figures or royals who are known to lie to the public......which to be fair most public figured lies but do be surprised people are picking them apart.

Are you drunk? This statement makes no sense.

[Anonymous]

That timeline left off that disturbing video of William looking so poorly that he can’t stand upright and was swaying. That was a really strange moment too.

Regarding hospital visits- there are lots of back doors to sneak people in for visits. I don’t believe she only got one visit. She’s very close to her family too

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it’s pretty clear that it’s an old photo. The Royals post non-contemporaneous photos all the time on their social media.

Except, this time, they tried to make a point of say “hey this pic was taken by William this week! 📸 “ which they don’t normally do. It just highlights the fib in their post.

…except no they didn’t. That’s literally not what the Instagram post said. That’s what you read in one linked news source; by the way, US Weekly said the photo was “taken earlier in 2024.” Here is literally the caption on the actual Instagram post:

Thank you for your kind wishes and continued support over the last two months.

Wishing everyone a Happy Mother’s Day. C

📸 The Prince of Wales, 2024

NOTE THAT THIS DOES NOT SAY “HEY WE TOOK THIS PHOTO THIS WEEK,” OR EVEN “WE TOOK THIS PHOTO IN 2024.” The “2024” can simply mean it was posted to celebrate Mother’s Day 2024.

So it was taken in the dead of winter in early 2024? With green grass?

I don’t know what to make of the photo. When compared to the Christmas photos of the children, Louis is now missing a tooth, and Charlotte’s lateral incisors have grown longer, so it couldn’t have been taken last fall.

But it’s also doubtful it was taken very recently due to the foliage.

So when was it taken? Or is it edited?

Dude, it’s an Instagram photo. Do you do this to the photos your family and friends post, too? If someone dares to use a photo of their family looking nice at the beach on their Christmas card, are you like OMG THIS WAS TAKEN MONTHS AGO! Because that’s what this post is: a greeting. A Mother’s Day (UK) greeting. This is not “Today is the day our family is able to sit together in real time and post a photo of this exact moment.” Are you really this dim?

If they’d been in hiding for months after a suspicious medical event and made a point to add “📸 2024” to the picture, which features bright green grass and full leaves and it is still winter? Yeah, I’d be scrutinizing it.

[Anonymous]

I feel like this shows there's definitely some tension between Charles/Camilla and William/Kate. Their communication office is obviously failing. Why doesn't Charles' team step in.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:That timeline left off that disturbing video of William looking so poorly that he can’t stand upright and was swaying. That was a really strange moment too.

Regarding hospital visits- there are lots of back doors to sneak people in for visits. I don’t believe she only got one visit. She’s very close to her family too

FYI - he always sways. Always has, always will.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think it’s pretty clear that it’s an old photo. The Royals post non-contemporaneous photos all the time on their social media.

Except, this time, they tried to make a point of say “hey this pic was taken by William this week! 📸 “ which they don’t normally do. It just highlights the fib in their post.

+1. It’s misleading.

Clearly it’s not recent with the grass too green and the tree in the background is ready to drop its leaves.

They need new PR.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it’s pretty clear that it’s an old photo. The Royals post non-contemporaneous photos all the time on their social media.

Except, this time, they tried to make a point of say “hey this pic was taken by William this week! 📸 “ which they don’t normally do. It just highlights the fib in their post.

…except no they didn’t. That’s literally not what the Instagram post said. That’s what you read in one linked news source; by the way, US Weekly said the photo was “taken earlier in 2024.” Here is literally the caption on the actual Instagram post:

Thank you for your kind wishes and continued support over the last two months.

Wishing everyone a Happy Mother’s Day. C

📸 The Prince of Wales, 2024

NOTE THAT THIS DOES NOT SAY “HEY WE TOOK THIS PHOTO THIS WEEK,” OR EVEN “WE TOOK THIS PHOTO IN 2024.” The “2024” can simply mean it was posted to celebrate Mother’s Day 2024.

So it was taken in the dead of winter in early 2024? With green grass?

I don’t know what to make of the photo. When compared to the Christmas photos of the children, Louis is now missing a tooth, and Charlotte’s lateral incisors have grown longer, so it couldn’t have been taken last fall.

But it’s also doubtful it was taken very recently due to the foliage.

So when was it taken? Or is it edited?

Dude, it’s an Instagram photo. Do you do this to the photos your family and friends post, too? If someone dares to use a photo of their family looking nice at the beach on their Christmas card, are you like OMG THIS WAS TAKEN MONTHS AGO! Because that’s what this post is: a greeting. A Mother’s Day (UK) greeting. This is not “Today is the day our family is able to sit together in real time and post a photo of this exact moment.” Are you really this dim?

If they’d been in hiding for months after a suspicious medical event and made a point to add “📸 2024” to the picture, which features bright green grass and full leaves and it is still winter? Yeah, I’d be scrutinizing it.

This.

I’m curious what naysayers think “📸 2024” means if not “this picture was taken in 2024”?

If it was meant to mean “this is a Mother’s Day memory for 2024” why use the flashing camera? Why not “💗 2024” or “👩🧑👧🧒 2024”?

The camera was a choice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it’s pretty clear that it’s an old photo. The Royals post non-contemporaneous photos all the time on their social media.

Except, this time, they tried to make a point of say “hey this pic was taken by William this week! 📸 “ which they don’t normally do. It just highlights the fib in their post.

…except no they didn’t. That’s literally not what the Instagram post said. That’s what you read in one linked news source; by the way, US Weekly said the photo was “taken earlier in 2024.” Here is literally the caption on the actual Instagram post:

Thank you for your kind wishes and continued support over the last two months.

Wishing everyone a Happy Mother’s Day. C

📸 The Prince of Wales, 2024

NOTE THAT THIS DOES NOT SAY “HEY WE TOOK THIS PHOTO THIS WEEK,” OR EVEN “WE TOOK THIS PHOTO IN 2024.” The “2024” can simply mean it was posted to celebrate Mother’s Day 2024.

So it was taken in the dead of winter in early 2024? With green grass?

I don’t know what to make of the photo. When compared to the Christmas photos of the children, Louis is now missing a tooth, and Charlotte’s lateral incisors have grown longer, so it couldn’t have been taken last fall.

But it’s also doubtful it was taken very recently due to the foliage.

So when was it taken? Or is it edited?

Dude, it’s an Instagram photo. Do you do this to the photos your family and friends post, too? If someone dares to use a photo of their family looking nice at the beach on their Christmas card, are you like OMG THIS WAS TAKEN MONTHS AGO! Because that’s what this post is: a greeting. A Mother’s Day (UK) greeting. This is not “Today is the day our family is able to sit together in real time and post a photo of this exact moment.” Are you really this dim?

If they’d been in hiding for months after a suspicious medical event and made a point to add “📸 2024” to the picture, which features bright green grass and full leaves and it is still winter? Yeah, I’d be scrutinizing it.

“2024” means it was posted in 2024, not that it was taken in 2024.

[Anonymous]

The grass is green at Windsor right now. The leaves could also be new/evergreen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it’s pretty clear that it’s an old photo. The Royals post non-contemporaneous photos all the time on their social media.

Except, this time, they tried to make a point of say “hey this pic was taken by William this week! 📸 “ which they don’t normally do. It just highlights the fib in their post.

…except no they didn’t. That’s literally not what the Instagram post said. That’s what you read in one linked news source; by the way, US Weekly said the photo was “taken earlier in 2024.” Here is literally the caption on the actual Instagram post:

Thank you for your kind wishes and continued support over the last two months.

Wishing everyone a Happy Mother’s Day. C

📸 The Prince of Wales, 2024

NOTE THAT THIS DOES NOT SAY “HEY WE TOOK THIS PHOTO THIS WEEK,” OR EVEN “WE TOOK THIS PHOTO IN 2024.” The “2024” can simply mean it was posted to celebrate Mother’s Day 2024.

So it was taken in the dead of winter in early 2024? With green grass?

I don’t know what to make of the photo. When compared to the Christmas photos of the children, Louis is now missing a tooth, and Charlotte’s lateral incisors have grown longer, so it couldn’t have been taken last fall.

But it’s also doubtful it was taken very recently due to the foliage.

So when was it taken? Or is it edited?

Dude, it’s an Instagram photo. Do you do this to the photos your family and friends post, too? If someone dares to use a photo of their family looking nice at the beach on their Christmas card, are you like OMG THIS WAS TAKEN MONTHS AGO! Because that’s what this post is: a greeting. A Mother’s Day (UK) greeting. This is not “Today is the day our family is able to sit together in real time and post a photo of this exact moment.” Are you really this dim?

If they’d been in hiding for months after a suspicious medical event and made a point to add “📸 2024” to the picture, which features bright green grass and full leaves and it is still winter? Yeah, I’d be scrutinizing it.

“2024” means it was posted in 2024, not that it was taken in 2024.

Why the camera then?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This whole thing has been a master class in horrific PR. They need a new communications team.

Because they kept her privacy? I think quite the opposite.

But she’s not a normal citizen. She’s a servant of the people of the Commonwealth. They PAY for her lifestyle. They PAY for her surgery. For all of it. It’s the same as when the president is ill or the secret of defense disappears. The people deserve to know what’s up. All of these people knew what they were getting into.

They PAY for everyone's surgery. Do you know what the NHS is?

What a laugh! As if the Royals don’t get preferential treatment and choice of doctors.

Then what is being paid for? PP insisted that she she no right to privacy because her surgery was paid for. What a laugh, indeed. Some Americans really are all bent out of shape over this.