Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So many decisions are made based on free transportation. Snow days, flooded roads, start times, end times. It’s ridiculous. We need to do away with school buses, boost the public buses and make decisions based on what’s best for our kids.
You want elementary school kids to get on RideOn buses alone?
Even if you limited it to HS, RideOn routes could never scale up to meet the demand before and after school.
In plenty of cities ES kids get in the bus. At the very least MS/HS kids get on the bus and train.
I have a hard time imagining my 6-year-old getting on a city bus. Actually no, I know exactly what would happen.
Regardless, let's say, as you seem to suggest, we keep buses for ES, and have MS/HS ride non-school public transportation.
How would that work? RideOn only carries 57,000 riders per day. MCPS reports 100,000 students ride the bus, typically twice per day. That's an extra 200,000 rides.
Now, obviously not all of those are middle/high school students, but you're still looking at increasing rides per day by 3-4x.
Worse, those rides obviously aren't spread throughout the day or throughout the system. Most of the riders would be going to a handful of places. But they'd need to get picked up from wider range of bus stops than currently exist. So many, many more buses would be needed. For only on some routes that pass schools, and only for a couple hours each day.
In an area of higher density housing, workplaces, and transit, this could be workable. You would expect a higher percentage of walkers. And higher-capacity rail service carrying some of the burden. But this wouldn't work in a place like MoCo.