It’s obvious from your post that you aren’t assigned to a high-poverty low-score school in Arlington. Send your kids to one of those schools and then come back here and tell us about your values. |
Also adding that the option schools are a way to provide a better education for families who can’t afford to buy into YOUR neighborhood. You bought your way into a school you’re happy with; you don’t get to judge people who don’t have that option, or who have kids with more at stake with respect to their educational opportunities. You don’t get to come on here and call them “stupid.” |
DP. Not being fluent in Spanish is not the end of the world. |
![]() |
DP. WOW. I guess your resentment was triggered! Enjoy your option school. |
It’s not resentful to call someone out for calling other choices “stupid.” We don’t use the option schools and have never applied to the lottery. |
|
|
The scarcity of options is, in my opinion, what drives their desirability. Its not that hard to “opt” into the lottery in Arlington and then parents get all hot and bothered about being in or being out.
If the emphasis was neighborhood schools, perhaps the overall public education system would be better. |
DP, I felt that same way about that post, and it's not resentment, its annoyance at the people who are like "neighborhood schools have tremendous value." I live in Green Valley and sent my kids to Drew, because we walk the walk. If you live north of Lee Highway, you paid three times as much as me for the same size house and lot in the same school system and basically the same commute to DC but a much different "neighborhood school." Other things I'm tired of hearing: "I don't care about test scores"--generally only said by highly educated upper middle class people who have lots of privileges, including the privilege of not having to worry about things like the quality of their neighborhood school because exclusionary zoning and small neighborhood boundary zones mean only the children of other highly educated upper middle class people will be there, and test scores don't signify anything. |
I would say that the emphasis IS neighborhood schools and that's why we have such a segregated system. If we weren't so "neighborhood" focused, we'd have boundaries or rank choice admissions that "equalize" all the schools and there wouldn't be as much "need" or desire for options beyond actual pedagogically different programs like immersion. |
It just read to me like someone who's bitter they're in a high-poverty neighborhood school district. (I am as well, btw. And our kids have attended our assigned Title I schools since kindergarten. One graduating Wakefield this year.) I actually know a lot of highly educated upper middle class people in south Arlington who profess their preference for their Title 1 neighborhood school's diversity over the academic focus of other schools. The vast majority of parents in Arlington, however, do not share that preference and fight tooth and nail to make sure the current neighborhood system remains. |
I’m that poster. I don’t live in a high poverty neighborhood. We can afford (nice) a house in any school pyramid in the DMV, btw, so no I am not bitter. Some people actually care about parity in public education. |
^ equity not parity! |
Concentrating poverty isn’t the way to close the achievement gap in education. This is shown in studies. It’s not really about your highly educated friends and their preferences. It’s about all the kids including the kids who are starting school behind. Does that make sense? |