The Tucker Carlson videos are dropping

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Actually Carlson is exposing obvious lies by the partisan J6 crew.

Sunshine is the best disinfectant.

No, he is gaslighting you, just like he did about Seth Rich, her emailzzzz, the 2020 elections, and every other topic that gets you angry. He admitted being a liar, he admitted having NO respect for his viewers and yet here you are with Stockholm Syndrome.

[Anonymous]

Hey Tucker, I dare you, show this footage that was just released today during a J6 trial. Peaceful tourists, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Actually Carlson is exposing obvious lies by the partisan J6 crew.

Sunshine is the best disinfectant.

The J6 crew was partisan in the sense that they are on the side of the United States and democratic elections.

Carlson by contrast is an amoral dishonest talking head.

[Anonymous]

What do you think Tucker's motives are? He is not trying to mislead, change, or re-write what happened. He is trying to get more people to watch his show. He will do whatever it takes to support this mission. Both sides have been using 1/6 as a political parlor trick since it happened. The people who broke into the capitol are criminals end of story. Move on

[Anonymous]

Let me get this straight - the guy who knowingly lied to his viewers about the election (and continues to do so) has something to say about these tapes and people actually believe him?? Honestly, some people are just too stupid for words.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Let me get this straight - the guy who knowingly lied to his viewers about the election (and continues to do so) has something to say about these tapes and people actually believe him?? Honestly, some people are just too stupid for words.

It's too painful for them to admit that they were wrong, so they continue to debase themselves to own the libs.

[Anonymous]

I know what I saw on live TV. And oh, what the "peaceful" demonstrators posted on their social media. I don't need Tucker "I am just an entertainer" Carlson to edit things for me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What do you think Tucker's motives are? He is not trying to mislead, change, or re-write what happened. He is trying to get more people to watch his show. He will do whatever it takes to support this mission. Both sides have been using 1/6 as a political parlor trick since it happened. The people who broke into the capitol are criminals end of story. Move on

He is absolutely doing the bolded.

He admitted to doing this after the 2022 election where "election fraud' and "voting machines" were concerned. He did it with respect to Hillary's emails, and Seth Rich. He has told us exactly who he is, and yet, you don't believe him?

[Anonymous]

Even Mitch, people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Even Mitch, people.

Mitch isn't an idiot. He knows that making up stories to defend terrorists and criminals is not good politics.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They arrested and jailed that guy for being escorted throughout the Capitol by the police. There’s something seriously wrong with all of this.

I know. What reasonable person WOULDN’T think he was just taking a tour in that environment. /s/

JFC dude.

Doesn’t matter. If an officer is escorting you around, it’s reasonable to think it’s all ok.

Uh, no, if you break into a building and a police officer follows you but does not tackle you, that doesn't make it okay.

Reasonable? Are you 10?

So you maintain the officer knew he broke the law and was simply following him, knowing there were cameras everywhere?

Maintain what? He was arrested, charged, and convicted. All without being tackled!

That's how our system works.

Again, if the evidence was withheld, no, it’s not how our system works. That video should have been handed to the defense by prosecution.

The videos that Carlson showed were shown to the defense and the prosecution. He didn't put up new stuff - he hasn't gone through 44,000 hours of videos to find any gotcha stuff because that's a tremendous amount of footage and the gotcha footage has already been by the J6 committee.

The prosecution, with their many, many lawyers, knew that video existed and deliberately withheld it from defense.

What is your evidence that anything relevant was withheld?

Let’s say the Feds had no idea that footage existed. Now they do. New trial?

Haha

No.

So we ignore important evidence because….mad?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They arrested and jailed that guy for being escorted throughout the Capitol by the police. There’s something seriously wrong with all of this.

I know. What reasonable person WOULDN’T think he was just taking a tour in that environment. /s/

JFC dude.

Doesn’t matter. If an officer is escorting you around, it’s reasonable to think it’s all ok.

Uh, no, if you break into a building and a police officer follows you but does not tackle you, that doesn't make it okay.

Reasonable? Are you 10?

So you maintain the officer knew he broke the law and was simply following him, knowing there were cameras everywhere?

Maintain what? He was arrested, charged, and convicted. All without being tackled!

That's how our system works.

Again, if the evidence was withheld, no, it’s not how our system works. That video should have been handed to the defense by prosecution.

The videos that Carlson showed were shown to the defense and the prosecution. He didn't put up new stuff - he hasn't gone through 44,000 hours of videos to find any gotcha stuff because that's a tremendous amount of footage and the gotcha footage has already been by the J6 committee.

The prosecution, with their many, many lawyers, knew that video existed and deliberately withheld it from defense.

No, the prosecution didn't have the new 44,000 hours of video. Only Tucker Carlson has that. McCarthy only gave the footage to him, not to prosecutors.

The prosecutors were the Feds, right? Yes, they did.

So, you don't live in the DMV, do you? Since you seem to think that one fed is the same as another fed and they all know the same things, like the Borg.

I do. I know the upper eschelon would do anything to get DJT

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Even Mitch, people.

Always Mitch

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:bLuE lIvEs mAtTeR

And every person prosecuted unfairly on this BS is in pain too, as are their families

Then don't do the crime. If they have been prosecuted and been found guilty, that is our system.

When the jury doesn’t have all the information, it’s a huge problem. You and I both know that. I’m just the one who believes in fair trials, not you

No jury is presented with 44,000 or 14,000 hours of videotape. By the prosecution or the defense.

Defense should have what the prosecution has. If Pelosi withheld anything, that’s on the Dems

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So… if I rob a bank, and the police are there and don’t stop me as I do it… does that mean I didn’t commit a crime?
Serious question.

Robbing a bank is a crime. Being shown around the Capitol by police is not.