Turns out the Falls Church school board guy from the Koch thinktank, Ilya Shapiro, really is toxic

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:


Total wuss. Comes across looking weak even though his dream is to be a poster boy for... Something.


Poster boy for vile POSs.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:


Total wuss. Comes across looking weak even though his dream is to be a poster boy for... Something.


Poster boy for vile POSs.




Such intelligent discourse here.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:


Total wuss. Comes across looking weak even though his dream is to be a poster boy for... Something.


Poster boy for vile POSs.




Such intelligent discourse here.


100% accurate
Anonymous
Unbelievable impatience on his part, if he had just waited another six months I’m sure he would’ve tweeted something else stupid and they could fire him for real.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Unbelievable impatience on his part, if he had just waited another six months I’m sure he would’ve tweeted something else stupid and they could fire him for real.

LOL. He probably quit in a huff because his assigned “office” was actually a group study room in the library.
Anonymous
Conservative men are always finding a way to play the victim.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Isn't hate speech excluded from the freedom of speech?


Free speech protection is for speech you don't like. Hate speech is protected.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I didn't know who this guy is until reading his op-ed in the WSJ today, and his tweet was stupid. That said, the worst part about this whole story is the black eye on Georgetown for not strongly advocating for free speech for their faculty. If this had happened at a state school like UMD, it would have riled up some students and faculty but the idea of taking any kind of administrative action would have immediately been quashed as the government cannot infringe upon free speech. Most liberal schools have signed onto the Chicago statement on freedom of speech. It is scary when institutions charged with generating knowledge and ideas "investigate" people for politically incorrect statements



This. We are truly in Mao's cultural revolution.


What a ridiculous statement about a guy who nothing happened to. Tell me you are historically ignorant without telling me….


Nothing happened? The place he worked at investigated him for speech and gave him a warning that he would be fired the next time. Threatening a person of his livelihood is not nothing.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Conservative men are always finding a way to play the victim.


Sometimes, they are the victim.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I didn't know who this guy is until reading his op-ed in the WSJ today, and his tweet was stupid. That said, the worst part about this whole story is the black eye on Georgetown for not strongly advocating for free speech for their faculty. If this had happened at a state school like UMD, it would have riled up some students and faculty but the idea of taking any kind of administrative action would have immediately been quashed as the government cannot infringe upon free speech. Most liberal schools have signed onto the Chicago statement on freedom of speech. It is scary when institutions charged with generating knowledge and ideas "investigate" people for politically incorrect statements



This. We are truly in Mao's cultural revolution.


What a ridiculous statement about a guy who nothing happened to. Tell me you are historically ignorant without telling me….


Nothing happened? The place he worked at investigated him for speech and gave him a warning that he would be fired the next time. Threatening a person of his livelihood is not nothing.


A job isn't guaranteed by the first amendment. He's not going to jail for his speech. But they don't have to employ him if he's going to be dumb.
Anonymous
Tempest in a teapot. He had the temerity to think a particular Asian man was a superior candidate to the Black women whose names had surfaced as Biden’s potential appointments to the Supreme Court. By no means was it a blanket dismissal of Black women.

However, because the left wanted a Black woman on the Court, they decided to cancel Shapiro. Never mind that there’s never been a single Asian, man or woman, on the Court.

I’m so done with the blatant posturing on the Twitter generation. Quit the Democratic Party last year and will not rejoin until they clean up their BS (and, no, not joining the GOP, either).
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Conservative men are always finding a way to play the victim.


Sometimes, they are the victim.


LOL. When are they the victim?

This small group holds all of the power.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Tempest in a teapot. He had the temerity to think a particular Asian man was a superior candidate to the Black women whose names had surfaced as Biden’s potential appointments to the Supreme Court. By no means was it a blanket dismissal of Black women.

However, because the left wanted a Black woman on the Court, they decided to cancel Shapiro. Never mind that there’s never been a single Asian, man or woman, on the Court.

I’m so done with the blatant posturing on the Twitter generation. Quit the Democratic Party last year and will not rejoin until they clean up their BS (and, no, not joining the GOP, either).


Yes yes, I remember his righteous outrage when Dumbass McILikeBeer was nominated. Because he was clearly the "best" candidate too.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Tempest in a teapot. He had the temerity to think a particular Asian man was a superior candidate to the Black women whose names had surfaced as Biden’s potential appointments to the Supreme Court. By no means was it a blanket dismissal of Black women.

However, because the left wanted a Black woman on the Court, they decided to cancel Shapiro. Never mind that there’s never been a single Asian, man or woman, on the Court.

I’m so done with the blatant posturing on the Twitter generation. Quit the Democratic Party last year and will not rejoin until they clean up their BS (and, no, not joining the GOP, either).


Don’t play obtuse. It wasn’t because he preferred another candidate. It was his disparate criteria for SCOTUS nominees.

He faced the consequences for his own words. No one made him say those things.
Anonymous
However, because the left wanted a Black woman on the Court, they decided to cancel Shapiro.

You’re going to end up in traction after that reach.
post reply Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Message Quick Reply
Go to: