Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 5

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I like beer.

As is good practice

Millions upon millions of beers today cracked open in the name of destroying liberal ideology

Good times are back!

It’s going to be so classy when Schlitz Kavanaugh installs a kegerator in his new office.

I’m sure he has many, many IQ points on you, so keep laughing simpleton.

Is that all you have left? The high really wore off fast, huh?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I like beer.

As is good practice

Millions upon millions of beers today cracked open in the name of destroying liberal ideology

Good times are back!

It’s going to be so classy when Schlitz Kavanaugh installs a kegerator in his new office.

He can make some good coin sponsoring it

Sounds like a solid plan

I will volunteer to have a ski with Bart

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I like beer.

As is good practice

Millions upon millions of beers today cracked open in the name of destroying liberal ideology

Good times are back!

It’s going to be so classy when Schlitz Kavanaugh installs a kegerator in his new office.

And hangs up a centerfold behind the door

The Kav Kave.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I like beer.

As is good practice

Millions upon millions of beers today cracked open in the name of destroying liberal ideology

Good times are back!

It’s going to be so classy when Schlitz Kavanaugh installs a kegerator in his new office.

And hangs up a centerfold behind the door

A centerfold calendar. Gotta track the skis and lifting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I like beer.

As is good practice

Millions upon millions of beers today cracked open in the name of destroying liberal ideology

Good times are back!

It’s going to be so classy when Schlitz Kavanaugh installs a kegerator in his new office.

And hangs up a centerfold behind the door

A centerfold calendar. Gotta track the skis and lifting.

And “scouting” the high school girls basketball teams.

[Anonymous]

It’s weird how “winning” makes some people so angry.

[Anonymous]

And conservative women only champion other conservative women.

This is sad.

All women, regardless of party, should champion each other. If you think men do - straight, gay, they do NOT.

Wake up, ladies.

FOR REAL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Collins is a hack. She is lying through her teeth when she claims Boof won’t try to gut Roe and any number of other protections. Every one of those Republicans needs to be voted out.

"Noting that Roe v. Wade was decided 45 years ago, and reaffirmed 19 years later in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, I asked Judge Kavanaugh whether the passage of time is relevant to following precedent. He said decisions become part of our legal framework with the passage of time and that honoring precedent is essential to maintaining public confidence.
Our discussion then turned to the right of privacy, on which the Supreme Court relied in Griswold v. Connecticut, a case that struck down a law banning the use and sale of contraceptives. Griswold established the legal foundation that led to Roe eight years later. In describing Griswold as “settled law,” Judge Kavanaugh observed that it was the correct application of two famous cases from the 1920s, Meyer and Pierce, that are not seriously challenged by anyone today. Finally, in his testimony, he noted repeatedly that Roe had been upheld by Planned Parenthood v. Casey, describing it as “precedent on precedent.” When I asked him would it be sufficient to overturn a long-established precedent if five current justices believed it was wrongly decided, he emphatically said “no.”

Opponents frequently cite then-candidate Donald Trump’s campaign pledge to nominate only judges who would overturn Roe. The Republican platform for all presidential campaigns has included this pledge since at least 1980. During this time, Republican presidents have appointed Justices O’Connor, Souter, and Kennedy to the Supreme Court. These are the very three justices—Republican president appointed justices—who authored the Casey decision, which reaffirmed Roe. Furthermore, pro-choice groups vigorously opposed each of these justices’ nominations. Incredibly, they even circulated buttons with the slogan “Stop Souter Or Women Will Die!” Just two years later, Justice Souter co-authored the Casey opinion, reaffirming a woman’s right to choose. Suffice it to say, prominent advocacy organizations have been wrong."
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/05/us/politics/susan-collins-speech-brett-kavanaugh.html

Well, it’s a good thing Boof O’Kavanaugh always tells the truth when talking to Senators .... Oh wait, that’s right, he lied repeatedly during his testimony and misled Senators countless times! Well, maybe he was telling the honest truth this one time. Nah, he’s a partisan hack who has been trying for years to gut Roe.

Way to go, Susan Collins. You got had. Women everywhere will think of you when their rights are being stripped away.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And conservative women only champion other conservative women.

This is sad.

All women, regardless of party, should champion each other. If you think men do - straight, gay, they do NOT.

Wake up, ladies.

FOR REAL

I disagree. I don't champion people solely because we share a gender. As another poster said, some women (and men) are garbage. DCUM is a constant reminder of that. Some of things liberals have spewed about Kavanaugh are so incredibly hateful, I'm still astounded. And all with no verifiable proof.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Collins is a hack. She is lying through her teeth when she claims Boof won’t try to gut Roe and any number of other protections. Every one of those Republicans needs to be voted out.

"Noting that Roe v. Wade was decided 45 years ago, and reaffirmed 19 years later in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, I asked Judge Kavanaugh whether the passage of time is relevant to following precedent. He said decisions become part of our legal framework with the passage of time and that honoring precedent is essential to maintaining public confidence.
Our discussion then turned to the right of privacy, on which the Supreme Court relied in Griswold v. Connecticut, a case that struck down a law banning the use and sale of contraceptives. Griswold established the legal foundation that led to Roe eight years later. In describing Griswold as “settled law,” Judge Kavanaugh observed that it was the correct application of two famous cases from the 1920s, Meyer and Pierce, that are not seriously challenged by anyone today. Finally, in his testimony, he noted repeatedly that Roe had been upheld by Planned Parenthood v. Casey, describing it as “precedent on precedent.” When I asked him would it be sufficient to overturn a long-established precedent if five current justices believed it was wrongly decided, he emphatically said “no.”

Opponents frequently cite then-candidate Donald Trump’s campaign pledge to nominate only judges who would overturn Roe. The Republican platform for all presidential campaigns has included this pledge since at least 1980. During this time, Republican presidents have appointed Justices O’Connor, Souter, and Kennedy to the Supreme Court. These are the very three justices—Republican president appointed justices—who authored the Casey decision, which reaffirmed Roe. Furthermore, pro-choice groups vigorously opposed each of these justices’ nominations. Incredibly, they even circulated buttons with the slogan “Stop Souter Or Women Will Die!” Just two years later, Justice Souter co-authored the Casey opinion, reaffirming a woman’s right to choose. Suffice it to say, prominent advocacy organizations have been wrong."
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/05/us/politics/susan-collins-speech-brett-kavanaugh.html

Well, it’s a good thing Boof O’Kavanaugh always tells the truth when talking to Senators .... Oh wait, that’s right, he lied repeatedly during his testimony and misled Senators countless times! Well, maybe he was telling the honest truth this one time. Nah, he’s a partisan hack who has been trying for years to gut Roe.

Way to go, Susan Collins. You got had. Women everywhere will think of you when their rights are being stripped away.

Susan Collins has more integrity in her pinky finger than you do in your entire soul.

[Anonymous]

Personally, I think the anger we see from conservatives when they “win” is because winning scares the pants off of them. Most of them are living mediocre lives with lousy jobs that don’t pay them enough to even start to get ahead, and none of the “wins” actually change any of that. The more they “win” without their lives improving, the more they have to face the fact that maybe the problem isn’t everyone else, maybe the problem is them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And conservative women only champion other conservative women.

This is sad.

All women, regardless of party, should champion each other. If you think men do - straight, gay, they do NOT.

Wake up, ladies.

FOR REAL

I disagree. I don't champion people solely because we share a gender. As another poster said, some women (and men) are garbage. DCUM is a constant reminder of that. Some of things liberals have spewed about Kavanaugh are so incredibly hateful, I'm still astounded. And all with no verifiable proof.

We all saw his testimony. We all saw him absolutely lose his mind with rage over the idea of not getting what he wanted. That was all we needed to know that he’s unfit (and that he’s probably capable of doing what he was accused of too).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Personally, I think the anger we see from conservatives when they “win” is because winning scares the pants off of them. Most of them are living mediocre lives with lousy jobs that don’t pay them enough to even start to get ahead, and none of the “wins” actually change any of that. The more they “win” without their lives improving, the more they have to face the fact that maybe the problem isn’t everyone else, maybe the problem is them.

Oh, my. I love the armchair psychology! And the projection...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And conservative women only champion other conservative women.

This is sad.

All women, regardless of party, should champion each other. If you think men do - straight, gay, they do NOT.

Wake up, ladies.

FOR REAL

I disagree. I don't champion people solely because we share a gender. As another poster said, some women (and men) are garbage. DCUM is a constant reminder of that. Some of things liberals have spewed about Kavanaugh are so incredibly hateful, I'm still astounded. And all with no verifiable proof.

We all saw his testimony. We all saw him absolutely lose his mind with rage over the idea of not getting what he wanted. That was all we needed to know that he’s unfit (and that he’s probably capable of doing what he was accused of too).

I saw a man justifiably outraged at being smeared with false allegations and zero evidence to back them up. He wasn't acting as a judge in those moments, he was *reacting* as a human being.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And conservative women only champion other conservative women.

This is sad.

All women, regardless of party, should champion each other. If you think men do - straight, gay, they do NOT.

Wake up, ladies.

FOR REAL

I disagree. I don't champion people solely because we share a gender. As another poster said, some women (and men) are garbage. DCUM is a constant reminder of that. Some of things liberals have spewed about Kavanaugh are so incredibly hateful, I'm still astounded. And all with no verifiable proof.

We all saw his testimony. We all saw him absolutely lose his mind with rage over the idea of not getting what he wanted. That was all we needed to know that he’s unfit (and that he’s probably capable of doing what he was accused of too).

I saw a man justifiably outraged at being smeared with false allegations and zero evidence to back them up. He wasn't acting as a judge in those moments, he was *reacting* as a human being.

His job in that moment was to respond like a judge.