Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
I did something very bad
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
|
I falsely reported that I overheard my neighbor saying that, "Obama sucks as president" on Obama's new Attack Watch web site beause I am angry about something my neighbor said a few weeks ago. http://www.attackwatch.com/ Now, I feel so guilty. I hope that my neighbor does not get into trouble. What should I do? Should I turn my self in... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-XYKRokgX00&feature=player_embedded |
Anonymous
Oh dears! Now your neighbor will just have to wait for the jackbooted thugs to carry them off to the gulag! What have you done!!!!??? 
|
Anonymous
|
Surprise surprise that the first people to know about this are the Republicans. I wonder why?
Maybe it's because you have had your own attack watch for years: Fox |
Anonymous
| lets just have a war....it'll be fun watching the libs scurry around! |
takoma
Member Offline
Member Offline
I try not to succumb to the the bias that right-wingers are illiterate cranks, but by putting so many illiterate cranky postings on this list, you make that difficult. Unless you are trying to discredit the right, or just have a perverse sense of humor, your rants are counter-productive. Ordinarily I try to ignore your stuff, but now and then I weaken and my charitable instincts make me try to give some helpful feedback. I hope you will accept this as such, and not waste time responding with an attack on me for trying to be helpful. |
Anonymous
|
If saying Obama sucks as President can get you "reported" - a lot of liberals are going to be in trouble. He does indeed suck as president. Craven appeasment from day one. He's the Neville Chamberlin of 21st century American politics.
And yes, I'll almost certainly vote for him again, because like democracy is the worst system of government in the history of the world except for all the others that have been tried, an ineffective, spineless Obama is infinitely preferable to any of the GOP candidates. |
Anonymous
...of course Fox News. Why don't you go back to MSNBC? I hear that they are completely unbiased. Actually, I read about this site in the Washington Post. Imagine the reaction if Bush did this. I'd like any liberal to look at me with straight face and tell me that the Ataaack Waaatch site does not reflect poorly on the president. The North Korean patriotic videos with the dancing and singing farm workers and soldiers on Youtube are less over-the-top than that site. Hint once you go to the site, if you want to turn in your neighbor select "Rumor" as the type of attack. |
jsteele
Site Admin Offline
Site Admin Offline
It's simply a version of Factcheck. They've already had such a site for quite a while. Given the number of attacks against Obama, they will probably need an entire data center full of servers to keep up. The anti-Obama posts in this thread are perfect examples of what he is up against. The site simply gives Obama's perspectives on charges made against him. Nobody cares if your neighbors thinks Obama sucks. I think Obama sucks. But, if your neighbor says that Obama is a Kenyan, Marxist, Islamic Terrorist, Obama is perfectly free to post a webpage saying that he is not, in fact, such a thing. I know that correcting the record is very scary to conservatives who believe that all truth is derived from chain emails, but I assure you it is safe to come out from under your bed. |
Anonymous
Yeah, we'll scurry right the hell through Georgia like we did last time. Then we'll send our carpetbaggers back in, and I guarantee you everyone of them will look exactly like Michael Dukakis, just to piss you off. We will make PC the official language of the occupied territories and you will have to use it when you file your tax returns, which will have a separate 10 page schedule so that we can calculate your reparations contribution. Don't complain, there is a 5% penalty for that. |
Anonymous
Ah, yes. "Liberal" MSNBC: nothing like four hours of two-term GOP Congressman to really deliver the liberal propaganda. You guys really do live in a fantasy world, don't you? 
|
Anonymous
You guys have had NewsBusters for years. I don't have to imagine if Bush did this. The GOP has been doing it for so long you forgot about it. |
Anonymous
And look I'll show you exactly why Obama needs Attack Watch. Here's Newsbusters, criticizing the headline of the article YOU read about Attack Watch, claiming bias (did you feel manipulated?): http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tom-blumer/2011/09/15/wapo-changes-attackwatchcom-related-post-title-make-it-about-conservativ And here is how it propagated in one day through the chain of GOP attack sites: http://topics.dallasnews.com/article/00LgdSI416enO?q=U.S.+Republican+Party http://www.bernsreport.com/index.php/view/latest/wapo-changes-attackwatchcomrelated-post-title-to-make-it-about-conservative-instead-of-general-ridicule/113545 http://www.prolifeblogs.com/topics.php?topic=blogspot http://friendfeed.com/littlebytesnews/3df51fda/freedom4usa-tcot-sgp-news-wapo-changes http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2778388/posts and on and on.... |
TheManWithAUsername
Member Offline
Member Offline
Awesome. |
Anonymous
Obama needs Attack Watch because of News Busters and a bunch of other random links (none of which are were ever even sponsored by the evil Bush)? Ha, ha, that is the best that you can up with, News Busters, really? Obama is most petty, thin skinned, narcissistic president in the history of the Republic. Good God, keep your Attack Watch web site. This is what the 3rd version of it? At least redesign it so that it comes up to Castro and Hugo Chavis standards of decorum and taste. That Attack Watch web site is too tacky for a South Park parody. Hell, Kim Il ("I'm so Lonely...") Sung would probably never even approve of such a lame web design. Actually, please don’t change a thing. The website is perfect the way it is since it truly captures the direction that the great "Hope and Change" presidency is heading. |
Anonymous
And you can keep your swift boaters. |