Project 2025 if Trump were to win

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He wrote the forward to Heritage Foundation President Robert’s book.

That doesn’t happen unless you have been working together for years.

Delusion or gaslighting MAGAs aren’t fooling anyone anymore. Don’t care if interview was 2022…..project 2025 was in works 2022. You don’t get 900 pages overnight.

MAGAs can keep trying to back pedal. But it’s too late. They wrote all down and there are interviews to back up what they wrote down.

+1 Books and plans to take down democracy aren’t written overnight. They’ve been workshopping this for years; it probably began in the Trump White House. This is the GOP’s baby.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:JD Vance is fully on board with Project 2025

Once again - Kamala’s campaign site spreading lies. They are disinformation experts.

Enlighten us, what’s the lie? Aside, since when does MAGA get outraged by lies?

[Anonymous]

Why are Republicans/Trump supporters so concerned with separating the campaign from Project 2025? What is in there that concerns you so much? It’s clearly a document written by some of the most prominent backers of your party. If you support the Republican Party, why don’t you support Project 2025? Why do you think some of the most important policy makers behind it don’t actually reflect the views and intentions of the party?

Note: I know exact why Dems are concerned. I just don’t understand what in Project 2025 concern Republicans, considering the document appear to capture some many Republican objectives.

[Anonymous]

Whether it’s under the aegis of Agenda 47 or Project 2025, the GOP is planning to do terrible things if they win:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why are Republicans/Trump supporters so concerned with separating the campaign from Project 2025? What is in there that concerns you so much? It’s clearly a document written by some of the most prominent backers of your party. If you support the Republican Party, why don’t you support Project 2025? Why do you think some of the most important policy makers behind it don’t actually reflect the views and intentions of the party?

Note: I know exact why Dems are concerned. I just don’t understand what in Project 2025 concern Republicans, considering the document appear to capture some many Republican objectives.

Oh it’s the GOP’s hopes and dreams in a nutshell. They’re only concerned because they figured out that people have noticed how terrible their policies are, how anti-American and anathema to everything the country stands for, that people have cottoned on to it tapping into the worst veins in American history.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are Republicans/Trump supporters so concerned with separating the campaign from Project 2025? What is in there that concerns you so much? It’s clearly a document written by some of the most prominent backers of your party. If you support the Republican Party, why don’t you support Project 2025? Why do you think some of the most important policy makers behind it don’t actually reflect the views and intentions of the party?

Note: I know exact why Dems are concerned. I just don’t understand what in Project 2025 concern Republicans, considering the document appear to capture some many Republican objectives.

Oh it’s the GOP’s hopes and dreams in a nutshell. They’re only concerned because they figured out that people have noticed how terrible their policies are, how anti-American and anathema to everything the country stands for, that people have cottoned on to it tapping into the worst veins in American history.

I mean, yeah, I know that and you know that.

But more importantly, why do they (Trump’s supporters) reject Project 2025? What is in there that they think is so bad?

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:JD Vance is fully on board with Project 2025

Once again - Kamala’s campaign site spreading lies. They are disinformation experts.

Enlighten us, what’s the lie? Aside, since when does MAGA get outraged by lies?

+1

Alternative facts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Superb editing! Where's the rest of his speech? You know this was FOUR years before Project 2025 was even a thing, right? Post the rest of what he was saying. We'll wait.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:JD Vance is fully on board with Project 2025

Once again - Kamala’s campaign site spreading lies. They are disinformation experts.

Enlighten us, what’s the lie? Aside, since when does MAGA get outraged by lies?

The campaign is saying that Vance "endorses Project 2025." That is not true.
This interview was 4 years before P 2025 existed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Superb editing! Where's the rest of his speech? You know this was FOUR years before Project 2025 was even a thing, right? Post the rest of what he was saying. We'll wait.

Project 2025 was a thing before Heritage put it on paper. Just go back to Trump’s administration. Schedule F, for example.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why are Republicans/Trump supporters so concerned with separating the campaign from Project 2025? What is in there that concerns you so much? It’s clearly a document written by some of the most prominent backers of your party. If you support the Republican Party, why don’t you support Project 2025? Why do you think some of the most important policy makers behind it don’t actually reflect the views and intentions of the party?

Note: I know exact why Dems are concerned. I just don’t understand what in Project 2025 concern Republicans, considering the document appear to capture some many Republican objectives.

1. It is not Trump's platform.
2. It is not the RNC's platform.
3. While there are some good things in it, there are others that many Republicans disagree with.
4. Many Democrats are flat out lying about what is in this document.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Good God. Another lie by this campaign.

Do they ever post anything that is true?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are Republicans/Trump supporters so concerned with separating the campaign from Project 2025? What is in there that concerns you so much? It’s clearly a document written by some of the most prominent backers of your party. If you support the Republican Party, why don’t you support Project 2025? Why do you think some of the most important policy makers behind it don’t actually reflect the views and intentions of the party?

Note: I know exact why Dems are concerned. I just don’t understand what in Project 2025 concern Republicans, considering the document appear to capture some many Republican objectives.

1. It is not Trump's platform.
2. It is not the RNC's platform.
3. While there are some good things in it, there are others that many Republicans disagree with.
4. Many Democrats are flat out lying about what is in this document.

This doesn’t answer my question. What don’t you like about it? What specifically in it would concern you if you found out it would be enacted? In other words, what in it, specifically, should Trump and the RNC distance themselves from?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are Republicans/Trump supporters so concerned with separating the campaign from Project 2025? What is in there that concerns you so much? It’s clearly a document written by some of the most prominent backers of your party. If you support the Republican Party, why don’t you support Project 2025? Why do you think some of the most important policy makers behind it don’t actually reflect the views and intentions of the party?

Note: I know exact why Dems are concerned. I just don’t understand what in Project 2025 concern Republicans, considering the document appear to capture some many Republican objectives.

1. It is not Trump's platform.
2. It is not the RNC's platform.
3. While there are some good things in it, there are others that many Republicans disagree with.
4. Many Democrats are flat out lying about what is in this document.

It is Trump and Vance’s platform. Own it because you’re going to be hearing about it nonstop for the next three months.