Another gunman, another elementary school

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wouldn’t help anyway. All evidence suggests resource officers don’t want to engage active shooters. So we don’t need them - waste of money.

Then use police officers.

Police weren't much help in this case, were they?

One of my good friends is a police officer. He says it's divided: half of the officers say they would wait around as they did in Texas to form a plan and wait for additional backup. The other half say no, you swore an oath, you go in there even if you are going to die because at least it gives the people you are sworn to protect a chance.

I'm not willing to take that 50/50 gamble with my children's lives. Are you?

This is illogical.

You actually are saying, like in an active shooter situation, YOU DONT WANT POLICE???? YOU WOULDNT CALL FREAKING 9-1-1????? Who would you call - Ghostbusters? Social worker?

Please, walk me through who will respond to an active shooter situation in your world. Who would be the person to handle it? Or would you suggest everybody just pray and do nothing while a shooter mows down kids

What’s illogical about it?

People are saying instead of gun reform, we just need armed security and police officers in schools.

But we now know that many of those police and guards won’t do anything in the event of a shooter. Many will bail or just wait around, as was the case in Texas.

I’m not sure where you got the idea I wouldn’t call 9-1-1. I said I don’t think police officers in schools are a solution, because most are proving to be useless.

The answer is gun reform. Our children will be safer when people don’t have access to these guns, not when we put armed police in schools.

Imagine kids cant buy any guns anymore. Teen boy grabs daddy's AR-15 or glock and walks up to a school to commit a school shooting. Do you want police there?

Daddies shouldn't have AR-15s, either.

But by your logic, we should get rid of the age limits for purchasing alcohol, because kids will just break into their parent's stash anyway 🙄

Other. Developed. Countries. Don't. Have. This. Problem. Because they focused on the issue - firearms - not turning schools into war zones.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wouldn’t help anyway. All evidence suggests resource officers don’t want to engage active shooters. So we don’t need them - waste of money.

Then use police officers.

Police weren't much help in this case, were they?

One of my good friends is a police officer. He says it's divided: half of the officers say they would wait around as they did in Texas to form a plan and wait for additional backup. The other half say no, you swore an oath, you go in there even if you are going to die because at least it gives the people you are sworn to protect a chance.

I'm not willing to take that 50/50 gamble with my children's lives. Are you?

This is illogical.

You actually are saying, like in an active shooter situation, YOU DONT WANT POLICE???? YOU WOULDNT CALL FREAKING 9-1-1????? Who would you call - Ghostbusters? Social worker?

Please, walk me through who will respond to an active shooter situation in your world. Who would be the person to handle it? Or would you suggest everybody just pray and do nothing while a shooter mows down kids

What’s illogical about it?

People are saying instead of gun reform, we just need armed security and police officers in schools.

But we now know that many of those police and guards won’t do anything in the event of a shooter. Many will bail or just wait around, as was the case in Texas.

I’m not sure where you got the idea I wouldn’t call 9-1-1. I said I don’t think police officers in schools are a solution, because most are proving to be useless.

The answer is gun reform. Our children will be safer when people don’t have access to these guns, not when we put armed police in schools.

Imagine kids cant buy any guns anymore. Teen boy grabs daddy's AR-15 or glock and walks up to a school to commit a school shooting. Do you want police there?

Daddies shouldn't have AR-15s, either.

But by your logic, we should get rid of the age limits for purchasing alcohol, because kids will just break into their parent's stash anyway 🙄

Other. Developed. Countries. Don't. Have. This. Problem. Because they focused on the issue - firearms - not turning schools into war zones.

+1. I lived in the Middle East and NEVER had to worry about my kids getting shot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wouldn’t help anyway. All evidence suggests resource officers don’t want to engage active shooters. So we don’t need them - waste of money.

Then use police officers.

Police weren't much help in this case, were they?

One of my good friends is a police officer. He says it's divided: half of the officers say they would wait around as they did in Texas to form a plan and wait for additional backup. The other half say no, you swore an oath, you go in there even if you are going to die because at least it gives the people you are sworn to protect a chance.

I'm not willing to take that 50/50 gamble with my children's lives. Are you?

This is illogical.

You actually are saying, like in an active shooter situation, YOU DONT WANT POLICE???? YOU WOULDNT CALL FREAKING 9-1-1????? Who would you call - Ghostbusters? Social worker?

Please, walk me through who will respond to an active shooter situation in your world. Who would be the person to handle it? Or would you suggest everybody just pray and do nothing while a shooter mows down kids

What’s illogical about it?

People are saying instead of gun reform, we just need armed security and police officers in schools.

But we now know that many of those police and guards won’t do anything in the event of a shooter. Many will bail or just wait around, as was the case in Texas.

I’m not sure where you got the idea I wouldn’t call 9-1-1. I said I don’t think police officers in schools are a solution, because most are proving to be useless.

The answer is gun reform. Our children will be safer when people don’t have access to these guns, not when we put armed police in schools.

Imagine kids cant buy any guns anymore. Teen boy grabs daddy's AR-15 or glock and walks up to a school to commit a school shooting. Do you want police there?

Daddies shouldn't have AR-15s, either.

But by your logic, we should get rid of the age limits for purchasing alcohol, because kids will just break into their parent's stash anyway 🙄

Other. Developed. Countries. Don't. Have. This. Problem. Because they focused on the issue - firearms - not turning schools into war zones.

What are your sentences one-word fragments?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wouldn’t help anyway. All evidence suggests resource officers don’t want to engage active shooters. So we don’t need them - waste of money.

Then use police officers.

Police weren't much help in this case, were they?

One of my good friends is a police officer. He says it's divided: half of the officers say they would wait around as they did in Texas to form a plan and wait for additional backup. The other half say no, you swore an oath, you go in there even if you are going to die because at least it gives the people you are sworn to protect a chance.

I'm not willing to take that 50/50 gamble with my children's lives. Are you?

This is illogical.

You actually are saying, like in an active shooter situation, YOU DONT WANT POLICE???? YOU WOULDNT CALL FREAKING 9-1-1????? Who would you call - Ghostbusters? Social worker?

Please, walk me through who will respond to an active shooter situation in your world. Who would be the person to handle it? Or would you suggest everybody just pray and do nothing while a shooter mows down kids

What’s illogical about it?

People are saying instead of gun reform, we just need armed security and police officers in schools.

But we now know that many of those police and guards won’t do anything in the event of a shooter. Many will bail or just wait around, as was the case in Texas.

I’m not sure where you got the idea I wouldn’t call 9-1-1. I said I don’t think police officers in schools are a solution, because most are proving to be useless.

The answer is gun reform. Our children will be safer when people don’t have access to these guns, not when we put armed police in schools.

Imagine kids cant buy any guns anymore. Teen boy grabs daddy's AR-15 or glock and walks up to a school to commit a school shooting. Do you want police there?

Daddies shouldn't have AR-15s, either.

But by your logic, we should get rid of the age limits for purchasing alcohol, because kids will just break into their parent's stash anyway 🙄

Other. Developed. Countries. Don't. Have. This. Problem. Because they focused on the issue - firearms - not turning schools into war zones.

What are your sentences one-word fragments?

In the year 2022, people frequently write in one word fragments for emphasis, pp. it’s a commonly used and understood manner of writing online particularly on social media.

You’re welcome!

NP.

[Anonymous]

We must get rid of the guns before anything else.

[Anonymous]

Thread from the daughter of a teacher killed at Sandy Hook, for those of you who think autopsy photos are a solution.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Thread from the daughter of a teacher killed at Sandy Hook, for those of you who think autopsy photos are a solution.

No one should be forced to released photos but some grieving families believe having people face the brutal reality of these massacres is the best option for them.

https://www.nhregister.com/connecticut/amp/CONNIE-SCHULTZ-In-open-casket-boy-s-body-shows-11399159.php

I asked her why it was important for her and for the governor to see Noah's body. 'I needed it to have a face for him,' she said. 'If there is ever a piece of legislation that comes across his desk, I needed it to be real for him.'"

Unprompted, Pozner continued: "We all saw how beautiful he was. He had thick, shiny hair, beautiful long eyelashes that rested on his cheeks. He looked like he was sleeping. But the reality of it was under the cloth he had covering his mouth. ... His jaw was blown away. I just want people to know the ugliness of it so we don't talk about it abstractly, like these little angels just went to heaven. No. They were butchered. They were brutalized. And that is what haunts me at night."

[Anonymous]

Remember how it was repeatedly emphasized that a teacher propped a door open and then that she left the building and left it open again upon her return?

Well, surprise, surprise, that narrative appears to be falling apart:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Remember how it was repeatedly emphasized that a teacher propped a door open and then that she left the building and left it open again upon her return?

Well, surprise, surprise, that narrative appears to be falling apart:

Now the shooter apologists will blame the rock.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember how it was repeatedly emphasized that a teacher propped a door open and then that she left the building and left it open again upon her return?

Well, surprise, surprise, that narrative appears to be falling apart:

Now the shooter apologists will blame the rock.

I'm super glad to hear that and that someone somewhere isn't feeling bad about that mistake.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember how it was repeatedly emphasized that a teacher propped a door open and then that she left the building and left it open again upon her return?

Well, surprise, surprise, that narrative appears to be falling apart:

Now the shooter apologists will blame the rock.

I'm super glad to hear that and that someone somewhere isn't feeling bad about that mistake.

I mean, I am happy about that, but I'm more than a little troubled by all the LYING from police.

[Anonymous]

https://twitter.com/thegoodliars/status/1531019935308304386?s=10&t=Clp5x2W9Kwfg4_2YCirDgA


Has anybody seen this video from a man who went to the NRA convention? It is excellent how he trolls the president of the NRA with “thoughts and prayers “

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember how it was repeatedly emphasized that a teacher propped a door open and then that she left the building and left it open again upon her return?

Well, surprise, surprise, that narrative appears to be falling apart:

Now the shooter apologists will blame the rock.

I'm super glad to hear that and that someone somewhere isn't feeling bad about that mistake.

I mean, I am happy about that, but I'm more than a little troubled by all the LYING from police.

I think it is fair to assume that everyone is upset about that on every level.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

So, how did the shooter get in?