2030 Girls Lacrosse

[Anonymous]

Pride Loudon's 2030 Team looks like they had a good year last year.

However it doesn't look like Pride has any other Loudon Teams, is the 2030 Team coming back for 25/26?

If they are, did they grow as a team picking up players, etc.?

Are there any other 2030 Teams out in the Loudon area?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People will always look for all star teams for their kids. AA will survive.

This is likely correct. Especially because of the inability of AS to select the best players.

And other regions basically just bringing full club teams. That's not the point of an all star team. All 4 age groups were won by teams with no more than 6 players from other teams. so at least 16/22 players from 1 team for each age group.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People will always look for all star teams for their kids. AA will survive.

This is likely correct. Especially because of the inability of AS to select the best players.

And other regions basically just bringing full club teams. That's not the point of an all star team. All 4 age groups were won by teams with no more than 6 players from other teams. so at least 16/22 players from 1 team for each age group.

is it selection bias? is it just the best players in that area are going to be on the same team? is it economic status and the ability to pay to tryout and travel? its hard to disentangle the factors that probably go into who tries out and who gets picked, but its easy enough to say that this whole thing is unfair

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Pride Loudon's 2030 Team looks like they had a good year last year.

However it doesn't look like Pride has any other Loudon Teams, is the 2030 Team coming back for 25/26?

If they are, did they grow as a team picking up players, etc.?

Are there any other 2030 Teams out in the Loudon area?

Isn't 3d there?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pride Loudon's 2030 Team looks like they had a good year last year.

However it doesn't look like Pride has any other Loudon Teams, is the 2030 Team coming back for 25/26?

If they are, did they grow as a team picking up players, etc.?

Are there any other 2030 Teams out in the Loudon area?

Isn't 3d there?

3D is there but I don't think they have a 2030 Team, they have years above and below but not a dedicated 2030 Team.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pride Loudon's 2030 Team looks like they had a good year last year.

However it doesn't look like Pride has any other Loudon Teams, is the 2030 Team coming back for 25/26?

If they are, did they grow as a team picking up players, etc.?

Are there any other 2030 Teams out in the Loudon area?

Isn't 3d there?

3D is there but I don't think they have a 2030 Team, they have years above and below but not a dedicated 2030 Team.

Pride and 3d are not going to compete with YJ for second best team in DC area. BLC is the best team heading into fall of this year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People will always look for all star teams for their kids. AA will survive.

This is likely correct. Especially because of the inability of AS to select the best players.

And other regions basically just bringing full club teams. That's not the point of an all star team. All 4 age groups were won by teams with no more than 6 players from other teams. so at least 16/22 players from 1 team for each age group.

is it selection bias? is it just the best players in that area are going to be on the same team? is it economic status and the ability to pay to tryout and travel? its hard to disentangle the factors that probably go into who tries out and who gets picked, but its easy enough to say that this whole thing is unfair

There was a selection bias. When SW is the coach picking the players, club affiliation makes a difference.

[Anonymous]

who is SW?

[Anonymous]

The idea that inferior players made these AS teams is insulting. Sometimes a try out doesn’t go your daughter’s way. Maybe the evaluators were looking the other way when she made all her great plays. Get over it. No need to come on here with your sour grapes and insult all the girls that did make the team.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The idea that inferior players made these AS teams is insulting. Sometimes a try out doesn’t go your daughter’s way. Maybe the evaluators were looking the other way when she made all her great plays. Get over it. No need to come on here with your sour grapes and insult all the girls that did make the team.

It’s not insulting if it’s true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:who is SW?

IYKYK

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People will always look for all star teams for their kids. AA will survive.

This is likely correct. Especially because of the inability of AS to select the best players.

The next All Star team to pick the best players without any politics will be the first, in fact, AA worse, that is how AS was created

Not true! This is Fake news

[Anonymous]

AS & AA are not going anywhere and AA is actually getting stronger now that it is with New Balance and not Under Armour. The longtime history and quality of players has always been high! It will continue to flourish!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People will always look for all star teams for their kids. AA will survive.

This is likely correct. Especially because of the inability of AS to select the best players.

The next All Star team to pick the best players without any politics will be the first, in fact, AA worse, that is how AS was created

Not true! This is Fake news

100% fake news. AA was more merit based than AS.

[Anonymous]

AA is more performance based!