Project 2025 if Trump were to win

[Anonymous]

Trump may not be a Nazi, but the Nazi's sure seem to think he is one.

[Anonymous]

Project 2025 is alarming and they will 100% run the show with their plan if Trump’s elected. He knows exactly what it is (I mean, he knows it’s a plan designed for implementation if he wins, not the details, he’s not a details kinda guy). In 2020 I failed to believe the people waving the flag about the Supreme Court and ultimately Roe v Wade being at risk and I will not make that mistake again.

These ultra conservative Christians have crafted a plan to take over from stem to stern.

[Anonymous]

I personally am willing to forgo the tax windfall for the sake of our republic

[Anonymous]

So if Trump and Vance distance themselves, the alienate their base. If they embrace it, they alienate everyone else.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Project 2025 would change the 40hr workweek to a 160hr work-month, so your boss could make you work extra hours with no overtime pay by cutting your hours later in the month.

See page 592.

That's not bad. I'll finish my work in 2-2.5 weeks as I work extra anyway.

[Anonymous]

Project 2025 is frightening and terrible, their agenda is spelled out in clear sight. Don't ignore it. It must be defeated.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Project 2025 would change the 40hr workweek to a 160hr work-month, so your boss could make you work extra hours with no overtime pay by cutting your hours later in the month.

See page 592.

That's not bad. I'll finish my work in 2-2.5 weeks as I work extra anyway.

Hey dummy.
This is about hourly workers.
It allows your employer to F you over on overtime based on their whim and poor planning.
It sucks and will hurt the working poor the most.

[Anonymous]

The segment within the manifesto on the State Department really looked amateurish at best.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Project 2025 would change the 40hr workweek to a 160hr work-month, so your boss could make you work extra hours with no overtime pay by cutting your hours later in the month.

See page 592.

That's not bad. I'll finish my work in 2-2.5 weeks as I work extra anyway.

NP. You're missing the point. The goal is to reduce or eliminate overtime pay. If they move from weekly to monthly it could lead employers to overload busy workweeks with extra-long shifts and then take advantage of slow periods through under-scheduling, which could effectively eliminate overtime altogether.

A person could work two 50 hour weeks followed by two 30 hour weeks. Its 160 hours, but they would lose 20 hours of overtime pay because under the monthly plan overtime would only come in at more than 160 hours a month. That is different from the current policy that pays overtime after more than 40 hours per week.

It also says they want employers to pay overtime rate for any hours worked on the sabbath.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Bill Clintons welfare reform bill was also written by the Heritage Foundation.

It seems like even with so called Democrat presidents , the Heritage Foundation gets legislative successes so what even is the point of the Democrat Party anymore if they are Republican life ? They didn’t pass anything progressive through Congress since LBJ. Why didn’t any Democrat President make Roe v Wade federal law through Congress?

Let’s not blame Republicans for being successful with their agenda. They deserve to win. Democrat Party Needs to be sat down and lose badly because they haven’t been progressive and have sold us out to Heritage Foundation anyway time and time again

That was a very different Heritage Foundation. I know b/c I used to run a think tank. Now, Heritage, who fired their conservative R CEO because they did not like Trump, is an arm of MAGA. It's a very different place. Remember, Trump is not a conservative, at least not we used to think a conservative was.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Strange. It's almost like these guys all know each other and are coordinating. But it can't be true since Trump told us so.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Strange. It's almost like these guys all know each other and are coordinating. But it can't be true since Trump told us so.

It’s going to affect their ability to pretend that a potential Trump-Vance admin would have no idea what Project 2025 is and/or that they don’t share those politics. It was pretty obvious Trump did anyway, but to write the foreword? That’s a double thumbs up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Strange. It's almost like these guys all know each other and are coordinating. But it can't be true since Trump told us so.

What does this (from the book’s description) mean? What foreign flag? The US flag lapel pin?

“In Washington, they wear foreign flags on their lapels, but they don’t protect our border”