Kane from Kaneshow divorcing and crying on air right now

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Hate on John all you want, but he definitely loves Laura. He's proud of her and gets giddy over her when someone calls in and complements Laura. I think they're sweet together.


I didn't say anything about him not loving her. But is it reciprocated. For all we know she's just comingalong for the ride just like N


Pray tell how nat came along for a ride... She's been with Pete since he was a nobody...or do you always just assume that anyone that gets a divorce is automatically a gold digger? Just curious

She put up with somebody with severe OCD and ADHD for over 8 years, that's no small task. She Probably lasted longer than I would have and most other woman on here hating on her. Divorce is more common than you have been led on to believe my friend.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Hate on John all you want, but he definitely loves Laura. He's proud of her and gets giddy over her when someone calls in and complements Laura. I think they're sweet together.


I didn't say anything about him not loving her. But is it reciprocated. For all we know she's just comingalong for the ride just like N


Pray tell how nat came along for a ride... She's been with Pete since he was a nobody...or do you always just assume that anyone that gets a divorce is automatically a gold digger? Just curious

She put up with somebody with severe OCD and ADHD for over 8 years, that's no small task. She Probably lasted longer than I would have and most other woman on here hating on her. Divorce is more common than you have been led on to believe my friend.



Completely agree.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
But you guys are obsessed! 115 pages in and you just keep going on and on and on...

Isn't there a Kane show message board you guys can go fangirl over, instead of doing it here?


But you see, the thing is you are also obsessed otherwise you would leave it be. Your are simply obsessed for different reasons. You have posted at least twice now and possibly more earlier if you contributed to the actual discussions... That is probably about average for anyone posting here considering there is a huge number of people viewing this thread.


No, the moderator of this site said that many people who never posted on here before found this site through a google search for Kane and are now brigading this thread.

And it's very obvious, given the word usage and spelling on this thread, that the educational and intelligence levels of Kane show viewers is FAR below that of the usual posters on here.


Yes, Google is generally how anybody finds a discussion on a topic they are interested in, so that should have been a no brainer for you. Unless you are trying to imply that DCUM is a closed community, and the only people that should be welcomed are those with an interest in every subject on the boards?

I've actually checked quite a few other threads since joining this circus, and it seems par for the course. And I can assure you that the average DCUM poster is no smarter than anyone here. Beyond the obvious fact that you have no way to quantifiably measure what you said, let's not forget that many of the "usual posters" are already Kane show listeners to begin with. This is after all a DC forum.

I would liken you to a closeted gay person. They are still gay, they just won't admit it or pretend otherwise. (I feel that I should add that I have nothing against gay people, but being closeted is the best example I could think of off the top of my head) ... In other words--> go grab your popcorn and sit back and enjoy the show...you know you love it, whether you choose to admit it or otherwise. Anyone that has read this thread is to some degree obsessed :)
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Pray tell how nat came along for a ride... She's been with Pete since he was a nobody...or do you always just assume that anyone that gets a divorce is automatically a gold digger? Just curious

She put up with somebody with severe OCD and ADHD for over 8 years, that's no small task. She Probably lasted longer than I would have and most other woman on here hating on her. Divorce is more common than you have been led on to believe my friend.



You sure go out of your way to stick up for her every chance you can. Would love to know how you're connected to her because it's obvious (or are you her?). She wasn't with him when he was exactly a nobody, get real. He was already well on his way. And don't forget while he's a complete jerk, he had to put up with her too. They seem to be perfect for each other.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Pray tell how nat came along for a ride... She's been with Pete since he was a nobody...or do you always just assume that anyone that gets a divorce is automatically a gold digger? Just curious

She put up with somebody with severe OCD and ADHD for over 8 years, that's no small task. She Probably lasted longer than I would have and most other woman on here hating on her. Divorce is more common than you have been led on to believe my friend.



You sure go out of your way to stick up for her every chance you can. Would love to know how you're connected to her because it's obvious (or are you her?). She wasn't with him when he was exactly a nobody, get real. He was already well on his way. And don't forget while he's a complete jerk, he had to put up with her too. They seem to be perfect for each other.


They have been married around 8 years roughly... And dated for 7 years before that... Kane was more or less a nobody back then...he certainly wasn't very well known. Why would a gold digger choose Someone that was probably making <50k when they first started getting serious..sry it doesn't add up...and yes radio DJ's before they get syndicated and notorious, believe it or not, do not make a lot of money. If she were gold digging she woundn't have dated him for 7 years, you get real...I never said that he did not have to put up with her stuff too, but these unfounded gold digging claims are just ridiculous. She could have done a heck of a lot better if all she was interested in was money.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Pray tell how nat came along for a ride... She's been with Pete since he was a nobody...or do you always just assume that anyone that gets a divorce is automatically a gold digger? Just curious

She put up with somebody with severe OCD and ADHD for over 8 years, that's no small task. She Probably lasted longer than I would have and most other woman on here hating on her. Divorce is more common than you have been led on to believe my friend.



You sure go out of your way to stick up for her every chance you can. Would love to know how you're connected to her because it's obvious (or are you her?). She wasn't with him when he was exactly a nobody, get real. He was already well on his way. And don't forget while he's a complete jerk, he had to put up with her too. They seem to be perfect for each other.


LOL. Different poster. You are so paranoid and delusional, it's downright hilarious....
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
But you guys are obsessed! 115 pages in and you just keep going on and on and on...

Isn't there a Kane show message board you guys can go fangirl over, instead of doing it here?


But you see, the thing is you are also obsessed otherwise you would leave it be. Your are simply obsessed for different reasons. You have posted at least twice now and possibly more earlier if you contributed to the actual discussions... That is probably about average for anyone posting here considering there is a huge number of people viewing this thread.


No, the moderator of this site said that many people who never posted on here before found this site through a google search for Kane and are now brigading this thread.

And it's very obvious, given the word usage and spelling on this thread, that the educational and intelligence levels of Kane show viewers is FAR below that of the usual posters on here.


Yes, Google is generally how anybody finds a discussion on a topic they are interested in, so that should have been a no brainer for you. Unless you are trying to imply that DCUM is a closed community, and the only people that should be welcomed are those with an interest in every subject on the boards?

I've actually checked quite a few other threads since joining this circus, and it seems par for the course. And I can assure you that the average DCUM poster is no smarter than anyone here. Beyond the obvious fact that you have no way to quantifiably measure what you said, let's not forget that many of the "usual posters" are already Kane show listeners to begin with. This is after all a DC forum.

I would liken you to a closeted gay person. They are still gay, they just won't admit it or pretend otherwise. (I feel that I should add that I have nothing against gay people, but being closeted is the best example I could think of off the top of my head) ... In other words--> go grab your popcorn and sit back and enjoy the show...you know you love it, whether you choose to admit it or otherwise. Anyone that has read this thread is to some degree obsessed :)


Wow. I thought I had seen the dumbest shit ever when people were (nonironically) using the word "amazeballs" but you just proved me wrong. Thanks for comparing not liking or being aware of Kane to struggling with sexuality and telling your family/friends about your sexual preferences, a potentially life-altering decision. Absolutely hilarious how dumb you are. But thanks for the laugh
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Pray tell how nat came along for a ride... She's been with Pete since he was a nobody...or do you always just assume that anyone that gets a divorce is automatically a gold digger? Just curious

She put up with somebody with severe OCD and ADHD for over 8 years, that's no small task. She Probably lasted longer than I would have and most other woman on here hating on her. Divorce is more common than you have been led on to believe my friend.



You sure go out of your way to stick up for her every chance you can. Would love to know how you're connected to her because it's obvious (or are you her?). She wasn't with him when he was exactly a nobody, get real. He was already well on his way. And don't forget while he's a complete jerk, he had to put up with her too. They seem to be perfect for each other.


They have been married around 8 years roughly... And dated for 7 years before that... Kane was more or less a nobody back then...he certainly wasn't very well known. Why would a gold digger choose Someone that was probably making <50k when they first started getting serious..sry it doesn't add up...and yes radio DJ's before they get syndicated and notorious, believe it or not, do not make a lot of money. If she were gold digging she woundn't have dated him for 7 years, you get real...I never said that he did not have to put up with her stuff too, but these unfounded gold digging claims are just ridiculous. She could have done a heck of a lot better if all she was interested in was money.


7 years. <50k. Heeheeheehee. You have no idea what you're talking about on several things. And it's not always just about money. Notoriety, free tickets, perks, self-promotion, etc. Stop making a fool of yourself defending her (or yourself if you're her).
Anonymous
Did no one hear him say that she wrecked the car and lied about it? Then, when she finally admitted it is when it all blew up? She hit a rock wall or fence or something, but why she did that, he didn't want to disclose. She has a drug and/or alcohol problem, perhaps both. She posted that she was saddened to see him expose her, but she would be posting her side on her blog. Yet to happen. Nothing posted, all she has said was not to believe everything you hear. She didn't deny cleaning out the bank account or not paying the bills, which was one of her household responsibilities. This is because she was spending money on drugs. I will bet any amount of money that this will be the case when it all finally comes out, which is why she doesn't want to post anything, she has to get her story straight to justify what he said she did. No, she doesn't have to explain anything to anyone, it is technically none of anyone's business. However, if you were publicly accused of doing such things, would you not want to defend yourself in some way, shape or form? I damn sure would! Even if it was just a simple post saying that the marriage was over, the love was gone and I only took some of the money. I would want to at least have my say for the haters, at least. What he said was recorded. If he is lying, he will be in big trouble with her lawyers and we will surely hear about it! You people posting about the timeline because of pics posted. Are you kidding? You can post a pic from a year ago and people would assume it was from today. That is common sense. There is no way in hell this is a scam. And, it is very one sided and perhaps he is exaggerating but bottom line, she is not trying to defend herself in any way. Watch and see what happens.. I guarantee it will come out that she has a problem and she was busted when she wrecked her new car and lied about it. She thought he would bust her out anyway, so she cleaned him out and ran with their kids...
Anonymous
Pp - the car wreck has been discussed ad nauseum. Keep up.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
But you guys are obsessed! 115 pages in and you just keep going on and on and on...

Isn't there a Kane show message board you guys can go fangirl over, instead of doing it here?


But you see, the thing is you are also obsessed otherwise you would leave it be. Your are simply obsessed for different reasons. You have posted at least twice now and possibly more earlier if you contributed to the actual discussions... That is probably about average for anyone posting here considering there is a huge number of people viewing this thread.


No, the moderator of this site said that many people who never posted on here before found this site through a google search for Kane and are now brigading this thread.

And it's very obvious, given the word usage and spelling on this thread, that the educational and intelligence levels of Kane show viewers is FAR below that of the usual posters on here.


Yes, Google is generally how anybody finds a discussion on a topic they are interested in, so that should have been a no brainer for you. Unless you are trying to imply that DCUM is a closed community, and the only people that should be welcomed are those with an interest in every subject on the boards?

I've actually checked quite a few other threads since joining this circus, and it seems par for the course. And I can assure you that the average DCUM poster is no smarter than anyone here. Beyond the obvious fact that you have no way to quantifiably measure what you said, let's not forget that many of the "usual posters" are already Kane show listeners to begin with. This is after all a DC forum.

I would liken you to a closeted gay person. They are still gay, they just won't admit it or pretend otherwise. (I feel that I should add that I have nothing against gay people, but being closeted is the best example I could think of off the top of my head) ... In other words--> go grab your popcorn and sit back and enjoy the show...you know you love it, whether you choose to admit it or otherwise. Anyone that has read this thread is to some degree obsessed :)


Wow. I thought I had seen the dumbest shit ever when people were (nonironically) using the word "amazeballs" but you just proved me wrong. Thanks for comparing not liking or being aware of Kane to struggling with sexuality and telling your family/friends about your sexual preferences, a potentially life-altering decision. Absolutely hilarious how dumb you are. But thanks for the laugh


Obviously the level of seriousness is vastly different between the 2 examples... But if you try not to read to far into it it's not a half bad analogy for what the other poster was doing. Obviously not every gay person goes through the same experience, but then again I was not even Discussing being gay but rather just one Aspect of being closeted. Whether you like it or not that's what being closeted entails for many people . Everyone has their own reason for doing it and they are all justified so please don't make this about being gay when it's so clearly not...for someone that calls other people dumb so much you sure didn't seem to be able to pick up on that. I guess that's what being defensive does, makes you miss the big picture...no wonder Danni comes off as such a B lool
Anonymous
Moral of the thread: Kane fans are insane and dumb as shit.

So pretty much you would expect when you imagine who would be a fan of him...
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Pray tell how nat came along for a ride... She's been with Pete since he was a nobody...or do you always just assume that anyone that gets a divorce is automatically a gold digger? Just curious

She put up with somebody with severe OCD and ADHD for over 8 years, that's no small task. She Probably lasted longer than I would have and most other woman on here hating on her. Divorce is more common than you have been led on to believe my friend.



You sure go out of your way to stick up for her every chance you can. Would love to know how you're connected to her because it's obvious (or are you her?). She wasn't with him when he was exactly a nobody, get real. He was already well on his way. And don't forget while he's a complete jerk, he had to put up with her too. They seem to be perfect for each other.


They have been married around 8 years roughly... And dated for 7 years before that... Kane was more or less a nobody back then...he certainly wasn't very well known. Why would a gold digger choose Someone that was probably making <50k when they first started getting serious..sry it doesn't add up...and yes radio DJ's before they get syndicated and notorious, believe it or not, do not make a lot of money. If she were gold digging she woundn't have dated him for 7 years, you get real...I never said that he did not have to put up with her stuff too, but these unfounded gold digging claims are just ridiculous. She could have done a heck of a lot better if all she was interested in was money.


7 years. <50k. Heeheeheehee. You have no idea what you're talking about on several things. And it's not always just about money. Notoriety, free tickets, perks, self-promotion, etc. Stop making a fool of yourself defending her (or yourself if you're her).


How long they dated has been discussed by Kane and Natasha themselves so I have no idea what you are talking about. And if you think Kane was a baller when he first started radio you are kidding yourself... The average salary for a radio DJ is around 40k . You must be confusing Kane who is on the RADIO with Somebody that is on TV...even if he was making more , it was still way below 100k. All the fame and money came in way after they started dating...keep grasping at straws to try to make her out to be a gold digger because that's clearly all you have.
Anonymous
I used to like the Kane show when I was in college ...8+ years ago... I kind of hoped that the show would grow along with its original fan base. But I get the feeling that as they got older and more mature the show purposely stayed at the *college level*...I guess that is their demographic. With nearly everything that COULD be interesting on the show just being fake bits it doesn't really offer a whole lot imo. Ah the good old days...
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Pp - the car wreck has been discussed ad nauseum. Keep up.

122 pages of comments? Nah, I will pass.. I was meaning on Instagram or Twitter and such. People are bashing and asking about all this stuff but no one has mentioned the car wreck and why she wrecked. He said he didn't want to discuss why she wrecked. That, to me, was a red flag. If it's all his fault and he is abusive and a cheater and a drug addict or whatever, why would he even bring it up? Open a can of worms to get the finger pointed at him? No way. I didn't say that she was guilty for not explaining her side, I am just saying it creates the doubt when all she has to do is acknowledge it and give a half ass explanation to shut people up, if she really isn't in the wrong. The truth always comes out. It shouldn't have been made public, but it was, therefore, please will want to know and people will find out. Watch and see..
Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture
Go to: