Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates Part 3

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pretty sure California has laws around showing underage kids without their parents permission--celebrities fought for that, so now whenever you see a shot of a kid, you know their parents said yes to them being on the internet

There is NO WAY Meghan didn't approve this photo of her with Archie. NO WAY. That California law against papping celebrity kids is a big deal.

Meghan is such a freaking hypocrite. They wanted privacy? Please.

The CA laws don’t include the kids on public ground with their parents - next time do some research before mouthing off.

Maybe you could post this law for us to prove your point? And what school, exactly, does 2 yo Archie attend?

[Anonymous]

Wow. Do you think she is unaware of that law? This was a huge PR mistake. Why wouldn’t her people tell her how this would appear? Surely someone who works for her knows about the California paparazzi laws.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pretty sure California has laws around showing underage kids without their parents permission--celebrities fought for that, so now whenever you see a shot of a kid, you know their parents said yes to them being on the internet

There is NO WAY Meghan didn't approve this photo of her with Archie. NO WAY. That California law against papping celebrity kids is a big deal.

Meghan is such a freaking hypocrite. They wanted privacy? Please.

Of course she approved it. She is toxic.

[Anonymous]

I found this information --


California paparrazi law protecting celebrity children:

" bill, authored by Sen. Kevin de León (D-Los Angeles), punishes someone who intentionally harasses the child of any other person "because of that person's employment." Harassment, as outlined in the bill, means,willful conduct that "seriously alarms, annoys, torments or terrorizes" the child and that "serves no legitimate purpose. It includes "conduct occurring during the course of any actual or attempted recording" of the child's image or voice by following the child or lying in wait and without consent of the parent."

WITHOUT CONSENT OF PARENT

https://www.rcfp.org/law-criminalizing-photography-celebrities-children-passed-california/#:~:text=California%20Gov.,photograph%20the%20children%20of%20celebrities.%E2%80%A6&text=September%2027%2C%202013-,California%20Gov.,photograph%20the%20children%20of%20celebrities.



So yeah, looks like Meghan approved photo. She's smiling in photo, too. Doesn't look upset AT ALL by paparrazi.

[Anonymous]

Meghan is a great, normal person, that didn't want to take crap from BRF! So, she didn't. And Harry clearly had enough of the insanity of being a "working royal." Meaning freeloader!
The bred housewives of dcum hate Meghan because she made a Prince move heaven and earth for her!
They can't get their husbands to put the kid to bed, or put his plate in the dishwasher!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pretty sure California has laws around showing underage kids without their parents permission--celebrities fought for that, so now whenever you see a shot of a kid, you know their parents said yes to them being on the internet

There is NO WAY Meghan didn't approve this photo of her with Archie. NO WAY. That California law against papping celebrity kids is a big deal.

Meghan is such a freaking hypocrite. They wanted privacy? Please.

Of course she approved it. She is toxic.

And they'll be divorced soon.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Meghan is a great, normal person, that didn't want to take crap from BRF! So, she didn't. And Harry clearly had enough of the insanity of being a "working royal." Meaning freeloader!
The bred housewives of dcum hate Meghan because she made a Prince move heaven and earth for her!
They can't get their husbands to put the kid to bed, or put his plate in the dishwasher!

LOL

[Anonymous]

There was a blind that Meghan had a camera crew/photog crew with her all last week while Harry was in UK trying to "mend fences/seek additional money" from his "toxic" family. Oh, and attend his "beloved grandfather's" funeral.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I found this information --


California paparrazi law protecting celebrity children:

" bill, authored by Sen. Kevin de León (D-Los Angeles), punishes someone who intentionally harasses the child of any other person "because of that person's employment." Harassment, as outlined in the bill, means,willful conduct that "seriously alarms, annoys, torments or terrorizes" the child and that "serves no legitimate purpose. It includes "conduct occurring during the course of any actual or attempted recording" of the child's image or voice by following the child or lying in wait and without consent of the parent."

WITHOUT CONSENT OF PARENT

https://www.rcfp.org/law-criminalizing-photography-celebrities-children-passed-california/#:~:text=California%20Gov.,photograph%20the%20children%20of%20celebrities.%E2%80%A6&text=September%2027%2C%202013-,California%20Gov.,photograph%20the%20children%20of%20celebrities.



So yeah, looks like Meghan approved photo. She's smiling in photo, too. Doesn't look upset AT ALL by paparrazi.

Did you actually read what you posted?

That photo looks like it was taken from across the street. If so, then it complies with the law against terrorizing celebrity children. They most definitely did not need parental permission to publish it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Meghan is a great, normal person, that didn't want to take crap from BRF! So, she didn't. And Harry clearly had enough of the insanity of being a "working royal." Meaning freeloader!
The bred housewives of dcum hate Meghan because she made a Prince move heaven and earth for her!
They can't get their husbands to put the kid to bed, or put his plate in the dishwasher!

No one wants Harry. No one wanted him. Everyone in that family is ugly, boring and lacking in intelligence, and Harry is the bottom of that barrel. At least there's an endgame to marrying William.
Harry married Megan because she was the only woman who would have him. She married him because she knows this and he's easy to manipulate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There was a blind that Meghan had a camera crew/photog crew with her all last week while Harry was in UK trying to "mend fences/seek additional money" from his "toxic" family. Oh, and attend his "beloved grandfather's" funeral.

This wouldn’t surprise me at all. We know she’s probably been texting Gayle.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meghan is a great, normal person, that didn't want to take crap from BRF! So, she didn't. And Harry clearly had enough of the insanity of being a "working royal." Meaning freeloader!
The bred housewives of dcum hate Meghan because she made a Prince move heaven and earth for her!
They can't get their husbands to put the kid to bed, or put his plate in the dishwasher!

No one wants Harry. No one wanted him. Everyone in that family is ugly, boring and lacking in intelligence, and Harry is the bottom of that barrel. At least there's an endgame to marrying William.
Harry married Megan because she was the only woman who would have him. She married him because she knows this and he's easy to manipulate.

Yeah, sure sweetheart. You don't want him, nobody wants a prince. You are just here on the Meghan and Harry, third!!! thread posting after 10 pm cause you don't want him! Or care.
LOL!
But, I will use this opportunity to correct myself: Bored housewives, but you are all poorly bred, so I was not off the mark too much!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are William and Kate not working more? True freeloaders of the yesteryears! Working is for plebes, I suppose!
And beneath them, no?

They exist to make you jealous.

Meh. They exist to inspire an end to the monarchy. Elizabeth will be the last queen.

True. At least the next 3 British monarchs will be kings.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meghan is a great, normal person, that didn't want to take crap from BRF! So, she didn't. And Harry clearly had enough of the insanity of being a "working royal." Meaning freeloader!
The bred housewives of dcum hate Meghan because she made a Prince move heaven and earth for her!
They can't get their husbands to put the kid to bed, or put his plate in the dishwasher!

LOL

LOL....What's the matter? Did you take a look at your husband and realized how right I am?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meghan is a great, normal person, that didn't want to take crap from BRF! So, she didn't. And Harry clearly had enough of the insanity of being a "working royal." Meaning freeloader!
The bred housewives of dcum hate Meghan because she made a Prince move heaven and earth for her!
They can't get their husbands to put the kid to bed, or put his plate in the dishwasher!

No one wants Harry. No one wanted him. Everyone in that family is ugly, boring and lacking in intelligence, and Harry is the bottom of that barrel. At least there's an endgame to marrying William.
Harry married Megan because she was the only woman who would have him. She married him because she knows this and he's easy to manipulate.

Yeah, sure sweetheart. You don't want him, nobody wants a prince. You are just here on the Meghan and Harry, third!!! thread posting after 10 pm cause you don't want him! Or care.
LOL!
But, I will use this opportunity to correct myself: Bored housewives, but you are all poorly bred, so I was not off the mark too much!

Actually, I'm not really attracted to white men. So Harry doesn't really do it for me. His being a prince is irrelevant. He'll never be king. He's a prince because he was born. Hardly impressive. Megan is far more appealing, even though I'm straight.

I'm not a housewife, but okay.