Tucker Carlson has unhinged profane meltdown after historian calls him a Koch/Murdoch puppet

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I finally got the opportunity to watch it and Tucker comes off like a thin skinned tool.

Also whenever his mouth isn’t moving, he looks like he’s defecating.

You must be referring to Bregman since TC wasn't in the video that this "historian" released.

Yes, they showed a still image. Watch it again.

[Anonymous]

An alleged historian who wrote a book pandering to plutocrats' fantasy (global open borders) calling another guy a hack shill for plutocrats. Neat.

I'm pretty sure the young man confused Tucker for Hannity. After all, Tucker actually invited him on his show to chat, Hannity wouldn't in a million years.

The hack came in locked and loaded to get a dumb viral moment, when he could have actually had decent dialogue with TC and enlighten TC's viewers.

Are CNN and MSNBC hosts shills too or just News Corps? Anyone at CNN or MSNBC invite him on?

[Anonymous]

Also, who's to decide if Tucker actually evolved or if he's just a hack shill exploiting populism/Trumpism? What if Tucker's newfound skepticism of GOP/Conservative Inc./globalism & compassion for middle America is genuine? This historian is basically saying nobody can evolve, you are who you are. That's a really nasty and cynical view of people. Says a lot, I think.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
The (historian) came in locked and loaded to get a dumb viral moment, when he could have actually had decent dialogue with TC and enlighten TC's viewers.

TC's viewers are undereducated suckers who are being fed hate and lies so they'll vote for Murdoch's tax cuts.

If you think it's possible to have "decent dialogue" on Tucker Carlson's show, I feel sorry for you.

Go ahead and think that the rightwing propaganda machine has some analogue on the left.
Joke's on you - you're not a billionaire, and that's all the GOP cares about.

[Anonymous]

Let me translate this post below:

- Sentence 1. Raise doubts.
- 2. Raise doubts.
- 3. Mischaracterize the historian.
- 4. Circle back: it's the Left's fault!

This post is actually a decent and semi-subtle piece of propaganda - whoever wrote this one is not a bad writer.

Also, who's to decide if Tucker actually evolved or if he's just a hack shill exploiting populism/Trumpism? What if Tucker's newfound skepticism of GOP/Conservative Inc./globalism & compassion for middle America is genuine? This historian is basically saying nobody can evolve, you are who you are. That's a really nasty and cynical view of people. Says a lot, I think.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:An alleged historian who wrote a book pandering to plutocrats' fantasy (global open borders) calling another guy a hack shill for plutocrats. Neat.

I'm pretty sure the young man confused Tucker for Hannity. After all, Tucker actually invited him on his show to chat, Hannity wouldn't in a million years.

The hack came in locked and loaded to get a dumb viral moment, when he could have actually had decent dialogue with TC and enlighten TC's viewers.

Are CNN and MSNBC hosts shills too or just News Corps? Anyone at CNN or MSNBC invite him on?

Yeah, for some reason, I don't think TC's viewers are looking for or are receptive to enlightenment. Nor is TC himself.

[Anonymous]

This thread cracks me up.

Tucker Carlson has nearly double the number of viewers in this time slot than CNN or MSNBC. He will be just fine.
He is discerning in his selection of guests. He doesn't mind conflict at all. He routinely has people with opposing viewpoints on. You would know that if you watch his show.
He doesn't like a$$holes. That is what this guy was.

[Anonymous]

Tucker had him on expecting a softball segment where they gently circle-jerk about 'the establishment sucks' without actually getting into the meat of the matter or real solutions.

Once you start naming the names (Murdoch, Koch, Cato) that pay for Tucker’s mansion and WASP lifestyle, instead of just pointless vague platitudes, you see segments get pulled.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This thread cracks me up.

Tucker Carlson has nearly double the number of viewers in this time slot than CNN or MSNBC. He will be just fine.
He is discerning in his selection of guests. He doesn't mind conflict at all. He routinely has people with opposing viewpoints on. You would know that if you watch his show.
He doesn't like a$$holes. That is what this guy was.

Yes, Fox (since 1996) and Limbaugh (since 1997) have built a large flock of brainwashed sheep that believe their lies.
A very large demographic slice of Tucker Carlson's viewers are nursing homes which leave Fox on all the time. That's why they advertise for catheters on Fox and not on other stations.

Also, Tucker Carlson does not have on opposing viewpoints; he airs fake liberal fools, which is why he cut the Rutger Bregman segment.
Much of the country is laughing at Carlson - that Bregman video got millions of views.

Tucker Carlson is a dumb person's idea of what a smart person sounds like.
Anyone who respects Carlson's show is someone I feel genuinely sorry for - maybe you'll learn about how the world works someday - or maybe not.

[Anonymous]

^ Fox (since 1996) and Limbaugh (since 1987)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Let me translate this post below:

- Sentence 1. Raise doubts.
- 2. Raise doubts.
- 3. Mischaracterize the historian.
- 4. Circle back: it's the Left's fault!

This post is actually a decent and semi-subtle piece of propaganda - whoever wrote this one is not a bad writer.

Also, who's to decide if Tucker actually evolved or if he's just a hack shill exploiting populism/Trumpism? What if Tucker's newfound skepticism of GOP/Conservative Inc./globalism & compassion for middle America is genuine? This historian is basically saying nobody can evolve, you are who you are. That's a really nasty and cynical view of people. Says a lot, I think.

Obama can evolve on gay marriage.
Schumer can evolve on illegal immigration.
Clinton can evolve on Iraq war support.

Nobody at News Corps can ever evolve? Any evolution is self-serving to manipulate an audience and/or make more money, period?

[Anonymous]

Nursing homes? Tucker and Maddow go back and forth for top “target demo” amongst all cable news hours. Target demo is millennials and Gen X’ers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Nursing homes? Tucker and Maddow go back and forth for top “target demo” amongst all cable news hours. Target demo is millennials and Gen X’ers.

https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2014/01/half-of-fox-news-viewers-are-68-and-older/283385/
"Half of Fox News' Viewers Are 68 and Older"

Catheter companies advertise on Fox.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nursing homes? Tucker and Maddow go back and forth for top “target demo” amongst all cable news hours. Target demo is millennials and Gen X’ers.

https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2014/01/half-of-fox-news-viewers-are-68-and-older/283385/
"Half of Fox News' Viewers Are 68 and Older"

Catheter companies advertise on Fox.

You forgot to add Depends undergarments LOL

The first time I talked to a Hannity or TC follower, it blew my mind. They are on another planet and my best advice is to not engage them. They will actually use the tactics(talk over you, change subject, don't acknowledge your point)as Hannity when talking to you. It's nuts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nursing homes? Tucker and Maddow go back and forth for top “target demo” amongst all cable news hours. Target demo is millennials and Gen X’ers.

https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2014/01/half-of-fox-news-viewers-are-68-and-older/283385/
"Half of Fox News' Viewers Are 68 and Older"

Catheter companies advertise on Fox.

You forgot to add Depends undergarments LOL

The first time I talked to a Hannity or TC follower, it blew my mind. They are on another planet and my best advice is to not engage them. They will actually use the tactics(talk over you, change subject, don't acknowledge your point)as Hannity when talking to you. It's nuts.

Have you ever heard the advertising that's on conservative talk radio for Limbaugh, Hannity, Levin and the others? It's even worse than the TV advertising on FOX - TOTALLY geezer oriented.