Tucker Carlson has unhinged profane meltdown after historian calls him a Koch/Murdoch puppet

[Anonymous]

Everything on TV including that simple minded foreigner is “billionaire backed.” Both he and Carlson are just pointless noise; theatre put on a tube and given book deals to divert our attention. Yawn.

[Anonymous]

Got a case of the Mondays? Time to rewatch this video. It will brighten your day.

[Anonymous]

I guffawed at TC losing his shit.

[Anonymous]

I finally got the opportunity to watch it and Tucker comes off like a thin skinned tool.

Also whenever his mouth isn’t moving, he looks like he’s defecating.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I finally got the opportunity to watch it and Tucker comes off like a thin skinned tool.

Also whenever his mouth isn’t moving, he looks like he’s defecating.

You must be referring to Bregman since TC wasn't in the video that this "historian" released.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I finally got the opportunity to watch it and Tucker comes off like a thin skinned tool.

Also whenever his mouth isn’t moving, he looks like he’s defecating.

You must be referring to Bregman since TC wasn't in the video that this "historian" released.

Most people on this thread have seen Tucker Carlson before.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Everything on TV including that simple minded foreigner is “billionaire backed.” Both he and Carlson are just pointless noise; theatre put on a tube and given book deals to divert our attention. Yawn.

But only Carlson lost his sh1t and couldn't defend himself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You also failed to take into account the free media support he got from Fox, Breitbart, Limbaugh, Daily Wire, Daily Caller, etc.

Similar to Clinton's free media support from CNN, etc?

LOL. You clearly didn't watch CNN. They attacked her on a daily basis over her emails et cetera.

You must have missed many a program, not to mention their collective SHOCK election night. They could barely contain themselves.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You also failed to take into account the free media support he got from Fox, Breitbart, Limbaugh, Daily Wire, Daily Caller, etc.

Similar to Clinton's free media support from CNN, etc?

LOL. You clearly didn't watch CNN. They attacked her on a daily basis over her emails et cetera.

You must have missed many a program, not to mention their collective SHOCK election night. They could barely contain themselves.

Correct.

Both CNN and the NYT thought they could make money from bothsidesism and slagging Hillary.
And then to their horror they realized on Election night they had just elected a corrupt racist moron who would turn out to do more damage to America in 2 years than any foreign power has done in our history.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You also failed to take into account the free media support he got from Fox, Breitbart, Limbaugh, Daily Wire, Daily Caller, etc.

Similar to Clinton's free media support from CNN, etc?

LOL. You clearly didn't watch CNN. They attacked her on a daily basis over her emails et cetera.

You must have missed many a program, not to mention their collective SHOCK election night. They could barely contain themselves.

Correct.

Both CNN and the NYT thought they could make money from bothsidesism and slagging Hillary.
And then to their horror they realized on Election night they had just elected a corrupt racist moron who would turn out to do more damage to America in 2 years than any foreign power has done in our history.

But hey Jeff Zucker and the Comcast execs are getting rich!
Who cares if some brown kids get a little domestic abuse? Zucker is still making money.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You also failed to take into account the free media support he got from Fox, Breitbart, Limbaugh, Daily Wire, Daily Caller, etc.

Similar to Clinton's free media support from CNN, etc?

LOL. You clearly didn't watch CNN. They attacked her on a daily basis over her emails et cetera.

You must have missed many a program, not to mention their collective SHOCK election night. They could barely contain themselves.

It was shocking that Trump received any votes at all. Aside from the GOP voter fraud votes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Nonsense as to whether they still would have raised a stink if Obama's father were Polish. Trump's mother was foreign born and nobody said a thing about that. It was all about Obama's race.

False equivalence. To my knowledge Obama Sr. was not a citizen and spent most his life in Kenya, whereas Trumps mother became a naturalized citizen in the 40s. Trying to say Trump was born in Scotland would be an even bigger stretch than whatever nonsense birthers cooked up more than 10 years ago. If his dad was born in the USSR on the other hand..

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everything on TV including that simple minded foreigner is “billionaire backed.” Both he and Carlson are just pointless noise; theatre put on a tube and given book deals to divert our attention. Yawn.

But only Carlson lost his sh1t and couldn't defend himself.

What was he supposed to say, “Umm buddy, we’re both whores”?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everything on TV including that simple minded foreigner is “billionaire backed.” Both he and Carlson are just pointless noise; theatre put on a tube and given book deals to divert our attention. Yawn.

But only Carlson lost his sh1t and couldn't defend himself.

What was he supposed to say, “Umm buddy, we’re both whores”?

Anything except embarrassing spluttering?

[Anonymous]

Tucker Carlson is a propagandist, who has his position and will continue to be employed by Rupert Murdoch ONLY as long as he is willing to shill for the pro-billionaire agenda. Same with Ingraham. Same with Hannity. Same with everyone at Washington Examiner. Same with everyone at the WSJ Editorial page.

Liberals are not the same. Their positions are most often NOT dependent on shilling for anyone on the left. (If anything guys like Chuck Todd are forced by owners/producers to have majority-conservatives on their shows.)

Real journalism is not the same as Fox. Real news is not the same as Fox.

Real news is filled with center-left people because educated people who are able to consider several complex positions tend to be center-to-left.

Academic economists come in three types: real left-wing economists, real right-wing economists, and lying hack right-wing economists paid by billionaires (like the people who signed this, were wrong, and refuse to admit it, for example: https://www.hoover.org/research/open-letter-ben-bernanke). There are no hack left-wing economists paid by billionaires because by and large the left hasn't built a billionaire-controlled propaganda machine (before you say it: no, the Washington Post is editorially independent of Bezos, dramatically different than Fox and DC Examiner.)

I'm sorry for your bothsidesism and your fantasy that your liars on the right are anything like the left.

Sorry. The problem is Fox, and Tucker, being controlled by Murdoch. Period. The economist guy is right. Hopefully America wakes up to that before it's too late.