Apparently Nick Jonas and Priyanka Chopra are getting married this weekend

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pregnant?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-6702735/Priyanka-Chopra-looks-glowing-gray-check-blazer-matching-skirt-Michael-Kors-NYFW-show.html#article-6702735

(I can’t seem to isolate an image to post.)

Anything to stay relevant I guess. What a horrible outfit.

She's either in an outfit that shows she doesn't have a flat stomach at all or she's desperately trying to get people to speculate on pregnancy. If she's pregnant she would appear to be far enough along that it was before they married which explains A LOT. I've never understood why the quickie wedding.

This woman gets on my last nerve. She's just coming across as a desperate famewhore trying to make it in the US. Poor Nick is either blinded by the sex he's getting or she's trapped him with a baby.

So funny that you get so worked up over someone who you are irrelevant to...maybe you're mad because she's more beautiful and successful than you'll ever be.

Oh come on you must admit she works overtime (or her staff does) to keep her in the press and it's still not making her all that relevant. Personally I don't find her all that beautiful or talented but I know she's been successful overseas. She just appears to be trying way too hard to make it in America.

NP...I really don’t see what so many of you haters see. She has a new movie coming out (which makes sense that we see her around) and seems to really love her husband. I find her to be very pretty but basic as an actress (like many, many actresses).

The amount of press she's been getting before the movie promo started has been insane. Did people really care that much about the wedding? They arguably got as much press as like, Clooney did. For 2 D-listers!

Def wouldn’t call them D list unless you are a lot older.

They're definitely not A list and for the amount of press that wedding got you'd think they were royals. Don't be fooled, Priyanka has been trying to make it big in America for many years. First as a singer (no one cared), then with her mediocre acting, and now by trying to be pop culture relevant. No one cares.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pregnant?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-6702735/Priyanka-Chopra-looks-glowing-gray-check-blazer-matching-skirt-Michael-Kors-NYFW-show.html#article-6702735

(I can’t seem to isolate an image to post.)

Anything to stay relevant I guess. What a horrible outfit.

She's either in an outfit that shows she doesn't have a flat stomach at all or she's desperately trying to get people to speculate on pregnancy. If she's pregnant she would appear to be far enough along that it was before they married which explains A LOT. I've never understood why the quickie wedding.

This woman gets on my last nerve. She's just coming across as a desperate famewhore trying to make it in the US. Poor Nick is either blinded by the sex he's getting or she's trapped him with a baby.

So funny that you get so worked up over someone who you are irrelevant to...maybe you're mad because she's more beautiful and successful than you'll ever be.

Oh come on you must admit she works overtime (or her staff does) to keep her in the press and it's still not making her all that relevant. Personally I don't find her all that beautiful or talented but I know she's been successful overseas. She just appears to be trying way too hard to make it in America.

NP...I really don’t see what so many of you haters see. She has a new movie coming out (which makes sense that we see her around) and seems to really love her husband. I find her to be very pretty but basic as an actress (like many, many actresses).

The amount of press she's been getting before the movie promo started has been insane. Did people really care that much about the wedding? They arguably got as much press as like, Clooney did. For 2 D-listers!

Def wouldn’t call them D list unless you are a lot older.

They're definitely not A list and for the amount of press that wedding got you'd think they were royals. Don't be fooled, Priyanka has been trying to make it big in America for many years. First as a singer (no one cared), then with her mediocre acting, and now by trying to be pop culture relevant. No one cares.

Here’s the thing, just bc you don’t like her doesn’t mean other ppl don’t. Obviously ppl care as there is a thread about her and she is still getting work. So again, she isn’t D list unless you are a lot older. Tara Reid is D list.

[Anonymous]

A B C D listing is not age dependent. Is Meryl Streep a D list actress to you? Do you consider any you-tubers to be A listers? People of all ages can have different tastes. Just imagine.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A B C D listing is not age dependent. Is Meryl Streep a D list actress to you? Do you consider any you-tubers to be A listers? People of all ages can have different tastes. Just imagine.

Actually it kind of is age dependent when you are referring to someone who is actively known and married to a famous pop singer. I believe Sandra Bullock to be A list however plenty of the new generation hadn’t heard of her before Birdbox. So they may not refer to her as A list. No, I do not consider you tubers A list but Priyanka isn’t a you tuber. She is a famous actress known by many (especially in her home country) married to a pop singer. Being A B C D has nothing to do with taste. You can hate this woman all you want but it still won’t change that she isn’t a D list actress. She’s not making Syfy movies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A B C D listing is not age dependent. Is Meryl Streep a D list actress to you? Do you consider any you-tubers to be A listers? People of all ages can have different tastes. Just imagine.

Actually it kind of is age dependent when you are referring to someone who is actively known and married to a famous pop singer. I believe Sandra Bullock to be A list however plenty of the new generation hadn’t heard of her before Birdbox. So they may not refer to her as A list. No, I do not consider you tubers A list but Priyanka isn’t a you tuber. She is a famous actress known by many (especially in her home country) married to a pop singer. Being A B C D has nothing to do with taste. You can hate this woman all you want but it still won’t change that she isn’t a D list actress. She’s not making Syfy movies.

Calm down, you’re responding to different posters. I never said she was D list. (I only read you saying it at least twice). Point is, just because a your girlfriends only heard of Sandra Bullock last month doesn’t make SB anything other than A list.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A B C D listing is not age dependent. Is Meryl Streep a D list actress to you? Do you consider any you-tubers to be A listers? People of all ages can have different tastes. Just imagine.

Actually it kind of is age dependent when you are referring to someone who is actively known and married to a famous pop singer. I believe Sandra Bullock to be A list however plenty of the new generation hadn’t heard of her before Birdbox. So they may not refer to her as A list. No, I do not consider you tubers A list but Priyanka isn’t a you tuber. She is a famous actress known by many (especially in her home country) married to a pop singer. Being A B C D has nothing to do with taste. You can hate this woman all you want but it still won’t change that she isn’t a D list actress. She’s not making Syfy movies.

Calm down, you’re responding to different posters. I never said she was D list. (I only read you saying it at least twice). Point is, just because a your girlfriends only heard of Sandra Bullock last month doesn’t make SB anything other than A list.

Umm I am calm but you can take the defensiveness down several notches. Also, it wasn’t “my girlfriends” who didn’t know Sandra Bullock. It was actually a lot of ppl posting on different media outlets, but continue to be wrong. Point is, just bc you dislike someone doesn’t make them D list.

[Anonymous]

Honestly, they’re probably a pretty even match, fame-wise.

[Anonymous]

Mustard anyone?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A B C D listing is not age dependent. Is Meryl Streep a D list actress to you? Do you consider any you-tubers to be A listers? People of all ages can have different tastes. Just imagine.

Actually it kind of is age dependent when you are referring to someone who is actively known and married to a famous pop singer. I believe Sandra Bullock to be A list however plenty of the new generation hadn’t heard of her before Birdbox. So they may not refer to her as A list. No, I do not consider you tubers A list but Priyanka isn’t a you tuber. She is a famous actress known by many (especially in her home country) married to a pop singer. Being A B C D has nothing to do with taste. You can hate this woman all you want but it still won’t change that she isn’t a D list actress. She’s not making Syfy movies.

Calm down, you’re responding to different posters. I never said she was D list. (I only read you saying it at least twice). Point is, just because a your girlfriends only heard of Sandra Bullock last month doesn’t make SB anything other than A list.

Umm I am calm but you can take the defensiveness down several notches. Also, it wasn’t “my girlfriends” who didn’t know Sandra Bullock. It was actually a lot of ppl posting on different media outlets, but continue to be wrong. Point is, just bc you dislike someone doesn’t make them D list.

You’re having a tantrum because someone called Nick’s wife a D lister? Mmmm, k.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Mustard anyone?

Why has no one posted the baby bump suit from yesterday?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mustard anyone?

Why has no one posted the baby bump suit from yesterday?

For your viewing pleasure!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A B C D listing is not age dependent. Is Meryl Streep a D list actress to you? Do you consider any you-tubers to be A listers? People of all ages can have different tastes. Just imagine.

Actually it kind of is age dependent when you are referring to someone who is actively known and married to a famous pop singer. I believe Sandra Bullock to be A list however plenty of the new generation hadn’t heard of her before Birdbox. So they may not refer to her as A list. No, I do not consider you tubers A list but Priyanka isn’t a you tuber. She is a famous actress known by many (especially in her home country) married to a pop singer. Being A B C D has nothing to do with taste. You can hate this woman all you want but it still won’t change that she isn’t a D list actress. She’s not making Syfy movies.

Calm down, you’re responding to different posters. I never said she was D list. (I only read you saying it at least twice). Point is, just because a your girlfriends only heard of Sandra Bullock last month doesn’t make SB anything other than A list.

Umm I am calm but you can take the defensiveness down several notches. Also, it wasn’t “my girlfriends” who didn’t know Sandra Bullock. It was actually a lot of ppl posting on different media outlets, but continue to be wrong. Point is, just bc you dislike someone doesn’t make them D list.

You’re having a tantrum because someone called Nick’s wife a D lister? Mmmm, k.

Oh I see, you’re that kind of person. Carry on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mustard anyone?

Why has no one posted the baby bump suit from yesterday?

For your viewing pleasure!

Thanks!

[Anonymous]

Are the John Lennon glasses a new trend? H.E.R wore them at the Grammys.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A B C D listing is not age dependent. Is Meryl Streep a D list actress to you? Do you consider any you-tubers to be A listers? People of all ages can have different tastes. Just imagine.

Actually it kind of is age dependent when you are referring to someone who is actively known and married to a famous pop singer. I believe Sandra Bullock to be A list however plenty of the new generation hadn’t heard of her before Birdbox. So they may not refer to her as A list. No, I do not consider you tubers A list but Priyanka isn’t a you tuber. She is a famous actress known by many (especially in her home country) married to a pop singer. Being A B C D has nothing to do with taste. You can hate this woman all you want but it still won’t change that she isn’t a D list actress. She’s not making Syfy movies.

Calm down, you’re responding to different posters. I never said she was D list. (I only read you saying it at least twice). Point is, just because a your girlfriends only heard of Sandra Bullock last month doesn’t make SB anything other than A list.

Umm I am calm but you can take the defensiveness down several notches. Also, it wasn’t “my girlfriends” who didn’t know Sandra Bullock. It was actually a lot of ppl posting on different media outlets, but continue to be wrong. Point is, just bc you dislike someone doesn’t make them D list.

She was on a tv show that ran 3 seasons here. She may be A list in India but she's def D list here.