Michael Cohen and related issues Master Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can a liberal here actually tell me what Hannity has done that's illegal?

The FBI might be able to tell you after they look at Cohen's files!

So in other words, speculation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another nothingburger ........ but liberals latch on to anything and then let their imagination run riot.

Just look at the posts in the first few pages of this thread and the rampant, wild speculation on what services Hannity must have retained Cohen, without one iota of support.

Some of us know what Michael Cohen has been known for and what the Fox newsroom has been known for and can add one and one together. Pardon us.

It’s still speculation

DP here. Of course it's speculation! So what? Some facts may come out sooner or later. You'll still say it's nothing or Clinton did the same thing.

You can speculate all you want but it makes y'all look like uneducated, spiteful fools. Have at it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can a liberal here actually tell me what Hannity has done that's illegal?

Asked and answered. Read the thread.

All speculation. Nothing truthful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can a liberal here actually tell me what Hannity has done that's illegal?

The FBI might be able to tell you after they look at Cohen's files!

So in other words, speculation.

The FBI has been reading Cohen’s communications for months. I hope non-client Hannity wasn’t hasnt not been seeking legal advice lately.

[Anonymous]

This will probably get deleted but

https://patribotics.blog/2017/07/20/fox-news-hannity-under-fbi-investigation-fcc-broadcasting-license-under-threat/

Louise Mensch had this last July. It is likely if there is anything to it, it would show up in Cohen's records.

[Anonymous]

I can't stop laughing at Hannity and the Trumpkins in this thread. What pathetic losers. LOL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Daaaaaaaaaaaaamn. This is huge.

How does Fox react? Did Fox even know?

Does Hannity apologize to his audience, take a "planned vacation," or go into nuclear meltdown tonight on his show?

Why is this an issue at all?

Hannity was offering opinions on Cohen without disclosing that he was up to his neck, personally, in the situation.

Illegal?

That wasn't the question.

But, to answer your new question, no that's not illegal. Just unethical. Folks should stop listening to Hannity because he's untrustworthy.

Liberal goalz. Won't work. Hannity fans are of the bulldog type. Good luck with that.

Mueller, once again, has nothing. The goal is to create a media sh*tstorm.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I can't stop laughing at Hannity and the Trumpkins in this thread. What pathetic losers. LOL.

A good Monday show for Rachael Maddow today...

[Anonymous]

Seth Abramson nails it again:

In one fell swoop, Hannity:

1 Says Cohen lied to a federal court about being his lawyer
2 Says any docs about him the feds seized aren't privileged
3 Makes himself a witness for Mueller
4 Revealed an undisclosed on-air conflict of interest
5 Contradicts what he said on the radio

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Daaaaaaaaaaaaamn. This is huge.

How does Fox react? Did Fox even know?

Does Hannity apologize to his audience, take a "planned vacation," or go into nuclear meltdown tonight on his show?

Why is this an issue at all?

Hannity was offering opinions on Cohen without disclosing that he was up to his neck, personally, in the situation.

Illegal?

That wasn't the question.

But, to answer your new question, no that's not illegal. Just unethical. Folks should stop listening to Hannity because he's untrustworthy.

Liberal goalz. Won't work. Hannity fans are of the bulldog type. Good luck with that.

Mueller, once again, has nothing. The goal is to create a media sh*tstorm.

This isn’t Mueller. Hannity fans are imbeciles.

[Anonymous]

Hannity tweeted that Cohen never represented him. OK then, no attorney-client privilege.

[Anonymous]

The apparent Trump supporters here are ridiculous. NONE of us know why Hannity spoke to/used Cohen, but SOMEONE’S statements aren’t adding up. Neither of these people has credibility - Hannity or Cohen. But Cohens attorney just stated in Federal Court that Hannity is Cohen’s *client*.

Is legality the sole thing Trump supporters care about? Not to mention there may very well be something illegal but we don’t know. Just because “libruls” can’t prove illegality in the 2 hours since this news came to light doesn’t mean Hannity is a beacon of truth and ethics and good judgment, not that everything done between these 2/3 is strictly legal.

[Anonymous]

Dear Lord. You folks are criticizing Trump supporters as being uneducated, angry, worried and fearful, and some of you rely on the words of Louise Mensch, Seth Abramson, and Rachel Maddow.
Too funny.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can a liberal here actually tell me what Hannity has done that's illegal?

Section 317 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 317, requires broadcasters to disclose to their listeners or viewers if matter has been aired in exchange for money, services or other valuable consideration.

Violation is a felony.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The apparent Trump supporters here are ridiculous. NONE of us know why Hannity spoke to/used Cohen, but SOMEONE’S statements aren’t adding up. Neither of these people has credibility - Hannity or Cohen. But Cohens attorney just stated in Federal Court that Hannity is Cohen’s *client*.

Is legality the sole thing Trump supporters care about? Not to mention there may very well be something illegal but we don’t know. Just because “libruls” can’t prove illegality in the 2 hours since this news came to light doesn’t mean Hannity is a beacon of truth and ethics and good judgment, not that everything done between these 2/3 is strictly legal.

We are mocking you for your nutty speculation.
And, we will come back to laugh at you when this is all cleared up.