Lerner takes the FIFTH

[Anonymous]

http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/author/Ben%20Rhodes

This is the brother of the head of CBS news: the man who refused to run Attkisson's stories.

[Anonymous]

She has been widely discredited for her partisan reporting. Surely you can find a neutral source.

Do you consider CBSNews to be a neutral source?
Run by the brother of a high
WH staffer?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

would hope so -- the sequester has been a horrible policy. I'd vote for more money for everything but defense, since their budget is already 5 times what it was pre 9/11.

And, you'd give more money to the VA, as well?

How about all the money wasted on the original ACA federal exchange which failed to function? (not to mention the amount spent to fix the program).

Taxpayers have ample cause for outrage over this administration's incompetent spending decisions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

She has been widely discredited for her partisan reporting. Surely you can find a neutral source.

Do you consider CBSNews to be a neutral source?
Run by the brother of a high
WH staffer?

Yes, I do actually. You are now bordering on cra-cra, you know that right? Are we going to start talking about Obama's birth certificate next?

[Anonymous]

Yes, I do actually. You are now bordering on cra-cra, you know that right? Are we going to start talking about Obama's birth certificate next?

So, now you resort to calling names and throwing out red herrings?

Alinsky #5

[Anonymous]

At the very minimum, according to today’s testimony, the employees of the IRS have broken the law (Federal Records Act).
It is ironic that the very agency that can make your life a living hell if you fail to provide them with appropriate documentation for tax purposes can fail to follow the law requiring the maintenance of documentation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

would hope so -- the sequester has been a horrible policy. I'd vote for more money for everything but defense, since their budget is already 5 times what it was pre 9/11.

And, you'd give more money to the VA, as well?

How about all the money wasted on the original ACA federal exchange which failed to function? (not to mention the amount spent to fix the program).

Taxpayers have ample cause for outrage over this administration's incompetent spending decisions.

It works. Nothing more than a big it project tact was a few months late and you are still talking about it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

would hope so -- the sequester has been a horrible policy. I'd vote for more money for everything but defense, since their budget is already 5 times what it was pre 9/11.

And, you'd give more money to the VA, as well?

How about all the money wasted on the original ACA federal exchange which failed to function? (not to mention the amount spent to fix the program).

Taxpayers have ample cause for outrage over this administration's incompetent spending decisions.

It works. Nothing more than a big it project tact was a few months late and you are still talking about it.

In my opinion, spending somewhere around $700 million for this website is not a good use of tax payer money. I know, and I think you probably know, that a project such as this could have been accomplished much more efficiently and for much less.
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/12/11/obamacare-website-gets-47-million-price-hike/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

would hope so -- the sequester has been a horrible policy. I'd vote for more money for everything but defense, since their budget is already 5 times what it was pre 9/11.

And, you'd give more money to the VA, as well?

How about all the money wasted on the original ACA federal exchange which failed to function? (not to mention the amount spent to fix the program).

Taxpayers have ample cause for outrage over this administration's incompetent spending decisions.

It works. Nothing more than a big it project tact was a few months late and you are still talking about it.

In my opinion, spending somewhere around $700 million for this website is not a good use of tax payer money. I know, and I think you probably know, that a project such as this could have been accomplished much more efficiently and for much less.
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/12/11/obamacare-website-gets-47-million-price-hike/

But you are ok with the $1 trillion plus we spent in Iraq? Because the domestic spending you are so up in arms about is peanuts compared to the Bush war and nation building efforts.

[Anonymous]

^^ National Defense is a priority, in my mind. Because, without our freedoms and our rights, nothing else matters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:^^ National Defense is a priority, in my mind. Because, without our freedoms and our rights, nothing else matters.

Yes, because Iraq was constantly attacking our freedoms and our rights.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

would hope so -- the sequester has been a horrible policy. I'd vote for more money for everything but defense, since their budget is already 5 times what it was pre 9/11.

And, you'd give more money to the VA, as well?

How about all the money wasted on the original ACA federal exchange which failed to function? (not to mention the amount spent to fix the program).

Taxpayers have ample cause for outrage over this administration's incompetent spending decisions.

It works. Nothing more than a big it project tact was a few months late and you are still talking about it.

In my opinion, spending somewhere around $700 million for this website is not a good use of tax payer money. I know, and I think you probably know, that a project such as this could have been accomplished much more efficiently and for much less.
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/12/11/obamacare-website-gets-47-million-price-hike/

Hey, ask your governor why he didn't built it himself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:^^ National Defense is a priority, in my mind. Because, without our freedoms and our rights, nothing else matters.

How in the world was Iraq "national defense"? You do know that all those WMD claims were proven to be false.

BTW, if you are ok with more than $1 trillion spent in Iraq, you have no standing to claim you are against wasteful spending. Even if you thought it was a just cause, so much thrown away on military contractors and "nation building"/pay out to various Iraqi factions. Much more money than the VA and IRS are "wasting" together x 10.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^^ National Defense is a priority, in my mind. Because, without our freedoms and our rights, nothing else matters.

How in the world was Iraq "national defense"? You do know that all those WMD claims were proven to be false.

BTW, if you are ok with more than $1 trillion spent in Iraq, you have no standing to claim you are against wasteful spending. Even if you thought it was a just cause, so much thrown away on military contractors and "nation building"/pay out to various Iraqi factions. Much more money than the VA and IRS are "wasting" together x 10.

If Obama had any common sense, he would have called the ACA the National Chemical Weapons Population Defense Initiative. It would be Obamacare, except every plan would be Platinum, the government would pay for it, and they would send you a free gas mask annually. Just to sweeten the deal for the Republicans, Halliburton could get a no-bid contract for it. That usually gets the money flowing.