So what exactly is your point? What it sounds like to me is that you feel they all should fry, and that the only way you can wrap your mind around a person being empathetic toward a suspected murderer/terrorist is if they are white. You are the one with race issues, not the PP's. |
| While I've never been able to work up an ounce of sympathy for heinous rapists, I feel for this guy as well as Lanza. Of course, I think they should be held accountable for their crimes. Pains me that there is no outlet to channel their frustrations and fury other than murder. |
| It is my opinion that more spiritually advanced people will have sympathy for everyone. Even murderers. People less evolved will not understand this. The best way to describe it would be, what if it was your brother who did this crime? You would have sympathy then...but when you don't know them you don't care. I have sympathy for everyone because to me no one is unvaluable or unworthy of love and compassion. No one!! I have felt this way since I was a young kid. |
| Weird - saying you're more evolved - this is just so ironic. |
| Because he's white. |
It's called rage. |
You are a nice person. I think you may have led a sheltered life, and you just have no reference point for feelings of rage or terror. |
I'm not the PP, but feel similar. My life has not been sheltered. I am able to identify and separate the desire for revenge and compassion. |
We can argue nature vs nurture forever, lets just agree to disagree. |
I think you mean sympathetic. |
My thought exactly. |
Nice? I was thinking condescending, self-righteous, and holier-than-thou. I think someone who premeditates and carries out a mass murder and then assassinates a police officer is both unvaluable and unworthy of love and compassion. |
| 22:05. No one is unworthy of love? Really? Hitler, Pol Pot, Vlad the Impalar, Atilla the Hun, Ayatollah Khomeni, Idi Amin, Ivan the Terrible, Stalin, Elizabeth Bathory, Mengele, Bin Laden, Himmler, Eichman, Kim ll Sung, Hirohito, Genghis Khan, Mao Zedong, etc. |
I think this captures the crux of the issue. Those who publicly preen about their sympathy for the killers are merely attempting to demonstrate their own "spiritually advanced" nature and their superiority to those "less evolved" souls who reserve their sympathies for those who, you know, got blown up. Engaging in this sort of status competition with such people is like wrestling with a pig in mud; you both get dirty, and the pig enjoys it. I believe there is a vanishingly small probability of meaningful discourse with anyone who non-ironically refers to themselves as "spiritually advanced" on these sorts of issues. |
Channel their frustrations??? Seriously? They killed and maimed innocent people. Maybe they should have taken an art class or tried some yoga. |