Tenleytown Library homeless issue

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:As the child of immigrant parents who did not speak English and worked long hours, the public library was my refuge. I spent countless afternoons there reading, studying, doing my homework, and talking to librarians about books and newspapers. It was safe, clean, and welcoming place. That experience no longer exists for many children today, and its loss is a profound social failure.

Public libraries have been radically transformed, not by accident but by deliberate policy choices that elevate the demands of the severely mentally ill, drug-addicted, and chronically homeless over the rights of the working class, poor families, students, and children who rely on libraries the most. This is not a rant about people down on their luck. It is about repeated, unchecked behavior that would be unacceptable anywhere else: aggressive public ranting, overwhelming filth and odor, public nudity, people soiling themselves and then occupying furniture that others will later use, harassment of minors, and the routine conversion of restrooms into makeshift bathing, laundry facilities, and places to inject drugs. These conditions are continually tolerated while staff stand by powerless or unwilling to act.

The result is that law-abiding patrons are effectively displaced from a public institution. No one can concentrate and people do not feel safe. Students are driven away from one of the few remaining free spaces for learning. When libraries become hostile or frightening environments, it is the poorest and most vulnerable law-abiding users who pay the price.

Defenders of this status quo often cloak themselves in the language of compassion. Librarians and outside advocates dismiss legitimate concerns as intolerance. This is not empathy; it is abdication. Compassion does not require sacrificing standards of hygiene, safety, or basic decency, nor does it require turning libraries into de facto homeless shelters or psychiatric wards.

It is a travesty that today, those who disrupt, intimidate, and degrade public spaces are afforded more practical rights than children trying to do homework, immigrants trying to learn English, or students trying to escape chaos at home. When libraries abandon standards, they do not become more inclusive they become unusable. And society is immeasurably poorer for it.



I agree. The city provides shelters and many of the unhoused decline to use them...so they can take over and render unusable any space they want, to the detriment of a much greater number of others? That makes no sense and is also a waste of taxpayer funds. Re the Tenleytown library, I've also stopped using the compost collection station on that corner because of the harassment I've experienced each time I've gone.


You are not better or more important than the smelly homeless person. There is nothing wrong with them sitting there in the warm. The library is just as much for them as it is for you.


DP. The library is open to the public, true. But there are reasonable expectations of good hygiene and socially acceptable behavior at play, too. The PPP beautifully lays all of this out in her post, which you clearly ignore because you have no actual rebuttal and deep down, you know she's correct. Public libraries are for ALL of us, to include women and children - the very same people who are constantly harassed by mentally ill homeless people. But it's clear you couldn't care less about all of those other people who are now unable to use the library as it was intended.


The poster who thinks anyone in an any condition should be able to be in the library apparently does not care about children's safety.


+1 The kind of person who thinks everyone is free to do whatever they want, whenever they want, wherever they want -- rights with no rules or obligations to others.


Stop twisting my words and making stuff up. That is not what I said. I DID say that the homeless have every right to be in public spaces, just like OP and just like you. If they are sitting there trying to stay warm, there is NOTHING wrong with that. I never said they are allowed to do whatever they want. If you are bothered by the smell, check the books out and take them home, princess. I'd much rather that, than the homeless freeze to death.


PP here. I've said before I'm not bothered by the smell. I AM concerned about those who are using drugs and alcohol (which many of them do) and the safety of children (which also should concern you, princess). I'm not twisting words. You're the one who thinks anyone has the right to hang out in any public space. Do you live in San Franciaco?


And again, we are responding to OP's ridiculous whining about the smell. Not drugs or violence. If that actually happened, she would have received sympathy. Instead, she is whining that she got a whiff of a homeless person. Details matter, princess.


Princess, perhaps you haven't worked with the homeless and don't realize the reasons for their being homeless. It's not just a smell. It's usually severe mental illness and/or addiction issues. There's a safety issue for children. You can quit pretending otherwise.


Then start your own thread about those issues. In this one, none of that was mentioned. It was just the smell.


DP. Wrong. The OP mentioned the smell - which I agree, is horrific - and also these:

"the offensive smell and condition in the vestibule from a few homeless individuals that were camping out on the benches.
One of the individuals was also acting in a concerning way that made me question mental stability."


In short, the OP was far more polite in her assessment than I would have been. The library reeks of shit, alcohol, and unwashed bodies. And the behavior of many of these homeless people is something that should never be allowed in the general public, much less among children.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why does everyone keep saying that libraries are for the poor or working class? I'm rich AF and I use the library all the time. I read way too much to buy all the books I consume--since I don't re-read, it would be so wasteful.


+1
We're big library patrons too, and always have been. Libraries are not homeless shelters and I think the people arguing that they should be used as such have never set foot in a library.


They're either ultra idealistic, naive, and ignorant or intentionally obtuse with an agenda.
Anonymous
Someone needs to invent an electronic reek-o-meter that can flag an objective number to the problem. I would pay to have this device in my own home to use for in communication with my teenager. Here is your smell number...it is objectively at number 10 "red" level of problem. Go wash.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Someone needs to invent an electronic reek-o-meter that can flag an objective number to the problem. I would pay to have this device in my own home to use for in communication with my teenager. Here is your smell number...it is objectively at number 10 "red" level of problem. Go wash.


An alcohol breath meter would be helpful.
Anonymous
The only solution DC seems interested in is moving these folks into the large Ward 3 apartment buildings, which I’d argue is worse.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Yeah, a lot of homeless people have schizophrenia and other pretty nasty mental health disorders, but what I don't understand is why librarians can't trained to treat them? and maybe provide them with some job/life counseling too? if the homeless people smell, is it too much to ask that librarians given them sponge baths? they have those machines for people to check out their own books, so it's not like they're so busy.


Librarians need to step up.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Why does everyone keep saying that libraries are for the poor or working class? I'm rich AF and I use the library all the time. I read way too much to buy all the books I consume--since I don't re-read, it would be so wasteful.


It is because
1) the issue of mentally ill and drug addicted homeless is way worse in poor/ working class/ urban neighborhoods. Far out in the suburb libraries without public transportation do not have the same level of craziness at their libraries.

2) Some people keep posting about being compassionate and everyone belongs in the public library but don't stop to think how allowing the 5% people at libraries to engage in unchecked behaviors that would be unacceptable anywhere are affecting the 95% of people in affect poor / working class neighborhoods. Many in the 95% stop going so library usage is lowered, more vagrants/addicts enter so then the ratio of problem people increase compared to people who follow rules.
Anonymous
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled almost two years that cities can ban people from sleeping and camping in public places. What you’re seeing on the streets of Tenleytown is a policy choice. Ask CM Frumin to do better.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why does everyone keep saying that libraries are for the poor or working class? I'm rich AF and I use the library all the time. I read way too much to buy all the books I consume--since I don't re-read, it would be so wasteful.


Who said that. I did say that the poor and homeless belong there just as much as you do.

Accessing the library computer might be their only way of communicating with their family or accessing any support service they need.


If that’s what they are doing, yes. Sleeping in the vestibule is not a proper use of the library.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why does everyone keep saying that libraries are for the poor or working class? I'm rich AF and I use the library all the time. I read way too much to buy all the books I consume--since I don't re-read, it would be so wasteful.


Who said that. I did say that the poor and homeless belong there just as much as you do.

Accessing the library computer might be their only way of communicating with their family or accessing any support service they need.


If that’s what they are doing, yes. Sleeping in the vestibule is not a proper use of the library.


So where would you advise one to go sleep? Seriously, pretend you entered the library and are authorized to look them in the face and inform them that sleeping in the vestibule is not a proper use of the library. Then the person looks at you and says, "I don't have anywhere else to go or anyone who cares about me to call. And it's so cold outside. The shelter makes us leave in the morning and be outside all day, but I'm freezing and tired and I know I look bad and don't smell good and nobody wants to be around me. Where should I go right now, lady?" What would you say?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yeah, a lot of homeless people have schizophrenia and other pretty nasty mental health disorders, but what I don't understand is why librarians can't trained to treat them? and maybe provide them with some job/life counseling too? if the homeless people smell, is it too much to ask that librarians given them sponge baths? they have those machines for people to check out their own books, so it's not like they're so busy.


I think they should also be trained to give you an enema since you're so clearly full of it.


Probably a lot of people on this thread will volunteer sponge baths since they clearly care so much about the homeless


We care enough not to want them outside in the freezing. More than you can say.


Says the person who never, ever goes to the library.


Hmmmm, you couldn't be more wrong. My child went to Murch. We lived down the street from this library until two years ago and went several times per week. SAme with the CC library, CP and even the MLK library. I would be willing to bet my salary that we spent more time there than you ever will. I also talked to several of these people and they knew us. Anything else you want to say?


Congrats You deserve a gold star sticker


Just showing more of your ugly soul. But at least you know. Ow how wrong you are.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The only gross people in this scenario is OP and her spawn. I am sick and tired of privileged people being so completely tone deaf. OP would rather these people freeze to death than find the only shelter they have in the city. They have nowhere else to go so save me your "offensive smell" and "gag" nonsense.


They have places to go. However, those places have more rules. The library is a free for all.


Including the homeless. They belong there just as much as OP.


No, actually, they do not.

The library serves a purpose. It is for browsing books, studying, accessing the internet if you don't have it at home, making copies, going to children's story time, etc.

It is not for hanging out, loitering, sleeping, harassing people and other things that many homeless people do there. So no, they do not have the "right" to be there to misuse the facility in this way.


No one was harassing Op or her spawn. Again, they have as much right to sit there as you do. You’d know that too if you weren’t a horrible person.


OP here -

My “spawn”? You’re hideous.

Harassment comes in different forms. Yes - intimidation by fear and extreme hygienic issues is a form of harassment.


You are a horrible person and you are raising your spawn to be the same. I hope that smell follows you wherever you go today. Gag away.


DP. And I sincerely hope at your next visit to the library, you sit in a puddle of jizz or perhaps some remnants of $hit left over from the mentally ill homeless people. After all, they have every right to sit there and leave their bodily fluids for the next person, amirite?


Yes, they do. But why would I sit in a puddle of jizz when I can use my eyes to determine where to sit. Not at all surprising that ugly peope like you also lack common sense.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why does everyone keep saying that libraries are for the poor or working class? I'm rich AF and I use the library all the time. I read way too much to buy all the books I consume--since I don't re-read, it would be so wasteful.


Who said that. I did say that the poor and homeless belong there just as much as you do.

Accessing the library computer might be their only way of communicating with their family or accessing any support service they need.


If that’s what they are doing, yes. Sleeping in the vestibule is not a proper use of the library.


So where would you advise one to go sleep? Seriously, pretend you entered the library and are authorized to look them in the face and inform them that sleeping in the vestibule is not a proper use of the library. Then the person looks at you and says, "I don't have anywhere else to go or anyone who cares about me to call. And it's so cold outside. The shelter makes us leave in the morning and be outside all day, but I'm freezing and tired and I know I look bad and don't smell good and nobody wants to be around me. Where should I go right now, lady?" What would you say?


Not the one you’re responding to, but I am very sure that a lot of these posters would have zero problem if these homeless people would just freeze to death so they don’t have to see them and smell them.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why does everyone keep saying that libraries are for the poor or working class? I'm rich AF and I use the library all the time. I read way too much to buy all the books I consume--since I don't re-read, it would be so wasteful.


Who said that. I did say that the poor and homeless belong there just as much as you do.

Accessing the library computer might be their only way of communicating with their family or accessing any support service they need.


If that’s what they are doing, yes. Sleeping in the vestibule is not a proper use of the library.


So where would you advise one to go sleep? Seriously, pretend you entered the library and are authorized to look them in the face and inform them that sleeping in the vestibule is not a proper use of the library. Then the person looks at you and says, "I don't have anywhere else to go or anyone who cares about me to call. And it's so cold outside. The shelter makes us leave in the morning and be outside all day, but I'm freezing and tired and I know I look bad and don't smell good and nobody wants to be around me. Where should I go right now, lady?" What would you say?


They need to be institutionalized, its really that simple. Find some cheap land a few hours outside the city, and if you can't take care of yourself you go there and get whatever mental/substance treatment you need. It ends up being a lot cheaper this way too, rather than having to deal with the homeless separately in every single venue.

Being a public nuisance should never be an option.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why does everyone keep saying that libraries are for the poor or working class? I'm rich AF and I use the library all the time. I read way too much to buy all the books I consume--since I don't re-read, it would be so wasteful.


Who said that. I did say that the poor and homeless belong there just as much as you do.

Accessing the library computer might be their only way of communicating with their family or accessing any support service they need.


If that’s what they are doing, yes. Sleeping in the vestibule is not a proper use of the library.


So where would you advise one to go sleep? Seriously, pretend you entered the library and are authorized to look them in the face and inform them that sleeping in the vestibule is not a proper use of the library. Then the person looks at you and says, "I don't have anywhere else to go or anyone who cares about me to call. And it's so cold outside. The shelter makes us leave in the morning and be outside all day, but I'm freezing and tired and I know I look bad and don't smell good and nobody wants to be around me. Where should I go right now, lady?" What would you say?


They need to be institutionalized, its really that simple. Find some cheap land a few hours outside the city, and if you can't take care of yourself you go there and get whatever mental/substance treatment you need. It ends up being a lot cheaper this way too, rather than having to deal with the homeless separately in every single venue.

Being a public nuisance should never be an option.


Other than whining about having to encounter the homeless, what are you doing to help them?
post reply Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Message Quick Reply
Go to: