Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Emory haters are so weird. It's been a decade of this, yet still T25. Just say you're bitter that your DC was rejected. Emory has better outcomes for many subjects compared to its peers. Emory has better finance/ IB placement than WashU, Vandy, and Rice.
So why is the yield and selectivity still so bad compared to these other schools a decade later?
Yeild is 40%. Emory is more selective than WashU, Notre Dame, USC, Umich, Uva, and Georgetown, UNC etc.
LOL No.
Class of 2029:
Emory acceptance rate with gaming: 15%
Washu < 12%
Notre Dame 9%
Georgetown: 12%
USC: 10.4%
Nice try with this pathetic garbage
You're adding Oxford, Emory is 10% and I was talking about test scores. Emory has higher test scores or in the case of WashU more students submitting. You're a one man army against Emory. You're the pathetic one.
NP - why wouldn’t you add Oxford? It is, after all an integral part of Emory University
All ranking publications separate the two schools, why would you include them? UVa wise is different from UVA. Barnard different from Columbia, Northeastern Oakland different than the Boston campus, NYU, Duke, Yale Nus etc. Why should Emory be treated differently. Emory is the only one that releases stats for its sister campus, mainly because its actually selective.