That is a terrible "blend" of modern and classic NE architecture! |
Much of Amherst is quite dilapidated and shabby, but it's worth it for the degree in Law, Jurisprudence, and Social Thought! |
As long as they avoid an architecture degree!!! :lol: |
+1 exactly! |
+1 And you would be correct. The frigid weather permeates one's personality and outlook. |
+1 Evidrntly, with a $3.5 billion endowment, they lack the funds or admin intellect to select and hire a skilled architecture firm. |
Because this is so unique, not like their peers have the same style: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
This has the opposite effect than intended. Other than the swarthmore building, these are all gorgeous and interesting constructions. Also the first two have received numerous awards and the CMC one had an award and hasn’t even been fully constructed yet. |
All hideous. |
Shows how meaningless awards can be in the world of architecture. |
These are beautiful buildings. What’s your preferred style? Drab and worn? |
Really? My impression of Amherst was quintessential NE small college. |
Beauty is in the eye of the brholder. Putting a mishmash of glass and metal buildings on an old campus is not attractive. They don't have a common element or share a connection to the older buildings. It looks like Legoland. |
Heavily disagree. The first one is of Pomona and if you look at the actual full layout, it resembles much of the layout of their other structures and has that Southern California look with the landscaping surrounding it. Williams' building is really just an upscaled classic New England building and most of their campus does look like that. And the CMC one....that's what CMC looks like. Here's an image if you don't believe me, it's a very corporate school: ![]() ![]() These fit exactly with their campuses. I'd love for your explanation as to how you conclude otherwise. |
My apologies...I thought they were all at Amherst. Yes, I can appreciate those buildings in California, Florida, etc. |