Meta Bend the Knee

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:lol at the crying liberals on this board who no longer count on Zuckerberg to squash speech.


Misinformation isn’t speech, a$$wipe.


Yes it is. It absolutely is, because who decides what is misinformation?

I’m old enough to remember when women claimed that the Covid vaccine was messing with their menstruation and it was censored and labeled misinformation.

Turned out to be true!


Cite your sources


DP

My uterus is MY source. After my 2nd Moderna shot in 2021, I skipped two periods, then had short duration periods every 14-16 days, for several months.

That was some scary sh*t.

Honest question and not trying to be funny, but how old are you exactly? I had those symptoms long before Covid. It was called peri-menopause followed by menopause. I’m now post menopause, so it’s been a minute when what you described occurred. Also if you don’t want children, be careful. That’s when oops babies, I thought I was finished happens
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:lol at the crying liberals on this board who no longer count on Zuckerberg to squash speech.


lol right?! they had no problem with it for the last 2 elections but now they do lol, I can't.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:lol at the crying liberals on this board who no longer count on Zuckerberg to squash speech.


lol right?! they had no problem with it for the last 2 elections but now they do lol, I can't.


Aiding and abetting crimes and violence and ignoring it for profit is not “free speech”, moron. It irresponsible corporate greed.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:lol at the crying liberals on this board who no longer count on Zuckerberg to squash speech.


lol right?! they had no problem with it for the last 2 elections but now they do lol, I can't.


Aiding and abetting crimes and violence and ignoring it for profit is not “free speech”, moron. It irresponsible corporate greed.


If you think you can make a case for aiding and abetting, I suggest you take that case forward.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Now Democrats want to stop people from saying negative things about how they are handling the response to these mismanaged fires.


Man watching MAGA aholes make political hay out of a once in a century fire has been so totally unsurprising.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:lol at the crying liberals on this board who no longer count on Zuckerberg to squash speech.


lol right?! they had no problem with it for the last 2 elections but now they do lol, I can't.


Aiding and abetting crimes and violence and ignoring it for profit is not “free speech”, moron. It irresponsible corporate greed.


If you think you can make a case for aiding and abetting, I suggest you take that case forward.


Dp- I’m sure a case could absolutely be made. I would have loved for the them to lose their 230 protection and face actual subpoenas during the last administration.
But Biden didn’t do anything to them. Our government has been completely unable to grapple with technology and we are a poorer, sicker, and angrier nation for it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It's kind of funny watching far left liberals here get bent out of shape because Zuckerberg has decided to embrace free speech.

Free speech used to be valued by liberals.


Free speech is a two-way street. You can say whatever you want, but people are free to challenge what you've said and call it out for bullshit. You don't want "free speech", you want consequence-free speech.



And the problem with FB is more than allowing the speech. It’s the algorithm. They know it took about 7 days for a “Christian woman in SC” user to be prompted to join Q Anon groups and other insanity. They willfully radicalized millions of people all over the world. They are not innocent bystanders. They didn’t care what happened, as long as it meant users spent more time on their website.


This comment needs to be pinned. People don’t understand the power of algorithms. Scary!


+1

I had to create a FB account to connect with a group I joined and, by default, FB pushes a constant stream of conspiracy theories and rando AI content.

It’s scary that they are doing this to millions of people.


What kind of group? Not defending FB at all, but this content is definitely not the “default.” I’ve had an account for years and never gotten that kind of stuff. I get all sorts of ads & crap, but it’s related to my Google searches & the pages I visit on FB (so, basically no political or conspiracy theory content at all).


The same here. I get tons of crap related to my hobby searches.


stop using google for anything. not searched not email. Do not use google.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:lol at the crying liberals on this board who no longer count on Zuckerberg to squash speech.


lol right?! they had no problem with it for the last 2 elections but now they do lol, I can't.


Aiding and abetting crimes and violence and ignoring it for profit is not “free speech”, moron. It irresponsible corporate greed.


If you think you can make a case for aiding and abetting, I suggest you take that case forward.


Dp- I’m sure a case could absolutely be made. I would have loved for the them to lose their 230 protection and face actual subpoenas during the last administration.
But Biden didn’t do anything to them. Our government has been completely unable to grapple with technology and we are a poorer, sicker, and angrier nation for it.


+1
Anonymous
I posted this on the other thread and wanted to move it here.

I've run FB ads for the last 5 years and have trained under some of the top in the industry. As part of the curriculum, often we'd look at what Trump did during the 2016 election - which was brilliant from a marketing and persuasion standpoint but highly unethical.

Cambridge Analytica harvest data from nearly 100 million FB users without consent and used that data for Trump's campaign in the 2016 election and build a psychologic and demographic profile for each voter - not just their political beliefs, but other beliefs, interests, even behaviors (like we can tell if someone likes to watch videos, click on links, write comments, etc and design ads catered to those behaviors).

They then used this data to run tens of thousands of ads *per day* to see what messages work with which groups. Often we tweak images, headlines, wording, etc. Even to the point where they'll take 20 different actors, have them give the same message, and see which actor people like best.

This is called micro targeting and A/B testing. They're standard practice in digital marketing, but obviously to get to the point where you are running tens of thousands of ads per day, you need insane amounts of money, which is where campaign financing and donations come in (because the average person can't do this).

And obviously, somebody who has the ability to raise this amount of money will very easily be able to get a large voter base from Facebook because of the way they slowly use propaganda to persuade people.

In marketing terms we call this a funnel, but it works the same. You align with somebody over a belief they already have, then slowly send them more and more content that starts to shape their beliefs in other things. This is why there are such strong pipelines from health, finance, relationships, etc to the far right: You start with a reasonable belief (XYZ diet is healthy, here's how to lose weight and get healthy, etc) then slowly introduce other ideas such as anti-vaxx (if you eat this diet you're so healthy you don't need vaccines!), introduce the concept of Big Pharma is out to get you, and so on.

Zuckerberg had to testify before Congress because of the illegal data harvesting, and FB put things like fact-checking and stricter data access in place to cover his butt. But ads are FB's source of revenue - they made $800 million from political ads in 2020 alone - so obviously they want to continue political ads even though it's highly unethical.

Now that Trump is in office, I suspect Zuck is being offered protection in exchange for other right-wing campaigns to have "free speech". Or at the very least, knows that a conservative-controlled government won't come after him. Which is extremely scary, because a massive amount of the right's campaign strategy is to spread misinformation and create outrage over things that aren't actually problems.

Sadly the average American doesn't stand a chance. Marketing is a trap that is intentionally set for you and there's no real way around it. Add in AI-generated images and it's terrifying; I see AI-generated images on FB daily where thousands of people comment not realizing it's fake.

Very scary time to be in the U.S.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:lol at the crying liberals on this board who no longer count on Zuckerberg to squash speech.


lol right?! they had no problem with it for the last 2 elections but now they do lol, I can't.


Aiding and abetting crimes and violence and ignoring it for profit is not “free speech”, moron. It irresponsible corporate greed.


What? Do you think what you wrote makes any sense?

MORON.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:lol at the crying liberals on this board who no longer count on Zuckerberg to squash speech.


lol right?! they had no problem with it for the last 2 elections but now they do lol, I can't.


Aiding and abetting crimes and violence and ignoring it for profit is not “free speech”, moron. It irresponsible corporate greed.


If you think you can make a case for aiding and abetting, I suggest you take that case forward.


lol lol

SMH.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:lol at the crying liberals on this board who no longer count on Zuckerberg to squash speech.


lol right?! they had no problem with it for the last 2 elections but now they do lol, I can't.


Aiding and abetting crimes and violence and ignoring it for profit is not “free speech”, moron. It irresponsible corporate greed.


If you think you can make a case for aiding and abetting, I suggest you take that case forward.


lol lol

SMH.


You two obviously know nothing about what they’ve allowed and ignored. Ignorance is bliss.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I posted this on the other thread and wanted to move it here.

I've run FB ads for the last 5 years and have trained under some of the top in the industry. As part of the curriculum, often we'd look at what Trump did during the 2016 election - which was brilliant from a marketing and persuasion standpoint but highly unethical.

Cambridge Analytica harvest data from nearly 100 million FB users without consent and used that data for Trump's campaign in the 2016 election and build a psychologic and demographic profile for each voter - not just their political beliefs, but other beliefs, interests, even behaviors (like we can tell if someone likes to watch videos, click on links, write comments, etc and design ads catered to those behaviors).

They then used this data to run tens of thousands of ads *per day* to see what messages work with which groups. Often we tweak images, headlines, wording, etc. Even to the point where they'll take 20 different actors, have them give the same message, and see which actor people like best.

This is called micro targeting and A/B testing. They're standard practice in digital marketing, but obviously to get to the point where you are running tens of thousands of ads per day, you need insane amounts of money, which is where campaign financing and donations come in (because the average person can't do this).

And obviously, somebody who has the ability to raise this amount of money will very easily be able to get a large voter base from Facebook because of the way they slowly use propaganda to persuade people.

In marketing terms we call this a funnel, but it works the same. You align with somebody over a belief they already have, then slowly send them more and more content that starts to shape their beliefs in other things. This is why there are such strong pipelines from health, finance, relationships, etc to the far right: You start with a reasonable belief (XYZ diet is healthy, here's how to lose weight and get healthy, etc) then slowly introduce other ideas such as anti-vaxx (if you eat this diet you're so healthy you don't need vaccines!), introduce the concept of Big Pharma is out to get you, and so on.

Zuckerberg had to testify before Congress because of the illegal data harvesting, and FB put things like fact-checking and stricter data access in place to cover his butt. But ads are FB's source of revenue - they made $800 million from political ads in 2020 alone - so obviously they want to continue political ads even though it's highly unethical.

Now that Trump is in office, I suspect Zuck is being offered protection in exchange for other right-wing campaigns to have "free speech". Or at the very least, knows that a conservative-controlled government won't come after him. Which is extremely scary, because a massive amount of the right's campaign strategy is to spread misinformation and create outrage over things that aren't actually problems.

Sadly the average American doesn't stand a chance. Marketing is a trap that is intentionally set for you and there's no real way around it. Add in AI-generated images and it's terrifying; I see AI-generated images on FB daily where thousands of people comment not realizing it's fake.

Very scary time to be in the U.S.

Eventually the mind-control/disinformation billionaires like Zuckerburg will be regarded as Josef Mengele was after WW2, using science to destroy humanity. And hopefully they'll get the same fate.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Now Democrats want to stop people from saying negative things about how they are handling the response to these mismanaged fires.


Man watching MAGA aholes make political hay out of a once in a century fire has been so totally unsurprising.


NP. Half the aholes I hear as a Californian are extreme leftists eager to kick elderly people out of their destroyed lifelong homes and openly celebrating the destruction. The other half are MAGA, agreed, but the political haymaking is not limited to MAGA.
Anonymous
Zuck knew Instagram was being used for human slave trading and did nothing.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: