Pitt Jolie FINALLY reach divorce settlement

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:lol 😂 finally. Someone posted a link about Giselle and I saw that they signed Christmas day

Angelina did on Christmas, and Brad on the 30th lol. Lots of people saw this coming after she won his correspondences. They'll settle the winery sooner then later so he messages don't leak

Or perhaps she finally settled hoping for an Oscar nom.

Then why wouldn't she settle months ago? That's laughable. He doesn't want his communications out.

I like how his side said he settled because of his gf lol

That’s funny but he’s still an a ss

I find it sad their narrative isnt that he settled for kids but the girfriend instead.

Says a lot about how much he really did not care about his children. It was always a power thing for him. He had the time and money to prolong the matter, requiring Jolie to expend an enormous amount in legal fees. The attorneys always win.

He's starting to let the mask slip with his PR. Today there was an article from his side that side he's upset she didn't sell to him and instead "took the money for herself." How does that make any sense? She would have had the money if she sold to him as well. He's mad he can't control her anymore

What he meant, cult follower, is that they both agreed the vineyard was to be an inheritance for their children. If kept in the family 100%, their children would inherit 100% of the profits/value. When she sold to an outsider and pocketed the money for herself, that ended. Come out if the bubble got a moment. She was the controlling one, btw.

What he meant? LOL He said exactly what he meant. Just like when his side said he always wanted a daughter leaving out Zahara.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:lol 😂 finally. Someone posted a link about Giselle and I saw that they signed Christmas day

Angelina did on Christmas, and Brad on the 30th lol. Lots of people saw this coming after she won his correspondences. They'll settle the winery sooner then later so he messages don't leak

Or perhaps she finally settled hoping for an Oscar nom.

Then why wouldn't she settle months ago? That's laughable. He doesn't want his communications out.

I like how his side said he settled because of his gf lol

That’s funny but he’s still an a ss

I find it sad their narrative isnt that he settled for kids but the girfriend instead.

Says a lot about how much he really did not care about his children. It was always a power thing for him. He had the time and money to prolong the matter, requiring Jolie to expend an enormous amount in legal fees. The attorneys always win.

He's starting to let the mask slip with his PR. Today there was an article from his side that side he's upset she didn't sell to him and instead "took the money for herself." How does that make any sense? She would have had the money if she sold to him as well. He's mad he can't control her anymore

No, he’s upset she sold an asset he built to a stranger he doesn’t want to be in business with. He and his business partner offered to buy her part of the winery. She refused to sell to them out of spite and sold it to a stranger behind his back. They went into business together, he gifted her part of his ownership stake, and she didn’t even have the decency to check if the buyer was a good fit for the winery before she sold. She’s a selfish and vindictive woman.

Not true. Brad left their deal first and tried to change their NDA terms. Not to mention the article from his team flat out says "took the money for herself" The money was ALWAYS going to her so why would this part be added? He wanted to trap her in the business.

How did he want to trap her in the business if he made an offer to purchase her share? She did nothing for Miraval. He and Marc Perrin made it successful. I’m sure he was happy to buy shares from a deadweight business partner who didn’t invest anything in the business. NDAs are standard in any business deal. No one wants to purchase an asset from someone who is going to turn around and trash them in the press, thereby damaging that asset. There was nothing out of the ordinary about the language of the NDA, like the Jolie people always claim.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think he made a tactical error in not making a very generous financial settlement, very quickly. Things surely would have gone more smoothly if he had, and the chateau sale could have been part of it. It smacks of egotism and control. She's the mother of his six children and he should have been very generous. Just on principle, let alone his gross behavior on the plane.

What does wanting a big lump sum payout say about someone? Did she want money or justice?

I'm not saying she's an angel, far from it. But she was entitled to a huge sum for division of property and child support for six kids over 8 years, and it does seem like he withheld it to punish her for leaving and publicly embarrassing him. And she retaliated by withholding the kids, even when it seemed reasonable he was healthy and ready to co-parent. They both suck.

What kind of mother does this?

I'm sure she rationalized it to herself--he's an awful father and person, the kids were better off with her etc. Like most narcissists do.

I was a little shocked when she had a member of her team basically admit she's been brainwashing the kids to think they had no voice because their father has privilege and power. What? The kids worked with court-appointed therapists, who represented their perspectives in custody proceedings. Only a sadistic mother would want to put her kids through testifying in court. Four are now adults and are free to speak out at any time. At least three seem to have dropped his name, out of loyalty to their mother not because he's been a terrible father as far as we can see. There is no evidence to suggest he deserved to have his parental rights severed. She's a vindictive nutcase who absolutely cannot see the harm she's done to her family (after his initial harm, which while terrible seems to have been short-lived). It's always been about her and what she wants, not what's in the best interest of raising well-adjusted kids who have healthy relationships with both parents.

-1
He tried to hit the children.

If someone jumped on your back and kids got too close or tried to intervene on a bumpy ride, I’m sure your arms would be all over the place and someone would accidentally get hit. I suspect this is why the FBI and DCF didn’t press charges. She attacked him first.

I wouldn’t be surprised if she was prepping some of the kids ahead of time. “Your dad is mean to me, I fear him”, etc.

No she didn't. He had physical touched her and pushed her down before he went for one of the kids.

He may have just walked up to the kid and screamed at them. So she has no idea what he was going to do. And sometimes a kid deserves a spanking or a slap in the face (I.e., open hand).

I believe in spanking, but apparently, he was choking Maddox. That's abuse not discipline.

Only choking I found in FBI report was Jolie choking Pitt.

So you're cherry picking what parts to believe. Sure.

LA Times
“Jolie filed for divorce from Pitt on Sept. 20, 2016. Three days later, The Times reported that Los Angeles County’s DCFS was investigating an alleged in-flight physical altercation between Pitt and son Maddox Jolie-Pitt, then 15. No punching or hitting was reported.”

From his sources which we know was untrue due to the fbi report dummy

Show us where in the report he hit, punched or choked Maddox. Otherwise you are just listening to Joile’s sources.

The agent saw Angelina's bruise and the scratches on his neck. Saying no punching or hitting was reported was untrue.

Grabbing someone is not same as hitting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:lol 😂 finally. Someone posted a link about Giselle and I saw that they signed Christmas day

Angelina did on Christmas, and Brad on the 30th lol. Lots of people saw this coming after she won his correspondences. They'll settle the winery sooner then later so he messages don't leak

Or perhaps she finally settled hoping for an Oscar nom.

Then why wouldn't she settle months ago? That's laughable. He doesn't want his communications out.

I like how his side said he settled because of his gf lol

That’s funny but he’s still an a ss

I find it sad their narrative isnt that he settled for kids but the girfriend instead.

Says a lot about how much he really did not care about his children. It was always a power thing for him. He had the time and money to prolong the matter, requiring Jolie to expend an enormous amount in legal fees. The attorneys always win.

He's starting to let the mask slip with his PR. Today there was an article from his side that side he's upset she didn't sell to him and instead "took the money for herself." How does that make any sense? She would have had the money if she sold to him as well. He's mad he can't control her anymore

No, he’s upset she sold an asset he built to a stranger he doesn’t want to be in business with. He and his business partner offered to buy her part of the winery. She refused to sell to them out of spite and sold it to a stranger behind his back. They went into business together, he gifted her part of his ownership stake, and she didn’t even have the decency to check if the buyer was a good fit for the winery before she sold. She’s a selfish and vindictive woman.

Not true. Brad left their deal first and tried to change their NDA terms. Not to mention the article from his team flat out says "took the money for herself" The money was ALWAYS going to her so why would this part be added? He wanted to trap her in the business.

How did he want to trap her in the business if he made an offer to purchase her share? She did nothing for Miraval. He and Marc Perrin made it successful. I’m sure he was happy to buy shares from a deadweight business partner who didn’t invest anything in the business. NDAs are standard in any business deal. No one wants to purchase an asset from someone who is going to turn around and trash them in the press, thereby damaging that asset. There was nothing out of the ordinary about the language of the NDA, like the Jolie people always claim.

He made an offer then left. Why didn't he change the NDA terms back when she disagreed? He wanted to trap her and never planed on negotiating with good faith.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think he made a tactical error in not making a very generous financial settlement, very quickly. Things surely would have gone more smoothly if he had, and the chateau sale could have been part of it. It smacks of egotism and control. She's the mother of his six children and he should have been very generous. Just on principle, let alone his gross behavior on the plane.

What does wanting a big lump sum payout say about someone? Did she want money or justice?

I'm not saying she's an angel, far from it. But she was entitled to a huge sum for division of property and child support for six kids over 8 years, and it does seem like he withheld it to punish her for leaving and publicly embarrassing him. And she retaliated by withholding the kids, even when it seemed reasonable he was healthy and ready to co-parent. They both suck.

What kind of mother does this?

I'm sure she rationalized it to herself--he's an awful father and person, the kids were better off with her etc. Like most narcissists do.

I was a little shocked when she had a member of her team basically admit she's been brainwashing the kids to think they had no voice because their father has privilege and power. What? The kids worked with court-appointed therapists, who represented their perspectives in custody proceedings. Only a sadistic mother would want to put her kids through testifying in court. Four are now adults and are free to speak out at any time. At least three seem to have dropped his name, out of loyalty to their mother not because he's been a terrible father as far as we can see. There is no evidence to suggest he deserved to have his parental rights severed. She's a vindictive nutcase who absolutely cannot see the harm she's done to her family (after his initial harm, which while terrible seems to have been short-lived). It's always been about her and what she wants, not what's in the best interest of raising well-adjusted kids who have healthy relationships with both parents.

-1
He tried to hit the children.

If someone jumped on your back and kids got too close or tried to intervene on a bumpy ride, I’m sure your arms would be all over the place and someone would accidentally get hit. I suspect this is why the FBI and DCF didn’t press charges. She attacked him first.

I wouldn’t be surprised if she was prepping some of the kids ahead of time. “Your dad is mean to me, I fear him”, etc.

No she didn't. He had physical touched her and pushed her down before he went for one of the kids.

He may have just walked up to the kid and screamed at them. So she has no idea what he was going to do. And sometimes a kid deserves a spanking or a slap in the face (I.e., open hand).

I believe in spanking, but apparently, he was choking Maddox. That's abuse not discipline.

Only choking I found in FBI report was Jolie choking Pitt.

So you're cherry picking what parts to believe. Sure.

LA Times
“Jolie filed for divorce from Pitt on Sept. 20, 2016. Three days later, The Times reported that Los Angeles County’s DCFS was investigating an alleged in-flight physical altercation between Pitt and son Maddox Jolie-Pitt, then 15. No punching or hitting was reported.”

From his sources which we know was untrue due to the fbi report dummy

Show us where in the report he hit, punched or choked Maddox. Otherwise you are just listening to Joile’s sources.

The agent saw Angelina's bruise and the scratches on his neck. Saying no punching or hitting was reported was untrue.

Grabbing someone is not same as hitting.

Are you stupid? Genuinely asking

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:lol 😂 finally. Someone posted a link about Giselle and I saw that they signed Christmas day

Angelina did on Christmas, and Brad on the 30th lol. Lots of people saw this coming after she won his correspondences. They'll settle the winery sooner then later so he messages don't leak

Or perhaps she finally settled hoping for an Oscar nom.

Then why wouldn't she settle months ago? That's laughable. He doesn't want his communications out.

I like how his side said he settled because of his gf lol

That’s funny but he’s still an a ss

I find it sad their narrative isnt that he settled for kids but the girfriend instead.

Says a lot about how much he really did not care about his children. It was always a power thing for him. He had the time and money to prolong the matter, requiring Jolie to expend an enormous amount in legal fees. The attorneys always win.

He's starting to let the mask slip with his PR. Today there was an article from his side that side he's upset she didn't sell to him and instead "took the money for herself." How does that make any sense? She would have had the money if she sold to him as well. He's mad he can't control her anymore

No, he’s upset she sold an asset he built to a stranger he doesn’t want to be in business with. He and his business partner offered to buy her part of the winery. She refused to sell to them out of spite and sold it to a stranger behind his back. They went into business together, he gifted her part of his ownership stake, and she didn’t even have the decency to check if the buyer was a good fit for the winery before she sold. She’s a selfish and vindictive woman.

Not true. Brad left their deal first and tried to change their NDA terms. Not to mention the article from his team flat out says "took the money for herself" The money was ALWAYS going to her so why would this part be added? He wanted to trap her in the business.

How did he want to trap her in the business if he made an offer to purchase her share? She did nothing for Miraval. He and Marc Perrin made it successful. I’m sure he was happy to buy shares from a deadweight business partner who didn’t invest anything in the business. NDAs are standard in any business deal. No one wants to purchase an asset from someone who is going to turn around and trash them in the press, thereby damaging that asset. There was nothing out of the ordinary about the language of the NDA, like the Jolie people always claim.

He made an offer then left. Why didn't he change the NDA terms back when she disagreed? He wanted to trap her and never planed on negotiating with good faith.

Her attorney was the one who notified his people that the deal was off. She ended the negotiations because she was secretly entering an agreement with Stoli to purchase the winery behind his back.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think he made a tactical error in not making a very generous financial settlement, very quickly. Things surely would have gone more smoothly if he had, and the chateau sale could have been part of it. It smacks of egotism and control. She's the mother of his six children and he should have been very generous. Just on principle, let alone his gross behavior on the plane.

What does wanting a big lump sum payout say about someone? Did she want money or justice?

I'm not saying she's an angel, far from it. But she was entitled to a huge sum for division of property and child support for six kids over 8 years, and it does seem like he withheld it to punish her for leaving and publicly embarrassing him. And she retaliated by withholding the kids, even when it seemed reasonable he was healthy and ready to co-parent. They both suck.

What kind of mother does this?

I'm sure she rationalized it to herself--he's an awful father and person, the kids were better off with her etc. Like most narcissists do.

I was a little shocked when she had a member of her team basically admit she's been brainwashing the kids to think they had no voice because their father has privilege and power. What? The kids worked with court-appointed therapists, who represented their perspectives in custody proceedings. Only a sadistic mother would want to put her kids through testifying in court. Four are now adults and are free to speak out at any time. At least three seem to have dropped his name, out of loyalty to their mother not because he's been a terrible father as far as we can see. There is no evidence to suggest he deserved to have his parental rights severed. She's a vindictive nutcase who absolutely cannot see the harm she's done to her family (after his initial harm, which while terrible seems to have been short-lived). It's always been about her and what she wants, not what's in the best interest of raising well-adjusted kids who have healthy relationships with both parents.

-1
He tried to hit the children.

If someone jumped on your back and kids got too close or tried to intervene on a bumpy ride, I’m sure your arms would be all over the place and someone would accidentally get hit. I suspect this is why the FBI and DCF didn’t press charges. She attacked him first.

I wouldn’t be surprised if she was prepping some of the kids ahead of time. “Your dad is mean to me, I fear him”, etc.

No she didn't. He had physical touched her and pushed her down before he went for one of the kids.

He may have just walked up to the kid and screamed at them. So she has no idea what he was going to do. And sometimes a kid deserves a spanking or a slap in the face (I.e., open hand).

I believe in spanking, but apparently, he was choking Maddox. That's abuse not discipline.

Only choking I found in FBI report was Jolie choking Pitt.

So you're cherry picking what parts to believe. Sure.

LA Times
“Jolie filed for divorce from Pitt on Sept. 20, 2016. Three days later, The Times reported that Los Angeles County’s DCFS was investigating an alleged in-flight physical altercation between Pitt and son Maddox Jolie-Pitt, then 15. No punching or hitting was reported.”

From his sources which we know was untrue due to the fbi report dummy

Show us where in the report he hit, punched or choked Maddox. Otherwise you are just listening to Joile’s sources.

The agent saw Angelina's bruise and the scratches on his neck. Saying no punching or hitting was reported was untrue.

Grabbing someone is not same as hitting.

Do you grab your partner or kids in ways that “leave marks”?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:lol 😂 finally. Someone posted a link about Giselle and I saw that they signed Christmas day

Angelina did on Christmas, and Brad on the 30th lol. Lots of people saw this coming after she won his correspondences. They'll settle the winery sooner then later so he messages don't leak

Or perhaps she finally settled hoping for an Oscar nom.

Then why wouldn't she settle months ago? That's laughable. He doesn't want his communications out.

I like how his side said he settled because of his gf lol

That’s funny but he’s still an a ss

I find it sad their narrative isnt that he settled for kids but the girfriend instead.

Says a lot about how much he really did not care about his children. It was always a power thing for him. He had the time and money to prolong the matter, requiring Jolie to expend an enormous amount in legal fees. The attorneys always win.

He's starting to let the mask slip with his PR. Today there was an article from his side that side he's upset she didn't sell to him and instead "took the money for herself." How does that make any sense? She would have had the money if she sold to him as well. He's mad he can't control her anymore

No, he’s upset she sold an asset he built to a stranger he doesn’t want to be in business with. He and his business partner offered to buy her part of the winery. She refused to sell to them out of spite and sold it to a stranger behind his back. They went into business together, he gifted her part of his ownership stake, and she didn’t even have the decency to check if the buyer was a good fit for the winery before she sold. She’s a selfish and vindictive woman.

Not true. Brad left their deal first and tried to change their NDA terms. Not to mention the article from his team flat out says "took the money for herself" The money was ALWAYS going to her so why would this part be added? He wanted to trap her in the business.

How did he want to trap her in the business if he made an offer to purchase her share? She did nothing for Miraval. He and Marc Perrin made it successful. I’m sure he was happy to buy shares from a deadweight business partner who didn’t invest anything in the business. NDAs are standard in any business deal. No one wants to purchase an asset from someone who is going to turn around and trash them in the press, thereby damaging that asset. There was nothing out of the ordinary about the language of the NDA, like the Jolie people always claim.

He made an offer then left. Why didn't he change the NDA terms back when she disagreed? He wanted to trap her and never planed on negotiating with good faith.

Offering someone $55 million is not negotiating in good faith? She was the one who wasn’t negotiating in good faith, because she was discussing the deal with Stoli the whole time she was negotiating with Brad. She cared more about hurting Brad by selling her share in his passion project to a stranger than she did about keeping the business in the family as an asset for her children to inherit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think he made a tactical error in not making a very generous financial settlement, very quickly. Things surely would have gone more smoothly if he had, and the chateau sale could have been part of it. It smacks of egotism and control. She's the mother of his six children and he should have been very generous. Just on principle, let alone his gross behavior on the plane.

What does wanting a big lump sum payout say about someone? Did she want money or justice?

I'm not saying she's an angel, far from it. But she was entitled to a huge sum for division of property and child support for six kids over 8 years, and it does seem like he withheld it to punish her for leaving and publicly embarrassing him. And she retaliated by withholding the kids, even when it seemed reasonable he was healthy and ready to co-parent. They both suck.

What kind of mother does this?

I'm sure she rationalized it to herself--he's an awful father and person, the kids were better off with her etc. Like most narcissists do.

I was a little shocked when she had a member of her team basically admit she's been brainwashing the kids to think they had no voice because their father has privilege and power. What? The kids worked with court-appointed therapists, who represented their perspectives in custody proceedings. Only a sadistic mother would want to put her kids through testifying in court. Four are now adults and are free to speak out at any time. At least three seem to have dropped his name, out of loyalty to their mother not because he's been a terrible father as far as we can see. There is no evidence to suggest he deserved to have his parental rights severed. She's a vindictive nutcase who absolutely cannot see the harm she's done to her family (after his initial harm, which while terrible seems to have been short-lived). It's always been about her and what she wants, not what's in the best interest of raising well-adjusted kids who have healthy relationships with both parents.

-1
He tried to hit the children.

If someone jumped on your back and kids got too close or tried to intervene on a bumpy ride, I’m sure your arms would be all over the place and someone would accidentally get hit. I suspect this is why the FBI and DCF didn’t press charges. She attacked him first.

I wouldn’t be surprised if she was prepping some of the kids ahead of time. “Your dad is mean to me, I fear him”, etc.

No she didn't. He had physical touched her and pushed her down before he went for one of the kids.

He may have just walked up to the kid and screamed at them. So she has no idea what he was going to do. And sometimes a kid deserves a spanking or a slap in the face (I.e., open hand).

I believe in spanking, but apparently, he was choking Maddox. That's abuse not discipline.

Only choking I found in FBI report was Jolie choking Pitt.

So you're cherry picking what parts to believe. Sure.

LA Times
“Jolie filed for divorce from Pitt on Sept. 20, 2016. Three days later, The Times reported that Los Angeles County’s DCFS was investigating an alleged in-flight physical altercation between Pitt and son Maddox Jolie-Pitt, then 15. No punching or hitting was reported.”

From his sources which we know was untrue due to the fbi report dummy

The FBI “report” was just her account, Dummy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:lol 😂 finally. Someone posted a link about Giselle and I saw that they signed Christmas day

Angelina did on Christmas, and Brad on the 30th lol. Lots of people saw this coming after she won his correspondences. They'll settle the winery sooner then later so he messages don't leak

Or perhaps she finally settled hoping for an Oscar nom.

Then why wouldn't she settle months ago? That's laughable. He doesn't want his communications out.

I like how his side said he settled because of his gf lol

That’s funny but he’s still an a ss

I find it sad their narrative isnt that he settled for kids but the girfriend instead.

Says a lot about how much he really did not care about his children. It was always a power thing for him. He had the time and money to prolong the matter, requiring Jolie to expend an enormous amount in legal fees. The attorneys always win.

He's starting to let the mask slip with his PR. Today there was an article from his side that side he's upset she didn't sell to him and instead "took the money for herself." How does that make any sense? She would have had the money if she sold to him as well. He's mad he can't control her anymore

No, he’s upset she sold an asset he built to a stranger he doesn’t want to be in business with. He and his business partner offered to buy her part of the winery. She refused to sell to them out of spite and sold it to a stranger behind his back. They went into business together, he gifted her part of his ownership stake, and she didn’t even have the decency to check if the buyer was a good fit for the winery before she sold. She’s a selfish and vindictive woman.

Not true. Brad left their deal first and tried to change their NDA terms. Not to mention the article from his team flat out says "took the money for herself" The money was ALWAYS going to her so why would this part be added? He wanted to trap her in the business.

How did he want to trap her in the business if he made an offer to purchase her share? She did nothing for Miraval. He and Marc Perrin made it successful. I’m sure he was happy to buy shares from a deadweight business partner who didn’t invest anything in the business. NDAs are standard in any business deal. No one wants to purchase an asset from someone who is going to turn around and trash them in the press, thereby damaging that asset. There was nothing out of the ordinary about the language of the NDA, like the Jolie people always claim.

He made an offer then left. Why didn't he change the NDA terms back when she disagreed? He wanted to trap her and never planed on negotiating with good faith.

Offering someone $55 million is not negotiating in good faith? She was the one who wasn’t negotiating in good faith, because she was discussing the deal with Stoli the whole time she was negotiating with Brad. She cared more about hurting Brad by selling her share in his passion project to a stranger than she did about keeping the business in the family as an asset for her children to inherit.

Leaving their agreed upon deal because she filed in family court is not negotiating in good faith and you know this. Thats exactly why she got his communications surrounding the abuse. He didn't care enough to fairly negotiate. He cares more about trapping her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think he made a tactical error in not making a very generous financial settlement, very quickly. Things surely would have gone more smoothly if he had, and the chateau sale could have been part of it. It smacks of egotism and control. She's the mother of his six children and he should have been very generous. Just on principle, let alone his gross behavior on the plane.

What does wanting a big lump sum payout say about someone? Did she want money or justice?

I'm not saying she's an angel, far from it. But she was entitled to a huge sum for division of property and child support for six kids over 8 years, and it does seem like he withheld it to punish her for leaving and publicly embarrassing him. And she retaliated by withholding the kids, even when it seemed reasonable he was healthy and ready to co-parent. They both suck.

What kind of mother does this?

I'm sure she rationalized it to herself--he's an awful father and person, the kids were better off with her etc. Like most narcissists do.

I was a little shocked when she had a member of her team basically admit she's been brainwashing the kids to think they had no voice because their father has privilege and power. What? The kids worked with court-appointed therapists, who represented their perspectives in custody proceedings. Only a sadistic mother would want to put her kids through testifying in court. Four are now adults and are free to speak out at any time. At least three seem to have dropped his name, out of loyalty to their mother not because he's been a terrible father as far as we can see. There is no evidence to suggest he deserved to have his parental rights severed. She's a vindictive nutcase who absolutely cannot see the harm she's done to her family (after his initial harm, which while terrible seems to have been short-lived). It's always been about her and what she wants, not what's in the best interest of raising well-adjusted kids who have healthy relationships with both parents.

-1
He tried to hit the children.

If someone jumped on your back and kids got too close or tried to intervene on a bumpy ride, I’m sure your arms would be all over the place and someone would accidentally get hit. I suspect this is why the FBI and DCF didn’t press charges. She attacked him first.

I wouldn’t be surprised if she was prepping some of the kids ahead of time. “Your dad is mean to me, I fear him”, etc.

No she didn't. He had physical touched her and pushed her down before he went for one of the kids.

He may have just walked up to the kid and screamed at them. So she has no idea what he was going to do. And sometimes a kid deserves a spanking or a slap in the face (I.e., open hand).

I believe in spanking, but apparently, he was choking Maddox. That's abuse not discipline.

Only choking I found in FBI report was Jolie choking Pitt.

So you're cherry picking what parts to believe. Sure.

LA Times
“Jolie filed for divorce from Pitt on Sept. 20, 2016. Three days later, The Times reported that Los Angeles County’s DCFS was investigating an alleged in-flight physical altercation between Pitt and son Maddox Jolie-Pitt, then 15. No punching or hitting was reported.”

From his sources which we know was untrue due to the fbi report dummy

The FBI “report” was just her account, Dummy.

The agents observations weren't dummy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:lol 😂 finally. Someone posted a link about Giselle and I saw that they signed Christmas day

Angelina did on Christmas, and Brad on the 30th lol. Lots of people saw this coming after she won his correspondences. They'll settle the winery sooner then later so he messages don't leak

Or perhaps she finally settled hoping for an Oscar nom.

Then why wouldn't she settle months ago? That's laughable. He doesn't want his communications out.

I like how his side said he settled because of his gf lol

That’s funny but he’s still an a ss

I find it sad their narrative isnt that he settled for kids but the girfriend instead.

Says a lot about how much he really did not care about his children. It was always a power thing for him. He had the time and money to prolong the matter, requiring Jolie to expend an enormous amount in legal fees. The attorneys always win.

He's starting to let the mask slip with his PR. Today there was an article from his side that side he's upset she didn't sell to him and instead "took the money for herself." How does that make any sense? She would have had the money if she sold to him as well. He's mad he can't control her anymore

No, he’s upset she sold an asset he built to a stranger he doesn’t want to be in business with. He and his business partner offered to buy her part of the winery. She refused to sell to them out of spite and sold it to a stranger behind his back. They went into business together, he gifted her part of his ownership stake, and she didn’t even have the decency to check if the buyer was a good fit for the winery before she sold. She’s a selfish and vindictive woman.

Not true. Brad left their deal first and tried to change their NDA terms. Not to mention the article from his team flat out says "took the money for herself" The money was ALWAYS going to her so why would this part be added? He wanted to trap her in the business.

How did he want to trap her in the business if he made an offer to purchase her share? She did nothing for Miraval. He and Marc Perrin made it successful. I’m sure he was happy to buy shares from a deadweight business partner who didn’t invest anything in the business. NDAs are standard in any business deal. No one wants to purchase an asset from someone who is going to turn around and trash them in the press, thereby damaging that asset. There was nothing out of the ordinary about the language of the NDA, like the Jolie people always claim.

He made an offer then left. Why didn't he change the NDA terms back when she disagreed? He wanted to trap her and never planed on negotiating with good faith.

Her attorney was the one who notified his people that the deal was off. She ended the negotiations because she was secretly entering an agreement with Stoli to purchase the winery behind his back.

NOPE! It was Brad's lawyer. He and Perrin walked away from the deal before Stoli ever even contacted her. Keep up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think he made a tactical error in not making a very generous financial settlement, very quickly. Things surely would have gone more smoothly if he had, and the chateau sale could have been part of it. It smacks of egotism and control. She's the mother of his six children and he should have been very generous. Just on principle, let alone his gross behavior on the plane.

What does wanting a big lump sum payout say about someone? Did she want money or justice?

I'm not saying she's an angel, far from it. But she was entitled to a huge sum for division of property and child support for six kids over 8 years, and it does seem like he withheld it to punish her for leaving and publicly embarrassing him. And she retaliated by withholding the kids, even when it seemed reasonable he was healthy and ready to co-parent. They both suck.

What kind of mother does this?

I'm sure she rationalized it to herself--he's an awful father and person, the kids were better off with her etc. Like most narcissists do.

I was a little shocked when she had a member of her team basically admit she's been brainwashing the kids to think they had no voice because their father has privilege and power. What? The kids worked with court-appointed therapists, who represented their perspectives in custody proceedings. Only a sadistic mother would want to put her kids through testifying in court. Four are now adults and are free to speak out at any time. At least three seem to have dropped his name, out of loyalty to their mother not because he's been a terrible father as far as we can see. There is no evidence to suggest he deserved to have his parental rights severed. She's a vindictive nutcase who absolutely cannot see the harm she's done to her family (after his initial harm, which while terrible seems to have been short-lived). It's always been about her and what she wants, not what's in the best interest of raising well-adjusted kids who have healthy relationships with both parents.

-1
He tried to hit the children.

If someone jumped on your back and kids got too close or tried to intervene on a bumpy ride, I’m sure your arms would be all over the place and someone would accidentally get hit. I suspect this is why the FBI and DCF didn’t press charges. She attacked him first.

I wouldn’t be surprised if she was prepping some of the kids ahead of time. “Your dad is mean to me, I fear him”, etc.

No she didn't. He had physical touched her and pushed her down before he went for one of the kids.

He may have just walked up to the kid and screamed at them. So she has no idea what he was going to do. And sometimes a kid deserves a spanking or a slap in the face (I.e., open hand).

I believe in spanking, but apparently, he was choking Maddox. That's abuse not discipline.

Only choking I found in FBI report was Jolie choking Pitt.

So you're cherry picking what parts to believe. Sure.

LA Times
“Jolie filed for divorce from Pitt on Sept. 20, 2016. Three days later, The Times reported that Los Angeles County’s DCFS was investigating an alleged in-flight physical altercation between Pitt and son Maddox Jolie-Pitt, then 15. No punching or hitting was reported.”

From his sources which we know was untrue due to the fbi report dummy

Show us where in the report he hit, punched or choked Maddox. Otherwise you are just listening to Joile’s sources.

The agent saw Angelina's bruise and the scratches on his neck. Saying no punching or hitting was reported was untrue.

Grabbing someone is not same as hitting.

Do you grab your partner or kids in ways that “leave marks”?

💀 that part because I am seeing some red flags

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think he made a tactical error in not making a very generous financial settlement, very quickly. Things surely would have gone more smoothly if he had, and the chateau sale could have been part of it. It smacks of egotism and control. She's the mother of his six children and he should have been very generous. Just on principle, let alone his gross behavior on the plane.

What does wanting a big lump sum payout say about someone? Did she want money or justice?

I'm not saying she's an angel, far from it. But she was entitled to a huge sum for division of property and child support for six kids over 8 years, and it does seem like he withheld it to punish her for leaving and publicly embarrassing him. And she retaliated by withholding the kids, even when it seemed reasonable he was healthy and ready to co-parent. They both suck.

What kind of mother does this?

I'm sure she rationalized it to herself--he's an awful father and person, the kids were better off with her etc. Like most narcissists do.

I was a little shocked when she had a member of her team basically admit she's been brainwashing the kids to think they had no voice because their father has privilege and power. What? The kids worked with court-appointed therapists, who represented their perspectives in custody proceedings. Only a sadistic mother would want to put her kids through testifying in court. Four are now adults and are free to speak out at any time. At least three seem to have dropped his name, out of loyalty to their mother not because he's been a terrible father as far as we can see. There is no evidence to suggest he deserved to have his parental rights severed. She's a vindictive nutcase who absolutely cannot see the harm she's done to her family (after his initial harm, which while terrible seems to have been short-lived). It's always been about her and what she wants, not what's in the best interest of raising well-adjusted kids who have healthy relationships with both parents.

-1
He tried to hit the children.

If someone jumped on your back and kids got too close or tried to intervene on a bumpy ride, I’m sure your arms would be all over the place and someone would accidentally get hit. I suspect this is why the FBI and DCF didn’t press charges. She attacked him first.

I wouldn’t be surprised if she was prepping some of the kids ahead of time. “Your dad is mean to me, I fear him”, etc.

No she didn't. He had physical touched her and pushed her down before he went for one of the kids.

He may have just walked up to the kid and screamed at them. So she has no idea what he was going to do. And sometimes a kid deserves a spanking or a slap in the face (I.e., open hand).

I believe in spanking, but apparently, he was choking Maddox. That's abuse not discipline.

Only choking I found in FBI report was Jolie choking Pitt.

So you're cherry picking what parts to believe. Sure.

LA Times
“Jolie filed for divorce from Pitt on Sept. 20, 2016. Three days later, The Times reported that Los Angeles County’s DCFS was investigating an alleged in-flight physical altercation between Pitt and son Maddox Jolie-Pitt, then 15. No punching or hitting was reported.”

From his sources which we know was untrue due to the fbi report dummy

The FBI “report” was just her account, Dummy.

Yeah, the same with the allegations she made against him in a court filing in the winery case. Her fans act as if it’s some sort of proof of his abuse, when all it is is her making one-sided allegations. None of the agencies she asked to investigate him charged him. The judge and therapist in their custody case believed he deserved 50/50 custody. Every law enforcement, legal or health professional who examined her allegations determined that they were meritless.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s a nasty piece of work. She’s releasing press about how she wishes Brad would stop attacking her, when she is the one who has been constantly attacking him through her PR people, rehashing the same story over and over again, in a failed and vindictive attempt to ruin her ex’s career.

She never seems to take any responsibility for any of her actions. She acts as if she is a victim of the lawsuit that Brad filed over the winery. However, she is the one who sold to a third party behind his back. She could have at least found an agreeable business partner to sell to, but everything she does is calculated to harm her ex and be as vindictive as possible.

I think she’s basically impossible to live with. Brad turned to alcohol to deal with the toxicity of living with her crazy and controlling self. She can’t be part of a partnership at all, which is why she’s stayed single all of these years.

Brad and his sources drag her and the kids weekly as well. "I've always wanted a daughter"

And he got a daughter, how is that statement from years ago an attack?

Because Shiloh is a son.