Washington Post article about Former Farquhar Administrator

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’d love an ama with that teacher who praised him to wapo (though apparently knew the allegations were true.) girl, you need to run your media decisions by someone else next time.

Yes.

But it’s also interesting and I want to know why he chose his victims.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I bet he’s sleeping with someone high up. Can’t wait to watch this unfold with a bag of popcorn.

More likely, he’s protected by other men who also behave in ways that make MCPS unsafe for women and girls.

[Anonymous]

Mcnight need to go, full stop. She has single handedly ruined this county and this is just the biggest news worthy event of all her mishaps

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:MCPS teachers and staff en masse should refuse to complete the sexual harassment compliance training until this predator is fired.

Most of us did it weeks ago.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think we all know why this guy was allowed to get away with predatory behavior for so long. Absolutely disgusting and also compelling grounds to terminate McKnight immediately as superintendent.

Please leave whatever racist nonsense you’re peddling out of this discussion-I’m sure these women wouldn’t appreciate you hijacking their complaints with whatever this is.

The women that were his victims absolutely see the pattern that falls along racial lines in this scenario. Not all black faculty and staff supported his disgusting behavior.

You must not live in MoCo. The majority of sexual predators and sex scandals in MCPS have been white people Central Office protected for years and years. Take your racist agenda back to Russia or where you post from.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’d love an ama with that teacher who praised him to wapo (though apparently knew the allegations were true.) girl, you need to run your media decisions by someone else next time.

Most of the staff had no clue he was leaving. I don't know if she was contacted before or after Paint Branch was announced, but she may have been thinking about protecting her own career and not going on record about her principal with negative comments. Many teachers at FMS are on the party scene, but not all. If we're not there, how in the world do we know what's happening? Rumors. So she has heard about it happening (rumor) but never experienced it because it did not happen to her. She should not be silenced just because it does not fit the narrative.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s sadder is that McKnight just promotes her friends......

And so did Jerry Weast, Jack Smith and others in the same role.

Name a similar situation involving Weast or Smith. We’ll wait.

The suggestion that it’s “our turn” to have a corrupt and/or incomplete superintendent sounds like Marion Barry-era excuse making. And it’s what a lot of families were hoping to avoid by moving to MoCo.

Guess you weren’t paying attention. The Weast and Smith lists are long.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s sadder is that McKnight just promotes her friends......

And so did Jerry Weast, Jack Smith and others in the same role.

Name a similar situation involving Weast or Smith. We’ll wait.

The suggestion that it’s “our turn” to have a corrupt and/or incomplete superintendent sounds like Marion Barry-era excuse making. And it’s what a lot of families were hoping to avoid by moving to MoCo.

Guess you weren’t paying attention. The Weast and Smith lists are long.

Starr covered up sexual anuse in Stamford, came here covered up more sexual abuse and hired all his friends.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’d love an ama with that teacher who praised him to wapo (though apparently knew the allegations were true.) girl, you need to run your media decisions by someone else next time.

Most of the staff had no clue he was leaving. I don't know if she was contacted before or after Paint Branch was announced, but she may have been thinking about protecting her own career and not going on record about her fprincipal with negative comments. Many teachers at FMS are on the party scene, but not all. If we're not there, how in the world do we know what's happening? Rumors. So she has heard about it happening (rumor) but never experienced it because it did not happen to her. She should not be silenced just because it does not fit the narrative.

It says she was aware.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’d love an ama with that teacher who praised him to wapo (though apparently knew the allegations were true.) girl, you need to run your media decisions by someone else next time.

Most of the staff had no clue he was leaving. I don't know if she was contacted before or after Paint Branch was announced, but she may have been thinking about protecting her own career and not going on record about her fprincipal with negative comments. Many teachers at FMS are on the party scene, but not all. If we're not there, how in the world do we know what's happening? Rumors. So she has heard about it happening (rumor) but never experienced it because it did not happen to her. She should not be silenced just because it does not fit the narrative.

It says she was aware.

Can still be about protecting herself. Why does she need to throw herself under a bus for anyone else? Would the women she worked with do the same for her?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I agree McKnight needs to go. Just one disaster after another. It seems people of the preferred race category get away with anything and get choice positions.

Not the time nor place for the last part of that statement.

It's exactly the right time. White women suffered because of the underlying mentality but who bears the consequences after? The children of Paint Branch. These ultra progressive policies have extremely negative consequences on the very people they are designed to support. The same is true for being soft on crime. Joe Schmo in Potomac with kids in private school don't suffer from these policies.

I'm all.for policies that bring people up but that is not what ultra left policies do. They drag everyone down to a low bar. Look at the state of our schools. We went from being one of the best school systems in the entire nation to a hot mess.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Mcnight need to go, full stop. She has single handedly ruined this county and this is just the biggest news worthy event of all her mishaps

Especially since these incidents predate her tenure. If I have any reservations about McKnight, it's not these situations as much as it is her focus on everything but academics.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s sadder is that McKnight just promotes her friends......

And so did Jerry Weast, Jack Smith and others in the same role.

Name a similar situation involving Weast or Smith. We’ll wait.

The suggestion that it’s “our turn” to have a corrupt and/or incomplete superintendent sounds like Marion Barry-era excuse making. And it’s what a lot of families were hoping to avoid by moving to MoCo.

Guess you weren’t paying attention. The Weast and Smith lists are long.

Still waiting for you to name a similar situation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:MCPS teachers and staff en masse should refuse to complete the sexual harassment compliance training until this predator is fired.

This.

What a joke!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’d love an ama with that teacher who praised him to wapo (though apparently knew the allegations were true.) girl, you need to run your media decisions by someone else next time.

Most of the staff had no clue he was leaving. I don't know if she was contacted before or after Paint Branch was announced, but she may have been thinking about protecting her own career and not going on record about her fprincipal with negative comments. Many teachers at FMS are on the party scene, but not all. If we're not there, how in the world do we know what's happening? Rumors. So she has heard about it happening (rumor) but never experienced it because it did not happen to her. She should not be silenced just because it does not fit the narrative.

It says she was aware.

Can still be about protecting herself. Why does she need to throw herself under a bus for anyone else? Would the women she worked with do the same for her?

You think the reporters strong armed her into commenting? She could have stayed mum-obviously she’s well within her rights but I bet she regrets it.