Has Bancroft's rapid gentrification ruined its chances to have its current feeder rights preserved?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:


This is something that the bilingual charters struggle with as their popularity increases. Look at Yu Ying and Stokes French posts for how much families complain about the quality of the language program because there aren’t sufficient native speakers. A by-right bilingual school HAS to have a language preference in early grades to let in OOB families and sufficient dominant families, or it will be impossible to maintain the quality of the program.


Native speakers are the key to a successful program. You are 100% right here.


What I would question, though, based upon the principal's obvious antipathy to the non-Latino parents (especially the affluent ones) is whether the preferences are being used to maintain a successful bilingual program or whether the ECE preferences are really being used to keep one particular demographic dominant in the school. Her comments, ill-considered as they were, would suggest the latter.


The children of the affluent white parents in the neighborhood can attend in K.


+1. Seriously, we’re talking about pre-K here. Most Ward 3 schools don’t even offer pre-K, and many EOTP parents don’t get seats at their IB either.


They actually all offer PK4.


Fair enough. What percent of IB families get a spot in PK4 at Janney, Murch, etc. though? We did pre-k at Bethune 16th (which is right across the park, so an easy commute for Ward 3 families), and there were a lot of families that used it for pre-K before going to their IB for K.
post reply Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Message Quick Reply
Go to: