Why should they? The financial aid packages are reportedly excellent for those students who need it. Why should tuition be O for incredibly wealthy families — who would have to pay tuition even at their state schools? |
Because endowments can’t be tapped into for that purpose |
This might be one of the most naive statements I've ever ready on here.
|
I’m a Harvard Law grad but have friends who did the joint MBA degree. You would be astounded at the good works done by students of both grad schools |
Yes. Most endowments have restrictions from the donor. They can't just be reallocated in this way. |
|
Jared Kushner was accepted after Daddy made a very generous donation. According to Daniel Golden, "the rich buy their under-achieving children’s way into elite universities with massive, tax-deductible donations." He also says an administrator from Jared's high school said of Jared, "His GPA did not warrant it, his SAT scores did not warrant it ... It was a little bit disappointing because there were at the time other kids we thought should really get in on the merits, and they did not."
If you want a pure meritocracy, you're better off looking at Caltech. |
| When you fill your freshmen class with 60 to 75% or more (they will never release these data) of recruited athletes, legacies, children of donors, celebrities, faculty & staff, VIPs, politicians etc. etc., you may have a good solid class with few stars to show off but certainly not the strongest class compared to schools admitting without all those bull crap. |
| It lost all credibility when it accepted Jazz Jennings and the Florida high school student who led the gun control events. Both worthy individuals but not intellectuals surely. |
|
It’s the brand.
Plus, to be accepted the students need to be superstars at their high schools. (I know people will say legacy, professor kids, athletes and yes, these get a bit of a leg up but are still mostly superstars in their own right). In terms of teaching - the students are mostly taught by TAs and don’t learn anything they wouldn’t / couldn’t learn elsewhere. |
|
MIT, Caltech, and CMU are tops for engineering.
Stanford is tops for tech biz Harvard is tops for world power. |
If Harvard starts admitting on the basis of (checks notes) nationally accomplished kids and not being the best grade grubber, it’s all coming apart. |
| Harvard, along with the rest of the Ivies, are hypocrites. They want to retain affirmative action yet refuse to get rid of ALDCs. |
| Yes. |
| I think all the applicants should 'boycott' Harvard for 1 year and see what happens. |
Why did you reactivate a 10 month old thread just to say this? So what? Most Harvard parents I know who want legacy status to count give six to seven figures. |