Did the god of the bible kill people?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If God makes people kill each other, does he make people save each other and be kind to one another, too?

If you believe in God, then you accept him as being all powerful and capable of/responsible for everything that happens here on Earth. Sometimes it's hard to explain some of the stuff he does, but mere humans are not meant to understand.

So if people can't understand god, then people should stop saying that they do when it suits them. Agree?

dp: no, we don’t all agree on what other people should do concerning God and their religion. Get a real hobby, instead of pretending anon posters here can control other people.

So, you want to say you understand when it suits you, but when you can't understand horrific things attributed to your god you want to shrug and say "Well, we mere humans can't understand that. But don't be gay or eat bacon."

That is logically inconsistent well beyond the point of hypocrisy.

If you don’t believe in God, why do you care how I live or worship?

I don't care how you live or worship. Have at it and enjoy. I hope you have a great life.

You've chosen to enter a discussion forum and we are in a discussion about religion. I care about your logic and reason in this discussion. You are free to not respond to my questions in the discussion if you choose not to answer them, for reasons you need not reveal. I am free to respond or not as I choose, for reasons I need not reveal. But I am happy to, since you asked.

To repeat: this is a discussion forum, set up for the purpose of discussion. All I care about is how you participate here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Most Biblical religions are not Biblical literalists. Very few are in fact, just the extreme fundamentalist sects.

Which means they are just making it up.

No, that’s not what that means. If you actually believe that, you have a pretty simple understanding.

DP. A simple understanding, but likely also an accurate understanding.

DP - actually, no understanding at all. The whole premise of this thread is kindergarten level, illogical, all or nothing, silliness.

You certainly are entitled to your opinion, but the words In the book are pretty plain. If you claim some are allegory and some are literal but you can’t give guidance on how to know the difference the that’s a big logical problem for you.

No it isn't, but you aren't interested in learning. If you were, you'd go to school and take some real theology courses.

Yes it is a problem, and that is a standard you would allow for no other thing in your life.

+1. There’s no inconsistency in saying you understand some parts of a thing and not other parts. I say that about my car and about my friend’s diagnosis all the time, because I’m not a mechanic or a doctor. And that’s OK.

This is a strawman. You admit this, by referring to the experts who CAN and (some) DO understand everything written in their books. We're not talking about understanding everything in the universe -- we're talking about understanding what men have written in a book.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If God makes people kill each other, does he make people save each other and be kind to one another, too?

If you believe in God, then you accept him as being all powerful and capable of/responsible for everything that happens here on Earth. Sometimes it's hard to explain some of the stuff he does, but mere humans are not meant to understand.

So if people can't understand god, then people should stop saying that they do when it suits them. Agree?

dp: no, we don’t all agree on what other people should do concerning God and their religion. Get a real hobby, instead of pretending anon posters here can control other people.

So, you want to say you understand when it suits you, but when you can't understand horrific things attributed to your god you want to shrug and say "Well, we mere humans can't understand that. But don't be gay or eat bacon."

That is logically inconsistent well beyond the point of hypocrisy.

If you don’t believe in God, why do you care how I live or worship?

I don't care how you live or worship. Have at it and enjoy. I hope you have a great life.

You've chosen to enter a discussion forum and we are in a discussion about religion. I care about your logic and reason in this discussion. You are free to not respond to my questions in the discussion if you choose not to answer them, for reasons you need not reveal. I am free to respond or not as I choose, for reasons I need not reveal. But I am happy to, since you asked.

To repeat: this is a discussion forum, set up for the purpose of discussion. All I care about is how you participate here.

What an extremely dishonest post.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If God makes people kill each other, does he make people save each other and be kind to one another, too?

If you believe in God, then you accept him as being all powerful and capable of/responsible for everything that happens here on Earth. Sometimes it's hard to explain some of the stuff he does, but mere humans are not meant to understand.

So if people can't understand god, then people should stop saying that they do when it suits them. Agree?

dp: no, we don’t all agree on what other people should do concerning God and their religion. Get a real hobby, instead of pretending anon posters here can control other people.

So, you want to say you understand when it suits you, but when you can't understand horrific things attributed to your god you want to shrug and say "Well, we mere humans can't understand that. But don't be gay or eat bacon."

That is logically inconsistent well beyond the point of hypocrisy.

If you don’t believe in God, why do you care how I live or worship?

I don't care how you live or worship. Have at it and enjoy. I hope you have a great life.

You've chosen to enter a discussion forum and we are in a discussion about religion. I care about your logic and reason in this discussion. You are free to not respond to my questions in the discussion if you choose not to answer them, for reasons you need not reveal. I am free to respond or not as I choose, for reasons I need not reveal. But I am happy to, since you asked.

To repeat: this is a discussion forum, set up for the purpose of discussion. All I care about is how you participate here.

What an extremely dishonest post.

What is dishonest about it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If God makes people kill each other, does he make people save each other and be kind to one another, too?

If you believe in God, then you accept him as being all powerful and capable of/responsible for everything that happens here on Earth. Sometimes it's hard to explain some of the stuff he does, but mere humans are not meant to understand.

So if people can't understand god, then people should stop saying that they do when it suits them. Agree?

dp: no, we don’t all agree on what other people should do concerning God and their religion. Get a real hobby, instead of pretending anon posters here can control other people.

So, you want to say you understand when it suits you, but when you can't understand horrific things attributed to your god you want to shrug and say "Well, we mere humans can't understand that. But don't be gay or eat bacon."

That is logically inconsistent well beyond the point of hypocrisy.

If you don’t believe in God, why do you care how I live or worship?

I don't care how you live or worship. Have at it and enjoy. I hope you have a great life.

You've chosen to enter a discussion forum and we are in a discussion about religion. I care about your logic and reason in this discussion. You are free to not respond to my questions in the discussion if you choose not to answer them, for reasons you need not reveal. I am free to respond or not as I choose, for reasons I need not reveal. But I am happy to, since you asked.

To repeat: this is a discussion forum, set up for the purpose of discussion. All I care about is how you participate here.

What an extremely dishonest post.

What is dishonest about it?

You can’t say other people are wrong because they think differently than you, and you don’t agree with their logic or reason. What makes you the standard of logic and reason in this forum or anywhere? Are you the same poster that is upset because the projected current population and religion trends according to Pew don’t agree with their desires for the world? Do you not realize you are not the gold standard for logic, reason, etc, out of every person in the entire world?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If God makes people kill each other, does he make people save each other and be kind to one another, too?

If you believe in God, then you accept him as being all powerful and capable of/responsible for everything that happens here on Earth. Sometimes it's hard to explain some of the stuff he does, but mere humans are not meant to understand.

So if people can't understand god, then people should stop saying that they do when it suits them. Agree?

dp: no, we don’t all agree on what other people should do concerning God and their religion. Get a real hobby, instead of pretending anon posters here can control other people.

So, you want to say you understand when it suits you, but when you can't understand horrific things attributed to your god you want to shrug and say "Well, we mere humans can't understand that. But don't be gay or eat bacon."

That is logically inconsistent well beyond the point of hypocrisy.

If you don’t believe in God, why do you care how I live or worship?

I don't care how you live or worship. Have at it and enjoy. I hope you have a great life.

You've chosen to enter a discussion forum and we are in a discussion about religion. I care about your logic and reason in this discussion. You are free to not respond to my questions in the discussion if you choose not to answer them, for reasons you need not reveal. I am free to respond or not as I choose, for reasons I need not reveal. But I am happy to, since you asked.

To repeat: this is a discussion forum, set up for the purpose of discussion. All I care about is how you participate here.

What an extremely dishonest post.

What is dishonest about it?

You can’t say other people are wrong because they think differently than you, and you don’t agree with their logic or reason. What makes you the standard of logic and reason in this forum or anywhere? Are you the same poster that is upset because the projected current population and religion trends according to Pew don’t agree with their desires for the world? Do you not realize you are not the gold standard for logic, reason, etc, out of every person in the entire world?

DOn't mind "dishonest" poster. They are just sounding off.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If God makes people kill each other, does he make people save each other and be kind to one another, too?

If you believe in God, then you accept him as being all powerful and capable of/responsible for everything that happens here on Earth. Sometimes it's hard to explain some of the stuff he does, but mere humans are not meant to understand.

So if people can't understand god, then people should stop saying that they do when it suits them. Agree?

dp: no, we don’t all agree on what other people should do concerning God and their religion. Get a real hobby, instead of pretending anon posters here can control other people.

So, you want to say you understand when it suits you, but when you can't understand horrific things attributed to your god you want to shrug and say "Well, we mere humans can't understand that. But don't be gay or eat bacon."

That is logically inconsistent well beyond the point of hypocrisy.

If you don’t believe in God, why do you care how I live or worship?

I don't care how you live or worship. Have at it and enjoy. I hope you have a great life.

You've chosen to enter a discussion forum and we are in a discussion about religion. I care about your logic and reason in this discussion. You are free to not respond to my questions in the discussion if you choose not to answer them, for reasons you need not reveal. I am free to respond or not as I choose, for reasons I need not reveal. But I am happy to, since you asked.

To repeat: this is a discussion forum, set up for the purpose of discussion. All I care about is how you participate here.

What an extremely dishonest post.

What is dishonest about it?

You can’t say other people are wrong because they think differently than you, and you don’t agree with their logic or reason. What makes you the standard of logic and reason in this forum or anywhere? Are you the same poster that is upset because the projected current population and religion trends according to Pew don’t agree with their desires for the world? Do you not realize you are not the gold standard for logic, reason, etc, out of every person in the entire world?

Nothing you posted says anything about what is dishonest in the post you are responding to.

If you wish to have a discussion, please respond to that question, and then I will response to your post above.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If God makes people kill each other, does he make people save each other and be kind to one another, too?

If you believe in God, then you accept him as being all powerful and capable of/responsible for everything that happens here on Earth. Sometimes it's hard to explain some of the stuff he does, but mere humans are not meant to understand.

So if people can't understand god, then people should stop saying that they do when it suits them. Agree?

dp: no, we don’t all agree on what other people should do concerning God and their religion. Get a real hobby, instead of pretending anon posters here can control other people.

So, you want to say you understand when it suits you, but when you can't understand horrific things attributed to your god you want to shrug and say "Well, we mere humans can't understand that. But don't be gay or eat bacon."

That is logically inconsistent well beyond the point of hypocrisy.

If you don’t believe in God, why do you care how I live or worship?

I don't care how you live or worship. Have at it and enjoy. I hope you have a great life.

You've chosen to enter a discussion forum and we are in a discussion about religion. I care about your logic and reason in this discussion. You are free to not respond to my questions in the discussion if you choose not to answer them, for reasons you need not reveal. I am free to respond or not as I choose, for reasons I need not reveal. But I am happy to, since you asked.

To repeat: this is a discussion forum, set up for the purpose of discussion. All I care about is how you participate here.

What an extremely dishonest post.

What is dishonest about it?

You can’t say other people are wrong because they think differently than you, and you don’t agree with their logic or reason. What makes you the standard of logic and reason in this forum or anywhere? Are you the same poster that is upset because the projected current population and religion trends according to Pew don’t agree with their desires for the world? Do you not realize you are not the gold standard for logic, reason, etc, out of every person in the entire world?

DOn't mind "dishonest" poster. They are just sounding off.

+1. They have also had a weird obsession with Pew for the past few years. Best to ignore a poster who uses sneaky rhetoric, or no rhetoric at all—she’s just here to pick fights with anonymous internet enemies that apparently live in her head.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If God makes people kill each other, does he make people save each other and be kind to one another, too?

If you believe in God, then you accept him as being all powerful and capable of/responsible for everything that happens here on Earth. Sometimes it's hard to explain some of the stuff he does, but mere humans are not meant to understand.

So if people can't understand god, then people should stop saying that they do when it suits them. Agree?

dp: no, we don’t all agree on what other people should do concerning God and their religion. Get a real hobby, instead of pretending anon posters here can control other people.

So, you want to say you understand when it suits you, but when you can't understand horrific things attributed to your god you want to shrug and say "Well, we mere humans can't understand that. But don't be gay or eat bacon."

That is logically inconsistent well beyond the point of hypocrisy.

If you don’t believe in God, why do you care how I live or worship?

I don't care how you live or worship. Have at it and enjoy. I hope you have a great life.

You've chosen to enter a discussion forum and we are in a discussion about religion. I care about your logic and reason in this discussion. You are free to not respond to my questions in the discussion if you choose not to answer them, for reasons you need not reveal. I am free to respond or not as I choose, for reasons I need not reveal. But I am happy to, since you asked.

To repeat: this is a discussion forum, set up for the purpose of discussion. All I care about is how you participate here.

What an extremely dishonest post.

What is dishonest about it?

You can’t say other people are wrong because they think differently than you, and you don’t agree with their logic or reason. What makes you the standard of logic and reason in this forum or anywhere? Are you the same poster that is upset because the projected current population and religion trends according to Pew don’t agree with their desires for the world? Do you not realize you are not the gold standard for logic, reason, etc, out of every person in the entire world?

DOn't mind "dishonest" poster. They are just sounding off.

+1. They have also had a weird obsession with Pew for the past few years. Best to ignore a poster who uses sneaky rhetoric, or no rhetoric at all—she’s just here to pick fights with anonymous internet enemies that apparently live in her head.

I am the PP who’s post was called dishonest, and I am waiting for an explanation on that. I don’t know what you are referring to WRT Pew, have nothing to do with that.

I do agree with you it is best not to respond to questions where you don’t have a logically sound answer.

Now, please respond with that was specifically dishonest int he post you replied to.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If God makes people kill each other, does he make people save each other and be kind to one another, too?

If you believe in God, then you accept him as being all powerful and capable of/responsible for everything that happens here on Earth. Sometimes it's hard to explain some of the stuff he does, but mere humans are not meant to understand.

So if people can't understand god, then people should stop saying that they do when it suits them. Agree?

dp: no, we don’t all agree on what other people should do concerning God and their religion. Get a real hobby, instead of pretending anon posters here can control other people.

So, you want to say you understand when it suits you, but when you can't understand horrific things attributed to your god you want to shrug and say "Well, we mere humans can't understand that. But don't be gay or eat bacon."

That is logically inconsistent well beyond the point of hypocrisy.

If you don’t believe in God, why do you care how I live or worship?

I don't care how you live or worship. Have at it and enjoy. I hope you have a great life.

You've chosen to enter a discussion forum and we are in a discussion about religion. I care about your logic and reason in this discussion. You are free to not respond to my questions in the discussion if you choose not to answer them, for reasons you need not reveal. I am free to respond or not as I choose, for reasons I need not reveal. But I am happy to, since you asked.

To repeat: this is a discussion forum, set up for the purpose of discussion. All I care about is how you participate here.

What an extremely dishonest post.

What is dishonest about it?

You can’t say other people are wrong because they think differently than you, and you don’t agree with their logic or reason. What makes you the standard of logic and reason in this forum or anywhere? Are you the same poster that is upset because the projected current population and religion trends according to Pew don’t agree with their desires for the world? Do you not realize you are not the gold standard for logic, reason, etc, out of every person in the entire world?

Nothing you posted says anything about what is dishonest in the post you are responding to.

If you wish to have a discussion, please respond to that question, and then I will response to your post above.

I don’t debate people that aren’t honest. I don’t have protracted conversations with people who have an attitude that everyone who has a different opinion is wrong and bad and stupid. I don’t give time to people who can’t accept that other people have different reasons for choices they make in their life, and/or they have “wrong” logic. You have the attitude that everyone who doesn’t think like you do is wrong or uneducated, or even crazy. It’s a waste of time to engage you.

Somehow you’ve come to view yourself as the center of the universe, and it’s just not so.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If God makes people kill each other, does he make people save each other and be kind to one another, too?

If you believe in God, then you accept him as being all powerful and capable of/responsible for everything that happens here on Earth. Sometimes it's hard to explain some of the stuff he does, but mere humans are not meant to understand.

So if people can't understand god, then people should stop saying that they do when it suits them. Agree?

dp: no, we don’t all agree on what other people should do concerning God and their religion. Get a real hobby, instead of pretending anon posters here can control other people.

So, you want to say you understand when it suits you, but when you can't understand horrific things attributed to your god you want to shrug and say "Well, we mere humans can't understand that. But don't be gay or eat bacon."

That is logically inconsistent well beyond the point of hypocrisy.

If you don’t believe in God, why do you care how I live or worship?

I don't care how you live or worship. Have at it and enjoy. I hope you have a great life.

You've chosen to enter a discussion forum and we are in a discussion about religion. I care about your logic and reason in this discussion. You are free to not respond to my questions in the discussion if you choose not to answer them, for reasons you need not reveal. I am free to respond or not as I choose, for reasons I need not reveal. But I am happy to, since you asked.

To repeat: this is a discussion forum, set up for the purpose of discussion. All I care about is how you participate here.

What an extremely dishonest post.

What is dishonest about it?

You can’t say other people are wrong because they think differently than you, and you don’t agree with their logic or reason. What makes you the standard of logic and reason in this forum or anywhere? Are you the same poster that is upset because the projected current population and religion trends according to Pew don’t agree with their desires for the world? Do you not realize you are not the gold standard for logic, reason, etc, out of every person in the entire world?

Nothing you posted says anything about what is dishonest in the post you are responding to.

If you wish to have a discussion, please respond to that question, and then I will response to your post above.

I don’t debate people that aren’t honest. I don’t have protracted conversations with people who have an attitude that everyone who has a different opinion is wrong and bad and stupid. I don’t give time to people who can’t accept that other people have different reasons for choices they make in their life, and/or they have “wrong” logic. You have the attitude that everyone who doesn’t think like you do is wrong or uneducated, or even crazy. It’s a waste of time to engage you.

Somehow you’ve come to view yourself as the center of the universe, and it’s just not so.

So you can’t say what was dishonest in that post you called dishonest?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If God makes people kill each other, does he make people save each other and be kind to one another, too?

If you believe in God, then you accept him as being all powerful and capable of/responsible for everything that happens here on Earth. Sometimes it's hard to explain some of the stuff he does, but mere humans are not meant to understand.

So if people can't understand god, then people should stop saying that they do when it suits them. Agree?

dp: no, we don’t all agree on what other people should do concerning God and their religion. Get a real hobby, instead of pretending anon posters here can control other people.

So, you want to say you understand when it suits you, but when you can't understand horrific things attributed to your god you want to shrug and say "Well, we mere humans can't understand that. But don't be gay or eat bacon."

That is logically inconsistent well beyond the point of hypocrisy.

If you don’t believe in God, why do you care how I live or worship?

I don't care how you live or worship. Have at it and enjoy. I hope you have a great life.

You've chosen to enter a discussion forum and we are in a discussion about religion. I care about your logic and reason in this discussion. You are free to not respond to my questions in the discussion if you choose not to answer them, for reasons you need not reveal. I am free to respond or not as I choose, for reasons I need not reveal. But I am happy to, since you asked.

To repeat: this is a discussion forum, set up for the purpose of discussion. All I care about is how you participate here.

What an extremely dishonest post.

What is dishonest about it?

You can’t say other people are wrong because they think differently than you, and you don’t agree with their logic or reason. What makes you the standard of logic and reason in this forum or anywhere? Are you the same poster that is upset because the projected current population and religion trends according to Pew don’t agree with their desires for the world? Do you not realize you are not the gold standard for logic, reason, etc, out of every person in the entire world?

Nothing you posted says anything about what is dishonest in the post you are responding to.

If you wish to have a discussion, please respond to that question, and then I will response to your post above.

I don’t debate people that aren’t honest. I don’t have protracted conversations with people who have an attitude that everyone who has a different opinion is wrong and bad and stupid. I don’t give time to people who can’t accept that other people have different reasons for choices they make in their life, and/or they have “wrong” logic. You have the attitude that everyone who doesn’t think like you do is wrong or uneducated, or even crazy. It’s a waste of time to engage you.

Somehow you’ve come to view yourself as the center of the universe, and it’s just not so.

So you can’t say what was dishonest in that post you called dishonest?

No, baking pumpkin bread with walnuts. Have a good day fretting about being the only correct, logical, and educated person in the world regarding religion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If God makes people kill each other, does he make people save each other and be kind to one another, too?

If you believe in God, then you accept him as being all powerful and capable of/responsible for everything that happens here on Earth. Sometimes it's hard to explain some of the stuff he does, but mere humans are not meant to understand.

So if people can't understand god, then people should stop saying that they do when it suits them. Agree?

dp: no, we don’t all agree on what other people should do concerning God and their religion. Get a real hobby, instead of pretending anon posters here can control other people.

So, you want to say you understand when it suits you, but when you can't understand horrific things attributed to your god you want to shrug and say "Well, we mere humans can't understand that. But don't be gay or eat bacon."

That is logically inconsistent well beyond the point of hypocrisy.

If you don’t believe in God, why do you care how I live or worship?

I don't care how you live or worship. Have at it and enjoy. I hope you have a great life.

You've chosen to enter a discussion forum and we are in a discussion about religion. I care about your logic and reason in this discussion. You are free to not respond to my questions in the discussion if you choose not to answer them, for reasons you need not reveal. I am free to respond or not as I choose, for reasons I need not reveal. But I am happy to, since you asked.

To repeat: this is a discussion forum, set up for the purpose of discussion. All I care about is how you participate here.

What an extremely dishonest post.

What is dishonest about it?

You can’t say other people are wrong because they think differently than you, and you don’t agree with their logic or reason. What makes you the standard of logic and reason in this forum or anywhere? Are you the same poster that is upset because the projected current population and religion trends according to Pew don’t agree with their desires for the world? Do you not realize you are not the gold standard for logic, reason, etc, out of every person in the entire world?

DOn't mind "dishonest" poster. They are just sounding off.

+1. They have also had a weird obsession with Pew for the past few years. Best to ignore a poster who uses sneaky rhetoric, or no rhetoric at all—she’s just here to pick fights with anonymous internet enemies that apparently live in her head.

I am the PP who’s post was called dishonest, and I am waiting for an explanation on that. I don’t know what you are referring to WRT Pew, have nothing to do with that.

I do agree with you it is best not to respond to questions where you don’t have a logically sound answer.

Now, please respond with that was specifically dishonest int he post you replied to.

I don’t take orders from posters who don’t argue in good faith.

I agree with pp: have fun thinking you’re the only smart, logical person around.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If God makes people kill each other, does he make people save each other and be kind to one another, too?

If you believe in God, then you accept him as being all powerful and capable of/responsible for everything that happens here on Earth. Sometimes it's hard to explain some of the stuff he does, but mere humans are not meant to understand.

So if people can't understand god, then people should stop saying that they do when it suits them. Agree?

dp: no, we don’t all agree on what other people should do concerning God and their religion. Get a real hobby, instead of pretending anon posters here can control other people.

So, you want to say you understand when it suits you, but when you can't understand horrific things attributed to your god you want to shrug and say "Well, we mere humans can't understand that. But don't be gay or eat bacon."

That is logically inconsistent well beyond the point of hypocrisy.

If you don’t believe in God, why do you care how I live or worship?

I don't care how you live or worship. Have at it and enjoy. I hope you have a great life.

You've chosen to enter a discussion forum and we are in a discussion about religion. I care about your logic and reason in this discussion. You are free to not respond to my questions in the discussion if you choose not to answer them, for reasons you need not reveal. I am free to respond or not as I choose, for reasons I need not reveal. But I am happy to, since you asked.

To repeat: this is a discussion forum, set up for the purpose of discussion. All I care about is how you participate here.

What an extremely dishonest post.

What is dishonest about it?

You can’t say other people are wrong because they think differently than you, and you don’t agree with their logic or reason. What makes you the standard of logic and reason in this forum or anywhere? Are you the same poster that is upset because the projected current population and religion trends according to Pew don’t agree with their desires for the world? Do you not realize you are not the gold standard for logic, reason, etc, out of every person in the entire world?

DOn't mind "dishonest" poster. They are just sounding off.

+1. They have also had a weird obsession with Pew for the past few years. Best to ignore a poster who uses sneaky rhetoric, or no rhetoric at all—she’s just here to pick fights with anonymous internet enemies that apparently live in her head.

I am the PP who’s post was called dishonest, and I am waiting for an explanation on that. I don’t know what you are referring to WRT Pew, have nothing to do with that.

I do agree with you it is best not to respond to questions where you don’t have a logically sound answer.

Now, please respond with that was specifically dishonest int he post you replied to.

I don’t take orders from posters who don’t argue in good faith.

I agree with pp: have fun thinking you’re the only smart, logical person around.

So you call a poster dishonest and can't back that up?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If God makes people kill each other, does he make people save each other and be kind to one another, too?

If you believe in God, then you accept him as being all powerful and capable of/responsible for everything that happens here on Earth. Sometimes it's hard to explain some of the stuff he does, but mere humans are not meant to understand.

So if people can't understand god, then people should stop saying that they do when it suits them. Agree?

dp: no, we don’t all agree on what other people should do concerning God and their religion. Get a real hobby, instead of pretending anon posters here can control other people.

So, you want to say you understand when it suits you, but when you can't understand horrific things attributed to your god you want to shrug and say "Well, we mere humans can't understand that. But don't be gay or eat bacon."

That is logically inconsistent well beyond the point of hypocrisy.

If you don’t believe in God, why do you care how I live or worship?

I don't care how you live or worship. Have at it and enjoy. I hope you have a great life.

You've chosen to enter a discussion forum and we are in a discussion about religion. I care about your logic and reason in this discussion. You are free to not respond to my questions in the discussion if you choose not to answer them, for reasons you need not reveal. I am free to respond or not as I choose, for reasons I need not reveal. But I am happy to, since you asked.

To repeat: this is a discussion forum, set up for the purpose of discussion. All I care about is how you participate here.

What an extremely dishonest post.

What is dishonest about it?

You can’t say other people are wrong because they think differently than you, and you don’t agree with their logic or reason. What makes you the standard of logic and reason in this forum or anywhere? Are you the same poster that is upset because the projected current population and religion trends according to Pew don’t agree with their desires for the world? Do you not realize you are not the gold standard for logic, reason, etc, out of every person in the entire world?

DOn't mind "dishonest" poster. They are just sounding off.

+1. They have also had a weird obsession with Pew for the past few years. Best to ignore a poster who uses sneaky rhetoric, or no rhetoric at all—she’s just here to pick fights with anonymous internet enemies that apparently live in her head.

I am the PP who’s post was called dishonest, and I am waiting for an explanation on that. I don’t know what you are referring to WRT Pew, have nothing to do with that.

I do agree with you it is best not to respond to questions where you don’t have a logically sound answer.

Now, please respond with that was specifically dishonest int he post you replied to.

I don’t take orders from posters who don’t argue in good faith.

I agree with pp: have fun thinking you’re the only smart, logical person around.

So you call a poster dishonest and can't back that up?

You are a wonderful person.

Can't back that up.