Lauren Sanchez

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:They might actually have some stuff in common, enough to keep him interested. It certainly seems like she has traded up repeatedly with men and she definitely has the look of a”gold digger”, but they might actually be compatible. Personally, I think if she dressed differently and eased up on all the surgical enhancements she’d look much better.


She is pretty beautiful in many ways. She just over did it in some ways but it seems to be the look that set finds fashionable. They look happy.


in what ways is she beautiful???
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Mackenzie has never been attractive. Lauren does come across as desperate now, but she was gorgeous when she was younger.


Disagree. Mackenzie Scott is naturally pretty and has a nice body.


Neither are attractive. However, I do think Mackenzie is the better looking one.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Mackenzie has never been attractive. Lauren does come across as desperate now, but she was gorgeous when she was younger.


Disagree. Mackenzie Scott is naturally pretty and has a nice body.


Neither are attractive. However, I do think Mackenzie is the better looking one.

Lauren was beautiful once but looks like the Joker now due to some unfortunate plastic surgery choices.
Mackenzie was and remains pretty and natural looking. And her new husband seems more attractive and nicer than her last husband and I wish her well.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Mackenzie has never been attractive. Lauren does come across as desperate now, but she was gorgeous when she was younger.


Disagree. Mackenzie Scott is naturally pretty and has a nice body.


Neither are attractive. However, I do think Mackenzie is the better looking one.

Lauren was beautiful once but looks like the Joker now due to some unfortunate plastic surgery choices.
Mackenzie was and remains pretty and natural looking. And her new husband seems more attractive and nicer than her last husband and I wish her well.



Agree on all counts.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:She's a caricature of everything men who women never paid attention to, think a woman—the ideal woman—should look like . [/b]She looks like an amalgamation of an ex stripper, porn star ,cheap hooker who's waging what appears to be an all out war against inevitable aging. There's nothing I find remotely appealing about her ; she isn't subtle , elegant , graceful nor classy . At best , she's type you screw at night but wouldn't be caught with during the day .


best comment in this thread. and the bolded is spot on.



So true. +1,000,000,000
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Mackenzie has never been attractive. Lauren does come across as desperate now, but she was gorgeous when she was younger.


Disagree. Mackenzie Scott is naturally pretty and has a nice body.


Neither are attractive. However, I do think Mackenzie is the better looking one.


This is like the most DCUM response EVER. Mackenzie is fine, Lauren might be desperate, but she's also out there looking like a porn star. Is it trashy? Hell yeah. But she's HOT. Mackenzie is not HOT. Do you not frequent the relationship forum? It comes down to that for many men.
Anonymous
Likelong trollop. Jeff is a schmuck.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Bezos responds


Pathetic. Like anyone wants to steal Sanchez away.


She’s 30 years too old for Leo anyway lol.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Would I be mean if I said she should fix her eyes??

I think HE needs to fix his eyes. What is wrong with his eyes anyway?



Maybe this is why they’re attracted to each other, they can’t see?
Anonymous
is nobody going to comment on the newest set of photos from st Barts? DCUM you failed me
Anonymous
I think there should be a rule on this thread about whether you’re a man or woman commenting.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:is nobody going to comment on the newest set of photos from st Barts? DCUM you failed me

She’s in great shape for her age. Too bad about that face though.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:is nobody going to comment on the newest set of photos from st Barts? DCUM you failed me



Links. Lauren Sanchez is not worth google energy. And I don’t want her in my search history.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:How do you know Lauren is not bright?

https://static.standard.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2019/03/20/13/laurensanchez-3-20-19-004.jpg?width=640" border="0" class="embeddedImage" />



She is clearly a beautiful woman with bad plastic surgery. She is a “hot girl”


Wow. She really messed up her face.

She is very pretty in the above photo---the one in the post below is awful.

So many women messing up their faces with too much surgery. Meg Ryan, Priscilla Presley, Courtney Cox, most of the Real Housewives, Goldie Hawn, Melanie Griffith, Kristin Davis, etc.



Maybe my beauty standards are different.. but I don't see a beautiful or pretty face...


This is really sad. She really was a pretty woman and now.....I can't look at her face b/c her lips are too scary.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:How do you know Lauren is not bright?

https://static.standard.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2019/03/20/13/laurensanchez-3-20-19-004.jpg?width=640" border="0" class="embeddedImage" />



She is clearly a beautiful woman with bad plastic surgery. She is a “hot girl”


Wow. She really messed up her face.

She is very pretty in the above photo---the one in the post below is awful.

So many women messing up their faces with too much surgery. Meg Ryan, Priscilla Presley, Courtney Cox, most of the Real Housewives, Goldie Hawn, Melanie Griffith, Kristin Davis, etc.



Maybe my beauty standards are different.. but I don't see a beautiful or pretty face...


This is really sad. She really was a pretty woman and now.....I can't look at her face b/c her lips are too scary.


NP. Oh my gosh, she really was so pretty! Her appearance now can only be described as grotesque.
post reply Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture
Message Quick Reply
Go to: