IRS Whistleblowers and Devon Archer - House Oversight

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another GOP "Star Witness" Tony Bobulinski - his story is starting to show cracks and is falling apart. People are stepping forward to refute Bobulinski and Bobulinski is trying to lash out, calling them "liars" except now it's looking more and more like Bobulinski is the liar and is on the take. Cassidy Hutchinson for example brought receipts - and PHOTOS to back up her account of secret meetings between Bobulinski and Meadows and exchanging of envelopes. https://abcnews.go.com/US/trump-white-house-aide-cassidy-hutchinson-pushes-back/story?id=107465387

Starting? It was without substantiation to begin with.

We still need answers on why Bobulinski's evidence was iPhone screenshots shown on a blackberry connected to a Russian cellphone provider, etc...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another GOP "Star Witness" Tony Bobulinski - his story is starting to show cracks and is falling apart. People are stepping forward to refute Bobulinski and Bobulinski is trying to lash out, calling them "liars" except now it's looking more and more like Bobulinski is the liar and is on the take. Cassidy Hutchinson for example brought receipts - and PHOTOS to back up her account of secret meetings between Bobulinski and Meadows and exchanging of envelopes. https://abcnews.go.com/US/trump-white-house-aide-cassidy-hutchinson-pushes-back/story?id=107465387

Starting? It was without substantiation to begin with.

We still need answers on why Bobulinski's evidence was iPhone screenshots shown on a blackberry connected to a [b]Russian cellphone provider, [/b]etc...

Just curious if you have any source for this claim other than some random X poster.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another GOP "Star Witness" Tony Bobulinski - his story is starting to show cracks and is falling apart. People are stepping forward to refute Bobulinski and Bobulinski is trying to lash out, calling them "liars" except now it's looking more and more like Bobulinski is the liar and is on the take. Cassidy Hutchinson for example brought receipts - and PHOTOS to back up her account of secret meetings between Bobulinski and Meadows and exchanging of envelopes. https://abcnews.go.com/US/trump-white-house-aide-cassidy-hutchinson-pushes-back/story?id=107465387

Starting? It was without substantiation to begin with.

We still need answers on why Bobulinski's evidence was iPhone screenshots shown on a blackberry connected to a [b]Russian cellphone provider, [/b]etc...

Just curious if you have any source for this claim other than some random X poster.

That image was used in the House documents as 'evidence" - it is in the public domain as such.

[Anonymous]

Republicans must love losing. They now have less than nothing because they have exposed themselves as easily corrupted idiots.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Republicans must love losing. They now have less than nothing because they have exposed themselves as easily corrupted idiots.

Their corruption is barely touched upon. It gets to go unremarked and they get to pretend to be just another party instead of the traitors that they are.

[Anonymous]

based on testimony, it sounds like Hunter Biden was able to document his various business interests and LLC.

While the GOP requested SARs reports, there apparently weren't any for the government to provide, because they didn't exist.

At what point does the rank and file right begin to understand the depths of the lies they have been told about this matter?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:based on testimony, it sounds like Hunter Biden was able to document his various business interests and LLC.

While the GOP requested SARs reports, there apparently weren't any for the government to provide, because they didn't exist.

At what point does the rank and file right begin to understand the depths of the lies they have been told about this matter?

“Never” is the answer.

[Anonymous]

The $200,000 referenced here was when Biden was out of office, not a sitting vice-president or president.

They literally have nothing.

[Anonymous]

You know things weren't going well for Hunter and the Dems when a group of Democrats leave the transcribed interview AN HOUR INTO IT to go to the microphones and try to get ahead of the story with the media.

They tried to spike the football AN HOUR INTO THE INTERVIEW!

LOL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You know things weren't going well for Hunter and the Dems when a group of Democrats leave the transcribed interview AN HOUR INTO IT to go to the microphones and try to get ahead of the story with the media.

They tried to spike the football AN HOUR INTO THE INTERVIEW!

LOL.

At what point have the dems mischaracterized what has been in the trasnscripts subsequently released? Can you say the same for the GOP?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another GOP "Star Witness" Tony Bobulinski - his story is starting to show cracks and is falling apart. People are stepping forward to refute Bobulinski and Bobulinski is trying to lash out, calling them "liars" except now it's looking more and more like Bobulinski is the liar and is on the take. Cassidy Hutchinson for example brought receipts - and PHOTOS to back up her account of secret meetings between Bobulinski and Meadows and exchanging of envelopes. https://abcnews.go.com/US/trump-white-house-aide-cassidy-hutchinson-pushes-back/story?id=107465387

Starting? It was without substantiation to begin with.

We still need answers on why Bobulinski's evidence was iPhone screenshots shown on a blackberry connected to a [b]Russian cellphone provider, [/b]etc...

Just curious if you have any source for this claim other than some random X poster.

That image was used in the House documents as 'evidence" - it is in the public domain as such.

But they do not have an credibility after the fake FBI guy

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another GOP "Star Witness" Tony Bobulinski - his story is starting to show cracks and is falling apart. People are stepping forward to refute Bobulinski and Bobulinski is trying to lash out, calling them "liars" except now it's looking more and more like Bobulinski is the liar and is on the take. Cassidy Hutchinson for example brought receipts - and PHOTOS to back up her account of secret meetings between Bobulinski and Meadows and exchanging of envelopes. https://abcnews.go.com/US/trump-white-house-aide-cassidy-hutchinson-pushes-back/story?id=107465387

Starting? It was without substantiation to begin with.

We still need answers on why Bobulinski's evidence was iPhone screenshots shown on a blackberry connected to a [b]Russian cellphone provider, [/b]etc...

Just curious if you have any source for this claim other than some random X poster.

That image was used in the House documents as 'evidence" - it is in the public domain as such.

But they do not have an credibility after the fake FBI guy

They never had credibility, but since when does the GOP act in facts and good faith?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another GOP "Star Witness" Tony Bobulinski - his story is starting to show cracks and is falling apart. People are stepping forward to refute Bobulinski and Bobulinski is trying to lash out, calling them "liars" except now it's looking more and more like Bobulinski is the liar and is on the take. Cassidy Hutchinson for example brought receipts - and PHOTOS to back up her account of secret meetings between Bobulinski and Meadows and exchanging of envelopes. https://abcnews.go.com/US/trump-white-house-aide-cassidy-hutchinson-pushes-back/story?id=107465387

Starting? It was without substantiation to begin with.

We still need answers on why Bobulinski's evidence was iPhone screenshots shown on a blackberry connected to a [b]Russian cellphone provider, [/b]etc...

Just curious if you have any source for this claim other than some random X poster.

That image was used in the House documents as 'evidence" - it is in the public domain as such.

And there was a ton of analysis of this "evidence" back then when this stuff first came out. It looked sketchy AF back then, and all the more so now, with the Smirnov revelations and other things coming out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The $200,000 referenced here was when Biden was out of office, not a sitting vice-president or president.

They literally have nothing.

They don’t need evidence. They have theories.

[Anonymous]