Indictment Monday?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why was Hope Hicks crying?

Because the mafia boss is giving her the evil eye. She’s probably tired of dealing with Trump. I admire her for standing up to him.

She's a grown woman who had a top position at the White House and crying like a little girl was ridiculous. "Women are too emotional and they cry. A woman should never be president for this reason.". How many times have you heard this and this toddler woman proved their point!

I don't believe here comment about keeping newspapers away from Melania who would have heard the whole sordid messon TV.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is the prosecutor's witness.

🔥Major development- undercutting the state’s case that Trump entered into an NDA with Stormy Daniel’s to save his presidential campaign:

Former Trump aide Hope Hicks testified that Trump: “was concerned about the [Stormy Daniel’s] story. He was concerned about how it would be viewed by his wife, and he wanted me to make sure the newspapers weren’t delivered to their residence that morning.”

Is Melania unaware of television? I would bet that she never reads newspapers but, if indeed, she even listens to the news, it is only on Fox!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is the prosecutor's witness.

🔥Major development- undercutting the state’s case that Trump entered into an NDA with Stormy Daniel’s to save his presidential campaign:

Former Trump aide Hope Hicks testified that Trump: “was concerned about the [Stormy Daniel’s] story. He was concerned about how it would be viewed by his wife, and he wanted me to make sure the newspapers weren’t delivered to their residence that morning.”

Yeah, so? Both can be true.

From where I sit, the prosecution is proving day by day that they have no case and there has been no crime committed.
And, IF there was a crime, Michael Cohen is the one who committed it.

Of course. Michael Cohen, who did not have the money, took out a home equity loan to pay $150K to Stormy Daniels to keep her from telling her story to the tabloids. He did it because he felt so strongly that Daniel's story should not be told befor the leection that he risked losing his home to stop her from telling her story. He felt much more strongly about this than the many running for President who purportedly had over $500M in the bank.

Man, have you drunk the Kool Aid.

Michael Cohen is not the sharpest tool in the shed. And, I suspect the jury will discover this during his testimony.

[Anonymous]

Cohen is cagey like a fox.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Cohen is cagey like a fox.

One thing that has been consistent thus far.....
Every single witness that has testified has no love for Cohen.
Hope Hicks said that he named himself "The Fixer" because he had to fix things HE broke.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cohen is cagey like a fox.

One thing that has been consistent thus far.....
Every single witness that has testified has no love for Cohen.
Hope Hicks said that he named himself "The Fixer" because he had to fix things HE broke.

That sounds like she is parroting Trump said after Cohen and Trump dissolved their relationship. Cohen was with the trump org. a long time so Trump found him valuable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cohen is cagey like a fox.

One thing that has been consistent thus far.....
Every single witness that has testified has no love for Cohen.
Hope Hicks said that he named himself "The Fixer" because he had to fix things HE broke.

If Trump is so smart with the best brain why would he hire someone like Cohen then?

Why would I want a president who made such poor choices in hiring his closest advisors?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is the prosecutor's witness.

🔥Major development- undercutting the state’s case that Trump entered into an NDA with Stormy Daniel’s to save his presidential campaign:

Former Trump aide Hope Hicks testified that Trump: “was concerned about the [Stormy Daniel’s] story. He was concerned about how it would be viewed by his wife, and he wanted me to make sure the newspapers weren’t delivered to their residence that morning.”

Yeah, so? Both can be true.

From where I sit, the prosecution is proving day by day that they have no case and there has been no crime committed.
And, IF there was a crime, Michael Cohen is the one who committed it.

Of course. Michael Cohen, who did not have the money, took out a home equity loan to pay $150K to Stormy Daniels to keep her from telling her story to the tabloids. He did it because he felt so strongly that Daniel's story should not be told befor the leection that he risked losing his home to stop her from telling her story. He felt much more strongly about this than the many running for President who purportedly had over $500M in the bank.

Man, have you drunk the Kool Aid.

Michael Cohen is not the sharpest tool in the shed. And, I suspect the jury will discover this during his testimony.

Trump is the one who hired him and kept him on for years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is the prosecutor's witness.

🔥Major development- undercutting the state’s case that Trump entered into an NDA with Stormy Daniel’s to save his presidential campaign:

Former Trump aide Hope Hicks testified that Trump: “was concerned about the [Stormy Daniel’s] story. He was concerned about how it would be viewed by his wife, and he wanted me to make sure the newspapers weren’t delivered to their residence that morning.”

Yeah, so? Both can be true.

From where I sit, the prosecution is proving day by day that they have no case and there has been no crime committed.
And, IF there was a crime, Michael Cohen is the one who committed it.

Of course. Michael Cohen, who did not have the money, took out a home equity loan to pay $150K to Stormy Daniels to keep her from telling her story to the tabloids. He did it because he felt so strongly that Daniel's story should not be told befor the leection that he risked losing his home to stop her from telling her story. He felt much more strongly about this than the many running for President who purportedly had over $500M in the bank.

Man, have you drunk the Kool Aid.

And they hope that we have as well. Unfortunately for us, Republicans are coming to a place where we have about as much choice as they did in Jonestown.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is the prosecutor's witness.

🔥Major development- undercutting the state’s case that Trump entered into an NDA with Stormy Daniel’s to save his presidential campaign:

Former Trump aide Hope Hicks testified that Trump: “was concerned about the [Stormy Daniel’s] story. He was concerned about how it would be viewed by his wife, and he wanted me to make sure the newspapers weren’t delivered to their residence that morning.”

Yeah, so? Both can be true.

From where I sit, the prosecution is proving day by day that they have no case and there has been no crime committed.
And, IF there was a crime, Michael Cohen is the one who committed it.

Of course. Michael Cohen, who did not have the money, took out a home equity loan to pay $150K to Stormy Daniels to keep her from telling her story to the tabloids. He did it because he felt so strongly that Daniel's story should not be told befor the leection that he risked losing his home to stop her from telling her story. He felt much more strongly about this than the many running for President who purportedly had over $500M in the bank.

Man, have you drunk the Kool Aid.

Michael Cohen is not the sharpest tool in the shed. And, I suspect the jury will discover this during his testimony.

Neither is Trump but they both have some skills. Cohen keeps meticulous records.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is the prosecutor's witness.

🔥Major development- undercutting the state’s case that Trump entered into an NDA with Stormy Daniel’s to save his presidential campaign:

Former Trump aide Hope Hicks testified that Trump: “was concerned about the [Stormy Daniel’s] story. He was concerned about how it would be viewed by his wife, and he wanted me to make sure the newspapers weren’t delivered to their residence that morning.”

Yeah, so? Both can be true.

From where I sit, the prosecution is proving day by day that they have no case and there has been no crime committed.
And, IF there was a crime, Michael Cohen is the one who committed it.

Of course. Michael Cohen, who did not have the money, took out a home equity loan to pay $150K to Stormy Daniels to keep her from telling her story to the tabloids. He did it because he felt so strongly that Daniel's story should not be told befor the leection that he risked losing his home to stop her from telling her story. He felt much more strongly about this than the many running for President who purportedly had over $500M in the bank.

Man, have you drunk the Kool Aid.

Plus, if Trump’s defense is that Cohen alone committed a crime by paying Daniels, that is an admission that Trump’s reimbursement to Cohen was not payment for legal services but was business fraud and campaign finance fraud by Trump to cover up Cohen’s crime. If Cohen is guilty, Trump is guilty.

[Anonymous]

The most interesting thing about Hope Hicks' testimony on the stand is how the biased media portrays it.

The conservative Fox News says that Hope Hicks imploded the prosecution's case by saying that Trump had no political intent to hide his affair, but was only hiding it to save his wife.

The liberal CNN News says that Hicks' testimony was a nightmare for Trump as it only proved all the points that the prosecution wanted to prove, namely that Trump knew about the payments Cohen made to Daniels and that he knew about the attempts to falsify business records to hide it.

The case of the confirmation bias from both sides as they believe what they saw confirms their own preconceived opinions.

It will be interesting to see what the jury thinks, as right now, they are the only real opinion that matters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The most interesting thing about Hope Hicks' testimony on the stand is how the biased media portrays it.

The conservative Fox News says that Hope Hicks imploded the prosecution's case by saying that Trump had no political intent to hide his affair, but was only hiding it to save his wife.

The liberal CNN News says that Hicks' testimony was a nightmare for Trump as it only proved all the points that the prosecution wanted to prove, namely that Trump knew about the payments Cohen made to Daniels and that he knew about the attempts to falsify business records to hide it.

The case of the confirmation bias from both sides as they believe what they saw confirms their own preconceived opinions.

It will be interesting to see what the jury thinks, as right now, they are the only real opinion that matters.

Fox knows what they are saying is bullshit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is the prosecutor's witness.

🔥Major development- undercutting the state’s case that Trump entered into an NDA with Stormy Daniel’s to save his presidential campaign:

Former Trump aide Hope Hicks testified that Trump: “was concerned about the [Stormy Daniel’s] story. He was concerned about how it would be viewed by his wife, and he wanted me to make sure the newspapers weren’t delivered to their residence that morning.”

Yeah, so? Both can be true.

From where I sit, the prosecution is proving day by day that they have no case and there has been no crime committed.
And, IF there was a crime, Michael Cohen is the one who committed it.

ARe you sitting at Mar a lago?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is the prosecutor's witness.

🔥Major development- undercutting the state’s case that Trump entered into an NDA with Stormy Daniel’s to save his presidential campaign:

Former Trump aide Hope Hicks testified that Trump: “was concerned about the [Stormy Daniel’s] story. He was concerned about how it would be viewed by his wife, and he wanted me to make sure the newspapers weren’t delivered to their residence that morning.”

Yeah, so? Both can be true.

From where I sit, the prosecution is proving day by day that they have no case and there has been no crime committed.
And, IF there was a crime, Michael Cohen is the one who committed it.

Come on over to my house because where I'm sitting Trump's goose is cooked.